Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Simps are latent patriarchs and those who hate them are the lackeys of feminists and Chads

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,297
On this forum, there are many misguided men who say that of all the socio-sexual demographics, simps are to be the most reviled.

They argue that simps enable foids to engage in dual mating strategy, and that Chadsexualism could not exist without simp bailouts in the form of betabuxxing/marriage.

But this is an unfair criticism, which makes powerless and oppressed men individually responsible for their state of immiseration, as if it's a matter of their own moral failings, and not a rotten culture which baits them with self-destructive social incentives.

Blaming a simp for subscribing to an Onlyfans page is not unlike blaming a homeless man for turning to drugs and alcohol to cope, or, indeed, blaming an incel for turning to video games and pornography to cope.

And it is all the more insidious because simp behavior is essentially patriarchal, in that their inclination to get married, provide for women and protect them, is the sort of stuff which built and sustained higher civilizations. The fact that they are so pathetic these days is not their own fault, but the fault of soyciety, which has empowered foids at their expense, and psychopathic Chads at the expense of everyone.

We should desire for this whole social hierarchy to flip, so that simps once again become dignified patriarchs, foids get domesticated, and psychopathic Chads get ostracized.
 
Last edited:
Simps are actively trying to harm us and to help foids harm us.
 
sounds like something a simp would say.

i think its time to investigate OP :feelswhere:
 
Simps are actively trying to harm us and to help foids harm us.
Their protector and provider behaviors are fundamentally patriarchal, and have merely been hacked by nefarious actors.

It's these nefarious actors who are the problem, not the simps; and if feminism is correctly understood as a means through which psychopathic Chads assert their hegemony over soyciety, then it follows that Chads are the hackers (who should be killed in GTA V).
 
Last edited:
They could've just searched "porn" on Google
The fact that they want actual relationships with women, for whom they can provide resources, is an evolutionary tendency in line with patriarchy.

The fact that they cannot get one, and have to treat their repressed patriarchal tendencies with humiliating feminist solutions, is the fault of soyciety.


Searching for "boobs" on Google images is what a psychopathic negroid raised by a single mother would do irl, by just fucking this girl or that.

Pair bonding and establishing a family and a nation is what a patriarch would do.
 
Last edited:
Low IQ. Civilization was not built by providing for women who do not have your own children, which is the case with cucks who donate money to e-thots, for instance. Doing that is timelessly retarded and masochistic, and thus a result of bad genes that should be erased from the gene pool via eugenics. Who you call “patriarchs” were the ones who made female worship, the idea that women are “equal human beings” to men, the norm, which is now what is destroying the civilization.
 
Low IQ. Civilization was not built by providing for women who do not have your own children, which is the case with cucks who donate money to e-thots, for instance. Doing that is timelessly retarded and masochistic, and thus a result of bad genes that should be erased from the gene pool via eugenics. Who you call “patriarchs” were the ones who made female worship, the idea that women are “equal human beings” to men, the norm, which is now what is destroying the civilization.
We both have valid points here and should seek to resolve their contradictions.

I argue that what distinguishes simps from patriarchs is primarily the social environment in which they exist.

Modern soyciety is clearly not conducive to marrying a woman, having children with her, and providing for them as a true patriarch would, because the economic system we are under the yoke of seeks to squeeze all the value out of people as it possibly can, and in the process commodifies absolutely everything and everyone.

Hence human relationships are increasingly becoming cheap and obsolete, and the only means through which prospective patriarchs can engage in their evolutionary drive to provide for a woman (in order to potentially procreate with her) is paradoxically through exploitative, transactional exchanges like donating to Twitch thots or paying for Onlyfans pages. And the only means through which prospective patriarchs can engage in their evolutionary drive to protect women (and thus the future of one's family and polity) is paradoxically through signalling their support of feminism.

Everything is warped and serves to nullify patriarchal behaviors, which I believe is fully intentional.

I would caution you against consigning men with patriarchal tendencies to the evolutionary dustbin, however manipulated they are. Calling promiscuous, psychopathic slayers adapative, and benevolently-minded patriarchs maladaptive, just become the evil soyciety we live under renders it that way, is a dangerous idea which will make the future even worse than things are now. It is brutal how blackpilled discourse often just justifies psychopathic Chad hegemony, not unlike feminist discourse, and this is probably fully intentional as well.

You are absolutely correct that feminism could not have succeeded without the support of weak men, who are accurately termed "simps," but it is no coincidence that they began to rise as a consequence of the social dislocations spurred by capitalism (in the late 19th century).

That is, they cannot even be blamed for their own behaviors, which are influenced by systemic factors outside of their control. And given the fact that they have become ever more powerless as time has gone on, attributing blame to them is even less justified, and only serves to distract us from the bloodsuckers who are becoming ever more powerful as time goes on and thus are truly culpable.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Snhook
Replies
2
Views
194
AngryUbermensch
AngryUbermensch
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
13
Views
501
AshamedVirgin34
AshamedVirgin34
MisfitPerson
Replies
29
Views
1K
failedbbcnormie
F
arthur17
Replies
2
Views
352
balkanceI
balkanceI

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top