[Blackpill] Studies expecting to find discrimination against women often find discrimination against males instead

FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
I took this from a Reddit post. Men without any power or privilege (most men) are deffinitely victims of a lot of bullshit. Something society likes to ignore.



There is a lot of research where the authors admit that they expected to find evidence of discrimination against women, but instead found evidence of discrimination against men.

Sometimes they take it gracefully and report their results in good faith. But other times they make excuses for it or try to cover it up.

The following is a list of 13 examples ranging from hiring discrimination, domestic violence, educational discrimination, and child custody discrimination.

Many of these are areas where people still assume that discrimination against women exists, despite formal academic research showing that it's really men who are discriminated against.

A study about employment discrimination against women and mothers instead uncovered discrimination against men and fathers
One study on hiring discrimination looked at the effects of marriage and parental status on a person's hiring prospects. They expected to find discrimination against women and against mothers specifically. What they found instead was that in every cohort, women were preferred over men. Whether single, married, childless, or with children. Instead of reporting on this novel finding, they instead went into detail about how pregnant women are discriminated against compared to non-pregnant women, which they try to frame as being sexist against women.

The fact that they found that women were preferred over men is buried inside of the body of the study, buffered by handwaving remarks about how pregnant women still face other difficulties related to employment (which I'm sure is valid but they straight up sound salty about the fact that their own research contradicted what they expected to find).

You can read the full text of the study here:

Becker, S. O., Fernandes, A., & Weichselbaumer, D. (2019). Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Labour Economics, 59, 139-152.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537119300429

A study about domestic violence against women finds that men are more likely to be victims
A 2005 study on domestic violence wrote their entire abstract in a way that implies that domestic violence is significantly worse against women than against men. But the actual body of their research reports the exact opposite of that. A fact that other researchers eventually discovered and wrote about. While not strictly about discrimination, they are guilty of expecting to find that things were worse for women when in reality it's men who appear to be disproportionately effected.

[A] recent study found that men are more likely than women to suffer serious injuries in intimate partner relationships and that men are actually less likely than women to use violence in intimate relationships (Felson & Cares, 2005). Some factors are apparently inhibiting men, who are generally much more violent than women (outside intimate relationships), from using violence against their female partners. Results in the Felson and Cares (2005) study show that those men who do engage in violence against their spouse and those women who engage in violence against their family members are more likely than other offenders to do so with high frequency. It is surprising that this result was obtained in what was essentially presented to respondents as, “a study of violence against women” (Felson & Cares, 2005, p. 15).In fact, the authors argue that men actually inhibit violence in intimate relationships compared to their non-intimate levels.
...Interestingly, authors responding to findings that suggest a narrow or non-existent gender gap in partner abuse rates also allege that females are universally more vulnerable to abuse by men than men are to abuse by women. Importantly, this perspective has found little support in the data.
Carney, M., Buttell, F., & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 108-115.
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...rature-With-Recommendations-for-Treatment.pdf

The offending study:

Felson, R. B., & Cares, A. C. (2005). Gender and the seriousness of assaults on intimate partners and other victims. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1182-1195.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00209.x

The 1975 US National Family Violence survey uncovered higher rates of abuse against men
The very first large scale federal study on domestic violence in the US was carried out by researchers who expected to find higher rates of female victimization compared to male victimization. The results of that study showed that slightly more men than women were victims of domestic violence, including severe forms of violence.

Two of those researchers -- Murray Straus and Suzanne Steinmetz -- spent the rest of their careers researching this phenomen after discovering this. Steinmetz, in particular, was the first researcher to coin the "battered husband syndrome" back in 1977, a concept that would eventually be coopted by feminists during the 1980s and derided as a "myth" when applied to men.

Straus, M. A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332-362.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.332

Related to this is the fact that Erin Pizzey discovered the same thing "on the ground" after opening the world's first domestic violence shelter for women in Britain. She attempted to open one for men the very next year after becoming convinced that domestic violence was not a gendered issue, but quickly faced resistance. Including from some of the same people who backed her shelter for women.

All of the relevant parties here took this in stride and bravely went against the status quo. In some instances they even received death threats and bomb threats from feminists. This myth has continued to persists after decades of research debunking it. Likely because people simply want to believe that it's true.

Multiple CDC sexual victimization surveys have found similar rates of female-on-male sexual assault as male-on-female sexual assault, despite famously reporting the opposite
Several studies on sexual assault have found near equal rates of male victimization as female victimization.

While there are a few "honest" studies out there, several well-known studies have tried to hide this fact in their research. The primary strategy they use is to define female-on-male rape as "something else that's not rape". There are other criticisms that come up though, including the issue of "priming" respondents.

Recently the CDC has come under fire for this.

This striking finding—that men and women reported similar rates of nonconsensual sex in a 12-month period—might have made for a newsworthy finding. Instead, the CDC’s public presentation of these data emphasized female sexual victimization, thereby (perhaps inadvertently) confirming gender stereotypes about victimization.
Stemple, L., & Meyer, I. H. (2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e19-e26.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/

A study trying to prove that mothers are discriminated against in family court instead found the exact opposite, and then tried to hide it
A study from the late 1980s on child custody discrimination expected to find discrimination against mothers, and not fathers, but instead discovered that men were 6 times less likely to gain custody compared to identically placed women.

Not only did their publication attempt to use dishonest statistical shenanigans to hide this, they tried to burry the raw data to prevent other researchers from double checking their findings. Their study is still widely cited by other researchers as well as by random people on the Internet, because it is the only study that, on the surface, found discrimination against mothers (making it the perfect example of "cherry picking evidence"). In one meta study it sticks out like a sore thumb in comparison to ~10 other studies that found the exact opposite.

You can read that meta study here, and a list of sources on page 974 in the footnotes:

"Beyond Economic Fatherhood: Encouraging Divorced Fathers to Parent".
https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/...3/issue3/Maldonado153U.Pa.L.Rev.921(2005).pdf

The offending study:

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Gender Bias Study Committee,. (1989). Gender Bias Study of the Court System in Massachusetts.
The story of how one researcher discovered that the study was fraudulent, and how he came into possession of the raw data that they tried to bury, can be found here:

Rosenthal, M. B. (1995). Misrepresentation of Gender Bias in the 1989 Report of the Gender Bias Committee of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Breaking The Science.
http://www.breakingthescience.org/SJC_GBC_analysis_intro.php

Unsubstantiated reports that women were underrepresented in medical research has created a large gap against male medical research
The researchers in this case may not have had a bias, but the research was conducted because of a general assumption that medical research was unfairly focused on men. The complaints were loud enough to inspire research into the topic where it was quickly discovered that far more interest and money is put into women's health research than men's, including even in areas where men are known to be effected more.

Recently John Oliver repeated these myths, despite some of this research being almost 20 years old now.

Bartlett, E. E. (2001). Did medical research routinely exclude women? An examination of the evidence. Epidemiology, 12(5), 584-586.
https://journals.lww.com/epidem/Ful..._Research_Routinely_Exclude_Women__An.20.aspx

"John Oliver repeats healthcare myths in his coverage of gender bias in the healthcare field". Men Are Human.
https://menarehuman.com/6195-2/

A study expecting to find discrimination against girls in math and science instead found that boys are discriminated against in literally every single subject
Another study on educational discrimination expected to find discrimination against female students, in part to explain why girls struggle in math and science. They instead found exactly the opposite of this: that male students were discriminated against in every subject, including even in math and science. This study was honest in how they reported their results though. And the researchers were humble enough to admit that they expected to find different results in the abstract.

Using data on test results in several subjects in the humanities and sciences, I found, contrary to expectations, that male students face discrimination in each subject.
Lavy, V. (2008). Do gender stereotypes reduce girls' or boys' human capital outcomes? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of public Economics, 92(10-11), 2083-2105.
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/vlavy/lavy_j.public.e_10.2008_gender_steriotypes.pdf

A researcher expecting to find discrimination against women in STEM instead found discriminated against men
An unpublished experiment meant to find discrimination against women in STEM instead found evidence of the opposite. The researcher masked the voices of candidates so that their gender wouldn't be known in interviews. The idea was that female candidates would do better than what they do when their gender is known. She instead found that this gender blind process benefited men instead of women, indicating that there was gender discrimination against men.

Turner, Karen. (2016, July 25). This tool gender-swapped the voices of tech job candidates. Here’s what happened. The Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-of-tech-job-candidates-heres-what-happened/

A study looking at discrimination against women in STEM instead found that women were preferred over men by a rate of 2:1
In this case the researchers don't appear to have had a bias, but they justified their research because of claims that women were being discriminated against in STEM.

Williams, W. M., and Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5360–5365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418878112.
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/17/5360.full.pdf

A study about employment discrimination in Australia found evidence of discrimination against men instead of women
Another study on gender blind hiring performed in Australia was meant to find discrimination against women, but instead found discrimination against men.

The research team fully expected to find far more female candidates shortlisted when sex was disguised. But, as the stunned team leader told the local media: "We found the opposite, that de-identifying candidates reduced the likelihood of women being selected for the shortlist."
https://reason.com/2019/10/22/orchestra-study-blind-auditions-gelman/

A study reporting discrimination against women in music instead found, and then tried to hide, evidence of discrimination against men
A widely cited study on orchestra auditions that supposedly found evidence of discrimination against women is flawed, and may in fact show the opposite. The results were not statistically significant since the data was flawed to begin with, which is perhaps what allowed the original researchers to mold it to their pre-determined conclusions. However, it does support the idea that men are discriminated against, a fact that shows up in their own data tables plain as day inside of the study.

The research went uncriticized for nearly two decades. That changed recently, when a few scholars and data scientist went back and read the whole study. The first thing that noticed is that the raw tabulations showed women doing worse [during blind auditions].
https://www.wsj.com/articles/blind-spots-in-the-blind-audition-study-11571599303

Feminist inspired "investigations" into pay discrimination against women at Google and the BBC instead found that men were being underpaid
Companies often come under fire for allegedly paying women less then men. Two companies that recently vowed to fix this instead learned that they were underpaying men, not women. Both have vowed to give raises to their male employees to fix a pay gap that they never expected to have.

Feminists have pointed out that men still outnumber women in high paid upper management positions, which might technically be true. But that wasn't the conclusion that they were fishing for when they first put pressure on these companies to look into this (ie, "equal pay for equal work").

Wakabayashi, Daisuke (2019, March 4). Google Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men as It Addresses Wage Equity. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/technology/google-gender-pay-gap.html

Sherwin, A. (2018, January 30). BBC men to get pay rises as review rejects gender discrimination claims. iNews.
https://inews.co.uk/news/media/bbc-men-pay-rise-gender-514047

If you know of any others, feel free to post them in the comments. I just think it's funny that people are so confident that women have things worse that they automatically expect their research to back this up. This tendency to assume that women have things worse and are discriminated against is itself, I would argue, essentially a form of discrimination against men. Especially when those researchers try to hide or misinterpret their findings.

That's not to say that there aren't areas where women are legitimately discriminated against. People just tend to make assumptions in that direction that often don't pan out. In fact, the entire idea that men might face discrimination, and not as some kind of side effect of a greater form of discrimination against women, is almost sacrilegious to some people.

There is, incidentally, evidence of discrimination against research that dares to focus on men or men's issues. Research that focuses on men's issues gets cited less, reported in the media less, and the researchers involved have less access to academic resources and grant money compared to researchers who look into women's issues.

So maybe that's why some of these researchers downplay their findings when they find evidence of discrimination against men.

For example:

Browne, Kingsley R., Mind Which Gap? The Selective Concern Over Statistical Sex Disparities (2013). Florida International University Law Review, Vol. 8, 2013; Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2013-22.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2311459

Jussim, L. (2019). Scientific Bias in Favor of Studies Finding Gender Bias: Studies that find bias against women often get disproportionate attention.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...fic-bias-in-favor-studies-finding-gender-bias

I wonder how many studies have gone unpublished because the researchers didn't like their results, and knew it could negatively impact their careers. And I wonder how many of the studies showing discrimination against men were perhaps originally hypothesized to find discrimination against women, but were begrudgingly published anyway. In either case, this bias seems to run pretty deep. Which is something you wouldn't normally expect to find in academia.

Link to original post

 
werty1457

werty1457

5'7", 3.5/10 mixed racecel, youngcel & mentalcel
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Posts
2,067
Online
20d 20h 29m
Did you hear about the google pay one
 
werty1457

werty1457

5'7", 3.5/10 mixed racecel, youngcel & mentalcel
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Posts
2,067
Online
20d 20h 29m
Ahh no. What's that one about?
Google was sued by their foids workers for "underpayment". Google HR did investigation and found that they actually underpay men compared to women for the same jobs
 
Ropemaxx

Ropemaxx

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 13, 2019
Posts
5,525
Online
63d 11h 58m
Google was sued by their foids workers for "underpayment". Google HR did investigation and found that they actually underpay men compared to women for the same jobs
Jfl at this clown world. I cant take it anymore
 
SkinjobCatastrophe

SkinjobCatastrophe

DESTROY ALL NORMIES
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Posts
1,449
Online
27d 7h 12m
Based post. It wouldnt matter if the Lord came down from heaven and directly told people that men are discriminated against in almost every socioeconomic position so as to hire more women. People would still believe that women have it worse and they need help but that they also dont need help because they are strong and independent! :soy:

People are programmed to give women an easy pass and the prevailing public sentiment now is that it would be morally wrong to say anything even remotely negative about women. So we are in a bit of a pickle because like you say funding wont go to good researchers but women write their garbage 300 page papers on how the power of the vagina is what makes the world go around and get congratulated for it.
 
AlexanderTheGreat11

AlexanderTheGreat11

youngcel
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Posts
29,078
Online
133d 15h 16m
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
Google was sued by their foids workers for "underpayment". Google HR did investigation and found that they actually underpay men compared to women for the same jobs
Ahaha fuck sake..how typical. I think I may have heard of that one actually.
Based post. It wouldnt matter if the Lord came down from heaven and directly told people that men are discriminated against in almost every socioeconomic position so as to hire more women. People would still believe that women have it worse and they need help but that they also dont need help because they are strong and independent! :soy:

People are programmed to give women an easy pass and the prevailing public sentiment now is that it would be morally wrong to say anything even remotely negative about women. So we are in a bit of a pickle because like you say funding wont go to good researchers but women write their garbage 300 page papers on how the power of the vagina is what makes the world go around and get congratulated for it.
Indeed. This makes a good point that even people who carry out studies are biased against men. Let's consider how many studies get thrown away because the findings aren't what they wanted
Good find
Thx tbh
 
LittleBoy

LittleBoy

Luminary of the Incelosphere & Inceldom
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Posts
10,977
Online
34d 3h 1m
@SergeantIncel @Master @mental_out @GoffSystemQB

This is must read in my books. If you please.
 
mental_out

mental_out

Facel mod
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,557
Online
81d 2h 58m
@SergeantIncel @Master @mental_out @GoffSystemQB

This is must read in my books. If you please.
Done, very good post, backed up by research as well which is good.
 
GoffSystemQB

GoffSystemQB

Nefarious Dark Overlord of I.N.C.E.L. aka mod
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Posts
4,475
Online
82d 8h 8m
One of the most maddening things in this world is the insistence that women have it worse and males are privileged when it is obvious to really absolutely anyone with 2 functioning brain cells (especially with the studies cited here) that it's the exact opposite.

It actually shows that no matter how bad things get women will ALWAYS be on top in terms of perceived victim hood.

Everyone should be able to notice this pattern. Whenever anybody talks about any problem about men someone always has to interject and tried to make women the bigger victim:
Males commit suicide more -> "Well females ATTEMPT suicide more. "
Many males nowadays receive now female affection or attention -> "Unwanted [i.e. ugly] sexual attention from men is WORSE than no attention."
Many men are completely lonely and receive no emotional support -> "Women are lonely to because they can't interact with who they want to interact with"
(paraphrasing here).

Because of the stated bias in academia towards women how bad men have it is probably underrepresented by an order or magnitude or two. I mean think about all the stuff they COULD be researching, but instead so much time and money is wasted trying to chase any study that shows women to be disadvantaged.

There will never be a point in history when men are perceived as getting lesser treatment no matter what happens. There may never even be a point where men are even perceived to be equal and not having privilege. All of this just goes to show just how much worse it's going to get.
 
Last edited:
GoffSystemQB

GoffSystemQB

Nefarious Dark Overlord of I.N.C.E.L. aka mod
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Posts
4,475
Online
82d 8h 8m
Done, very good post, backed up by research as well which is good.
I was going to pin it and move it there after, but I guess it will get good action here in this section here too. Maybe we can pin new additions here since most threads are old?
 
mental_out

mental_out

Facel mod
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,557
Online
81d 2h 58m
One of the most maddening things in this world is the insistence that women have it worse and males are privileged when it is obvious to really absolutely anyone with 2 functioning brain cells (especially with the studies cited here) that it's the exact opposite.

It actually shows that no matter how bad things get women will ALWAYS be on top in terms of perceived victim hood.

Everyone should be able to notice this pattern. Whenever anybody talks about any problem about men someone always has to interject and tried to make women the bigger victim:
Males commit suicide more -> "Well females ATTEMPT suicide more. "
Many males nowadays receive now female affection or attention -> "Unwanted [i.e. ugly] sexual attention from men is WORSE than no attention."
Many men are completely lonely and receive no emotional support -> "Women are lonely to because they can't interact with who they want to interact with"
(paraphrasing here).

Because of the stated bias in academia towards women how bad men have it is probably underrepresented by an order or magnitude or two. I mean think about all the stuff they COULD be researching, but instead so much time and money is wasted trying to chase any study that shows women to be disadvantaged.

There will never be a point in history when men are perceived as getting lesser treatment no matter what happens. There may never even be a point where men are even perceived to be equal and not having privilege. All if this just goes to show just how much worse it's going to get.
I think a lot of it is they're totally blind to most men. They ultimately see only the most attractive men, most successful men, and ignore the millions more who aren't in those positions, who're ultimately the ones worst off. There's a good reason why suicide and homelessness are predominantly male issues.
 
bigantennaemay1

bigantennaemay1

Autismcel wizard with special powers
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
1,573
Online
9d 3h 2m
A study trying to prove that mothers are discriminated against in family court instead found the exact opposite, and then tried to hide it
A study from the late 1980s on child custody discrimination expected to find discrimination against mothers, and not fathers, but instead discovered that men were 6 times less likely to gain custody compared to identically placed women.

Not only did their publication attempt to use dishonest statistical shenanigans to hide this, they tried to burry the raw data to prevent other researchers from double checking their findings.
And this is why I double check for myself and don't take anything a scientist or "the experts" say at face value.
I wonder how many studies have gone unpublished because the researchers didn't like their results, and knew it could negatively impact their careers.
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
Done, very good post, backed up by research as well which is good.
Without a doubt. Stuff like this is crucial information.
One of the most maddening things in this world is the insistence that women have it worse and males are privileged when it is obvious to really absolutely anyone with 2 functioning brain cells (especially with the studies cited here) that it's the exact opposite.

It actually shows that no matter how bad things get women will ALWAYS be on top in terms of perceived victim hood.

Everyone should be able to notice this pattern. Whenever anybody talks about any problem about men someone always has to interject and tried to make women the bigger victim:
Males commit suicide more -> "Well females ATTEMPT suicide more. "
Many males nowadays receive now female affection or attention -> "Unwanted [i.e. ugly] sexual attention from men is WORSE than no attention."
Many men are completely lonely and receive no emotional support -> "Women are lonely to because they can't interact with who they want to interact with"
(paraphrasing here).

Because of the stated bias in academia towards women how bad men have it is probably underrepresented by an order or magnitude or two. I mean think about all the stuff they COULD be researching, but instead so much time and money is wasted trying to chase any study that shows women to be disadvantaged.

There will never be a point in history when men are perceived as getting lesser treatment no matter what happens. There may never even be a point where men are even perceived to be equal and not having privilege. All of this just goes to show just how much worse it's going to get.
Yeah also true. Men can't have issues in a world of *women are opwessed*. Most men don't have this privilege people claim we do.
I think a lot of it is they're totally blind to most men. They ultimately see only the most attractive men, most successful men, and ignore the millions more who aren't in those positions, who're ultimately the ones worst off. There's a good reason why suicide and homelessness are predominantly male issues.
This is true. Society, especially women, don't consider ugly, low value men as actual men. They don't consider us human for sure. They rate most men as unattractive anyway. Men like us are an entirely different species. So our problems get ignored.
And this is why I double check for myself and don't take anything a scientist or "the experts" say at face value.
Deffinitely good to do
 
GoffSystemQB

GoffSystemQB

Nefarious Dark Overlord of I.N.C.E.L. aka mod
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Posts
4,475
Online
82d 8h 8m
I think a lot of it is they're totally blind to most men. They ultimately see only the most attractive men, most successful men, and ignore the millions more who aren't in those positions, who're ultimately the ones worst off. There's a good reason why suicide and homelessness are predominantly male issues.
That's definitely a large part of it most are completely unaware. But at a deeper level there's something far more malevolent than ignorance. I've seen those types be confronted with statistics and studies time and time again and without fail they always find some way to excuse it away. Then they go right back to complaining about some menial / false issue like the "wage gap" or back to talking about something about sexual assault / harassment just ignoring everything they were confronted with for forever.

Whether they want to admit it or not they really just do not care and think the placement of ugly men in society is justified.

I simply cannot take anyone on the left seriously nor do I know how anyone else here does. Their social justice "advocacy" stops short on the two most prominent things in society: Lookism + "male disposability." It's almost some sort of mockery or sick joke.

It's actually laughable when you think about it that according to these people's ideologies they would believe the guy on the left below is more "oppressed" than the one on the right.

1590106437622.png
1590106482184.png


Does anyone truly believe that the guy on the right faces more discrimination and trouble in his life because of the way he looks than the guy on the left? I have a very hard time believing that.

They didn't just magically stop short on the most pervasive form of
discrimination and injustice in modern society. They think it's completely justified. All of that "how can you hate or treat someone differently because of the way they are born" or "he didn't choose to be born that way" completely goes out the window when talking about ugly men.

They are fundamentally psychopaths towards us who are incapable of having empathy for our situation. I've seen it first-hand from women who thought that men could easily "just use Tinder" to get a GF / sex (like they can) to becoming more aware. At no point do they ever have empathy. As they become more aware they just continue to deflect and come up with some new way on how it's your fault for being lonely.

In fact, some of the most toxic are those that are the most aware of their own nature in my experience.
 
Last edited:
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
That's definitely a large part of it most are completely unaware. But at a deeper level there's something far more malevolent than ignorance. I've seen those types be confronted with statistics and studies time and time again and without fail they always find some way to excuse it away. Then they go right back to complaining about some menial / false issue like the "wage gap" or back to talking about something about sexual assault / harassment just ignoring everything they were confronted with for forever.

Whether they want to admit it or not they really just do not care or ambivalent and think the placement of ugly men in society is justified.

I simply cannot take anyone on the left seriously nor do I know how anyone else here does. Their social justice "advocacy" stops short on the two most prominent things in society: Lookism + "male disposability." It's almost some sort of mockery or sick joke.

It's actually laughable when you think about it that according to these people's ideologies they would believe the guy on the left below is more "oppressed" than the one on the right.

View attachment 262756View attachment 262757

Does anyone truly believe that the guy on the right faces more discrimination and trouble in his life because of the way he looks than the guy on the left? I have a very hard time believing that.

They didn't just magically stop short on the most pervasive form of
discrimination and injustice in modern society. They think it's completely justified. All of that "how can you hate or treat someone differently because of the way they are born" or "he didn't choose to be born that way" completely goes out the window when talking about ugly men.

They are fundamentally psychopaths towards us who are incapable of having empathy for our situation. I've seen it first-hand from women who thought that men could easily "just use Tinder" to get a GF / sex (like they can) to becoming more aware. At no point do they ever have empathy. As they become more aware they just continue to deflect and come up with some new way on how it's your fault for being lonely.

In fact, some of the most toxic are those that are the most aware of their own nature in my experience.
People are fucking stupid. They're clueless. And love their ignorance is bliss approach
 
Wristlet 2

Wristlet 2

"The only thing I could do was even the score."
-
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Posts
2,797
Online
35d 8h 28m
People are fucking stupid. They're clueless. And love their ignorance is bliss approach
idk man, sometimes i think we may have to accept that other people are just a lot less intelligent than us. like not really purposefully ignorant but just stupid. because it's not just that they don't understand us or the blackpill, they also suck at running their own lives. lots of incels are surgerymaxxing and ascending as we speak, while redpillers waste their time on "theory" shitposts and bluepillers waste their lives as society's paypigs.
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
idk man, sometimes i think we may have to accept that other people are just a lot less intelligent than us. like not really purposefully ignorant but just stupid. because it's not just that they don't understand us or the blackpill, they also suck at running their own lives. lots of incels are surgerymaxxing and ascending as we speak, while redpillers waste their time on "theory" shitposts and bluepillers waste their lives as society's paypigs.
Most of them.know that what we say is correct. They repeat similar things between their peers..they just won't admit it to us or do anything about it because they want us to die.
 
Wristlet 2

Wristlet 2

"The only thing I could do was even the score."
-
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Posts
2,797
Online
35d 8h 28m
Most of them.know that what we say is correct. They repeat similar things between their peers..they just won't admit it to us or do anything about it because they want us to die.
brutal
 
Lado

Lado

Recruit
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Posts
20
Online
1d 5h 8m
A study trying to prove that mothers are discriminated against in family court instead found the exact opposite, and then tried to hide it
What? you have to be Helen Keller to not see that family court is extremely biased against men? What the fuck did they expect in this study?
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
What? you have to be Helen Keller to not see that family court is extremely biased against men? What the fuck did they expect in this study?
Virtue signalling cucks believe their own bullshit it seems. Everyone knows men get fucked by courts in all areas as opposed to women
 
Lado

Lado

Recruit
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Posts
20
Online
1d 5h 8m
Virtue signalling cucks believe their own bullshit it seems. Everyone knows men get fucked by courts in all areas as opposed to women
I mean this is really the only one that there are absolutely no amount of mental gymnastics that cucks and feminists can do to somehow spin it to where women are the victims. It blows my fucking mind people actually try to argue against this one.
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
I mean this is really the only one that there are absolutely no amount of mental gymnastics that cucks and feminists can do to somehow spin it to where women are the victims. It blows my fucking mind people actually try to argue against this one.
And they say we have the victim complex when it's actually just projection on their part..
 
MountainGorilla

MountainGorilla

Postmaxxing anime avi halo piece of shit
-
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Posts
5,502
Online
81d 13h 13m
One of the most maddening things in this world is the insistence that women have it worse and males are privileged when it is obvious to really absolutely anyone with 2 functioning brain cells (especially with the studies cited here) that it's the exact opposite.

It actually shows that no matter how bad things get women will ALWAYS be on top in terms of perceived victim hood.

Everyone should be able to notice this pattern. Whenever anybody talks about any problem about men someone always has to interject and tried to make women the bigger victim:
Males commit suicide more -> "Well females ATTEMPT suicide more. "
Many males nowadays receive now female affection or attention -> "Unwanted [i.e. ugly] sexual attention from men is WORSE than no attention."
Many men are completely lonely and receive no emotional support -> "Women are lonely to because they can't interact with who they want to interact with"
(paraphrasing here).

Because of the stated bias in academia towards women how bad men have it is probably underrepresented by an order or magnitude or two. I mean think about all the stuff they COULD be researching, but instead so much time and money is wasted trying to chase any study that shows women to be disadvantaged.

There will never be a point in history when men are perceived as getting lesser treatment no matter what happens. There may never even be a point where men are even perceived to be equal and not having privilege. All of this just goes to show just how much worse it's going to get.
I think a lot of it is they're totally blind to most men. They ultimately see only the most attractive men, most successful men, and ignore the millions more who aren't in those positions, who're ultimately the ones worst off. There's a good reason why suicide and homelessness are predominantly male issues.
This is true. Society, especially women, don't consider ugly, low value men as actual men. They don't consider us human for sure. They rate most men as unattractive anyway. Men like us are an entirely different species. So our problems get ignored
That's definitely a large part of it most are completely unaware. But at a deeper level there's something far more malevolent than ignorance. I've seen those types be confronted with statistics and studies time and time again and without fail they always find some way to excuse it away. Then they go right back to complaining about some menial / false issue like the "wage gap" or back to talking about something about sexual assault / harassment just ignoring everything they were confronted with for forever.

Whether they want to admit it or not they really just do not care and think the placement of ugly men in society is justified.

I simply cannot take anyone on the left seriously nor do I know how anyone else here does. Their social justice "advocacy" stops short on the two most prominent things in society: Lookism + "male disposability." It's almost some sort of mockery or sick joke.

It's actually laughable when you think about it that according to these people's ideologies they would believe the guy on the left below is more "oppressed" than the one on the right.

View attachment 262756View attachment 262757

Does anyone truly believe that the guy on the right faces more discrimination and trouble in his life because of the way he looks than the guy on the left? I have a very hard time believing that.

They didn't just magically stop short on the most pervasive form of
discrimination and injustice in modern society. They think it's completely justified. All of that "how can you hate or treat someone differently because of the way they are born" or "he didn't choose to be born that way" completely goes out the window when talking about ugly men.

They are fundamentally psychopaths towards us who are incapable of having empathy for our situation. I've seen it first-hand from women who thought that men could easily "just use Tinder" to get a GF / sex (like they can) to becoming more aware. At no point do they ever have empathy. As they become more aware they just continue to deflect and come up with some new way on how it's your fault for being lonely.

In fact, some of the most toxic are those that are the most aware of their own nature in my experience.
People are fucking stupid. They're clueless. And love their ignorance is bliss approach
idk man, sometimes i think we may have to accept that other people are just a lot less intelligent than us. like not really purposefully ignorant but just stupid. because it's not just that they don't understand us or the blackpill, they also suck at running their own lives. lots of incels are surgerymaxxing and ascending as we speak, while redpillers waste their time on "theory" shitposts and bluepillers waste their lives as society's paypigs.
This is ragefuel for me man, I'm not gonna studymaxx and go through the "american script" just to get fucked over like this. Now I see it with my own eyes, living by "the script" is cucked. Its fucking unfair knowing that I will have to work 10x harder than a femoid. Serously, how do fucking normies go through the system without giving a single fuck that the system is designed to exploit and fuck them over? Damn the bluepill programming is powerful.

I don't want to live in this society man knowing that we are fucking cows lead to the slaughter since day 1 we were born.
Might think about becoming a NEET some day...
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
This is ragefuel for me man, I'm not gonna studymaxx and go through the "american script" just to get fucked over like this. Now I see it with my own eyes, living by "the script" is cucked. Its fucking unfair knowing that I will have to work 10x harder than a femoid. Serously, how do fucking normies go through the system without giving a single fuck that they system is designed to exploit and fuck them over? Damn the bluepill programming is powerful.

I don't want to live in this society man knowing that we are fucking cows lead to the slaughter since day 1 we were born.
Might think about becoming a NEET some day...
I never bothered with studymaxxing tbh. I refuse to get real employment. Slave for society. Let them tax me. Fuck that. If I can't be a part of society I won't serve it. I like my free time to heroin and alcoholmaxx.
 
mental_out

mental_out

Facel mod
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,557
Online
81d 2h 58m
This is ragefuel for me man, I'm not gonna studymaxx and go through the "american script" just to get fucked over like this. Now I see it with my own eyes, living by "the script" is cucked. Its fucking unfair knowing that I will have to work 10x harder than a femoid. Serously, how do fucking normies go through the system without giving a single fuck that the system is designed to exploit and fuck them over? Damn the bluepill programming is powerful.

I don't want to live in this society man knowing that we are fucking cows lead to the slaughter since day 1 we were born.
Might think about becoming a NEET some day...
I'm just really sick of feminists lying all the time and making out that women are the worst off when they're generally doing better than men in almost every area of life.
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
I'm just really sick of feminists lying all the time and making out that women are the worst off when they're generally doing better than men in almost every area of life.
B-but wot about dat Wyman dat got hittered. Dat meenz men kant hav ishoos
 
MountainGorilla

MountainGorilla

Postmaxxing anime avi halo piece of shit
-
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Posts
5,502
Online
81d 13h 13m
I'm just really sick of feminists lying all the time and making out that women are the worst off when they're generally doing better than men in almost every area of life.
this is science™️ we're talking about here. Real science died a long time ago
pic related
1590111231180.png
 
mental_out

mental_out

Facel mod
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,557
Online
81d 2h 58m
this is science™️ we're talking about here. Real science died a long time ago
pic related
View attachment 262787
The thing is, there is science for it, but they wont accept any science that goes against their ideology. Ultimately ideology to them is far more important than reality. I guess it's partly a sunk cost fallacy of having put so much effort into feminism, to admit now it's full of shit would mean they wasted their time and would also reduce womens political power as ultimately victims get more power these days (only majority approved victims however)
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
The thing is, there is science for it, but they wont accept any science that goes against their ideology. Ultimately ideology to them is far more important than reality. I guess it's partly a sunk cost fallacy of having put so much effort into feminism, to admit now it's full of shit would mean they wasted their time and would also reduce womens political power as ultimately victims get more power these days (only majority approved victims however)
The irony being they bang on about ideology all day. Yet fail to realise theirs is flawed
 
MaxZM98

MaxZM98

Socially constructed loser
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
2,590
Online
24d 17h 23m
this might be the biggest 'IT wont touch this'post in history.

quality stuff :feelsautistic:
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
this might be the biggest 'IT wont touch this'post in history.

quality stuff :feelsautistic:
If they do touch it (like their users do with children jfl) they'll spin some bullshit but won't refute it
 
FinnCel

FinnCel

Alcoholcel
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Posts
27,183
Online
82d 6h 42m
Blackpill vs Feminism
 
Arthas93

Arthas93

Always remember that we all will die.
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Posts
2,577
Online
11d 17h 16m
Cuckpills won't touch this.
this might be the biggest 'IT wont touch this'post in history.

quality stuff :feelsautistic:
IT has been bombed at Cuckddit.
Guess they are going to have to use gay twitter now.
 
Last edited:
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
Arthas93

Arthas93

Always remember that we all will die.
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Posts
2,577
Online
11d 17h 16m
I hope they do. More blackpill exposure. Without any rebuttal apart fr "muh inkwell bahd"
They smear it with so much bullshit that the exposure loses it's sharpness.
 
78980n

78980n

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Posts
8,357
Online
76d 4h 43m
HAHAHA this is too good.
 
grondilu

grondilu

Legend
★★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
3,703
Online
68d 21h 19m
Dishonest scientists are disgusting.
 
Numb

Numb

Deformed Mexican
★★★★★
Joined
May 16, 2019
Posts
8,246
Online
14d 22h 21m
bookmarked LOL
 
coppernicus

coppernicus

Professional thread bumper
-
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Posts
3,198
Online
18d 16h 5m
I thought I had bookmarked it, but now I can't find it. It was an essay talking the famous feminist myth that women are discriminated against in the health industry. At the end, the numbers actually turned out to be something alone the lines of 81% goes for general research, 13% goes for women exclusive and 6% goes for men exclusive. The author also pointed out a lot of different examples of women's health being prioritize over that of men. He didn't even have to go to the classical breast cancer example, since there were so many more. Anyway if I find it I'll post it here.

Just another day of women living in recruit while claiming to be on veteran jfl.
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
They smear it with so much bullshit that the exposure loses it's sharpness.
They arent interested in anything that fucks up their narrative. They will happily deny solid research if it in any way gives our situation any merit for legitimacy. They absolutely love the ignorance is bliss and justifiable hatred approach.
 
mNFwTJ3wz9

mNFwTJ3wz9

Major
★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
2,357
Online
9d 19h 10m
> r/UnpopularFacts

Holy fuck this sub is going to get b&
 
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
FrailPaleStaleMale

FrailPaleStaleMale

Hopeless addict druggicel
★★★★★
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
5,434
Online
73d 13h 6m
Motherfuckers will still think women are “oppressed”
Just one of those factoids
HAHAHA this is too good.
Tbh, funny when it backfires on them. They hate the truth
Dishonest scientists are disgusting.
Like what's the actual point of being a fucking scientist or researcher if you have absolutely no interest in your findings. You just have an opinion
bookmarked LOL
Same
I thought I had bookmarked it, but now I can't find it. It was an essay talking the famous feminist myth that women are discriminated against in the health industry. At the end, the numbers actually turned out to be something alone the lines of 81% goes for general research, 13% goes for women exclusive and 6% goes for men exclusive. The author also pointed out a lot of different examples of women's health being prioritize over that of men. He didn't even have to go to the classical breast cancer example, since there were so many more. Anyway if I find it I'll post it here.

Just another day of women living in recruit while claiming to be on veteran jfl.
Tutorial. Even recruit is too generous. Jfl. Deffinitely link if you ever find it..
 
Top