[Blackpill] [Study] [Juicy] Study finds foid scientists turn out to be shit without male guidance in their careers

Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Subhewman
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
1,553
Online
32d 9h 49m

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a
reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO


View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567


View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992


View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!" :soy::soy:

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Irredeemable

Irredeemable

Warlock
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Posts
6,827
Online
112d 10h 43m
More evidence that women are garbage.
 
mNFwTJ3wz9

mNFwTJ3wz9

Everyone except me is a Fed
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
22,725
Online
51d 13h 19m
MORE THAN 100% BASED
FUCK FOIDS
PERIMETER OF A FRACTAL IQ PAPER
 
Mulattocel

Mulattocel

Officer
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Posts
910
Online
28d 12h 32m
Not surprising
 
Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Subhewman
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
1,553
Online
32d 9h 49m
More evidence that women are garbage.
It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.
 
S

SuccessfulShark

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Posts
429
Online
13d 18h 3m
I hate feminism
 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
5,846
Online
46d 9h 56m
More evidence that women are garbage.
It would be better for society if they just went back to the kitchen and fulfilled their traditional roles, because as evidenced again they literally suck at everything.
but this time we should apply eugenics to them so they won't turn into whores for good, hypergamy must be wiped out of the species
 
slavcel11

slavcel11

Commander
★★★
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Posts
3,238
Online
54d 4h 42m
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.
 
horseshoe

horseshoe

Officer
★★★
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Posts
758
Online
18d 16h 8m
Foids and soys seething at a paper published in the most prestigious journal on the planet. Brilliant.
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.
:feelshaha:
 
LittleDarkAge

LittleDarkAge

I have no mouth and I must scream
★★
Joined
May 26, 2019
Posts
1,105
Online
17d 18h 50m
Foids are incapable of thinking for themselves, they always need someone to hold their hand
 
Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Subhewman
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
1,553
Online
32d 9h 49m
The only appropriate place for foids in academia is under the desk.
Based :feelskek:
Nicolette here get's it :feelshmm:
Only high iq post by a foid on that thread :feelskek:
Isn't that a highly reputed journal?
Yes Nature is the most prestigious scientific journal, though Nature Communications is technically a "mega-journal" ie like a sub journal of Nature but still has high impact factor (articles in it are often cited by other researchers)
 
Robloxcel

Robloxcel

Socially inept
Joined
May 10, 2020
Posts
85
Online
2d 18h 10m
This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.
 
Simulacrasimulation

Simulacrasimulation

Veteran
★★
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
1,140
Online
43d 5h 45m

Published in Nature Communications

Abstract
We study mentorship in scientific collaborations, where a junior scientist is supported by potentially multiple senior collaborators, without them necessarily having formal supervisory roles. We identify 3 million mentor–protégé pairs and survey a random sample, verifying that their relationship involved some form of mentorship. We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors. We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors. While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. These findings add a new perspective to the policy debate on how to best elevate the status of women in science.

---
TLDR:

We find that mentorship quality predicts the scientific impact of the papers written by protégés post mentorship without their mentors.

We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a
reduction in post-mentorship impact of female protégés, but also a reduction in the gain of female mentors.

In other words:

Foids NEED to have male mentors if they want to succeed and have an impactful scientific career after their mentorships.

Look at the reactions it's been receiving and the soy SJW lefty foid professors and PhD's responding on Twitter LMFAO


View: https://twitter.com/CarolynBertozzi/status/1329100008918978567


View: https://twitter.com/skepchicks/status/1329172344460500992


View: https://twitter.com/niknikkums/status/1329145648717959171



"GarBaGe aLErT. HOW DARE YOU SAY WAHMEN CAN'T BE GOOD MENTORS LIKE MEN!! YOU FILTHY MISOGYNISTIC, PRIVILEGED, STOOPID WHITE MALES!!" :soy::soy:

The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpB83chNBQc
 
ReallyRice

ReallyRice

ER calls and I must answer.
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Posts
7,071
Online
77d 12h 53m
No wonder single mom households are shitshows
 
Trump2020

Trump2020

Genetic shit
★★★
Joined
Oct 29, 2020
Posts
208
Online
6d 5h 25m
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.
 
Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Subhewman
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
1,553
Online
32d 9h 49m
Lol I noticed these people are starting to include their pronouns in their twitter bios "he/him" :lul:

It's over... :feelsrope:

This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.
Absolutely
 
Simulacrasimulation

Simulacrasimulation

Veteran
★★
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
1,140
Online
43d 5h 45m
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would still be in the stoneage.
almost too based
 
The Zulfigar

The Zulfigar

Major
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Posts
2,039
Online
13d 18h 41m
Good morning women are low iq
Women cannot be scientists because they think with emotions and not with logic, and also are completely oblivious to everything that is not themselves and Chad.

If society was only made up by women they would be dead.
 
osman27

osman27

Officer
★★
Joined
Oct 8, 2020
Posts
662
Online
12d 5h 46m
The paper was btw written by 3 sandniggers JFL. Gigabased. :feelskek: :feelskek:
[/QUOTE]

From searching on twitter, it seems these triggered soys were smart enough not say anything about that. Report written in Abu dhabi........ Based since I'm still in the city for the next few weeks.
 
Babica Yaga

Babica Yaga

Subhewman
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
1,553
Online
32d 9h 49m
Quick update: The paper has been retracted.
Editor’s Note: Readers are alerted that this paper is subject to criticisms that are being considered by the editors. Those criticisms were targeted to the authors’ interpretation of their data that gender plays a role in the success of mentoring relationships between junior and senior researchers, in a way that undermines the role of female mentors and mentees. We are investigating the concerns raised and an editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.
Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.
 
nazianime

nazianime

Don't touch my virginity!
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Posts
2,994
Online
139d 22h 44m
Quick update: The paper has been retracted.


Just felt the need to address this as it shows ((they)) will go as far as to censor scientific knowledge if it doesn't align with their belief systems. Truly saddening.
JFL, "I LoVE sCieNce" :soy:
Yet when the paper shows women are incompetent at mentoring. "ThIS SiEnTIfic PaPer is my sogy kneeee" :feels:
 
Ika-Sama

Ika-Sama

Suffering from Brain Damage
★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
385
Online
9d 15h 57m
This is a classic example of how if the scientific results of research don’t fit the sjw agenda they will just claim they are false with absolutely no evidence. What they want to believe (that women are equal or superior to men at literally everything) MUST be true and any facts disputing that must be false.