Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [STUDY] Women with defective genes are TWICE more likely to reproduce than men with the same defective genes

Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,131

When looking at carriers of defective genes, women are 2 times more likely to reproduce and pass on their defective genes than men.

By defective they mean schizophrenia, autism, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, bipolar disorder, lower educational attainment, lower general intelligence and any sort of intellectual disability.

The whole eugenics based argument of "teehee women will improve the genepool you inkel :^)" has been btfo. Women pollute the fuck out of the genepool so that eugenics shit can gtfo

Here we show that genetic variants that damage these genes reduce reproductive success substantially in males but much less so in females. We present evidence that this reduction is mediated by cognitive and behavioural traits, which renders male carriers of such variants less likely to find mating partners.
 
Even biology is rigged against men
 
That is an atomic blackpill.
 
Water is wet. Nuff said.
 
That is an atomic blackpill.
Add to this the fact that balding genes are an X chromosome thing, meaning only women can pass on norwood genes to their sons. A man can only pass on his norwood genes to his daughters.

Women literally carry the norwood genes but are immune to it. They are never selected against it and create balding men that will in turn be hated by other women

Women create incels, it's a never ending cycle of suffering
 
Add to this the fact that balding genes are an X chromosome thing, meaning only women can pass on norwood genes to their sons. A man can only pass on his norwood genes to his daughters.

Women literally carry the norwood genes but are immune to it. They are never selected against it and create balding men that will in turn be hated by other women

Women create incels, it's a never ending cycle of suffering
Do you want another blackpill? Women can't become bald unless they have an actual disease.
 
Do you want another blackpill? Women can't become bald unless they have an actual disease.
They can if their hair follicles are extremely sensitive to DHT, and if they're old. Androgenetic alopecia happens for women too, it's just extremely rare and very easy to cure for them.

Non androgenic forms of alopecia are more common for women, such as traction alopecia, which is literally just foids pulling on their hair too hard with ponytails jfl
 
sooooooooooooooooo over
 
They can if their hair follicles are extremely sensitive to DHT, and if they're old. Androgenetic alopecia happens for women too, it's just extremely rare and very easy to cure for them.

Non androgenic forms of alopecia are more common for women, such as traction alopecia, which is literally just foids pulling on their hair too hard with ponytails jfl
When they're old, it only things but it won't cause any balding. That is only if a disease like alopecia takes care of it, but like you said, it's extremely rare so women win once again.
 
the arguement that inceldom is good for the gene pool and the average person will be better looking and all that is BS cuz u still got ugly girls dating meaning u can still have ugly boys and this just proves this even more
 
Women: women earn less than men!!
Society: it's OK, we'll make sure you'll earn more

Men: we reproduce less than women!!
Society: fuck off you incel terrorist! You should work harder to improve yourself :soy: :soy: :soy:
full
 
Women: women earn less than men!!
Society: it's OK, we'll make sure you'll earn more

Men: we reproduce less than women!!
Society: fuck off you incel terrorist! You should work harder to improve yourself :soy: :soy: :soy:
full

So fucking this.

Male-female relationships are a zero-sum game anyway tbh
 
Where's the logic here though????

She"ll pass the same shitty genes to her offspring. Wtf nature, fuck u
 
Simps will fuck and procreate with any foid they can have.
 
Where's the logic here though????

She"ll pass the same shitty genes to her offspring. Wtf nature, fuck u
There's no logic, men just wanna spread their seed and don't care.

Besides, women live on tutorial mode so even the mentally unstable women described in this study probably don't suffer much on a day to day basis.

Women: women earn less than men!!
Society: it's OK, we'll make sure you'll earn more

Men: we reproduce less than women!!
Society: fuck off you incel terrorist! You should work harder to improve yourself :soy: :soy: :soy:
full
Good analogy but the pay gap is a myth, whereas the sex gap is real
 
if just fucking chad worked then the genepool would've been cleaned off incels and other "undesirables" since the paleolithic age
only use of eugenics has the potential improve humankind and even then ethical concerns and financial inequality will sabotage it
 
twice?! lmfao more like 100 times, some kids just write down numbers with no proof.
 
The whole eugenics based argument of "teehee women will improve the genepool you inkel :^)" has been btfo. Women pollute the fuck out of the genepool so that eugenics shit can gtfo

Actually the "argument" is that women will "improve the gene pool" by mating with "superior" men.

But the reality is that women often have sex and reproduce with thugs, low IQ apes and bastards in general, so even these "superior" sex havers have shitty genes themselves.
Water is wet. Nuff said.
People always post shit like this, like this sort of thing was obvious to everyone. I spent 10 years trying to "self improve" because I never knew about stuff like this. All the media, fiction, etc. pushes 24/7 a narrative about women not giving a single shit about looks/genes and that its all your fault for not having sex as a man.

This might be obvious for veteran blackpillers but this was far from obvious 3 years ago when I still believed I looked "good enough"
 
Last edited:
twice?! lmfao more like 100 times, some kids just write down numbers with no proof.
Females are severely under diagnosed, meaning the real number is far worse than twice.
 
people who think hypergamy makes sense should look at this. No, it doesn't make sense, it's a primitive, animalistic mechanism that fuck our species
 
Actually the "argument" is that women will "improve the gene pool" by mating with "superior" men.

But the reality is that women often have sex and reproduce with thugs, low IQ apes and bastards in general, so even these "superior" sex havers have shitty genes themselves.
I know very well what the argument is. But when normies admit that genetics have something to do with attraction/sexual reproduction they love to just say that since we have bad genetics we shouldn't be reproducing. But women reproduce just fine with bad genetics, there's a double standard here

And yeah like you said, plenty of men with great looks are very impulsive, dark triad or dumb.

People always post shit like this, like this sort of thing was obvious to everyone. I spent 10 years trying to "self improve" because I never knew about stuff like this. All the media, fiction, etc. pushes 24/7 a narrative about women not giving a single shit about looks/genes and that its all your fault for not having sex as a man.

This might be obvious for veteran blackpillers but this was far from obvious 3 years ago when I still believed I looked "good enough"
God fucking damn yeah. In every piece of fiction the normal guy gets the girl at the end if he was a good person and/or put in the effort. All of fiction sells this lie. That and unconditional love.

I guess the reason this lie exists is because most fiction is written/produced by men who let their dreams/desires impact their work

irl almost nothing matters but looks in the eyes of women. And women have very little loyalty
 
richard lynn's Dysgenic book which i have been reading atm has similarly alarming data, over and over again showing that women with the genes that make one low iq and psychopathic reproduce at much higher rates than smart well behaved women. for men there is a slight dysgenic effect (low quality men reproducing more than men who are smart/think ahead, due to never using contraception) but for women it is a HUGE difference. and you neednt even look at the studies u can see it all around. smart women all have one kid when they're far too old. dumb, badly behaved women have 5 by age 30! and welfare has exacerbated this as there are now no consequences for whoring around.
 
richard lynn's Dysgenic book which i have been reading atm has similarly alarming data, over and over again showing that women with the genes that make one low iq and psychopathic reproduce at much higher rates than smart well behaved women. for men there is a slight dysgenic effect (low quality men reproducing more than men who are smart/think ahead, due to never using contraception) but for women it is a HUGE difference. and you neednt even look at the studies u can see it all around. smart women all have one kid when they're far too old. dumb, badly behaved women have 5 by age 30! and welfare has exacerbated this as there are now no consequences for whoring around.
Brutal and thanks for the reference, might read that book later
 
I know very well what the argument is. But when normies admit that genetics have something to do with attraction/sexual reproduction they love to just say that since we have bad genetics we shouldn't be reproducing. But women reproduce just fine with bad genetics, there's a double standard here

And yeah like you said, plenty of men with great looks are very impulsive, dark triad or dumb.

Dude I need to make a meme about this of the dude who have to press the button and doesn't know which one
 
Add to this the fact that balding genes are an X chromosome thing, meaning only women can pass on norwood genes to their sons. A man can only pass on his norwood genes to his daughters.

Women literally carry the norwood genes but are immune to it. They are never selected against it and create balding men that will in turn be hated by other women

Women create incels, it's a never ending cycle of suffering
richard lynn's Dysgenic book which i have been reading atm has similarly alarming data, over and over again showing that women with the genes that make one low iq and psychopathic reproduce at much higher rates than smart well behaved women. for men there is a slight dysgenic effect (low quality men reproducing more than men who are smart/think ahead, due to never using contraception) but for women it is a HUGE difference. and you neednt even look at the studies u can see it all around. smart women all have one kid when they're far too old. dumb, badly behaved women have 5 by age 30! and welfare has exacerbated this as there are now no consequences for whoring around.
 
Women are the only reason shit genes still exist.
 
Women also had never face sexual selection and sieving through wars or through death in job/hunting like men had.
The only danger for women and sexual selection in action was on the birthing bed.
 
So in short, even retards want chad.
 
It's funny when soys say :soy: :soy: :soy: "b-but if women prefer good looking guyz then inkelz wouldn't exist silly inkell hHAahA igotchu":soy::soy::soy:

Them conveniently forgetting that BOTH parents genes matter and stuff like juggernaut law exists.
It's almost as retarded as the normies and foids who try to "igotchu" by saying "uh so if 20% of the men are all women want, how come 80% of women arent single and childless???"

jfl
 
They conveniently forget all the random hookups people have in that moment jfl
I've known/heard of a handful of girls who were willingly dating chads who had side chicks or another gf. I wonder how many foids like this there are out there
 
Absolute ragefuel. Deformed women SMVmog average men.
 
Absolute ragefuel. Deformed women SMVmog average men.
Well the study here only looked at individuals that were mentally defective, it didn't take looks into account.

But there are studies on the incel wiki that show that being ugly doesn't reduce a woman's chances of reproducing. The same is of course not true for men
 
Women: women earn less than men!!
Society: it's OK, we'll make sure you'll earn more

Men: we reproduce less than women!!
Society: fuck off you incel terrorist! You should work harder to improve yourself :soy: :soy: :soy:
full
Add no sex robots allowed reeeeeee, it demeans women wahhhh.
 
A bit of a water is wet post tbh
 
It's men's fault for having sex with anything.
 
Bluepilled study: The actual rate is 10x more likely. AT LEAST.
 
As nature intended so stop whining
 
Historically, more women than men have been able to reproduce. That means people today have more female ancestors than male ancestors. And you can see where a lot of the physical and psychological problems men have came from
 
A bit of a water is wet post tbh
Never hurts to have proof to back up the obvious stuff. Because bluepillers love to just deny the obvious stuff or call it a woman hating thing

It's men's fault for having sex with anything.
True

Bluepilled study: The actual rate is 10x more likely. AT LEAST.
Women are severely underdiagnosed in general, so the actual figure is much worse than the 2 times found in the study. Besides whatever model they used isn't a perfect representation of reality. The point is that a strong trend was noticeable: women get laid and reproduce just fine with defective genes that would doom most men
 

Similar threads

Shaktiman
Replies
5
Views
295
Adolf Kitler
Adolf Kitler
FrothySolutions
Replies
1
Views
427
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Todd Thundercock
Replies
32
Views
2K
Electus
Electus
copingincel
Replies
15
Views
2K
SmhChan
SmhChan

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top