Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The birth of farming 9000yrs ago created evolutionary incel physical traits (fact!)

Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Posts
4,177
Humans have small, slender heads and weaker jaws, because of our discovery of soft foods like cheese and dairy, a new study suggests. Research by The University of California suggests the advent of farming, especially dairy products, had a small but significant effect on the shape of human skulls. The reason is all in the effort it took to eat farmed food. Humans who live by hunting and foraging wild foods have to put more effort into chewing than those surviving on a softer diet of cheese and cereal mush. Without the daily work-out of crunching, grinding and gnawing, bones and muscle declined, refining the features of farming communities.

“The effect of farming is mostly visible in the areas of the skull that generate or experience stress during chewing,” said graduate student David Katz, formerly of UC Davis, who is now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Calgary, Alberta.


“The simplest explanation is that these stresses were reduced because farming diets were generally softer.”

Hunter gatherers began to rely on diets from domesticated plants and animals from around 10,000 years ago, and archaeologists have noted the skulls began to shrink but could never quantify the change or say why it happened.

To pick out the changes, researchers studied more than 1,000 skulls and jaws from pre-industrial groups throughout the world who were either hunter gatherers or farmers.
They found that in farming communities one part of one of the major chewing muscles, the temporalis, became smaller and changed position as communities changed their diet. As a result the upper jaw became shorter and the lower jaw smaller.

A previous study by The University of Cambridge suggested that over time human skeletons have become much lighter and more fragile since the invention of agriculture as we switched from foraging to farming.

While human hunter-gatherers from around 7,000 years ago had bones comparable in strength to modern orangutans, farmers from the same area over 6,000 years later had significantly lighter and weaker bones that would have been more susceptible to breaking. Bone mass was around 20 per cent higher in the foragers - the equivalent to what an average person would lose after three months of weightlessness in space.

Sedentary Farming stock.

main-qimg-7082603dfabffff86e15ddc25b1f2163


Hunter, gatherer, warrior, protector of tribe, active.

1440196645241.jpg
 
Last edited:
I always had a hard time chewing food when I was a child. the situation was so severe that my mother bought filet mignon, which was the only meat I could eat. in fact, it never started for me.
 
Tfw bluepilled parents didn't tell you about mewing and chewing hard foods instead of chugging sugary drinks all day.:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsbadman::feelscry::feelscry::feelscry::feelsrope:
 
This was actually also caused mostly by selection for neotenous traits, meaning men likely chose to breed with the most feminine women or child-like women. These genes made us, overall, look less rugged and masculine, and more child-like.

I think the selection for farmers occurred because growing food helped provide far more energy for our brains than being a hunter did, so the smarter farmers survived more than the hunters.

Male sexual selection probably made us less rugged and masculine. Attraction to young looking foids has always played a part in our evolution from savage cavemen to civilized man. Neoteny doesn't seem to just play a role with men though, it also seems to be something women are attracted to also. You'd be surprised at how many women are attracted to feminine (young looking) men and boys, and how many women are secretly attracted to minors. Even if nobody is legally allowed to fuck/reproduce with a minor, you'll often find out that they are attracted to adults who look like one of prodded enough.
 

Attachments

  • skulls.jpg
    skulls.jpg
    23 KB · Views: 97
A strong chin is also relevant to boardroom success, says Antell, who conducted a study in 2007 analyzing the chins of Fortune 500 CEOs. He found that 90 percent had non-receding or prominent chins, a trait held by less than 75 percent of the population. “Today, you wear your resume on your face,” he explains, adding that people with stronger chins were perceived to be a) more trustworthy and b) have better leadership skills — both highly-desired traits in a CEO. The only exception was the decidedly weak-chinned Bill Gates. “But he didn’t get hired for the job,” Antell notes. “He founded his own company.”


14pkT5YQuH87GwFdK_4TC8Q.gif
 
I think the selection for farmers occurred because growing food helped provide far more energy for our brains than being a hunter did, so the smarter farmers survived more than the hunters.
Different skills for sure, but yeah farming and storing the yield long term requires more planning and intelligent life structure.
 
Lookism will be mainstream very soon. We weren't talking bullshit all the time about effects of lookism in real life
 

Attachments

  • incelvschadSKULL.png
    incelvschadSKULL.png
    66.4 KB · Views: 101
The Chad in your post is supposed to be part Jew, just so you know. Just lol at cucked video game studios portraying Jews as badasses.
 
Hunter gatherers began to rely on diets from domesticated plants and animals from around 10,000 years ago, and archaeologists have noted the skulls began to shrink but could never quantify the change or say why it happened.

To pick out the changes, researchers studied more than 1,000 skulls and jaws from pre-industrial groups throughout the world who were either hunter gatherers or farmers.
They found that in farming communities one part of one of the major chewing muscles, the temporalis, became smaller and changed position as communities changed their diet. As a result the upper jaw became shorter and the lower jaw smaller.
 
This was actually also caused mostly by selection for neotenous traits, meaning men likely chose to breed with the most feminine women or child-like women. These genes made us, overall, look less rugged and masculine, and more child-like.

I think the selection for farmers occurred because growing food helped provide far more energy for our brains than being a hunter did, so the smarter farmers survived more than the hunters.

Male sexual selection probably made us less rugged and masculine. Attraction to young looking foids has always played a part in our evolution from savage cavemen to civilized man.


Thats a good point. Men choose more girly and light boned women and these traits get passed on to males.

High calories from farming and dairy gave them more free time to discover and advance society, thats true. Hunter gatherers hunt for hours, spending most of the day looking for food. This leaves less free time to innovate.

Neoteny doesn't seem to just play a role with men though, it also seems to be something women are attracted to also. You'd be surprised at how many women are attracted to feminine (young looking) men and boys, and how many women are secretly attracted to minors. Even if nobody is legally allowed to fuck/reproduce with a minor, you'll often find out that they are attracted to adults who look like one of prodded enough.

I still don't agree. Women will always choose masculine men for sex, partnership... to lead. Its rare to find women attracted to light boned boyish men. Perhaps the biggest killer is light boned boyish men get rejected from masculine social circles, your social circle becomes threadbare to non-existent, lowering your status in the eyes of women and making you an easy target for masculine bullies/jocks. They also get called gay / unprovoked homophobia even though straight.
Lookism will be mainstream very soon. We weren't talking bullshit all the time about effects of lookism in real life


Eeven aliens are made to look as incel as possible. Skinny neck, small weak body, large head, neoteny, hairless.

E-T-wallpaper-et-the-extra-terrestrial-1281696-1024-768.jpg
 
Last edited:
increased population from agriculture led to a permanent incel underclass, which we probably all belong to. The gigachad hunter class took over positions of authority and hoarded all the best resources. Thus guaranteeing top tier nutrition to forge the chadiest jaws and secure their harems
 
Last edited:
increased population from agriculture led to a permanent incel underclass, which we probably all belong to. The gigachad hunter class took over positions of authority and hoarded all the best resources. Thus guaranteeing top tier nutrition to forge the chadiest jaws and secure their harems


I'm sure all royal families today could trace there lineage back to gigachads that reigned over the softjaw, birdboned tool, incel peasants. Our history defines our rank in society today. There is no free will.
 
I'm sure all royal families today could trace there lineage back to gigachads that reigned over the softjaw, birdboned tool, incel peasants.
they'd rather inbreed themselves to extinction then let their lineage be tainted by incel serf scum
 
This just proves chads are primitive relics from stone age, and femoids are dumb animals with unevolved mind and enemies of progress
 
Why women more often have high forehead?
All their bones are smaller than men's (except for the pelvic)
 

Attachments

  • incelvschadSKULL.png
    incelvschadSKULL.png
    66.4 KB · Views: 82
This just proves chads are primitive relics from stone age, and femoids are dumb animals with unevolved mind and enemies of progress

Progression doesn't mean weakening of the jaw; it has a negative net effect and our brains and evolution are too slow to catch up and find it desirable trait. Its just sad that you either come out strong jawed, weak, or inbetween. We have no say but blue pilled parents play a role, too. Munching on hard foods as a kid could really make the difference between winning in the dating game or losing in life.

I wouldnt call the ideal type "hyper-masculine", but rather adult or juvenile-mature. Someting with a masculine jaw and slightly boyish face is ideal. Think of alain delon f.e. rather than hyper-masculine type like alastair overeem.

Here some quotes and further explanations:

"Very clear is the connection of races to the ontogenetic development: There are races, which retain the more childlike (paedomorphen) habitus (f.e. Palaemongolids, img 308 - look at the pictures posted in the phy. anthro. section from Knußmann), and such, which are more typical adult formed - or even overreaching (f.e. Nilotids, img 304).

"The protuberance of the mucous membrane (lips) of Negrids is a phylogenetically progressive, whereas the strong prognathy is an archaic (primitive) feature."

If its about intelligence difference, we have Lynn, Rushton, Herrnstein, Murray to look for the intellectual background of the various types.

For psychological differences the works of Cattel, Kretschmer, Sheldon, Eysenck, Rohracher, v. Eickstedt etc. are a must reads from my point of view.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top