Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The concept of a sexual "partner" is liberal propaganda which falsely implies equality between men and women

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,335
It is eerily similar to the capitalist concept of a store "associate," which has all the pretensions of workplace egalitarianism, but without any of the substance.

The most important thing you can learn from the blackpill is that people are not equal to each other, whether sexually, racially, or mentally, and liberal efforts to plaster over fundamental, biological differences with egalitarian fluff only serves to make everybody equally exploitable by culturally homogenizing them under the same system of power, and does not eliminate hierarchy at all (which might actually be a virtuous pursuit if taken seriously) but rather exacerbates hierarchy.

Furthermore, the type of hierarchy liberalism exacerbates is the worst sort, whose golden standard is a superficially charming, yet inherently violent and rapacious, psychopath. It is no wonder that such a pretentious and exploitative system as liberalism rewards the most pretentious and exploitative people. In this regard, perhaps Trump Derangement Syndrome merely represents the guilty conscience of idealistic liberals.
 
Last edited:
It is eerily similar to the capitalist concept of a store "associate," which has all the pretensions of workplace egalitarianism, but without any of the substance.

The most important thing that you can learn from the blackpill is that people are not equal to each other, whether sexually, racially, or mentally, and liberal efforts to plaster over fundamental, biological differences with egalitarian fluff only serves to make everybody equally exploitable by culturally homogenizing them under the same system of power, and does not eliminate hierarchy at all (which might actually be a virtuous pursuit if taken seriously) but rather exacerbates hierarchy.

Furthermore, the type of hierarchy liberalism exacerbates is the worst sort, whose golden standard is a superficially charming, yet inherently violent and rapacious, psychopath. It is no wonder that such a pretentious and exploitative system as liberalism rewards the most pretentious and exploitative people. In this regard, perhaps Trump Derangement Syndrome merely represents the guilty conscience of idealistic liberals.

This is High IQ.
 
Women have so much more SMV than men. Most normie men who get into a relationship are just there to pay the bills and help raise the children.

So many of them are miserable. They don't get the sex or respect they should be getting
 
Women have so much more SMV than men. Most normie men who get into a relationship are just there to pay the bills and help raise the children.

So many of them are miserable. They don't get the sex or respect they should be getting
Clearly, the rhetoric of a sexual "partnership" is meant to beguile normie men into thinking they're on equal terms with their queen.

It is telling how this pretense isn't present during "casual" hook-ups with Chad, who is explicitly deferred to as a superior being.

A roastie kneels down to give Chad a blowjob, while her normie "partner" kneels down to propose marriage to her :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Clearly, the rhetoric of a sexual "partnership" is meant to beguile normie men into thinking they're on equal terms with their queen.

It is telling how this pretense isn't present during "casual" hook-ups with Chad, who is explicitly deferred to as a superior being.

A roastie kneels down to give Chad a blowjob, and her normie "partner" kneels down and proposes to her :feelskek:
Tbh I think the whole partner thing might have made some sense when monogamy was enforced, divorce rates were low and women were shamed for being promiscuous. But things have changed so much since then
 
Tbh I think the whole partner thing might have made some sense when monogamy was enforced, divorce rates were low and women were shamed for being promiscuous. But things have changed so much since then
Cope.

As with other facets of modern "dating" culture, the origins of this phraseology is to be found in prostitution:

1590660515382


 
Last edited:
Tbh I think the whole partner thing might have made some sense when monogamy was enforced, divorce rates were low and women were shamed for being promiscuous. But things have changed so much since then
Foids weren't partners in those days, they were wives, subservient to men as they should be
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top