Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion The intelligence quotient is a flawed metric when applied to women and needs to be reevaluated

  • Thread starter GermaniaIncelia
  • Start date
G

GermaniaIncelia

incel vortex
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Posts
2,664
The intelligence quotient is supposed to serve as an indicative number for general intelligence used for problem solving compared to the average of a selected reference group. But general intelligence of different reference groups can not and should not always be compared with one another as if their numbers were indicative of the same meaning.

I'll explain.

Let's assume for every decision in your life you flipped a coin to make your choice and that one side of the coin represented the obviously wrong choices while the other the obviously right choices. We'll define the 'right' choices here as those choices who lead to the better sum of health and financial outcomes for you and the people around you in comparison to the outcomes of the wrong or you could more appropriately also say worse choices. On average and all the more the larger the sample size of decisions becomes, you would approximately get half of your decisions right and half of them wrong. And in this scenario, where you merely leave your decisions to dumb luck, not even to some form of intelligence, you would still be correct 50% of the time. Now if you handed these same issues to a woman, her choices would be wrong almost all of the time. The reason for why that is is irrelevant here, it could be because the woman is stupid or it could be because making wrong choices is just her nature, that's not the point of discussion here. But the point is that the woman as a sex when faced with problems to solve has something that makes her inclination for intentionally picked bad choices extremely high in frequency.


You would be far more often correct in your decisions by throwing coins to solve problems than a woman would if you let her choose based on her judgement ability.
Women can reach high IQ numbers, but their choices in problem solving are contradictory to what the metric is supposed to represent, which is the ability to solve the problems. Not to make them worse. When faced with this truth, it becomes evident quite quickly that the IQ for women is not to be interpreted the same way as for men. And that, in fact, the IQ for women shows the inverse ability to solve problems. As the more intelligence a woman has at her disposal to solve problems with, the more of that capacity she will use fully intentionally to make the problem worse. This could also partly explain why the smarts of women are inversely proportional to their fertility.

Every point of IQ a foid has, she uses not to solve problems, but to create them.
 
Last edited:
1587106500996
 
"IQ" isn't designed to measure the capacity of a person to make choices which lead to the better sum of health and financial outcomes.

It's really only designed to measure cognitive processing power.
 
"IQ" isn't designed to measure the capacity of a person to make choices which lead to the better sum of health and financial outcomes.

It's really only designed to measure cognitive processing power.
There are various IQ tests that measure what is called 'fluid intelligence', which is "the ability to use logic and reason to solve a problem."
 
agree that foids make bad decisions, put low IQ post anyway because 1. thats called practical intelligence and 2. if throwing yourself in front of a car is a decision to make every car that passes foids would all be dead if they chose stupidly most of the times
 
Last edited:
No because no woman ever had a high IQ and all those who do have a high IQ are fakes. All geniuses are male. IQ as a measurement is not perfect but it's good.
 
We're trying to measure someone's intelligence here yet, it's difficult to even make a complete definition on what intelligence is. We instantly jump to IQ an test without realising that its not even that accurate of a predictor of intelligence.

The person with the highest IQ in the world is Marilyn vos Savant with an IQ of 228. Look it up if you don't believe me. She even states that IQ may be a measure of how much brain power one has the ability to use, not your total brain power. It's pretty insane to think that just your use of memory, pattern recognition and ability to unscramble words is proof of intelligence. If you're somewhat observant, those measures are quite straightforward (to an extent ofc).

I'd say men are more intelligent than women because we are far more creative, more analytical, better with logic and better at reasoning. Women tend to need help in these areas. Newton was observing the sky one day and thought about how the moon and stars all had their own gravitational pull. This was after discovering how the Earth and every object on the Earth has gravitational pull. Women would struggle to arrive at this conclusion. Sure they can spell, write and do math to a satisfactory level (on average), but only after they've been taught these already learned concepts. They just can't synthesise anything new.
 
IQ only applies if your primal emotions and instincts don't override it.
 

Similar threads

Mortis
Replies
53
Views
1K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
R
Replies
1
Views
138
Da_Yunez
Da_Yunez
ForeverGrey
Replies
28
Views
957
Nagger
Nagger
ne4rthend
Replies
27
Views
463
Masquerade
Masquerade
wasteofspace
Replies
12
Views
192
Evangelioncel
Evangelioncel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top