[Blackpill] The intense hatred for pedo/hebephiles (even non-practicing ones) doesn't come from Christianity but from feminism and psychology, particularly Freud

Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
There's nothing in the Bible about pedophilia. It's a given that we are not supposed to hurt innocent people because loving thy neighbor is a commandment (so penetrating prepubescents can be inferred as wrong), but the Bible doesn't say anything about AoC, minimal marriage age, age difference in relationships or anything of the kind.

The intense hatred for anyone who even admits to be able to feel attraction towards underage people comes from:

1) Puritan old women who used religious moralism as an excuse to shame men who date much younger women, because of envy and jealousy
2) Psychology's unfounded claims about invariable trauma happening every time someone older has any kind of romantic or sexual relationship with anyone below certain arbitrary age of choice
3) Freud making everything about sex in his crazy theories and reducing humans to sex-obsessed animals. People stopped believing in the capacity of people to relinquish sex; they don't believe a person can choose to be celibate, a homosexual can choose not to have homosexual sex, a pedophile can choose not to pursue sex with children etc.

Thus, they believe anyone who feels attraction towards underage people is a rapist (a "statutory rapist", at best) or someone who is about to become a rapist at any moment.

"I feel attraction towards underage people" = "I'm a rapist" in the minds of people who buy into modern psychology and Freud's insane theories.
 
tulasdanslos

tulasdanslos

Vocaloidcel
★★
Joined
May 30, 2018
Posts
2,175
Online
64d 19h 46m
Spot on analysis, this is what makes the most sense.
 
Made in Heaven

Made in Heaven

Lolipill is the Ultimate Truth
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Posts
2,045
Online
22d 8h 56m
The Bible supports and promotes "child" marriage as young as 7-8 years old. Christcucks, as always, just love to dismiss the parts of their religion that make them uncomfortable.
 
King_of_morons

King_of_morons

Shit
★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
4,787
Online
88d 6h 9m
The Bible supports and promotes "child" marriage as young as 7-8 years old. Christcucks, as always, just love to dismiss the parts of their religion that make them uncomfortable.
Blackpilled sig.
1592085316561.png
 
Emba

Emba

mostly harmless
★★★★★
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
18,142
Online
64d 22h 51m
I am against statutory rape!

Most statues don't even have holes to fuck! Therefore, it's impossible to rape a statue! And i don't like that!
 
Looksmaxxcel

Looksmaxxcel

Veteran
★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Posts
1,367
Online
5d 17h 10m
I don't think pedophilia is okay at all, but these same retards with a mob-like mentality would crucify me for liking a 16 year old no differently than an actual child predator, even though I'm not much older.

You press them and ask them why they think it's just as bad, and they come up with the answer "uh, well uh, it's the power dynamic! You're taking advantage of her and have more power over her, DURRR!" In reality this isn't even about age or ""pedophilia"", it's just feminists who hate the fact that women like to be submissive or that younger women prefer older men. "Pedo" is just a magic word they use to get an emotional rise out of people, just like they overuse the word "misogyny" and "rape".

And ironically, they're silent on reverse scenarios where it's a young man and an older woman, because they only call it ""pedophilia"" when it's a scenario that goes against their narrative, but not when the power dynamic is in the favor of the female.

In other words, ""pedophilia"" is newspeak for, "non-chad man who dares to be attracted to young, teenage women. And it makes me butthurt because it goes against my feminist, matriarchal narrative."
 
Venomkore

Venomkore

5’4 Akechicel
-
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Posts
8,718
Online
31d 19h 1m
I’m just 16 but I’m kinda worried that I’ll never stop finding people around my age group hot. I was talkin’ to my buddy the other day and I was like huh that girls kinda hot. And he was like dude she’s in 7th grade. Like I think it’s getting to the point where it isn’t socially acceptable anymore
 
78980n

78980n

★★★★★
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Posts
11,204
Online
111d 24m
I am against statutory rape!

Most statues don't even have holes to fuck! Therefore, it's impossible to rape a statue! And i don't like that!
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
The Bible supports and promotes "child" marriage as young as 7-8 years old. Christcucks, as always, just love to dismiss the parts of their religion that make them uncomfortable.
I don't remember that exact part you mentioned, but even if you disregard the old testament, there's nothing against marrying young girls, even if much younger than you, in the new testament either.
 
yeshuallah

yeshuallah

:panties:
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Posts
13,070
Online
98d 29m
there is nothing wrong with pedophilia
 
Made in Heaven

Made in Heaven

Lolipill is the Ultimate Truth
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Posts
2,045
Online
22d 8h 56m
I don't remember that exact part you mentioned, but even if you disregard the old testament, there's nothing against marrying young girls, even if much younger than you, in the new testament either.
It's not a specific part per say, more so how early Christians understood marriage. It's why, for example, why AoC in USA was 10 a mere 100 years ago, until (((feminists))) changed it.
 
ReturnOfSaddam

ReturnOfSaddam

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
May 23, 2020
Posts
397
Online
6d 3h 53m
I’m just 16 but I’m kinda worried that I’ll never stop finding people around my age group hot. I was talkin’ to my buddy the other day and I was like huh that girls kinda hot. And he was like dude she’s in 7th grade. Like I think it’s getting to the point where it isn’t socially acceptable anymore
Yeah that doesn't happen, people just pretend to stop finding JBs hot lol.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
I’m just 16 but I’m kinda worried that I’ll never stop finding people around my age group hot. I was talkin’ to my buddy the other day and I was like huh that girls kinda hot. And he was like dude she’s in 7th grade. Like I think it’s getting to the point where it isn’t socially acceptable anymore
Yeah that doesn't happen, people just pretend to stop finding JBs hot lol.
I remember being myself already 16-19 and still finding 12-14 girls hot, I got worried back when I was bluepilled. But then I found 4chan and realized pretty much everyone still finds them attractive, it's just that you're forced to be a liar about it by modern society.
 
Last edited:
Venomkore

Venomkore

5’4 Akechicel
-
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Posts
8,718
Online
31d 19h 1m
I remember being myself already 16-19 and still finding 12-14 girls hot, I got worried back when I was bluepilled. But then I found 4chan and realized pretty much everyone still finds them attractive, it's just that you're force to be a liar about it by modern society.
oh lol
 
Zettacel

Zettacel

★ ∈ KD6-3.7 ⋑ ★
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
21,891
Online
51d 19h 19m
Nice to know.
 
Pengwin

Pengwin

Inhabitant of the Antarctic circle
★★★
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
2,215
Online
13d 17h 42m
3) Freud making everything about sex in his crazy theories and reducing humans to sex-obsessed animals. People stopped believing in the capacity of people to relinquish sex; they don't believe a person can choose to be celibate, a homosexual can choose not to have homosexual sex, a pedophile can choose not to pursue sex with children etc.
Care to elaborate please? I read some of his work for school but I didn't find anything problematic with his works.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
Care to elaborate please? I read some of his work for school but I didn't find anything problematic with his works.
From Freud comes the modern idea that sex is an irresistible impulse that so many people adopt today (but conveniently set aside when incels complain about not being able to get sex and this being something serious).

People think that if you feel attraction towards a certain group, you can't help but having sex with such group. For example, if someone is a homosexual, the idea that he can simply choose not to partake in homosexual sex for moral, spiritual or health reasons, or, God forbid, that people can encourage other people to take that decision, is not accepted by many people today. They even get revolted if you simply suggest it.

So that's why they also assume that all people who feel attraction for kids will eventually engage in some sexual act or attempt of sexual act with them.

In the case of pedophilia things get even much more intense because most people today think that even just watching porn of it is a serious crime, even if you don't pay for it. So a pedophile has no acceptable outlets for his sexuality at all, which leads people to further assume that a pedophile is hurting children (they think watching media hurts people . I mean, in the case of CP; In the case of gore for example, magically, it's different).
 
Last edited:
Pengwin

Pengwin

Inhabitant of the Antarctic circle
★★★
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
2,215
Online
13d 17h 42m
From Freud comes the modern idea that sex is an irresistible impulse that so many people adopt today (but conveniently set aside when incels complain about not being able to get sex and this being something serious).

People think that if you feel attraction towards a certain group, you can't help but having sex with such group. For example, if someone is a homosexual, the idea that he can simply choose not to partake in homosexual sex for moral, spiritual or health reasons, or, God forbid, that people can encourage other people to take that decision, is not accepted by many people today. They even get revolted if you simply suggest it.

So that's why they also assume that all people who feel attraction for kids will eventually engage in some sexual act or attempt of sexual act with them.
Yes , thanks for the comprehensive response.
According to that same logic every aggressive person would instantaneously be a murderer or every poor/hungry person would be a thief. We are humans with sound intellect and morality not animals.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
Yes , thanks for the comprehensive response.
According to that same logic every aggressive person would instantaneously be a murderer or every poor/hungry person would be a thief. We are humans with sound intellect and morality not animals.
Exactly. No one chooses to depend on food, to have aggressive thoughts or to feel attraction towards certain people. Crime= actually damaging/hurting people in a non-self-defense way. Not thinking thoughts, watching stuff for free on the internet, venting about your feelings, having unpopular opinions, etc.
 
Last edited:
psygnosis-owl

psygnosis-owl

pedocels.co
-
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
1,833
Online
65d 11h 24m
I don't read Sigmund Freud, or his student by proxy Erik Erikson, as being anti-child or teen adolescence sexuality.

If anything they encouraged it by discussing psychosexual development and sexual exploration in childhood and teens as perfectly normal. If anything by not achieving an ego identity, tied into sexuality, ideas and body, they said this is a problem if adults miss out on stages.
If anything psychosexual development is anti-feminist as it proves why feminist are obsessed with their first teenage loves, but then scowl at incels for saying the same thing (or missing out on).

Peer reviewed psychological reports used psychosexual development in defense of adolescence teenagers ages 13-17 consenting to sex with older people. This is mentioned on the wikipedia page.
Science confirms adolescence ends at age 18 and a teenager can be a matured, physically, sexually and identity by age 18. I saw private school kids achieve self actualisation by age 18 when I worked at a school where they fully endorsed this.

The biggest coper and perverter of psychosexual development that bends to Jewish bankers and feminists is contemporary psychologist Jeffrey Arnett. He claimed it was ok to not have achieved an identity or complete adolescence by age 18. Despite evidence this is mentally damaging to people's oxycotin levels, sense of worth and life direction. Also mental health issues with an identity crisis (the term was coined by Erik Erikson).
Going by his lecture Arnett sounds like "psychosexual development at ages 18-25" is pandering to demographics which benefit marketers, nightclubs, city based companies, colleges and the career women lie. So trading in prime dating and pairbonding for money is how I read him. Become a worker bee and beta buxer of your one and only post-wall wife who never loved you in the first place as she had 3 or more sexual partners between 13-17 in high school.

 
Last edited:
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,563
Online
52d 5h 57m
I don't read Sigmund Freud, or his student by proxy Erik Erikson, as being anti-child or teen adolescence sexuality.

If anything they encouraged it by discussing psychosexual development and sexual exploration in childhood and teens as perfectly normal. If anything by not achieving an ego identity, tied into sexuality, ideas and body, they said this is a problem if adults miss out on stages.
If anything psychosexual development is anti-feminist as it proves why feminist are obsessed with their first teenage loves, but then scowl at incels for saying the same thing (or missing out on).

Peer reviewed psychological reports used psychosexual development in defense of adolescence teenagers ages 13-17 consenting to sex with older people. This is mentioned on the wikipedia page.
Science confirms adolescence ends at age 18 and a teenager can be a matured, physically, sexually and identity by age 18. I saw private school kids achieve self actualisation by age 18 when I worked at a school where they fully endorsed this.

The biggest coper and perverter of psychosexual development that bends to Jewish bankers and feminists is contemporary psychologist Jeffrey Arnett. He claimed it was ok to not have achieved an identity or complete adolescence by age 18. Despite evidence this is mentally damaging to people's oxycotin levels, sense of worth and life direction. Also mental health issues with an identity crisis (the term was coined by Erik Erikson).
Going by his lecture Arnett sounds like "psychosexual development at ages 18-25" is pandering to demographics which benefit marketers, nightclubs, city based companies, colleges and the career women lie. So trading in prime dating and pairbonding for money is how I read him. Become a worker bee and beta buxer of your one and only post-wall wife who never loved you in the first place as she had 3 or more sexual partners between 13-17 in high school.

I didn't say Freud was opposed to teenage sex or age-gapped teenage sex, but rather that what people get from Freud (that pretty much everything is about sex and people can't resist their urges to have sex) mixed with some other stuff (i.e. the belief that any sexual contact with an underage person ruins their life) makes people hate pedophiles intensily, even non-practicing ones.

I'll watch it if it isn't too agecucked.
 
Top