Take a look at this story: https://outline.com/y5z3Aj
An accused mall attacker blames women who rejected him, so he throws a 5 year old boy off the third floor inside of the Mall of America. I'm going to break this story down so that we can get to the real facts of this story. This incident is obviously being used to frame this guy as an incel, even though there isn't really a connection. The connection that they create in this story is the fact that he lashed out after a string of rejections, and this isn't anything new. Men have lashed out for hundreds of years about rejections and they were never called incels.
Here is an example that I found in google: https://www.nytimes.com/1939/12/25/...ed-him-then-takes-own-life-after-predawn.html
The above story is from 1939, about 80 years ago. No mention of incels in there. Why the mention in this story?
This story already sounds disjointed and taken out of context already. This "journalist" is already pulling phrases and words out of the criminal complaint that is relevant to their story. This is a classic tactic for those that wish to weave a narrative using a news story. They take phrase and words from somewhere else that is out of context. This is how other outlets create a narrative. This publication adds in the word incel for little or no reason, then other outlets report on this story and it ends up in their stories too. This is how they spread this false narrative. Lies, deceptions, and talking points is how they are influencing people and it's working. People of all political ideologies are falling for it and it is messed up.
Police & Fire
Accused Mall Attacker Blames Women Who Rejected Him: Police
Authorities say the man accused of throwing a 5-year-old off of the third floor at the mall blames women for making him "lash out."
By William Bornhoft, Patch Staff | Apr 16, 2019 3:47 pm ET | Updated Apr 16, 2019 4:10 pm ET
The Minneapolis man accused in the Mall of America attack blames women for making him aggressive, police said. (Image via Bloomington Police Department)
BLOOMINGTON, MN — The man accused of throwing a 5-year-old off of the third floor at the Mall of America blames women for his aggressive behavior, according to police. Emmanuel Aranda, 24, of Minneapolis, has been charged with attempted premeditated first-degree murder.
According to the criminal complaint, Aranda indicated to police that he had been coming to the mall for several years and made efforts to talk to women there, but they rejected him.
The rejection "caused him to lash out and be aggressive," the criminal complaint states.
Police say Aranda was previously ordered to stay out of the mall after he threw water in a woman's face and destroyed property.
Aranda admitted he came to the mall Thursday intending to kill an adult, but that it did not "work out," according to the complaint. He returned Friday and chose to attack the 5-year-old boy instead, according to police.
Authorities say video surveillance showed Aranda looking over the third-floor balcony several times before approaching the boy Friday. The boy was thrown approximately 39 feet and landed on the first floor, according to police. He suffered life-threatening injuries and remains hospitalized.
Last week's attack at the mall is the latest in a string of assaults involving an accused male who blames women and sexual frustration for making them violent. In November, a 40-year-old man shot six people at a yoga studio in Tallahassee, Florida, before fatally shooting himself. Two women were killed.
According to CNN, the Florida attacker identified with "involuntary celibates," also known as "incels," a subculture of men who despise women because they won't have sex with them.
In 2018, the Southern Poverty Law Center added "male supremacy " to the ideologies they track because of the way certain groups — including incels — "denigrate and dehumanize women, often including advocating physical and sexual violence against them."
An accused mall attacker blames women who rejected him, so he throws a 5 year old boy off the third floor inside of the Mall of America. I'm going to break this story down so that we can get to the real facts of this story. This incident is obviously being used to frame this guy as an incel, even though there isn't really a connection. The connection that they create in this story is the fact that he lashed out after a string of rejections, and this isn't anything new. Men have lashed out for hundreds of years about rejections and they were never called incels.
Here is an example that I found in google: https://www.nytimes.com/1939/12/25/...ed-him-then-takes-own-life-after-predawn.html
The above story is from 1939, about 80 years ago. No mention of incels in there. Why the mention in this story?
This story already sounds disjointed and taken out of context already. This "journalist" is already pulling phrases and words out of the criminal complaint that is relevant to their story. This is a classic tactic for those that wish to weave a narrative using a news story. They take phrase and words from somewhere else that is out of context. This is how other outlets create a narrative. This publication adds in the word incel for little or no reason, then other outlets report on this story and it ends up in their stories too. This is how they spread this false narrative. Lies, deceptions, and talking points is how they are influencing people and it's working. People of all political ideologies are falling for it and it is messed up.
Last edited by a moderator:
