Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The Sex Cultist idol is the inverse sort of god to Zeus

boojies

boojies

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Posts
332
1.png


2.png


9cWWGfc.png


4.png


5.png


6.png


compete.png


serveimage



House voice votes to BAN shipments of CHILD sex dolls and robots

...

Some scientist are actually claiming that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia.

'To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior and they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior,' Goodlatte stated.


Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]



Blasphemy laws and mental illness in Pakistan

There is emerging evidence that individuals who are mentally ill are overrepresented in the group of defendants prosecuted under the blasphemy laws of Pakistan.
This article discusses the background of blasphemy legislation in Pakistan, and proposes causal interactions between underlying mental illness in the defendant and prosecution for blasphemy. It sketches possible legal safeguards for such blasphemy defendants with mental illness in mental health legislation.

...

The entire spectrum of psychopathology lends itself to various behavioural infringements that could fall foul of the blasphemy laws in place in Pakistan. Individuals with psychotic disorders, such as mania and schizophrenia, can present symptoms of grandiose and bizarre delusional systems of being of divine origin, behavioural disinhibition and lack of insight, which place them at risk of prosecution under these laws. Individuals with autism, with varying degrees of intellectual disability, are another diagnostic group also at risk of not being able to follow social rules of due reverence and regard for what the community holds sacrosanct. Neurotic disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder can also create overbearing and compelling pressures on individuals to blaspheme in some instances, and this can have serious legal consequences if the targets of the blasphemy are revered by the community.

The association of mental illness and blasphemy allegations can also be more complex. Sexual abuse of vulnerable individuals with intellectual disabilities has on occasion been masked by allegations of blasphemy by abusers when they fear discovery. The lack of any legal protections for such vulnerable blasphemy defendants ensures that their testimony is extracted when they fear for their lives, and the sex abuse issue is concealed behind the allegations of blasphemy. In other cases, physical abuse can be an interacting factor, where the blasphemy allegations are raised against an individual with autism for example, when various attempts to physically discipline the individual have failed, and have, instead, resulted in severe physical injuries, which could lead to criminal prosecution against the abusers, unless blasphemy is raised as the reason why the discipline was implemented in the first place.

The most commonly cited criticism of the blasphemy laws is that they are used by the majority community to victimise religious minorities. Nevertheless, it is often the case that the person who is alleged to have committed the blasphemy has underlying vulnerabilities that explain why that person in particular stands so charged, and not others within the same disadvantaged community. The basis of this vulnerability can often be some form of mental illness. It is a separate matter whether this illness could benefit from treatment, but what is clear is that such individuals require some form of legal and social protections by virtue of their mental illness.

So funny to imagine all of the traitors in our government imagining they are going to bring justice to me for not worshiping their respected pagan idol. Are you going to arrest me for my fucking engineered genome that you fabricated yourself successfully identifying the treason committers and simply losing because of how powerful they became by their treasonous subversion of our constitution?

I'm sorry that the CIA didn't think ahead to realizing that the cheaters would be the only people in charge by their fabrication of idols, and that I would be a criminal for disbelieving in this fucking abomination. I don't even believe in hell, yet rest assured that all who believe in the MKUltraic idols are going to burn in damnation for eternity by all Abrahamic religious scriptures.

The CIA condemned to hell all dead members of our supreme court who they had reference this pagan idol. They rendered our supreme court as treason committers and idolators.

ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm

The Origin of the Myths

In 1976 Robin Lloyd, correspondent for NBC, published For Money or Love: Boy Prostitution in America (Out of Print)(Out of Print).18 In the book, for which a U.S. senator had written an introduction, Lloyd claimed that a huge network of prostitution involving 300,000 boys existed. The notion that child pornography trade is big business was initiated in this book. Yet, nowhere in the book is there any empirical basis for the number 300,000. Indeed, Lloyd admitted that it was a working hypothesis which he had suggested to a number of experts to test their reactions.19 This didn't prevent Judianne Densen-Gerber, director of Odyssey House, a chain of residential treatment clinics for drug addicts, from taking over the figure as if it represented a reliable statistic. She set about to mobilize public opinion against child pornography to which, she said, Lloyd had alerted her.

The media followed the stories of child exploitation in detail. In the national periodicals during 1977 nine articles appeared.20 The New York Times, a paper known to avoid sensationalism, printed 27 articles that year compared to one in the two years before. When in May, 1977 the highly popular television series Sixty Minutes devoted a program to child pornography, a tidal wave of letters to politicians resulted.21 That spring a subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives held a series of hearings on the subject which lasted until autumn, keeping child pornography in the news in the U.S.A. A platform was established by crusaders against child pornography, and in the prevailing climate of moral panic their cries for stronger measures received wide political support.

The chairman of the committee was Representative John Conyers Jr., who had organized the hearings to pass judgment on the proposal of Representatives Kildee and Murphy for a first Federal law against child pornography. It was this series of hearings that would make the question of child pornography a national issue. The first hearing was dominated by the appearance of Judianne Densen-Gerber. Equipped. with some child pornography magazines, she shocked congressional representatives with her claim that she had, together with Robin Lloyd, counted 264 comparable publications that, according to her, appeared monthly (an exaggeration by a factor of several orders of magnitude as we shall see). The figures which Robin Lloyd had mentioned as a working hypothesis were repeated by Densen-Gerber as fact:

Lloyd's book documented the involvement of 300,000 boys, aged 8 to 16, in activities revolving around sex for sale.22

She then multiplied the number by two, because her intuition told her that 300,000 girls were also involved in such activities. She then multiplied it again by two since, according to Lloyd, the real figure was "twice what he (could) statistically validate,"23 and this lead to something like a million children. The chairman Conyers multiplied this again by two since, he reasoned, America had not only one million runaways but another one million school drop outs. In this way the contours of a national disaster were drawn. According to Conyers:

"So we have somewhere possibly in the neighbourhood of 2 million kids who form a ready market for sexual exploitation from pornographers and the like."24

Densen-Gerber could not agree more. The Kildee-Murphy proposal was made law without any opposition: 401 for, 0 against.

The Spread of Rumors

In 1986 the Senate Commission33 under the chairmanship of William V. Roth, Republican from Delaware, came to the same conclusion as the ILIC report. Nevertheless, neither the Roth report nor the ILIC report were able to dampen the spread of rumors about an enormous trade. Even in 1986, the claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber continued to come up as facts in official reports: the Meese Commission, initiated by the Reagan administration to prepare a drastic sharpening of the anti-pornography laws, uncritically took over these claims.34 According to the Meese Commission, Congress had discovered that child pornography and child prostitution "have become highly organized, multi-million dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."35 The monthly appearance of 264 magazines (Densen-Gerber) was again reported as truth, alongside the 30,000 exploited children of Los Angeles (Lloyd Martin).

The U.S. Supreme Court took over these claims in their first child pornography case, New York v Ferber (1982), saying that child pornography comprised, "highly organized multimillion dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."36 The otherwise dignified court was so upset by the alleged extent of the problem that the solicitor for the accused, Herald Price Fahringer, lost his composure and fled the sitting as fast as he could.37

The claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber also appeared outside the U.S.A. The report, Exploitation of Child Labour, which was submitted in 1981 to the Commission for Human Rights of the United Nations, claimed: "In the United States there are at least 264 pornographic magazines specializing in pornography concerning children."38 It was claimed that in 1977, 15,000 slides and 4,000 films of child pornography had been intercepted by the police, which was, according to the report, 5% of the total stock in circulation.

According to the United Nations report, the value of trade in child pornography in 1977 was estimated at $500 million. Such estimates are not based on any kind of empirical evidence, and are easy to refute. If these claims were true then the allegedly intercepted slides and films would have had a value of thousands of dollars each.39 In reality, these films were sold for much less, which can be checked with reference to the advertisement brochures of Deltaboek, publisher of homosexual pornography and literature. From here it is apparent that the Golden Boys film series, produced by COQ in Denmark, cost 85 guilders each, which is about $35.

In 1986, Defence for Children International prepared a report on child prostitution in which they claimed: "Estimates on the number of child prostitutes vary from 300,000 to several millions for the U.S. and Canada."40 A year later these figures were taken over by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.41 This report was later submitted to the Ministers of Justice of the member countries of the Council of Europe. Within the Council of Europe a report on child exploitation was written in which it was claimed that: "A study of boy prostitutes had suggested that there were 300,000 boy prostitutes in the United States, many of whom are designated runaways."42 The claims of the United Nations report were also repeated. As late as 1988 the Dutch language world development magazine, Onze Wereld (Our World), claimed that: "The American (sic) periodical43 Child Abuse and Neglect reported that in the United States at least 264 different child pornography magazines are in circulation. The kiddieporn stars are drawn from the numerous American runaway teenagers."44 The same article made similar exaggerated claims about alleged illicit trade in donor organs obtained from children killed for the purpose. The story about donor organs had also appeared in the report of the Council of Europe, although there was never any evidence and the story was not credible from the beginning.45

The alleged size of the child pornography trade and the many children said to have been involved, are little more than myths. They are the result of the arbitrary multiplication of arbitrary numbers of alleged victims made by a journalist. The claims had taken on a life of their own. The fact that these claims had by 1980 been rejected by thorough official investigations was insufficient to prevent the claim from reappearing, not only in the media but also in other official circles, including the United States Senate, the United States Supreme Court, a Commission of the American Justice Department, the United Nations and the Council of Europe. After the number had been cited in the Hearings of the House of Representatives, it became associated with an ostensibly reliable source. The fact that the original source was anything but reliable was forgotten.


McKune provides a single citation to support its statement “that the recidivism rate of untreated offenders has been estimated to be as high as 80%”: the U.S. Dept. of Justice, Nat. Institute of Corrections, A Practitioner’s Guide to Treating the Incarcerated Male Sex Offender xiii (1988). Justice Kennedy likely found that reference in the amicus brief supporting Kansas filed by the Solicitor General, then Ted Olson, as the SG’s brief also cites it for the claim that sex offenders have this astonishingly high recidivism rate. This Practitioner’s Guide11 itself provides but one source for the claim, an article published in 1986 in Psychology Today, a mass market magazine aimed at a lay audience. That article has this sentence: “Most untreated sex offenders released from prison go on to commit more offenses– indeed, as many as 80% do.” But the sentence is a bare assertion: the article contains no supporting reference for it. But perhaps the author was merely offering an estimate based on his training and expertise. The problem there is that he had little of either.

He is a counselor, not a scholar of sex crimes or re-offense rates, and the cited article is not about recidivism statistics. It’s about a counseling program for sex offenders he then ran in an Oregon prison. His unsupported assertion about the recidivism rate for untreated sex offenders was offered to contrast with his equally unsupported assertion about the lower recidivism rate for those who complete his program.


That phrase comes from Justice Anthony Kennedy's plurality opinion in the 2002 Supreme Court case McKune v. Lile, where he claimed "the rate of recidivism of untreated offenders has been estimated to be as high as 80%." Kennedy's characterization of the recidivism risk as "frightening and high" has been echoed in scores of decisions upholding restrictions on sex offenders. But the original source for his recidivism estimate was an uncorroborated assertion in a 1986 Psychology Today article by a therapist who has repudiated the number, saying he is "appalled" at its lingering impact.

_104844583_babystroking_gettyimages-1072420002.jpg


Let us not rape the real babies in actual reality to protect the sanctity of the idols of the CIA.
 
Last edited:
If that posts purpose was to make me feel stupid.

It WORKED!!!:feelsgah::feelsgah:
 
Adam sandler iq post
 
So funny to imagine all of the traitors in our government imagining they are going to bring justice to me for not worshiping their respected pagan idol.

Imagine all those faggots who worship females.
 
Servant is only a fucking doll and a piece of art you retarded idol worshipers.

serveimage


Stop allowing the mystery cult that believes in this doll lead to the rape of flesh and blood children in actual reality.


“merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image.” This is some mystical religious thinking. Like in Voodoo. And note, this was said by a respectable lawyer to appease a judge. And this logic is used over and over, for example by Australian Government web sites.


"... every time somebody looks at that image it's like the crime is taking place all over again…"


"we hear that in court that they feel like they are victimized every single time someone downloads their videos or looks at their videos they feel like they are being raped all over again,” said Canonico


The children might feel like being raped time and again when someone watches it.
 
JFL i will try OP to read this
 
Belief in the idols of Synanon is incompatible with being saved by any Abrahamic faith. Only those taking no graven images or idols will go to heaven. The believers in this idol will burn in hellfire for ever and ever. The CIA condemned those they exposed to this abomination, and they committed treason against the United States of America, as did each traitor in our congress who worshiped this fucking idol, as did each traitor on our supreme court who allowed the believers in the scriptures of this establishment of religion to enslave the disbelievers in their false reality. You are not the supreme court; the supreme court said you violated its law and so you now will burn in hell forever and ever for your idolatry, you traitors to the United States of America who committed the crime of treason in respect of the idol of a false establishment of religion.

I will enjoy heaven as one not believing in the scriptures of false establishments of religion, as one not worshiping the idols of your abominable establishment of religion, you fucking heathen traitors. God condemns you from the supreme court, you fucking idol worshiping treason committers.

I take no graven images upon me; I bow to no idol


worshiped by traitors to my constitution,


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]


When speech is eloquent and the ideas expressed lofty, it is easy to find restrictions on them invalid. But were the First Amendment limited to such discourse, our freedom would be sterile indeed. Mr. Osborne's pictures may be distasteful, but the Constitution guarantees both his right to possess them privately and his right to avoid punishment under an overbroad law. I respectfully dissent.


Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall once summed up the drug war by reminding his fellow justices that "there is no drug exception to the Constitution."


Thurgood Marshall is the only supreme court justice to get into heaven. Have fun burning you traitors.

At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?
And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,
And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become
as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.
And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven. (Matthew 18:1–10)

You believed in Servant and Servant disbelieved in God, and you supported him over the children believing in God, so suffer in hellfire you traitors to heaven and the constitution of the United States of America. Your prison is forever and ever. I am happy with your 100 year prison sentences for people as I am, for it is far less than forever and ever in a lake of fucking fire you idol worshiping treason committers.
 
Last edited:
Very scary thread :feelstrash: :feelstrash: :feelstrash::feelstrash::feelsbaton:
Is it about cheese piza ?
 
Too many words all over I can't concentrate tbh
 
How do you idol worshipers feel about yourselves now?


But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

serveimage


_104844583_babystroking_gettyimages-1072420002.jpg



House voice votes to BAN shipments of CHILD sex dolls and robots

...

Some scientist are actually claiming that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia.

'To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior and they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior,' Goodlatte stated.


Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

I serve the true God, not the idols of the traitors in the CIA.

In the name of Jesus Christ, banish this idol from my presence. I will respect not this baby deity. Fuck Servant. A doll doesn't believe in God, and God commanded you offend not against the child having capacity for belief in him. You explicitly disregarded the command of God, in order to spare a doll of traitorous idolators being desecrated, at the expense of the suffering of the children having belief in the Lord, while you condemned me for being a heathen with sickness while I did nothing whatsoever against a single one of you, while you committed treason and worshiped idols.
 
Last edited:
What does Zeus have to do with the second 2 examples under disintegration?
 
JFL if you think the average user hete has the reading comprehension to understand any of that.

Add a tldr.
 
The most concise statement I could possibly make to characterize the situation is that you're idol worshiping Nazis, treason committers, and rightfully going to burn in hellfire forever and ever.
 
The most concise statement I could possibly make to characterize the situation is that you're idol worshiping Nazis, treason committers, and rightfully going to burn in hellfire forever and ever.

Care to elab, but keep in within a few lines?
 
It's pretty straightforward really. You believe that a doll is a baby god, and that we ought rape actual children rather than tarnish its holy image, which is attributable solely to your extreme mental illness. Your lack of awareness of such is attributable directly to your deactivation of your TPN, and is literally a pathological condition called cognitive anosognosia.


There are self-administered, validated tools as well, such as the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS),11 which is based on a separation of the concepts of “cognitive insight” and “clinical insight.” Clinical insight is described as the awareness of mental illness requiring treatment, while cognitive insight encompasses the patient’s ability to evaluate, reappraise, and modify distorted beliefs or misperceptions. These interpretations are regulated at a “higher level” of cognition, also called metacognition, allowing clinicians to assess self-regulating and self-monitoring functions of thought processes. The BCIS assesses a patient’s objectivity about delusional thinking, previous errors, reattribution of false explanations, and ability to receive corrective information from others. It includes self-reflectiveness and self-certainty subscales in order to measure willingness and capacity to entertain alternate explanations and over-confidence in validity of beliefs.


"When there's a question of faith, from the analytic point of view, it may seem absurd," said Tony Jack, who led the research. "But, from what we understand about the brain, the leap of faith to belief in the supernatural amounts to pushing aside the critical/analytical way of thinking to help us achieve greater social and emotional insight."


Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence

...

Challenges to political beliefs produced increased activity in the default mode network—a set of interconnected structures associated with self-representation and disengagement from the external world.

Immediately and forcibly administer NMDAR PAMs -- or such things -- to anyone who has beheld this illegal idol, such that it forces their DMN to deactivate.


NMDA receptor modulators (glutamate modulators) are a new form of antipsychotic that are in Phase II FDA study. The first compound studied was glycine which was hypothesized by Daniel Javitt after observation that people with phencyclidine(PCP)-induced psychosis were lacking in glutamate transmission.[1] (PCP is an NMDA receptor antagonist that blocks glutamate) In giving glycine to people with PCP-induced psychosis a recovery rate was noted. From there, it was hypothesized that people with psychosis from schizophrenia would benefit from increased glutamate transmission and glycine was added with strong recovery rates noted especially in the area of negative and cognitive symptoms. Glycine, however, sporadic results aside (dose 60 g/day or 0.8 g/kg,[2][3] approximately the amount in 300 g of gelatin powder or two kilograms of sunflower seeds[4]) remains an adjunct antipsychotic and an unworkable compound. However, the Eli Lilly and Company study drug LY2140023 is being studied as a primary antipsychotic and is showing strong recovery rates, especially in the area of negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Tardive dyskinesia, diabetes and other standard complications have not been noted:

Treatment with LY2140023, like treatment with olanzapine, was safe and well-tolerated; treated patients showed statistically significant improvements in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo (P o 0.001 at week 4). Notably, patients treated with LY2140023 did not differ from placebo-treated patients with respect to prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal symptoms or weight gain. These data suggest that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists have antipsychotic properties and may provide a new alternative for the treatment of schizophrenia.[5]

Other NMDA receptor modulators are being studied and this modality of treatment may once approved as antipsychotic medications gradually replace the current (dopaminergic) antipsychotics.

They need to be kept out of their long term visual memories so that the idol stops exerting influence on them after they look away from it.


activity in the DMN is strongly associated with mental imagery that is not directly tied to current perception (“stimulus-independent thought”), which is also a central feature of dreams.
 
Last edited:
Also, I haven't actually any ability to truly condemn you to hell, in case you were concerned, being fully without any special supernatural gifts or authorities vested in me. And I imagine that exception would certainly be made for your idolatry given that you were mistaken in your beliefs regarding something instead of intentionally blasphemous. I'm sure that much as I will ultimately overlook your treasonous subversion of the constitution, that God may very well overlook your blasphemous idolatry as well, but I have no idea to be honest, and cannot truly condemn you to hell, nor grant Thurgood Marshall access to heaven.

I personally, in my severely limited expression of ability to actuate anything, am not particularly caring of technicalities so long as I am not under the authority of a baby idol or other such things. I like to imagine myself a reasonable person not overly concerned with traditions or technical exactingness and the like, and as seeing compromise as something that is oftentimes unavoidable and agreeable, and simply am not desiring to worship a baby doll or similar such things. I oftentimes certainly am too harsh on you all despite almost all of you unambiguously being treason committers, traitors, idolators, and generally with seemingly profound mental impairments both of intellect and association to existence, and ultimately am simply wanting to advance the world to a superior state, and see you primarily as being obstacles to my otherwise substantial ability to actuate such. Although you almost all deserve to be rounded up and thrown into fucking cages and the like, or with handcuffs slapped onto you, or with your doors kicked in such that you can be physically taken to mental health facilities toward forcibly injecting you with NMDAR modulators, realize that nobody actually is going to do such things on my behalf anyway, and I certainly am not going to do any such thing myself; rather, opting to futility call for such to actuate in the knowledge that it has extremely little probability of actually doing so.

Do you need some fucking NMDAR PAMs to deactivate your long term visual memory accessing networks sufficiently to free you from the intoxication of the child idol doll? Yes, yes, absolutely. Do I think me demanding that you immediately have such administered to you is going to result in anything? Of course not! Nobody other than I here even knows what the fuck an NMDAR PAM is in the first place, and in the second place even had anyone any of them on hand they would almost certainly not inject you with them regardless of your need for such, regardless of my demand that such actuates.

Insubordination requires an expectation of having any ability to affect anything whatsoever, but I in utmost honesty simply shout things at you in the full expectation that nothing will ever actuate in relation to the matter in any case, seeing as I in the utmost honesty believe you would need to be smarter than you are to do what I suggest you do in any case, for virtually all of you reading this.

Please realize that I am without the ability to actuate such things as your decimation, and simply like to communicate my stream of consciousness, including when it includes my desire for such to actuate. I'm without doubt that I would have nothing other than mercy upon you immediately upon gaining the ability to do anything to you, for it is, in most blatant truth, your delusional ass that is causing all problems between us, with me being among the most agreeable people you could ever possibly meet, and this simply not extending to such things as bowing before Servant the child doll idol, becoming a devout Synanite, or other such things traditionally considered too preposterous to even consider whether they were constitutional. Even as I, even as seemingly a programmed genetic bot of sorts, with the mission of actuating the desires of whoever manifested me in such a way, am certainly not entirely set on any particular thing being in any particular way, so long as it isn't ridiculous horse shit, but that is seemingly an insurmountable standard for virtually all of you in any case.

Point in case perhaps being me spending every single minute of every single day for the past six years pouring a dump truck of information onto you in the futile attempt to cause you to not have your children more commonly raped, only to advance to the point that I'm competing against a toy doll's desire to avoid being desecrated. This is just one of innumerable examples. Examples abound for a species with two of its most pressing matters being 1) the current state of the nuptial gift system, over which you have waged a bloody and highly destructive war of slave trafficking and terrorism, and the other being 2) your beliefs in relation to the child doll idol and that entire space in general, all of which is delusional and blatantly false, as well as scientifically refuted drivel of zero validity.

As someone having imagined myself born into the 20th century, and being currently in the 21st century, I was simply disappointed that instead of working on fun problems for the betterment of humanity, such as improving medicine, or working on addressing climate change, I need to instead work on addressing your inability to comprehend that a doll isn't a baby god, and to avoid being killed in the cross fire of your extraordinarily heated war regarding which nuptial gifts can be presented to females. It was a bitter disappointment for me to realize that two of your most pressing issues were ultimately your belief in a baby doll god, and a bloody war -- ultimately for pussy -- actuating through the legal system in relation to drugs.
 
Last edited:
don't administer NMDAR PAMs, administer ketamine immediately. NMDAR PAMs just make it worse because they are associating them to their idols. I suggested techniques that make it worse because they use the opposite type of a God. I order you to immediately administer NMDAR antagonists, to the fullest extent of my ability to order such. Idolators are taking control of the USA, protect with NMDAR antagonist administration immediately to all governmental officials.
serveimage


_104844583_babystroking_gettyimages-1072420002.jpg


1.png


2.png


9cWWGfc.png


4.png


5.png


6.png


compete.png



Finally, we have demonstrated that attention to engaging social stimuli not only activates the DMN but also deactivates the TPN. In a subsequent study[30] it was shown that this pattern of DMN activation and TPN deactivation was present for humanizing depictions of individuals, whereas dehumanizing depictions, which are associated with decreased moral concern, either involved decreased activity in the DMN or increased activity in the TPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that we are neurologically constrained from simultaneously exercising moral concern and analytic thinking.


We suggest that this structural feature of the brain underlies the long noted anecdotal tension between materialistic and spiritual worldviews. This linkage is supported by three observations. First, brain areas implicated in analytic thinking (TPN) support cognitive process essential for maintaining a naturalistic world view (e.g. thinking about objects, mechanisms and causes; [29, 49, 71, 73–77]), whereas the brain areas implicated in moral concern (DMN) are associated with thinking about phenomena which have traditionally been thought of as non-physical, namely minds and emotions [78–83]. Second, brain areas associated with materialism (TPN) tend to be suppressed when brain areas associated with moral concern (DMN) are activated [29, 71, 72]. This might explain the tendency to link mind with spirit, i.e. the view that minds and emotions are associated with the extra- or super- natural. Third, brain areas associated with analytic thinking are associated with religious disbelief [73, 74, 84], and brain areas associated with moral concern are associated with religious belief [73] and prayer [84, 85].

Dissociate them from the unconstitutional religious idol immediately with NMDAR antagonists such as ketamine, nitrous oxide, PCP, and trust high ranking by scientometric medical officials, and tell them to close their eyes.
 
Last edited:
read my posts on the other forum you need to pick between NMDAR antagonists and NMDAR PAMs depending on if Servant is an image or an icon/idol to them, as you can use the visual memory technique to determine. Stop fucking looking at it servant is coming to me right now in my vision because of how much I looked at it even with NVLD. I never desire to see that false God again and demand all measures be taken to prevent me from looking upon the false God.

Servant is upset at my disregard for him; yet I disbelieve in him and care not of the false god and his upset at me as he is a psychosis inducing warfare agent. I desire not to see this warfare agent ever in my life again, and demand this be implemented for me, even as those who desire to worship this God may look upon him freely.

My family will pay the capitalist economy handsomely that proves to us it prevents this image or icon from ever being displayed to us. We consider the display of this false psychosis inducing agent to us an assault, and request law enforcement and military intervention in the prevention of this ever again manifesting, without exception.

desecrate this idol, detain the treason committers in our government who disallow the desecration of this abomination.

I demand governmental compensation sufficient to pay for said system be implemented, and further to benefit me for the crime committed against me, for the egregious crime that was committed against me, and the immediate detainment of all treason committers who bow to this idol.

Arrest and imprison the members of the supreme court who commit treason against our constitution in the name of this Idol child. The disbelievers in this Idol can then implement the needed policies to ensure the continuation of constitutional law.
However ensure not to harm a single real child in the desecration of this idol, for what is happening may be an evolved false signaling strategy to induce the deaths of competitor infants in infanticide by an acute psychosis in me; ensure reality yourselves, as I am losing my association to it. Make sure to only desecrate images.

Thomas Szasz’ constructive theory of mental illnesses – that they are (often deceptive) social strategies – can be reframed as a testable scientific hypothesis using concepts from evolutionary biology. Most data on non-bizarre delusions support the hypothesis that delusions evolved to mitigate the dangerous consequences of social failure by serving to unconsciously deceive others into providing social benefits that otherwise would not be forthcoming. In ancestral environments, a delusional individual convinced others that he or she possessed valuable information or social contacts, faced dangerous external threats, or was ill, and was thus eligible to receive valuable benefits.

Only desecrate images, don't desecrate idols, and prevent this image and idol being displayed to me capitalist economy.


I fully believe the previous thing to be an idolatrous doll and holy image; however, I may be expressing a highly evolved infanticide technique to cause you to kill guarder children. Can the medical establishment still with consensus determine dolls from living creatures?

poaching.jpg

I believe that to be actually a female child, but note the way she looks as compared to the satellite child; it is somewhat the way of the look difference between what to me seems to be an idolatrous image and icon and the example of the real human baby as I put it forth.


Infanticide in non-human primates occurs when an individual kills its own or another individual's dependent young. Five hypotheses have been proposed to explain infanticide in non-human primates: exploitation, resource competition, parental manipulation, sexual selection, and social pathology.[1]
 
Last edited:
my temporary delirium was induced by FBI agents illegally administering scopalamine to me. They raped me. Professional sexologists believe Dr. Densen-Gerber engineered an attempted infantocide. The CIA claims she was a double agent -- I don't know how Tupac knew about the doll so long ago in that case.
 
this thread is too high iq for me
 
my temporary delirium was induced by FBI agents illegally administering scopalamine to me. They raped me. Professional sexologists believe Dr. Densen-Gerber engineered an attempted infantocide. The CIA claims she was a double agent -- I don't know how Tupac knew about the doll so long ago in that case.

Damn.
 
100% schizophrenic
Good luck in life OP
 
Out of control schizoposting
Aside from that, fuck moralityfags who demonize normal human behavior like drug use and masturbation to achieve power over others. Even if they ban something, they just switch to wanting to ban more stuff.
 
The most concise statement I could possibly make to characterize the situation is that you're idol worshiping Nazis, treason committers, and rightfully going to burn in hellfire forever and ever.
Nazis were based tho. Christfaggotry has rotted your brain.
 

Similar threads

SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
7
Views
270
Ventingblackpiller
Ventingblackpiller
SnakeCel
Replies
2
Views
156
SupremeGentleCel
S
nice_try
Replies
35
Views
597
highiqpostmaxxer
highiqpostmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top