There's zero reason for anyone to hire an ugly male

[mylifeistrash]

There's an endless supply of average and above guys who will work hard for shit wages.

In the west, hire an ethnic guy to appeal to the government and gets lucrative contracts. If you hire a white guy, he better be very high IQ to worth it.

But an ugly guy? Zero benefit. Ugly woman? Tons of benefit, but male? Eat shit and die, you don't even get to become a tax paying slave. You will die on the fucking streets.

But bro, ugly guys could have a great qualifications, blah blah...
Even if that shit was true, he'll make all the women and "bros" at work feel uncomfortable.

 

[mentalcel666]

There's an endless supply of average and above guys who will work hard for shit wages.

In the west, hire an ethnic guy to appeal to the government and gets lucrative contracts. If you hire a white guy, he better be very high IQ to worth it.

But an ugly guy? Zero benefit. Ugly woman? Tons of benefit, but male? Eat shit and die, you don't even get to become a tax paying slave. You will die on the fucking streets.

But bro, ugly guys could have a great qualifications, blah blah...
Even if that shit was true, he'll make all the women and "bros" at work feel uncomfortable.

capitalists dont give a shit about the feelings you cause other people, you are just human capital,

if you can make some already rich fucker more money you are going to get hired.

edit: i guess actual people are hiring so the negative bias towards ugly people could have an affect if its an cushy office job or something.

but every big company like amazon or burger king doesnt give a shit about the appearance, only if you can make them money

 

[Deleted member 18214]

According so some people here its "There's zero reason for anyone to hire a male with bad social skills"

With women having affirmative action BS it gives company's less money to pool around hence they can't afford to hire ugly men and would rather hire better looking men because of the halo effect. Such greed.

 

[NEETard]

Ugly men can be abused because we are used to it

 

[Irredeemable]

There's an endless supply of average and above guys who will work hard for shit wages.

In the west, hire an ethnic guy to appeal to the government and gets lucrative contracts. If you hire a white guy, he better be very high IQ to worth it.

But an ugly guy? Zero benefit. Ugly woman? Tons of benefit, but male? Eat shit and die, you don't even get to become a tax paying slave. You will die on the fucking streets.

But bro, ugly guys could have a great qualifications, blah blah...
Even if that shit was true, he'll make all the women and "bros" at work feel uncomfortable.

If you're an employer, ugly employees are unlikely to mog you.

 

[mylifeistrash]

According so some people here its "There's zero reason for anyone to hire a male with bad social skills"

With women having affirmative action BS it gives company's less money to pool around hence they can't afford to hire ugly men and would rather hire better looking men because of the halo effect. Such greed.

I was just ignoring the super obvious fact that women control hiring in any large org.

So ugly men are stuck with the garbage tier of companies.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

I was just ignoring the super obvious fact that women control hiring in any large org.

So ugly men are stuck with the garbage tier of companies.

If women didn't have rights hence couldn't get such bs jobs men would have the full economic power of the west on their shoulders instead. The wealth generation would be unimaginable. Getting a job would be waaaay easier than in this degenerate metropolis. Its a shame really.

 

[mylifeistrash]

If women didn't have rights hence couldn't get such bs jobs men would have the full economic power of the west on their shoulders instead. The wealth generation would be unimaginable. Getting a job would be waaaay easier than in this degenerate metropolis. Its a shame really.

instead we have some fake version of capitalism where the governments pump money into the stock market to keep prices high
and actual profit isn't required

If there is profit, it's from the gov giving them money

yay we all work for the gov\

 

[Deleted member 24081]

Another brutal reality thread by @mylifeistrash based

 

[Deleted member 18214]

instead we have some fake version of capitalism where the governments pump money into the stock market to keep prices high
and actual profit isn't required

If there is profit, it's from the gov giving them money

yay we all work for the gov\

Yet people will call this "capitalism" jfl

 

[PPEcel]

capitalists dont give a shit about the feelings you cause other people, you are just human capital,

if you can make some already rich fucker more money you are going to get hired.

edit: i guess actual people are hiring so the negative bias towards ugly people could have an affect if its an cushy office job or something.

but every big company like amazon or burger king doesnt give a shit about the appearance, only if you can make them money

You're right. Large, bureaucratic organizations have their downsides.

The CEO might be a purely numbers person but that doesn't mean the HR foid is free of implicit biases.

If women didn't have rights hence couldn't get such bs jobs men would have the full economic power of the west on their shoulders instead. The wealth generation would be unimaginable. Getting a job would be waaaay easier than in this degenerate metropolis. Its a shame really.

That doesn't sound right. Reducing the labor force doesn't increase GDP.

 

[Deleted member 23656]

There's an endless supply of average and above guys who will work hard for shit wages.

In the west, hire an ethnic guy to appeal to the government and gets lucrative contracts. If you hire a white guy, he better be very high IQ to worth it.

But an ugly guy? Zero benefit. Ugly woman? Tons of benefit, but male? Eat shit and die, you don't even get to become a tax paying slave. You will die on the fucking streets.

But bro, ugly guys could have a great qualifications, blah blah...
Even if that shit was true, he'll make all the women and "bros" at work feel uncomfortable.

Just remember. Everytime the government/corporations make a change, ask how does this affect bargaining power of workers?

 

[mylifeistrash]

Just remember. Everytime the government/corporations make a change, ask how does this affect bargaining power of workers?

every change is to increase labor pool and reduce power / rights of workers

 

[Deleted member 24125]

reading shit like this just makes me want to rope

 

[Norton]

Definitely ugly guys have it much harder on the job market.
Just another reason why state funded surgery is needed for people with "defects", that make them much less society-able compared with normies.

For example jumbled yellow teeth.
It's usually not the person's fault, some people just innately have a more yellowish base tooth color and some people just innately have more disorderly teeth than others.
Granted SOME people can make up for their teeth with other attributes, but I'm talking about people who don't have this luxury.

At the end of the day, others will still judge those people as more "dirty", and less goal-driven, less successful, and less employable,
than people who have "normal" teeth (somewhat straight, somewhat white. Not necessarily even perfect).
It does not matter, that a person with "ugly" teeth can have perfect hygiene (better than someone with prettier teeth than them) and completely healthy teeth, people will STILL judge them negatively for the appearance of them, especially when people are comparing them to other people.

And the people who have those disadvantages, are they supposed to work for a long time to save up multiple thousands of dollars,
JUST so they can have normal teeth like everyone else?
JUST so they won't be discriminated against anymore?

In my opinion, this is cruel and unfair.

And at the end of the day, it's morally questionable and a bad tradeoff for society to keep ugly people as they are.
Society could invest the money for corrective surgery upfront, or alternatively they can decide that people can stay ugly and rather pay for the mental health cost and potential unemployment...

"Yeah, just let him be ugly... he can work out with his therapist that he feels socially judged and discriminated against on the job market. No need to make him normal"
In my opinion, that is immoral.

It would be nice to have everyone be Chads and Stacies, but at the end of the day, the ones who actually get discriminated against for their looks need it more urgently than people who just don't stand out very much.
For people who do not fit the stigma, it's more of an elective cosmetic procudure, but for those who actually face discrimination, it just makes them able to take part in society as a normal person.

 

[Deleted member 24272]

There's an endless supply of average and above guys who will work hard for shit wages.

A Chad wıll not enter a shitty job since he never thinks about un-certainty of future and doesnt hold the anxiety of the past,he wıll get promated in 6 months even ıf he gets one.
For Normies ı must say that they wıll take shit wages sınce they have great social skills and are generally cool with sub 7 man.

 

[Deleted member 23682]

For Normies ı must say that they wıll take shit wages sınce they have great social skills and are generally cool with sub 7 man.

Not with sub4 men though

 

[Deleted member 23712]

capitalists dont give a shit about the feelings you cause other people, you are just human capital,

if you can make some already rich fucker more money you are going to get hired.

edit: i guess actual people are hiring so the negative bias towards ugly people could have an affect if its an cushy office job or something.

but every big company like amazon or burger king doesnt give a shit about the appearance, only if you can make them money

Death to capitalism inshallah

 

[The Incel Decade]

Most males CEO's are over 6 foot. It's an ingrained bias that helps them get ahead.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Ugly men are hated so fucking much

 

[FlamingCel]

reading shit like this just makes me want to rope

 

[Deleted member 18435]

Definitely ugly guys have it much harder on the job market.
Just another reason why state funded surgery is needed for people with "defects", that make them much less society-able compared with normies.

For example jumbled yellow teeth.
It's usually not the person's fault, some people just innately have a more yellowish base tooth color and some people just innately have more disorderly teeth than others.
Granted SOME people can make up for their teeth with other attributes, but I'm talking about people who don't have this luxury.

At the end of the day, others will still judge those people as more "dirty", and less goal-driven, less successful, and less employable,
than people who have "normal" teeth (somewhat straight, somewhat white. Not necessarily even perfect).
It does not matter, that a person with "ugly" teeth can have perfect hygiene (better than someone with prettier teeth than them) and completely healthy teeth, people will STILL judge them negatively for the appearance of them, especially when people are comparing them to other people.

And the people who have those disadvantages, are they supposed to work for a long time to save up multiple thousands of dollars,
JUST so they can have normal teeth like everyone else?
JUST so they won't be discriminated against anymore?

In my opinion, this is cruel and unfair.

And at the end of the day, it's morally questionable and a bad tradeoff for society to keep ugly people as they are.
Society could invest the money for corrective surgery upfront, or alternatively they can decide that people can stay ugly and rather pay for the mental health cost and potential unemployment...

"Yeah, just let him be ugly... he can work out with his therapist that he feels socially judged and discriminated against on the job market. No need to make him normal"
In my opinion, that is immoral.

It would be nice to have everyone be Chads and Stacies, but at the end of the day, the ones who actually get discriminated against for their looks need it more urgently than people who just don't stand out very much.
For people who do not fit the stigma, it's more of an elective cosmetic procudure, but for those who actually face discrimination, it just makes them able to take part in society as a normal person.

 

[Emba]

I don't like being ugly

 

[Ellsworth]

They can pay us less