If you are ugly or unattractive to most people then there is a set limit to how much your contributions to any social group will be appreciated, regardless of if it's in a professional or social context, people will only be able to value you to a certain extent, and that amount is pretty fucking low. Before I tell you why, let's quickly define value and contribution so that we all are on the same page.
Value: the regard that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or usefulness of something.
Contribution: the part played by a person or thing in bringing about a result or helping something to advance.
If you would like to understand how much value someone or something has, then the easiest method is to look at the goals of yourself or the collective (group) and how the object (person, thing, etc) contributes towards that goal being accomplished.
Here are some examples:
In many social circles 'jesters' or funny people are valued not because of themselves but because their jokes help the collective achieve their goal of 'having fun.'
*However it is not the jester himself who is valued, it's their jokes since 'being funny' is something that most people can achieve.
In a professional setting someone may be valued for their work since it contributes to the goals of the company.
Once this contribution stops being made to the group however the group turns on the object and rejects it. 'There's no point in having someone do something if it's already done, and better by someone else,' hence why many jobs like working on a conveyer belt have lost value because of the advances of machine who can perform the same purpose more efficiently.
Even foid's fall into this. Everyone want's sex and so that's the value and contribution that foids bring, but since it's not something you learn and something you're simply born able to do.
Now that you understand this what are we? Humans, there for we can all be classified as one group, one type of existence. Sure, different people pursue different goals but all in all we hold one purpose constant no matter what our background is or social/economic status: reproduction.
✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎
That is the ultimate goal of any species, to reproduce and improve the species as a whole. as such people who have superior genetics are instantly valued more, because they are the best at helping the species as a whole achieve it's one purpose.
"But what if someone is unwilling to help, do they lose this value since they don't contribute? Like foids who don't have kids."
Well, yes and no. technically yes but at the same time no because the fact that they still possess the ability to contribute and so they are valued. This is why children are valued so much, because their perceived potential to aide the species in the ultimate goal is there.
Like I mentioned before if you can not help the group achieve it's purpose it will reject you, it will turn on you. That's why incels are hated, even if they do not believe in the black pill.'extreme ideologies' and being a virgin is looked down upon, because it shows that you will not be useful to the group. To humanities ultimate goal, and therefore to the world, you're useless.
@Gymcelled
Value: the regard that something is held to deserve; the importance, worth, or usefulness of something.
Contribution: the part played by a person or thing in bringing about a result or helping something to advance.
If you would like to understand how much value someone or something has, then the easiest method is to look at the goals of yourself or the collective (group) and how the object (person, thing, etc) contributes towards that goal being accomplished.
Here are some examples:
In many social circles 'jesters' or funny people are valued not because of themselves but because their jokes help the collective achieve their goal of 'having fun.'
*However it is not the jester himself who is valued, it's their jokes since 'being funny' is something that most people can achieve.
In a professional setting someone may be valued for their work since it contributes to the goals of the company.
Once this contribution stops being made to the group however the group turns on the object and rejects it. 'There's no point in having someone do something if it's already done, and better by someone else,' hence why many jobs like working on a conveyer belt have lost value because of the advances of machine who can perform the same purpose more efficiently.
Even foid's fall into this. Everyone want's sex and so that's the value and contribution that foids bring, but since it's not something you learn and something you're simply born able to do.
Now that you understand this what are we? Humans, there for we can all be classified as one group, one type of existence. Sure, different people pursue different goals but all in all we hold one purpose constant no matter what our background is or social/economic status: reproduction.
✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎ ✡︎salty✡︎
That is the ultimate goal of any species, to reproduce and improve the species as a whole. as such people who have superior genetics are instantly valued more, because they are the best at helping the species as a whole achieve it's one purpose.
"But what if someone is unwilling to help, do they lose this value since they don't contribute? Like foids who don't have kids."
Well, yes and no. technically yes but at the same time no because the fact that they still possess the ability to contribute and so they are valued. This is why children are valued so much, because their perceived potential to aide the species in the ultimate goal is there.
Like I mentioned before if you can not help the group achieve it's purpose it will reject you, it will turn on you. That's why incels are hated, even if they do not believe in the black pill.'extreme ideologies' and being a virgin is looked down upon, because it shows that you will not be useful to the group. To humanities ultimate goal, and therefore to the world, you're useless.
@Gymcelled
