Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Trying to flex on people for being losers is actually pretty gay

jerrycan dan

jerrycan dan

autistic retard
-
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Posts
8,952
Normalfaggots, even if they understand this, will never willingly stomach this or change their behaviour because putdowns, one-upping, status maintanence and clamoring for the most "alpha" position when foids are around is the lifeblood of their social interaction, but when you think about it trying to flex on people for them being piece of shit retard losers worse off than you is actually pretty pointless. It's always flung at people with the assumption that a person sucking is their fault attached to it, even though the vast majority of people who are pathetic losers are like that because of a mix of their genetics and their upbringing by people they didn't choose in an environment there was no difficulty selection stream for.

The guy who's poor? He's an idiot too stupid to learn a semi-coveted skill required for the maintanence of the system, with low conscientiousness and no connections (be it in the form of palm greasing skills or silver spoons in his mouth). All of these are almost certainly the result of things outside of his control and largely the result of genes governing his behaviour and cognition. The guy who has no girlfriend? He is a fucking ugly manlet framelet rat-faced incel who gets looked at women like a cockroach regardless of whether he works on himself by showering and gymcelling or not, his only hope for ascending is if he pays for it. Is it supposed to be his fault his parents were short and ugly, and he was probably bottlefed too much, maybe even had shitty nutrition as a child if he lived in a third world country and became a 5'3 turbomanlet?

The guy who's fat and kinda slow, and who got made fun of and ostracised by everyone in high school because he was annoying and didn't seem to "get it"? He's not me (although I had a similar level of social status, to be fair), but this is a real guy I used to know who makes me think of all this. I'm certain that, even though he makes a decent amount of money as a mechanic now, he still gets constant "ribbing" from people who will never truly take him seriously and will never ascend in social or economic status beyond a certain point. And guess what? His single mother is even fatter and stupider than him, go figure.

To make things worse, bad genes of all kinds and even shitty environments tend to come in packages, vice versa with good genes and environments.

When 115IQ trust fund lawyer Chad or somebody who's 60% of the way to being trust fund Chad because he's some "self made" Chadlite tries to pettily flex on some bald ugly incel janitor who lives in a hovel with his nice car and his girlfriend, what is he really proving? Especially when he does this over the fucking internet which I see CONSTANTLY (you'd think anonymity would make people less inclined to do this if there wasn't some innate urge to do it). The assumption that failures in life are at fault for the vast majority of their failure and that they could have avoided it by simply trying harder is demonstrably incorrect - the only thing smug assholes prove when they neg people worse off than them is that they are of higher genetic quality and were handed more resources which they now have at their disposal, largely as a result of innate characteristics.

This is like when Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies. He didn't think that Germans were morally superior to them because they were decent human beings and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, but because by virtue of their genetics the Germans weren't disgusting brown nigger monkeys incapable of creating anything noteworthy whatsoever. The herrenrasse is of better stock than subhumans, and the civilisation it produces is the result of the quality of its stock - both bragging normalfaggots and National Socialist racial logic share the same sentiment. The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.

Because rich handsome Chad has a hot gf and a Ferrari, does that make him a "better person"? In terms of his "quality" as a human being and his ability to improve the stock of the next generation, yes, but when you describe negging other men over things they have little control over as it actually is, it becomes clear that it should actually be morally repugnant according to normalfag slave morality programming. According to the moral code which these clowns claim to uphold, everyone who does this should be considered a giant asshole on the level of those who bully special ed kids and burn victims for their shortcomings (you should have just jumped out of the way of the fire faster bro!).

And yet despite this normalfags have an insatiable hunger for spouting narcissistic, status-maintaining putdowns that they need to feed in any social space they enter, even autistic shithole lookism discord servers like biv's one (if you're a cuckcord user you probably know what I mean) where narcissistic Chadlites flex on genetic failures with things they put almost no effort into achieving. This is another thing that made me think about this topic, not because I was dunked on myself but because others were constantly, I just got bored and the narc jannies banned me for posting scat porn and dog sex vids.

Obviously it's human nature, but the moralising we do to justify it is so fucking retarded. I can already sense that if this gets put on Inceltears (which it might be but I doubt they'll touch it right away if at all) or some other just worldist lysenkoist platform people will instantly go "nooooooooo you can't say that you're just minimising your own failures and the failures of others that come about as a lack of effort and pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps".

Most people never reach their full genetic potential, that can be conceded, but how could they? Maybe if I personally had the motivation I could be ripped and bump myself up half a looks point, read a bunch of books and become a sort of low-tier polymath with some inevitable usefulness, then still not be respected and be a complete loser because I am an aspie manlet, but that would require me being on fucking speed all the time and I'd die at 40 of heart failure. Even if I maxxed out my potential I still could never be Bill Gates or some shit without a ton of luck and factors outside of my control working in my favour. I just want to fucking lie down and rot for a reason. What was put into me, what was done to me and what happened to me that I had no control over, even beyond my genetics, is who I am now.

If I go and put myself out there my success in a society (because we live in one of those with lots of people who dictate whether an individual is high status or not, otherwise you are a hermit like Kaczynski whose main status to be looked at is the status of your physical health, whether you've broken your leg and are starving or whether you're in good shape and eating well) is decided by people whose actions, environment and innate characteristics I also have no control over. I am sure I just rot in my room because I am lazy and it's my fault, sure, I should go outside and "make the most" of my life now that I am a young adult and so much is now set in stone already, dumb shit bluepillers. I'd tell you to kill yourselves, but only a select few people have the special kind of bravery required to do that pretty much entirely as a result of things out of their conscious control.


Away from the tangent to finish with some venting that might resonate with some of you - watching this gay negging happen to other subhumans who try to put themselves out there in any setting and just get shat on so someone else can use them as a social footstool leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I don't enjoy it, I don't feel the urge to dominate those lower than me really. Especially when people (Knajjd is a good example lol) who already have a chip on their shoulder and something to prove do it, I just think it's gay. I think it's my Asperger's but I don't really care if I am "above" someone, people's attributes will speak for themselves and they don't need to be flossed on in a puerile manner beyond that (in an ideal situation). If I was a 150IQ Chad slayer or an almost friendless, completely gfless, quasi-NEET loser like I am now it wouldn't affect how other people should be treated by me, unless of course I wanted to signal my higher value to those around me by shitting on them like normalfags do constantly when they engage in this behaviour. I think people like soys who are of the same stock as us should be bullied for their insufferable behaviour until they become slightly more self-aware like us, but beyond that it's just kind of tiring and I find it hard to like or respect anyone who does it.
 
Yeah I never understood it either. Could be an autistic thing, where I talk to high status people in the same way I talk to low status people. Or could it be Im just a decent human being?

Normies seem to hate it if you dont adjust your mannerisms to fit the pecking-order, its like, they want to stop you, and say hey, wtf are you doing, youre low status, you cant talk to me like that, you have to be my bitch, why arent you being my bitch right now?

I talk to the homeless mentally ill 4'8 indian incel the same way I talk to the rich 6'4 nordic chad, I dont feel the need to make myself a bitch to the 6'4 nordic chad, nor do I feel the need to make myself an alpha to the homeless 4'8 incel. But everyone around you will call you out for not changing how you talk to someone.

This autistic trait literally makes me "a decent fucking human being" by default because I dont change how im talking to someone based on who it is, but i will tell you this now, it gets me into a lot of trouble out in the world, people dont like it when you don't talk to them in a way they believe you should based on their status vs your status.
 
Last edited:
Normalfaggots, even if they understand this, will never willingly stomach this or change their behaviour because putdowns, one-upping, status maintanence and clamoring for the most "alpha" position when foids are around is the lifeblood of their social interaction, but when you think about it trying to flex on people for them being piece of shit retard losers worse off than you is actually pretty pointless. It's always flung at people with the assumption that a person sucking is their fault attached to it, even though the vast majority of people who are pathetic losers are like that because of a mix of their genetics and their upbringing by people they didn't choose in an environment there was no difficulty selection stream for.

The guy who's poor? He's an idiot too stupid to learn a semi-coveted skill required for the maintanence of the system, with low conscientiousness and no connections (be it in the form of palm greasing skills or silver spoons in his mouth). All of these are almost certainly the result of things outside of his control and largely the result of genes governing his behaviour and cognition. The guy who has no girlfriend? He is a fucking ugly manlet framelet rat-faced incel who gets looked at women like a cockroach regardless of whether he works on himself by showering and gymcelling or not, his only hope for ascending is if he pays for it. Is it supposed to be his fault his parents were short and ugly, and he was probably bottlefed too much, maybe even had shitty nutrition as a child if he lived in a third world country and became a 5'3 turbomanlet?

The guy who's fat and kinda slow, and who got made fun of and ostracised by everyone in high school because he was annoying and didn't seem to "get it"? He's not me (although I had a similar level of social status, to be fair), but this is a real guy I used to know who makes me think of all this. I'm certain that, even though he makes a decent amount of money as a mechanic now, he still gets constant "ribbing" from people who will never truly take him seriously and will never ascend in social or economic status beyond a certain point. And guess what? His single mother is even fatter and stupider than him, go figure.

To make things worse, bad genes of all kinds and even shitty environments tend to come in packages, vice versa with good genes and environments.

When 115IQ trust fund lawyer Chad or somebody who's 60% of the way to being trust fund Chad because he's some "self made" Chadlite tries to pettily flex on some bald ugly incel janitor who lives in a hovel with his nice car and his girlfriend, what is he really proving? Especially when he does this over the fucking internet which I see CONSTANTLY (you'd think anonymity would make people less inclined to do this if there wasn't some innate urge to do it). The assumption that failures in life are at fault for the vast majority of their failure and that they could have avoided it by simply trying harder is demonstrably incorrect - the only thing smug assholes prove when they neg people worse off than them is that they are of higher genetic quality and were handed more resources which they now have at their disposal, largely as a result of innate characteristics.

This is like when Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies. He didn't think that Germans were morally superior to them because they were decent human beings and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, but because by virtue of their genetics the Germans weren't disgusting brown nigger monkeys incapable of creating anything noteworthy whatsoever. The herrenrasse is of better stock than subhumans, and the civilisation it produces is the result of the quality of its stock - both bragging normalfaggots and National Socialist racial logic share the same sentiment. The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.

Because rich handsome Chad has a hot gf and a Ferrari, does that make him a "better person"? In terms of his "quality" as a human being and his ability to improve the stock of the next generation, yes, but when you describe negging other men over things they have little control over as it actually is, it becomes clear that it should actually be morally repugnant according to normalfag slave morality programming. According to the moral code which these clowns claim to uphold, everyone who does this should be considered a giant asshole on the level of those who bully special ed kids and burn victims for their shortcomings (you should have just jumped out of the way of the fire faster bro!).

And yet despite this normalfags have an insatiable hunger for spouting narcissistic, status-maintaining putdowns that they need to feed in any social space they enter, even autistic shithole lookism discord servers like biv's one (if you're a cuckcord user you probably know what I mean) where narcissistic Chadlites flex on genetic failures with things they put almost no effort into achieving. This is another thing that made me think about this topic, not because I was dunked on myself but because others were constantly, I just got bored and the narc jannies banned me for posting scat porn and dog sex vids.

Obviously it's human nature, but the moralising we do to justify it is so fucking retarded. I can already sense that if this gets put on Inceltears (which it might be but I doubt they'll touch it right away if at all) or some other just worldist lysenkoist platform people will instantly go "nooooooooo you can't say that you're just minimising your own failures and the failures of others that come about as a lack of effort and pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps".

Most people never reach their full genetic potential, that can be conceded, but how could they? Maybe if I personally had the motivation I could be ripped and bump myself up half a looks point, read a bunch of books and become a sort of low-tier polymath with some inevitable usefulness, then still not be respected and be a complete loser because I am an aspie manlet, but that would require me being on fucking speed all the time and I'd die at 40 of heart failure. Even if I maxxed out my potential I still could never be Bill Gates or some shit without a ton of luck and factors outside of my control working in my favour. I just want to fucking lie down and rot for a reason. What was put into me, what was done to me and what happened to me that I had no control over, even beyond my genetics, is who I am now.

If I go and put myself out there my success in a society (because we live in one of those with lots of people who dictate whether an individual is high status or not, otherwise you are a hermit like Kaczynski whose main status to be looked at is the status of your physical health, whether you've broken your leg and are starving or whether you're in good shape and eating well) is decided by people whose actions, environment and innate characteristics I also have no control over. I am sure I just rot in my room because I am lazy and it's my fault, sure, I should go outside and "make the most" of my life now that I am a young adult and so much is now set in stone already, dumb shit bluepillers. I'd tell you to kill yourselves, but only a select few people have the special kind of bravery required to do that pretty much entirely as a result of things out of their conscious control.


Away from the tangent to finish with some venting that might resonate with some of you - watching this gay negging happen to other subhumans who try to put themselves out there in any setting and just get shat on so someone else can use them as a social footstool leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I don't enjoy it, I don't feel the urge to dominate those lower than me really. Especially when people (Knajjd is a good example lol) who already have a chip on their shoulder and something to prove do it, I just think it's gay. I think it's my Asperger's but I don't really care if I am "above" someone, people's attributes will speak for themselves and they don't need to be flossed on in a puerile manner beyond that (in an ideal situation). If I was a 150IQ Chad slayer or an almost friendless, completely gfless, quasi-NEET loser like I am now it wouldn't affect how other people should be treated by me, unless of course I wanted to signal my higher value to those around me by shitting on them like normalfags do constantly when they engage in this behaviour. I think people like soys who are of the same stock as us should be bullied for their insufferable behaviour until they become slightly more self-aware like us, but beyond that it's just kind of tiring and I find it hard to like or respect anyone who does it.
Are you socialist/communist?
 
Yeah I never understood it either. Could be an autistic thing, where I talk to high status people in the same way I talk to low status people. Or could it be Im just a decent human being?

Normies seem to hate it if you dont adjust your mannerisms to fit the pecking-order, its like, they want to stop you, and say hey, wtf are you doing, youre low status, you cant talk to me like that, you have to be my bitch, why arent you being my bitch right now?
I noticed this too from a young age, how my mother would change the way she spoke depending on who she was speaking to, and I wondered "why don't I do that?" I actually pointed it out to the fat bitch herself, but until then she wasn't even aware she was doing it, so it must be a thing that NT people do subconsciously.
 
I noticed this too from a young age, how my mother would change the way she spoke depending on who she was speaking to, and I wondered "why don't I do that?" I actually pointed it out to the fat bitch herself, but until then she wasn't even aware she was doing it, so it must be a thing that NT people do subconsciously.
Their brains are automatics, ours are manuals
 
I noticed this too from a young age, how my mother would change the way she spoke depending on who she was speaking to, and I wondered "why don't I do that?" I actually pointed it out to the fat bitch herself, but until then she wasn't even aware she was doing it, so it must be a thing that NT people do subconsciously.
I talk to everyone the same way, I never really noticed that was a autist trait but maybe it is. I’m socially retarded so I wouldn’t be surprised if I have been screwing myself through social cues all these years.
 
The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.

That's on point. They also keep ugly/short men around to make fun of them. And if you ever say anything back they say oh we're just joking cmon or don't be so defensive.

Being short or ugly is living life on the defensive, always taking shit from everyone at every turn no matter what you do.

The only incels who avoid this are ogrecels because they could fucking body anyone who talks shit about them, so unless they act like massive pussies they're fine.
 
Kill all normies
 
It natural to talk to people of different status differently, it's the one upping that is unbearable. Would u speak to Elon Musk :soy: the way u speak to a tramp? Ur tone will obviously be different.
 
It natural to talk to people of different status differently, it's the one upping that is unbearable. Would u speak to Elon Musk :soy: the way u speak to a tramp? Ur tone will obviously be different.
tbh there is almost certainly a place for respecting actual superiority, but that place definitely isn't faggy one upping and negging so I agree
 
It natural to talk to people of different status differently, it's the one upping that is unbearable. Would u speak to Elon Musk :soy: the way u speak to a tramp? Ur tone will obviously be different.

Yeah its definitely the one-upmanship that irritates me, as soon as there is young women around you even have married men, 55 year old men etc. rushing to be the first to cause shit. Happens to me in sports clubs. In my opinion neither chads nor incels do this, its a normie thing.
 
Yeah its definitely the one-upmanship that irritates me, as soon as there is young women around you even have married men, 55 year old men etc. rushing to be the first to cause shit. Happens to me in sports clubs. In my opinion neither chads nor incels do this, its a normie thing.
I have to admit I have intuitively displayed such behaviour in the past, it's like a default behaviour for guys.
 
I do think the means of production should belong to the people who work them tbh
I see. I think the reason for this is that you expect everyone will be acting as informed and responsible as you would, were the ownership of the means of production suddenly become social. But most people won't.

This behavior you're so frustrated with is instinctual in nature. People are always trying to improve their self-esteem through various means, this being one of the ways that's easy, effective and virtually risk-free. In a way, society has actually made bullying worse for the victim, since before they could fight back and potentially win, rising in the hierarchy. But nowadays if you fight back you'll be shunned upon, or even end up as a criminal.

Regardless, improving social status by shitting on others is natural. It's not gay or low IQ or anything else. It's just the way the things are. If other, more effective and less destructive ways were available to people, they'd use them. But since lives of the vast majority of people are governed by their reward center, and not their prefrontal cortex, more complex ways of improving self-esteem (like postmaxxing on incels.co) are basically impossible for them. The best thing they can do is doing what the society expects from them (buy a car, marry, raise kids) and fulfilling their basic urges.

You shouldn't be frustrated by what is normal. It's counterproductive. To change this would mean either getting rid of 99% of the population, or greatly improving their intellectual acuity. Both tasks are not really possible to accomplish, so you shouldn't even bother with thinking about this. Accept that we're all still monkeys controlled by our primal desires, and you're just ahead of the curve.
 
Normalfaggots, even if they understand this, will never willingly stomach this or change their behaviour because putdowns, one-upping, status maintanence and clamoring for the most "alpha" position when foids are around is the lifeblood of their social interaction, but when you think about it trying to flex on people for them being piece of shit retard losers worse off than you is actually pretty pointless. It's always flung at people with the assumption that a person sucking is their fault attached to it, even though the vast majority of people who are pathetic losers are like that because of a mix of their genetics and their upbringing by people they didn't choose in an environment there was no difficulty selection stream for.

The guy who's poor? He's an idiot too stupid to learn a semi-coveted skill required for the maintanence of the system, with low conscientiousness and no connections (be it in the form of palm greasing skills or silver spoons in his mouth). All of these are almost certainly the result of things outside of his control and largely the result of genes governing his behaviour and cognition. The guy who has no girlfriend? He is a fucking ugly manlet framelet rat-faced incel who gets looked at women like a cockroach regardless of whether he works on himself by showering and gymcelling or not, his only hope for ascending is if he pays for it. Is it supposed to be his fault his parents were short and ugly, and he was probably bottlefed too much, maybe even had shitty nutrition as a child if he lived in a third world country and became a 5'3 turbomanlet?

The guy who's fat and kinda slow, and who got made fun of and ostracised by everyone in high school because he was annoying and didn't seem to "get it"? He's not me (although I had a similar level of social status, to be fair), but this is a real guy I used to know who makes me think of all this. I'm certain that, even though he makes a decent amount of money as a mechanic now, he still gets constant "ribbing" from people who will never truly take him seriously and will never ascend in social or economic status beyond a certain point. And guess what? His single mother is even fatter and stupider than him, go figure.

To make things worse, bad genes of all kinds and even shitty environments tend to come in packages, vice versa with good genes and environments.

When 115IQ trust fund lawyer Chad or somebody who's 60% of the way to being trust fund Chad because he's some "self made" Chadlite tries to pettily flex on some bald ugly incel janitor who lives in a hovel with his nice car and his girlfriend, what is he really proving? Especially when he does this over the fucking internet which I see CONSTANTLY (you'd think anonymity would make people less inclined to do this if there wasn't some innate urge to do it). The assumption that failures in life are at fault for the vast majority of their failure and that they could have avoided it by simply trying harder is demonstrably incorrect - the only thing smug assholes prove when they neg people worse off than them is that they are of higher genetic quality and were handed more resources which they now have at their disposal, largely as a result of innate characteristics.

This is like when Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies. He didn't think that Germans were morally superior to them because they were decent human beings and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, but because by virtue of their genetics the Germans weren't disgusting brown nigger monkeys incapable of creating anything noteworthy whatsoever. The herrenrasse is of better stock than subhumans, and the civilisation it produces is the result of the quality of its stock - both bragging normalfaggots and National Socialist racial logic share the same sentiment. The difference is that the latter is honest and has the courage (and arguably mercy) to put bullets in the heads of those who just suck, whereas normalfaggots keep losers around to dunk on so they can look better in comparison. This is the most gay shit ever.

Because rich handsome Chad has a hot gf and a Ferrari, does that make him a "better person"? In terms of his "quality" as a human being and his ability to improve the stock of the next generation, yes, but when you describe negging other men over things they have little control over as it actually is, it becomes clear that it should actually be morally repugnant according to normalfag slave morality programming. According to the moral code which these clowns claim to uphold, everyone who does this should be considered a giant asshole on the level of those who bully special ed kids and burn victims for their shortcomings (you should have just jumped out of the way of the fire faster bro!).

And yet despite this normalfags have an insatiable hunger for spouting narcissistic, status-maintaining putdowns that they need to feed in any social space they enter, even autistic shithole lookism discord servers like biv's one (if you're a cuckcord user you probably know what I mean) where narcissistic Chadlites flex on genetic failures with things they put almost no effort into achieving. This is another thing that made me think about this topic, not because I was dunked on myself but because others were constantly, I just got bored and the narc jannies banned me for posting scat porn and dog sex vids.

Obviously it's human nature, but the moralising we do to justify it is so fucking retarded. I can already sense that if this gets put on Inceltears (which it might be but I doubt they'll touch it right away if at all) or some other just worldist lysenkoist platform people will instantly go "nooooooooo you can't say that you're just minimising your own failures and the failures of others that come about as a lack of effort and pulling yourselves up by your bootstraps".

Most people never reach their full genetic potential, that can be conceded, but how could they? Maybe if I personally had the motivation I could be ripped and bump myself up half a looks point, read a bunch of books and become a sort of low-tier polymath with some inevitable usefulness, then still not be respected and be a complete loser because I am an aspie manlet, but that would require me being on fucking speed all the time and I'd die at 40 of heart failure. Even if I maxxed out my potential I still could never be Bill Gates or some shit without a ton of luck and factors outside of my control working in my favour. I just want to fucking lie down and rot for a reason. What was put into me, what was done to me and what happened to me that I had no control over, even beyond my genetics, is who I am now.

If I go and put myself out there my success in a society (because we live in one of those with lots of people who dictate whether an individual is high status or not, otherwise you are a hermit like Kaczynski whose main status to be looked at is the status of your physical health, whether you've broken your leg and are starving or whether you're in good shape and eating well) is decided by people whose actions, environment and innate characteristics I also have no control over. I am sure I just rot in my room because I am lazy and it's my fault, sure, I should go outside and "make the most" of my life now that I am a young adult and so much is now set in stone already, dumb shit bluepillers. I'd tell you to kill yourselves, but only a select few people have the special kind of bravery required to do that pretty much entirely as a result of things out of their conscious control.


Away from the tangent to finish with some venting that might resonate with some of you - watching this gay negging happen to other subhumans who try to put themselves out there in any setting and just get shat on so someone else can use them as a social footstool leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I don't enjoy it, I don't feel the urge to dominate those lower than me really. Especially when people (Knajjd is a good example lol) who already have a chip on their shoulder and something to prove do it, I just think it's gay. I think it's my Asperger's but I don't really care if I am "above" someone, people's attributes will speak for themselves and they don't need to be flossed on in a puerile manner beyond that (in an ideal situation). If I was a 150IQ Chad slayer or an almost friendless, completely gfless, quasi-NEET loser like I am now it wouldn't affect how other people should be treated by me, unless of course I wanted to signal my higher value to those around me by shitting on them like normalfags do constantly when they engage in this behaviour. I think people like soys who are of the same stock as us should be bullied for their insufferable behaviour until they become slightly more self-aware like us, but beyond that it's just kind of tiring and I find it hard to like or respect anyone who does it.
Yeah I never understood it either. Could be an autistic thing, where I talk to high status people in the same way I talk to low status people. Or could it be Im just a decent human being?

Normies seem to hate it if you dont adjust your mannerisms to fit the pecking-order, its like, they want to stop you, and say hey, wtf are you doing, youre low status, you cant talk to me like that, you have to be my bitch, why arent you being my bitch right now?

I talk to the homeless mentally ill 4'8 indian incel the same way I talk to the rich 6'4 nordic chad, I dont feel the need to make myself a bitch to the 6'4 nordic chad, nor do I feel the need to make myself an alpha to the homeless 4'8 incel. But everyone around you will call you out for not changing how you talk to someone.

This autistic trait literally makes me "a decent fucking human being" by default because I dont change how im talking to someone based on who it is, but i will tell you this now, it gets me into a lot of trouble out in the world, people dont like it when you don't talk to them in a way they believe you should based on their status vs your status.


The basis of all ridicule is making fun of someone for their shitty or mediocre genes but covering up with moral superiority and virtue signalling. (claiming they have bad personalities)

It just so happens that all of the bad people are uglier than the ones who are flexing on them.

If punching up was really a thing, we'd all be shitty on women for being bad people.

flexing / ridiculing is basically just shitting on non-chads
 
"He only bullies you because he's insecure!". Proceeds to bully you in the same way
Hitler pointed to low IQ shitskin races like gypsies and said that clearly Germans, with their prevailing nordid or subnordid phenotype and history of excelling in things that weren't crime, poverty and having 10 kids with their cousins, were superior to the subhuman gypsies.
Ironically, Hitler was a subhuman Austrian. There's rumors that he had some Jewish heritage too. If anything, he pulled the ultimate Jew move and finessed his way into power over an Anglo society
 
Your beliefs, values and morals determine your behavior. That behavior (flexing on losers) is a manifestation of the just world hypothesis. They believe that since your lot in life is 100% merit-based, your current life situation is entirely the product of your own doing.

It's very easy to predict how people will generally behave, once you've determined what software they're running on.
 
"He only bullies you because he's insecure!". Proceeds to bully you in the same way

Ironically, Hitler was a subhuman Austrian. There's rumors that he had some Jewish heritage too. If anything, he pulled the ultimate Jew move and finessed his way into power over an Anglo society
ngl Himmler was one of the biggest autistic nordicists out there and he looks like a swarthy rat subhuman
 
good thread. just found this from the similar threads section
 

Similar threads

MaldireMan0077
Replies
8
Views
237
edger0uter
edger0uter
Logic55
Replies
6
Views
91
Efiliste
Efiliste
A
Replies
13
Views
193
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top