Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Unpopular opinion: we have a problem with paedophilia in this community

I just want teen love

Anyone ranting against people who wanna date teens on this forum is probably a sex haver

Unless you miss out on teen love you just dont know the pain
 
And misogyny in and of itself is nowhere near comparable to diddling kids. One is a vague concept and the other is a physical act.
I gave you specific examples(rape is a physical act)
Because almost every rape joke I see here is top-tier shitposting.
so if we start posting about raping kids and act like its "just a joke" would that just be considered shitposting? would the paedophilia problem in this community finally be solved?
But I'm getting the impression that some users are genuinely obsessed with preteen foids.
well, im getting the impression that some users are genuinely obsessed with taking away female rights
 
okay

why are you so keen to call out pedophilia but completely disregard all the female hate we have on here? you say its not ok because it hurts children, but we have threads and posts here dedicated to discussing things like rape and removing female rights.

imagine if you titled this thread instead: [Serious] Unpopular opinion: we have a problem with misogyny in this community

that obviously wouldn't fly

the same users here who go on about paedophilia being bad will make jokes about female rape and taking away women's rights, they only do this because its socially acceptable in this specific forum. once the topic of hurting children gets brought up then suddenly "it has gone too far".
That's cuz its unnatural degeneracy. Same reason we don't talk about faggots or tranniesfuckers around here.
 
so if we start posting about raping kids and act like its "just a joke" would that just be considered shitposting? would the paedophilia problem in this community finally be solved?

Probably. Though it isn't necessarily good shitposting. It's hard to describe good shitposting, but I know it when I see it.
 
All of that "science" goes out the window when an adult foid fucks a 13 year old boy. There's no reason to protect pubescent teen whores who already have sex and dress like whores. Men have been fucking them for 1000's of years, no one cared about "science" or their mental development until feminism arrived to only punish men for fucking "minors". Until we see the same punishments given to foids, long prison sentences and them being beat by angry mobs, the same thing that happens to men, it will be cucked to support those bias laws that aren't applied equally and don't make sense in nature with any other animal species.
 
I just want teen love

Anyone ranting against people who wanna date teens on this forum is probably a sex haver

Unless you miss out on teen love you just dont know the pain
Teen love is a low iq cope. I have said it a thousand times already that hollywood style teenlove only favors teen chads and chad thirsty teen foids. Its NOT reserved for incels.
Our benefit lies in ensuring that teen girls are NOT able to take miles of chad cock by the time they are 16 in the guise of "teen love"
 
dn read
Welcome back Mr

which one do you like the best?
 
There's no reason to protect pubescent teen whores who already have sex and dress like whores.
They don't need to be protected. They need to be disciplined first. I agree that aoc laws make no sense in a feminist world where promiscuity, even among minors, is celebrated.
 
The real problem is that humanity set itself outside the rythms of nature.Adolescence is a human construct.In nature you either are a child or an adult.Period.In a non distant past getting a wife between 14-16 years was the most natural thing in the world.Were all the people before 1945 pedophiles?

And we are special and smart cause women think they have to party and take dicks til at least 29 years old or else life sucks?If you have menstruations this means nature has judged you physically and mentally mature to have child,maybe not the second after you bleed but 2 years having passed it is totally normal and biologic for we men wanting to impregnate you..This is how it worked for millennia and no one complained.Real pedo consider 7 as the gold standard.SEVENNot 14 which is the fucking double
Exactly this. Once a girl shows the first signs of puberty, she is biologically ready to be bred 2-3 years into her development. If she starts at 10, she's reaady by 12-13. If she starts at 6, she's ready by 8-9. And so on.
 
They don't need to be protected. They need to be disciplined first. I agree that aoc laws make no sense in a feminist world where promiscuity, even among minors, is celebrated.
If young foids were treated like actual kids, and weren't allowed to fuck around, dress like whores, and have social media, then I'd understand. But since teen whores do all those things, even more than adult foids a lot of times, then it's cucked to defend them in this current soyciety. Fuck chad's and stacy's kids, they can burn in hell, get raped, get killed, or get aborted for all I care. Jfl if they expect me to care when a 30 year old incel fucks them when they've been whores already for the passed 3 years.
 
The point is MOOT!

IT'S MOOT I SAY!

The point is MOOT!

IT'S MOOT I SAY!



aww
 
most of the edgelords discussing this stuff do it just as a way to piss off IT or feel edgy, or lament that they never got laid in high school but would never take action against jbs in real life
 
Bookmarked this thread. Will read responses tomorrow. Thanks OP.
 
Yes, there is a problem. There's a pedo psyop happening on this forum and most people are fucking oblivious to it. There's a handful of pedos here. At least one has an account on rapey under the same name (tulasdanslos).

Someone like Personalityinkwell got a little too aggressive with the pedo pushing (even to the point he would post obvious jailbait tik toks) on the main sub and saw that it backfired, so he noped the fuck out. Others like tulasdanslos openly admit that pedophilia is perfectly fine (yes, I'm ded srs). Then you have guys like Edmund_Kemper who are more subtle about it, but attack you nonetheless when you call bullshit.

The problem in the community is certainly there. They're careful not to step over the fence they straddle on, and so nothing gets done about it.

IT won't touch this

What do you mean? Of course, they will. There's kids invovled.
 
I will just ask you one question, is it ok for a 13 year old girl to be fucked by a 13 yo boy in your opinion?

Also, this thread is a response to many of the questions you asked there.
 
Last edited:
What I don’t understand is why so many of you are obsessed with the age of consent.

This topic comes up again and again and again, and quite frankly I think we spend a little too much time discussing a topic that doesn’t and shouldn’t marginally affect us in any way. I also don’t understand why so many of you are intent on justifying sexual relationships between adults and children. Why, exactly, do some of you focus your attention on this topic so often?

My point is simple.

There are some things that 13-year-olds generally aren’t allowed to do, like:
  • File a lawsuit
  • Drive a heavy goods vehicle
  • Drop out of school and enlist in the Navy
I don’t see why we can’t add:
  • Consent to a potentially exploitative sexual relationship with someone significantly older
It is NOT "agecucking" to recognize that social and brain development occurs at different phases through life; it's just scientific reality. At the same time, governments have a compelling interest to protect minors, and part of that protection is to limit the range of decisions that they (and, by extension, the adults around them) are allowed to make. I think that the existence of a minimum age of consent is not unreasonable as part of the delicate balancing act between individual freedom and the state's paternalism. I'm not sure at which exact point the AOC should be, as that's a question that is best left to the scientific community, but I know for a fact that a minimum AOC should exist.

Look, as a committed civil libertarian, I'm not here to police your freedom of thought. If you like to think about kids, that's OK. If you like to draw pictures of kids having sex, I think that's a little fucked up, but that's OK because you're not hurting anyone. If you like to spend 8 hours a day jerking your pp off to Teengallery in the privacy of your bedroom, that's also a little fucked up, but hey, there's no nudity involved and it's nothing worse than what you see at a public beach anyway, so that's OK.

Physically molesting a kid? Not OK.

None of this is necessarily a defence of the status quo, or a suggestion that the status quo is perfect. There are a lot of valid discussions we can have about how the criminal justice system and society at large treats sex offenders and their civil liberties.

Vigilantism (including shows like TCAP) is unhelpful and erodes procedural due process and the right to privacy. Publicly accessible sex offender registries do very little to actually safeguard the public; the U.S. should shift to a U.K.-style system where sex offender registries are only accessible to law enforcement. Unduly harsh sentencing guidelines, again, do little to safeguard the public, and often disproportionately punishes offenders from low-income backgrounds. Violence directed against sex offenders in correctional institutions might sound good to normies, but they actually foster a culture in which all inmates are taught that violence is a desirable element of conflict resolution, and in the long run, decreases the chances that prisoners can smoothly reintegrate to society. You could write a long essay about each of these points.

But whether you can normatively justify an adult engaging in sexual activity with a child really isn't a matter up for debate. I don't see why that's the case here on the forum.
Male brains arent fully developed till 25 and females till 21. Are you willing to change consent age to those?
 
All of that "science" goes out the window when an adult foid fucks a 13 year old boy. There's no reason to protect pubescent teen whores who already have sex and dress like whores. Men have been fucking them for 1000's of years, no one cared about "science" or their mental development until feminism arrived to only punish men for fucking "minors". Until we see the same punishments given to foids, long prison sentences and them being beat by angry mobs, the same thing that happens to men, it will be cucked to support those bias laws that aren't applied equally and don't make sense in nature with any other animal species.

Those adult foids need to face longer sentences, you're right.

What do you mean? Of course, they will. There's kids invovled.
:feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:

I will just ask you one question, is it ok for a 13 year old girl to be fucked by a 13 yo boy in your opinion?

Also, this thread is a response to many of the questions you asked there.
Yes.

Will look at thread later.
 
Yes.

Will look at thread later.
Then you're an agecuck feminist. You believe in "power unbalance" and that age gap relationships between two sexually mature people are not ok because they're "potentially exploitative", which are 100% feminist concepts. Born of the feminist movement.

Had you answered no, I'd have said you're just a moralist who wants to sexually repress people until a certain arbitrary age, which I also don't agree with, but at least is something consistent and respectable that has some logic behind it, unlike that feminist nonsensical garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • File a lawsuit
  • Drive a heavy goods vehicle
  • Drop out of school and enlist in the Navy
Now apply these points to the 13yo chad that's screwing her.
 
I am just pointing out the hypocracy of the AOC. If an ugly man gets baited into it, he get a long prison sentence and it’s on his records. But if a woman does it is written off. You don’t see those creeper shows baiting women and them tearing them apart calling them trash and telling them they would kill them if it was their son. Also these female teens knowingly go and seek older men to have sex with and guess what. They stay quite about it. It was never about protecting children it was about humiliating men.
 
And by "pedophilia" you mean hebephilia/ephebophilia
 
It is NOT "agecucking" to recognize that social and brain development occurs at different phases through life; it's just scientific reality

That argument is only valid if females in that age group aren't already engaging in sex

Lets say a 15 year old female walks out of a room just finished sucking of a 15 year old males dick and a 20 year old male approaches her, its ridiculous to argue that in the space of time between her sucking dick and leaving that room, she magically lost all of her ability to consent to sexual acts, all her "development" went to zero the moment the 20 year old male attempted to initiate courtship

Also age of consent is abitrary, the age of consent in some countries is 16, in some its 15, and in some its even 13, if "measuring development" was such a sure fire thing, humans as a society would not be so indecisive about what age what should be allowed

At the same time, governments have a compelling interest to protect minors, and part of that protection is to limit the range of decisions that they (and, by extension, the adults around them) are allowed to make

Then it should be illegal for them to engage in those acts period, not just illegal for the older party to engage in those acts with them

Notice its illegal for minors to drink alcohol or smoke, it isn't solely illegal for an adult to be drinking or smoking with them, a ridiculous law like that is exactly how age of consent laws function, and that's because those laws are about emotions not logic

But whether you can normatively justify an adult engaging in sexual activity with a child really isn't a matter up for debate. I don't see why that's the case here on the forum.

Depends on what you mean by child, a person can't be a child like its an on or off button, if they are a child, then they can't engage in said acts period, the moment a female has sex with a male of her age group society can't now assert her innocence as if sex is something new to her and something she isn't already used to consenting to

Either way its all abitrary

Its ridiculous that I can fuck this female:
h_094ktds995pl.jpg

But I can't fuck this female:
meikawoollard_jan14.jpg
 
What type are we talking about here? Because I have seen people on here unironically say women should be married at 8 or 12. Unless your talking about finding a 16 year old attractive which isn't being a pedophile.
 
Then you're an agecuck feminist. You believe in "power unbalance" and that age gap relationships between two sexually mature people are not ok because they're "potentially exploitative", which are 100% feminist concepts. Born of the feminist movement.

Had you answered no, I'd have said you're just a moralist who wants to sexually repress people until a certain arbitrary age, which I also don't agree with, but at least is something consistent and respectable that has some logic behind it, unlike that feminist nonsensical garbage.

How the fuck is that sexual repression?
 
@based_meme I defend pedophilia because I am an advocate for uncucked society where men can marry off their daughters, not because I want elites plowing underage pussy like it happens now. It's kind of naïf on my part since it's not happening any time soon, but you should be going after the heads of the sex negative crew of 'Cuties', rather than mine.
 
I want to fuck a 13+ year olds prime pussy.

20200529 110243
 
LMAO nigga you is lying or brain damaged

I'm not into MILFs but am into foids in their 20s. I honestly think 25-year-olds look way better than 16-year-olds. Probably because that's the age group of escorts I visit.
 
How the fuck is that sexual repression?

TBH I don't believe in that "power imbalance" nonsense either, because there's supposed to be a power imbalance, women were never supposed to have rights to begin with, nor work, nor own property, now that the power imbalance is gone the leverage of the sexes is skewed in women's favor

If women didn't have any of those things I'd probably already be married with a 2nd child on the way, trying to work my way up the corporate ladder (which I actually do pretty well at)

So can't fault men seeking out that imbalance in other aspects, basically trying to "raise a committed wife"

For me the entire experience has been soured and I don't want to get married to anymore no matter what situation presents itself
 
Last edited:
@based_meme I defend pedophilia because I am an advocate for uncucked society where men can marry off their daughters, not because I want elites plowing underage pussy like it happens now. It's kind of naïf on my part since it's not happening any time soon, but you should be going after the heads of the sex negative crew of 'Cuties', rather than mine.

How noble of you.
 
I keep reading these age of consent threads, and I always think "What does it actually matter, if you can't get an adult woman what makes you think if the age of consent was 13 you would be able to get a 13 year old" . As someone who lives in a country where the age of consent is below 18, just because the law says its ok to date under 18 doesn't suddenly mean you are actually capable of getting a teenage girlfriend, especially if you fail at getting adult girlfriends.
 
I keep reading these age of consent threads, and I always think "What does it actually matter, if you can't get an adult woman what makes you think if the age of consent was 13 you would be able to get a 13 year old" . As someone who lives in a country where the age of consent is below 18, just because the law says its ok to date under 18 doesn't suddenly mean you are actually capable of getting a teenage girlfriend, especially if you fail at getting adult girlfriends.
At the very least you won't be harassed by whiteknights or go to jail for attempting to fuck them.
 
50 years ago ppl got married at 12/13 years old :feelsclown:
 
I keep reading these age of consent threads, and I always think "What does it actually matter, if you can't get an adult woman what makes you think if the age of consent was 13 you would be able to get a 13 year old" . As someone who lives in a country where the age of consent is below 18, just because the law says its ok to date under 18 doesn't suddenly mean you are actually capable of getting a teenage girlfriend, especially if you fail at getting adult girlfriends.
Legalize child marriage, prostitution, and porn.
 
yes, I want to fuck a 13 yo jb and take her virginity. How could you tell?
 
Legalize child marriage, prostitution, and porn.

If you legalize it, it would be like child actors or child workers, the child would need their parents consent to get into any of these. No parents regardless of how cucked or nuts they are, in a first world country, is going to let their 10 year old daughter work in a brothel.
 
There is not.

The lack of emotional validation is one of the primary reasons why inceldom is so terrible. That and knowing that you are a genetic dead end.

That’s pretty bluepill

Then you're an agecuck feminist. You believe in "power unbalance" and that age gap relationships between two sexually mature people are not ok because they're "potentially exploitative", which are 100% feminist concepts. Born of the feminist movement.

I want to fuck a 13+ year olds prime pussy.

View attachment 325227
My nigga I prefer 15 and up though but 13 is still good :feelsEhh:
 
One could say it is all about mind-state and age is buteth a number. Aspies and fellow aliens may possess emotion of teenager but year of 43 in mommy's basement.
 
tbh it is pretty dumb that its talked about so much. I honestly think a lot of it is baiting and/or IT trolls. I'm sure there are users that want to talk about it that are legit/aren't trolling but a good percentage is people looking for attention and its a pretty quick way to get it.
Yeah its likely mods who need ad rev from the normies ........And I TEARS Fuckin falls for it
I just want teen love

Anyone ranting against people who wanna date teens on this forum is probably a sex haver

Unless you miss out on teen love you just dont know the pain
Probs not teens aren't mentally matured...many female and male teens act like breeding animals without a care in the world for their consequences
50 years ago ppl got married at 12/13 years old :feelsclown:
In less developed countries....slavery was practiced before does that make it okay....
Exactly this. Once a girl shows the first signs of puberty, she is biologically ready to be bred 2-3 years into her development. If she starts at 10, she's reaady by 12-13. If she starts at 6, she's ready by 8-9. And so on.
But she can't consent.....she's not mentally matured
 
Last edited:
It kinda sucks how the mods don't moderate this kinda bullshit accusation of "pedophilia", which is false information, when foids of pubescent or even post pubescent ages are discussed.

I haven't seen anyone here say they want to have sex with a prepubescent foid. If someone can find some posts suggesting that, I would like to see them.
 

Similar threads

fukurou
Replies
5
Views
110
turbosperg
turbosperg
RealSchizo
Replies
12
Views
307
Pancakecel
Pancakecel
AsiaCel
Replies
5
Views
171
Minamoto
Minamoto
foidrapist69
Replies
4
Views
148
foidrapist69
foidrapist69

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top