G
A toroidal field or torus field is created by 2 tori of opposing polarity. It is the oldest known structure in existence and its fields exist around everything, "inanimate" and "animate" objects alike. The principle of toroidal fields and its strong correlation to electricity can be observed everywhere, in the physical forms that it molds itself around like storms or explosions or in the influences it has on the objects around itself like electrical discharges observable in volcanic eruptions or from static electricity.
The principle is not correlated to electricity by coincidence, it works very similar to electrical polarity and the observable outcome is as follows: Things that are of the same polarity will by their very nature repel each other, while only those things that are of the opposite polarity will be drawn towards each other to form something greater than themselves.
So not only am I proposing that everything in existence and its components consist of electromagnetics rather than just particles, but that the numbers drawn from this observation can be used to create toroidal electromagnetic fields, such as when a man and a woman are drawn together. I'm sure the fibonacci numbers and fractals are not foreign to many people on here.
My idea now is basically to apply this principle to the opposite sexes and also the dating market and look at them as toroidal fields. We name such a toroidal field after its dominant pole and thus call it a foidal toroidal. That if you want to look at man and woman as two extreme poles who oppose each other, then the strongest attraction is created to let's say the most northern pole if you are numerically placed on the most southern pole. And this is where the fractals come in, we live in a time where women are not fully women anymore and men are not fully men according to this extreme masculine or feminine idea of this extreme dipolarity. Instead the world today seems full of people who are confused, hormone disrupted, unsure about their gender, whether to act masculine, feminine, how to or if it even makes sense to find proper balance between the two or if they should just work towards one of the two extremes of masculinity and femininity. If you remember the graphics from said video which visualize the numbers quite well, each sub-structure of a larger structure is again nothing but a carbon copy of its larger parent structure and there are certain number combinations that just do not work. So what happens if you are not exactly placed on one of the two extremes that are the poles? Like being somewhere around the middle. From the most zoomed out view what changes is that the strength with which you attract or repel the extreme opposite is reduced. Let's translate this to real life terms. The more feminine you are as a male, the less attracted feminine foids will be to you and vice versa.
The extreme south pole would be the position of giga chad. Whereas the north pole extreme would be the slutty stacey. This fractal toroidal principle also aligns with the pareto principle if you think about how the flow or current created by two such poles works. It always has one opening, the north pole which allows for most of the energy to enter through it, think on earth this would be the neutrinos from the sun's solar wind entering through the hole of the van allen belt in the north pole. Or for an apple growing on a tree, the twig buds and the southern pole is like a human asshole, it mainly serves to excrete all the bottom tier subhuman, subspecies garbage, an exit point for the energy to leave. Not to say that gigachads are literally physiological assholes, but from an electromagnetic view, they are. And they have to be if they want to attract the energy from those foids who temporarily hold the most of this youthful energy during their fertility phase. The further away from the poles you are within the field, the less of an external magnetic influence there will be on you, the less of a magnetic influence you will have on others and the more important for your influence on others become the subfields of your coordinates within this torus.
But here comes the interesting part, if you zoom in a little further into this toroidal field to the point where you are the extreme pole of a smaller substructure of this dating field, and remember that mathematically speaking the fibonacci numbers are a thus far irrefutable part of our reality so we can with certainty extrapolate that such a substructure should exist, then the polar opposite that you will strongly attract towards you has to be on a very specific position within that larger picture of the toroidal dating market field.
Think of it visualised as a chess field. We will call the field zoom level 0. Men are white, women black. Masculinity starts out on row 1, feminity at row 8. If you are anywhere on row 1, you are a chad. But the closer your position is to row 8, the further away from chad you are and thus the less desired and more repelled by row 8s. Let's say there are 3 manlets, one is a curry d8, another is a snownigger a8 and the last a h8 bushnigger. Then the polar opposites from the parent toroidal view is that you attract respectively e1, h1 and a1 persons.
This counts for physical traits and spiritual or intellectual traits but with very strong differences in priority. For example as a politically radical right your polar opposites would be radical lefts. As "mysoginist" your polar opposite is a misandrist in its most extreme form aka feminist. Physical opposites are easier to distinguish, like tall vs short or muscly vs graceful. Physical and intellectual traits work very differently in the way they attract and repel due to the priority of traits within a foidal toroidal. More on that later.
But if you zoom in just a bit further, let's take out the first 2 rows and the last 2 columns for example. Then the polar opposites you now attract are aligned on the following positions for a8 and d8 you get f3 and c3 respectively.
Each zoom level represents importance or priority of the traits for foids and men. So the most important physical trait of men is represented on zoom level 0, the next most important physical trait on zoom level 1 and so on. If you do this for every zoom level and you combine the highlighted fields of all levels into a single set of traits, you arrive at a pattern that should tell you precisely the kinds of traits of a foid that you will attract or that you should be looking out for. You should then theoretically be able to go through the traits like a checklist from top to bottom and if that kind of foid can not find 1. trait of perceived chad height, she will settle for someone with at least 2. trait of chad face, 3. trait chad muscles etc. until you arrive at the bottom of the barrel traits that become relevant for incels, such as money or the willingness to cuck, similar hobbies or the infamous personality.
A full picture of such a field of traits would look something like this for candidate a8, where red denotes the candidate, green the main characteristics of interest and blue the secondary characteristics of interest, with the priority highest at the bottom right and lowest towards the top left of the field.
If you look at it from a foid's perspective, then you have to fulfil all the traits from a8 to h1 to be chad and if you fulfil all the secondary traits on top of it to be gigachad. Note also that this visualisation only illustrates what the opposite candidate expects, it makes no statements about odds and thus does not reflect your chances on the market if you fulfil the said traits since that still depends on the amount of chad the foid has access to. But it does or at least should give you an explanation for why it is important to foids that factors like hobbies, political views or personality are immensely similar to those of foids while the important traits like the physical ones need to be vastly different. It's because personality and hobbies are so irrelevant in the vast scope of things that minor differences in these already serve as polar opposites within their toroidal field. While the important factors that are so high priority need to be far more distinct from one another to be able to draw each other in. They work on different frequencies and thus require different wavelengths in order to achieve their harmonic frequency resonance.
Thank you for visiting my ted talk.
The principle is not correlated to electricity by coincidence, it works very similar to electrical polarity and the observable outcome is as follows: Things that are of the same polarity will by their very nature repel each other, while only those things that are of the opposite polarity will be drawn towards each other to form something greater than themselves.
So not only am I proposing that everything in existence and its components consist of electromagnetics rather than just particles, but that the numbers drawn from this observation can be used to create toroidal electromagnetic fields, such as when a man and a woman are drawn together. I'm sure the fibonacci numbers and fractals are not foreign to many people on here.
My idea now is basically to apply this principle to the opposite sexes and also the dating market and look at them as toroidal fields. We name such a toroidal field after its dominant pole and thus call it a foidal toroidal. That if you want to look at man and woman as two extreme poles who oppose each other, then the strongest attraction is created to let's say the most northern pole if you are numerically placed on the most southern pole. And this is where the fractals come in, we live in a time where women are not fully women anymore and men are not fully men according to this extreme masculine or feminine idea of this extreme dipolarity. Instead the world today seems full of people who are confused, hormone disrupted, unsure about their gender, whether to act masculine, feminine, how to or if it even makes sense to find proper balance between the two or if they should just work towards one of the two extremes of masculinity and femininity. If you remember the graphics from said video which visualize the numbers quite well, each sub-structure of a larger structure is again nothing but a carbon copy of its larger parent structure and there are certain number combinations that just do not work. So what happens if you are not exactly placed on one of the two extremes that are the poles? Like being somewhere around the middle. From the most zoomed out view what changes is that the strength with which you attract or repel the extreme opposite is reduced. Let's translate this to real life terms. The more feminine you are as a male, the less attracted feminine foids will be to you and vice versa.
The extreme south pole would be the position of giga chad. Whereas the north pole extreme would be the slutty stacey. This fractal toroidal principle also aligns with the pareto principle if you think about how the flow or current created by two such poles works. It always has one opening, the north pole which allows for most of the energy to enter through it, think on earth this would be the neutrinos from the sun's solar wind entering through the hole of the van allen belt in the north pole. Or for an apple growing on a tree, the twig buds and the southern pole is like a human asshole, it mainly serves to excrete all the bottom tier subhuman, subspecies garbage, an exit point for the energy to leave. Not to say that gigachads are literally physiological assholes, but from an electromagnetic view, they are. And they have to be if they want to attract the energy from those foids who temporarily hold the most of this youthful energy during their fertility phase. The further away from the poles you are within the field, the less of an external magnetic influence there will be on you, the less of a magnetic influence you will have on others and the more important for your influence on others become the subfields of your coordinates within this torus.
But here comes the interesting part, if you zoom in a little further into this toroidal field to the point where you are the extreme pole of a smaller substructure of this dating field, and remember that mathematically speaking the fibonacci numbers are a thus far irrefutable part of our reality so we can with certainty extrapolate that such a substructure should exist, then the polar opposite that you will strongly attract towards you has to be on a very specific position within that larger picture of the toroidal dating market field.
Think of it visualised as a chess field. We will call the field zoom level 0. Men are white, women black. Masculinity starts out on row 1, feminity at row 8. If you are anywhere on row 1, you are a chad. But the closer your position is to row 8, the further away from chad you are and thus the less desired and more repelled by row 8s. Let's say there are 3 manlets, one is a curry d8, another is a snownigger a8 and the last a h8 bushnigger. Then the polar opposites from the parent toroidal view is that you attract respectively e1, h1 and a1 persons.
This counts for physical traits and spiritual or intellectual traits but with very strong differences in priority. For example as a politically radical right your polar opposites would be radical lefts. As "mysoginist" your polar opposite is a misandrist in its most extreme form aka feminist. Physical opposites are easier to distinguish, like tall vs short or muscly vs graceful. Physical and intellectual traits work very differently in the way they attract and repel due to the priority of traits within a foidal toroidal. More on that later.
But if you zoom in just a bit further, let's take out the first 2 rows and the last 2 columns for example. Then the polar opposites you now attract are aligned on the following positions for a8 and d8 you get f3 and c3 respectively.
Each zoom level represents importance or priority of the traits for foids and men. So the most important physical trait of men is represented on zoom level 0, the next most important physical trait on zoom level 1 and so on. If you do this for every zoom level and you combine the highlighted fields of all levels into a single set of traits, you arrive at a pattern that should tell you precisely the kinds of traits of a foid that you will attract or that you should be looking out for. You should then theoretically be able to go through the traits like a checklist from top to bottom and if that kind of foid can not find 1. trait of perceived chad height, she will settle for someone with at least 2. trait of chad face, 3. trait chad muscles etc. until you arrive at the bottom of the barrel traits that become relevant for incels, such as money or the willingness to cuck, similar hobbies or the infamous personality.
A full picture of such a field of traits would look something like this for candidate a8, where red denotes the candidate, green the main characteristics of interest and blue the secondary characteristics of interest, with the priority highest at the bottom right and lowest towards the top left of the field.
If you look at it from a foid's perspective, then you have to fulfil all the traits from a8 to h1 to be chad and if you fulfil all the secondary traits on top of it to be gigachad. Note also that this visualisation only illustrates what the opposite candidate expects, it makes no statements about odds and thus does not reflect your chances on the market if you fulfil the said traits since that still depends on the amount of chad the foid has access to. But it does or at least should give you an explanation for why it is important to foids that factors like hobbies, political views or personality are immensely similar to those of foids while the important traits like the physical ones need to be vastly different. It's because personality and hobbies are so irrelevant in the vast scope of things that minor differences in these already serve as polar opposites within their toroidal field. While the important factors that are so high priority need to be far more distinct from one another to be able to draw each other in. They work on different frequencies and thus require different wavelengths in order to achieve their harmonic frequency resonance.
Thank you for visiting my ted talk.
Last edited:
