Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

We should start calling tall men who date really short women pedophiles.

Looksmaxxcel

Looksmaxxcel

Captain
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Posts
1,597
Stigmatize and shame the fuck out of couples like this. Use the very same weapons that these SJW feminists and cucks are using against us, who want to frame every man a pedophile for retarded bullshit reasons in order to ruin his life. I've had enough with seeing the ugly fucking smug goblins treating short guys of their own league like shit while thinking they're entitled to guys who are a foot taller than them. Show them all no fucking mercy.
 
Stigmatize and shame the fuck out of couples like this. Use the very same weapons that these SJW feminists and cucks are using against us, who want to frame every man a pedophile for retarded bullshit reasons in order to ruin his life. I've had enough with seeing the ugly fucking smug goblins treating short guys of their own league like shit while thinking they're entitled to guys who are a foot taller than them. Show them all no fucking mercy.
Pedophilia has nothing to do with height, bro.
 
Pedophilia has nothing to do with height, bro.
I don't think he implied that. He just doesn't want short foids to have children because they will be short too I guess.
 
I don't think he implied that. He just doesn't want short foids to have children because they will be short too I guess.
I still don't see the connection.
 
Stigmatize and shame the fuck out of couples like this. Use the very same weapons that these SJW feminists and cucks are using against us, who want to frame every man a pedophile for retarded bullshit reasons in order to ruin his life. I've had enough with seeing the ugly fucking smug goblins treating short guys of their own league like shit while thinking they're entitled to guys who are a foot taller than them. Show them all no fucking mercy.
I see you were inspired by my post. I bet we can get some relatively lower SMV foids who have to settle for relatively shorter chad lites on board because they’ll be jealous of all the short girls that get to date very tall guys. Thoughts?
 
Some normies already do this ngl
 
I see you were inspired by my post. I bet we can get some relatively lower SMV foids who have to settle for relatively shorter chad lites on board because they’ll be jealous of all the short girls that get to date very tall guys. Thoughts?
Yeah, your post inspired me to make this thread. We absolutely should try to appeal to the jealous lower SMV women, I think weaponizing this against them by any means possible is what we should do.
 
Tall guys dating short girls isn’t pedophilia
 
I think it would actually work tbh, it sounds retarded and like something normies would do so it's giving me hope
 
Yes. Meanwhile we should support porn :feelspuke: with petite women to further our agenda
 
Pedophilia has nothing to do with height, bro.
Tell that to politicians that try to instate restrictions on sex doll height because of how certain size dolls less than a certain size look like children.
 
Tell that to politicians that try to instate restrictions on sex doll height because of how certain size dolls less than a certain size look like children.
Oh, yeah. Some like that happened here in Spain too. But I think OP is talking about another thing: actual people.
 
Oh, yeah. Some like that happened here in Spain too. But I think OP is talking about another thing: actual people.
There's still a precedent there.
If they are going to treat adult males having sex dolls below a certain height as pedophilia there's no reason why tall males that get with short foids of similar height to the banned sex dolls be treated any differently or for short males to be okay with that kind of double standard.
 
Last edited:
might as well. fuck society and its hypocrisy.

6'6+ psychopathic powerlifters can fuck <4'11 bitches who have low IQ and neotenous looks, and most people wouldn't bat an eye so long as the foid is 18+ y/o. an arbitrary law dictates that the former is more acceptable than a responsible man looking to marry a 17 y/o virgin.
Exactly this.
Tall males that have a preference for short nubile females might as well be closeted pedophiles if short and nubile females are now by default considered too young by appearance to even have the ability to properly consent to sexual activity.

And don't forget the precedent from how female sex dolls below a certain size are banned in some countries and unavailable for purchase by adult males.

Proving it's not just age but also size differences that matter in setting terms of acceptability
@LittleBoy

A female that is less than 5 feet tall being with a 6 foot tall and above male seems no different in the strength and maturity disparity than that between a teenager that hasn't fully matured and that of an adult.

Otherwise it upholds a kind of system where it's considered okay for 6 foot + tall adult males to fuck 4'10'' and less tall women because it's supposedly consensual but other looks characteristics and seemingly not fully matured body differences can still be used to incriminate any guy that so much as happens to date a woman that is below the age (or appears to look below the age) of 18.
 
Last edited:
There's still a precedent there.
If they are going to treat adult males having sex dolls below a certain height as pedophilia there's no reason why tall males that get with short foids of similar height to the banned sex dolls be treated any differently or for short males to be okay with that kind of double standard.
Short women have volition. You can't ban them from having sex lol. They just shouldn't ban those dolls, but maby those dolls are extremely petite, like 3'5"-4'0", but then midgets would be illegal :lul:
 
Short women have volition.
Teenage females have volition too but statutory rape is still a thing.
Doesn't matter if they were okay with having sex with a slightly older male above the legal limit.

You can't ban them from having sex lol.
Nobody (including women) is entitled to sex though lol.
That's what :soy: say and they need to live with it.

They just shouldn't ban those dolls, but maby those dolls are extremely petite, like 3'5"-4'0", but then midgets would be illegal :lul:
A chad with pedophilic urges can fuck midgets and it would be considered okay to soyciety as long as the foid consents.
 
Last edited:
when a guy 5 6 guy wants a girl shorter than him, he is considered a pedo
but when 6 1 chad dates 5 3, 5 5 or 5 7 girl it is fine :feelsclown:
Exactly this.
Tall males that have a preference for short nubile females might as well be closeted pedophiles if short and nubile females are now by default considered too young by appearance to even have the ability to properly consent to sexual activity.

And don't forget the precedent from how female sex dolls below a certain size are banned in some countries and unavailable for purchase by adult males.

Proving it's not just age but also size differences that matter in setting terms of acceptability
@LittleBoy

A female that is less than 5 feet tall being with a 6 foot tall and above male seems no different in the strength and maturity disparity than that between a teenager that hasn't fully matured and that of an adult.

Otherwise it upholds a kind of system where it's considered okay for 6 foot + tall adult males to fuck 4'10'' and less tall women because it's supposedly consensual but other looks characteristics and seemingly not fully matured body differences can still be used to incriminate any guy that so much as happens to date a woman that is below the age (or appears to look below the age) of 18.

Based as fuck. Nigga how come I didn't see this although you tagged me?
 
Based as fuck. Nigga how come I didn't see this although you tagged me?
Idk maybe when I edited the post to tag you it didn't show up.

I think it's a glitch on this site if you quote multiple people or edit your post to quote or tag multiple people that sometimes they won't get notified.
 
Teenage females have volition too but statutory rape is still a thing.
Doesn't matter if they were okay with having sex with a slightly older male above the legal limit.


Nobody is entitled to sex though lol.
That's what :soy: say and they need to live with it.


A chad with pedophilic urges can fuck midgets and it would be considered okay to soyciety as long as the foid consents.
[/QUOTE]
My point was: we shouldn't label those dolls as "tiny" or "childlike" but as "midgets" :feelsthink:
 
My point was: we shouldn't label those dolls as "tiny" or "childlike" but as "midgets" :feelsthink:
That's something out of our control.

A savvy politician that likes to argue controversial changes to laws definitely needs to point out the discrepancy in the wording of these laws though.

If childlike pertains to a doll representing a female below a certain size then by extension it it's not a stretch to imagine the governmet one day classifying males having sex with females below a certain height a form of pedophilia if the female decides to press sexual assault or domestic violence charges for any reason.
 
If childlike pertains to a doll representing a female below a certain size then by extension it it's not a stretch to imagine the governmet one day classifying males having sex with females below a certain height a form of pedophilia if the female decides to press sexual assault or domestic violence charges for any reason.
I agree with this. But can you explain me how is that related to the guy's height? How can you punish a guy being with someone short only if he is too tall? That's the part I don't get (early in the morning for me :feelstastyman:) The childlike sex dolls thing is controversial not because of the guys height, but because the doll has childlike features. If a guy is very tall, he couldn't do it with women that are about average height or slightly below?
 
I agree with this. But can you explain me how is that related to the guy's height?


How can you punish a guy being with someone short only if he is too tall? That's the part I don't get (early in the morning for me :feelstastyman:)

The childlike sex dolls thing is controversial not because of the guys height, but because the doll has childlike features. If a guy is very tall, he couldn't do it with women that are about average height or slightly below?

You are right you can't control for exact height difference. But you can apply a lower bound beyond which you aren't in good territory if you decide to have sex with a woman that short and small.

Just like child sex dolls there should be a cutoff that applies to all adult males if they are to be consistent and not found to be applying one-sided laws that penalize other people for engaging in personal entertainment and fun (which sex and masturbation can fall under) in a supposedly wrong way (ie via a sex doll rather than via intimacy with another human being).

So for example if it's illegal to have a sex doll resembling a woman that is less than 4'11'' tall it should also be illegal for an adult male to be in a relationship and have sex with a woman less than 4'11'' tall.

If an adult male in posession of or who has bought or lent a sex doll less than the legally designated height results in him getting pedophilia and indecency charges, then a man found guilty of engaging in a sexual relationship with a woman at or below this designated height should also be charged with pedophilia and indecency charges and get the same kind of punishment when convicted.

Currently I don't know if such a law even exists. Which means even if a sex doll below a certain height is banned, a 6 foot and above tall chad can still legally have sex with a woman of that certain height or below. It's a double standard that should be corrected.
Otherwise it sends the message that some forms of pedophilia and exploitation of size and maturity differences are okay.
 
Last edited:
It's a double standard that should be corrected.
Otherwise it sends the message that some forms of pedophilia and exploitation of size and maturity differences are okay.
Totally agree.

Sooner or later those cases would start to pop up, and such contradiction should become self evident (maby it's not so for them, I barely know what to expect from them anymore).
 
Sooner or later those cases would start to pop up, and such contradiction would become self evident (but maybe it's not so for them, I barely know what to expect from them anymore).
Well this is the argument that should have been put forth when these kind of laws were first put in place.

In an era of increasing awareness around height differences in relationships and caution about size and power differences in relationships and abuse and the different types of coercion you would think this would have been apparent to others.
Or more likely it's a morally grey area they have chosen to ignore and hope wouldn't come up so they wouldn't have to address the inherent contradictions involved.

But no longer.
They began this conversation and more serious look into this issue when they started declaring size differences of sex dolls below a certain height and size a legal liability.
No reason now for them not to enforce the same standards to sexual relationships and sex between two people, lest they be found of inadvertently enabling loopholes around these kinds of laws.

Remember too that even if the smaller size female had consented in this arrangement and the taller male swears that it's the case and both parties were fine, it can still be argued this isn't sufficient.
For example look at how even younger less mature girls that supposedly consent to sexual relations with older more mature looking males is still considered statutory rape and is a criminal offense.
 
Last edited:
Remember too that even if the smaller size female had consented in this arrangement and the taller male swears that it's the case and both parties were fine, it can still be argued this isn't sufficient.
For example look at how even younger less mature girls that supposedly consent to sexual relations with older more mature looking males is still considered statutory rape and is a criminal offense.
Right in the bull's eye :feelshehe:
 
High IQ tbh
Pedophilia has nothing to do with height, bro.
This isn't about being reasonable. It's about improving our SMV. A 20 year old man fucking a 17 year old woman has nothing to do with pedophilia either, but old roasties called it pedo and banned it because they didn't like having to compete with 17 year olds for chad's attention.
 
Ok... :dafuckfeels:

Are you completely sure of this? Not a rhetoric question, since I'm not sure myself.
Depends on location whether 17 is legal or not, but in general, the whole raising age of consent was done by roasties. In the US it was heavily pushed by feminist groups to raise it first to 16, and then to 18 later in most states.
 
Stigmatize and shame the fuck out of couples like this. Use the very same weapons that these SJW feminists and cucks are using against us, who want to frame every man a pedophile for retarded bullshit reasons in order to ruin his life. I've had enough with seeing the ugly fucking smug goblins treating short guys of their own league like shit while thinking they're entitled to guys who are a foot taller than them. Show them all no fucking mercy.
Jokes and phrases meant to cast doubt on such couples also help with the stigma.
"There are pedophiles. And then there are guys that try to get around age of consent laws by dating girls more than a foot shorter than them. But I repeat myself."

"You say you aren't interested in underage girls. Yet you only go out with girls much smaller than you and the size of an average school girl. Seems legit."

IncelTear isn't taking this thread well.
But given the implications that might ruin their fun would you expect anything different from the same sub that Dr. Pizza posted on :feelskek:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jzxtpn/not_how_consent_laws_work/

 
Last edited:
Jokes and phrases meant to cast doubt on such couples also help with the stigma.


IncelTear isn't taking this thread well.
But given the implications that might ruin their fun would you expect anything different from the same sub that Dr. Pizza posted on :feelskek:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jzxtpn/not_how_consent_laws_work/


Lmfao what a bunch of fucking retards. They're all a bunch of autistic socially inept retards who think I actually believe in my own bullshit about tall men dating short women being pedophiles.

Also, JFL at this pathetic macho posturing. A bunch of losers trying to look tough. Bring it the fuck on you fucking fat double-chin having funko-pop collecting rancid smelling landwhales.
Capture2
 
Last edited:
I've noticed average sized foids are more likely to go for 5'9-5'10 guys than the shorter ones. The shorter ones are more likely to fetishise height
 
Lmfao what a bunch of fucking retards. They're all a bunch of autistic socially inept retards who think I actually believe in my own bullshit about tall men dating short women being pedophiles.

Also, JFL at this pathetic macho posturing. A bunch of losers trying to look tough. Bring it the fuck on you fucking fat double-chin having funko-pop collecting rancid smelling landwhales.
View attachment 377459
Based downvotes tbh

Pretty telling that just like jbw a lot of CuckTears feel that they benefit from the removal of the stigma against height mismatched relationships between short females and tall males.
 
Based downvotes tbh

Pretty telling that just like jbw a lot of CuckTears feel that they benefit from the removal of the stigma against height mismatched relationships between short females and tall males.
Anything that benefits wamen is of most importance to them, they're a bunch of pathetic fucking simps. They'll even throw other groups of people under the bus for wamen.
 
Anything that benefits wamen is of most importance to them, they're a bunch of pathetic fucking simps. They'll even throw other groups of people under the bus for wamen.
Of course. They worship women.
What these virgin but not incel types that feel refuge with CuckTears needs to realize is that when they face altercations with women and society and are left with no one to turn to the types of people on CuckTears will treat them just as they would any male they think is whining or saying/suggesting something bad about women.
There is no honor among thieves or in this case, reddit cucks.
 
prob what tall girls would want.

They'd want to shame tall men into daing tall girls.
I'd rather see tall guys with short girls, and entitled tall whores posting on twitter how short girls are stealing there men.
 
Jokes and phrases meant to cast doubt on such couples also help with the stigma.


IncelTear isn't taking this thread well.
But given the implications that might ruin their fun would you expect anything different from the same sub that Dr. Pizza posted on :feelskek:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jzxtpn/not_how_consent_laws_work/


IT is being cornered by its own beliefs jfl.They have to disagree with us, but deep down they admit that what OP proposed is something that they think unconsciously.If he were an incel, he would be criticized.
 

Similar threads

ddking0001
Replies
4
Views
995
Therapywasaaste
Therapywasaaste
InMemoriam
Replies
20
Views
4K
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
Aquiline
Replies
140
Views
20K
Fancy Alcoholic
Fancy Alcoholic
stalin22
Replies
49
Views
9K
stalin22
stalin22

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top