[Blackpill] Western civilization is becoming asexual (spoiler: they're murdering Freud)

B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
For the last 70 years feminist cultural theorists firmly espoused that we lived in a phallocentric world and that, with the right critical googles on, one could see cock-shaped symbols -- from stripper poles to modernist skyscrapers -- marking masculine power and supremacy everywhere. This was because the core organizational principle of the western world was to cater to the male gaze. From antiquity to modern times cultural rendering of women was that of a passive erotic object meant to sexually gratify the male narcissist, the voyeur, the pervert.

When Derrida added that even privileging logos was a dick move in itself, everything could be interpreted as cock privilege -- and everything became subject to the male gaze. It became fashionable to play where is patriarchy's Waldo within visual arts, classical literature and pop music... Everything was presumed to be sexual and already sexualised by men and for men's pleasure, and exposing it for what it is was only the proper thing to do.

But a simple return to prudish modesty isn't an option, gaslighting is. Third wave feminists just went from interpreting everything as having a phallic or yonic shape to denying that the obvious huge cock stand-in could have anything to do with sex.
 
Last edited:
TheNEET

TheNEET

School of Friendship dropout
★★
Joined
May 27, 2018
Posts
5,179
Online
13d 1h 37m
stop sexualizing sex, you silly inkwell :soy::soy::soy:
 
78980n

78980n

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Posts
8,282
Online
75d 7h 52m
Trying to wrap my head around that tweet rn
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Trying to wrap my head around that tweet rn
Shaking her ass against a iron pole is her morning workout routine, not a reason to jack off... what is there not to understand?
 
OldIncel

OldIncel

You’d walk right over me.
-
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Posts
3,122
Online
19d 20h 40m
Venomkore

Venomkore

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Posts
5,672
Online
17d 17h 13m
Cannot comprehend how stupid that tweet is jfl
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
ok so why do you dress almost naked when you do this? you realize that naked people are more likely to be viewed sexually right? idiot
Cannot comprehend how stupid that tweet is jfl
Lurk more. A woman may as well be twerking with a 10$ bill between her ass cheeks, physically her ass might be right there, inches from your face, but it would take someone watching her through the lens of entitlement to interpret it as a invitation to consume her body.
 
OldIncel

OldIncel

You’d walk right over me.
-
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Posts
3,122
Online
19d 20h 40m
Lurk more. A woman may as well be twerking with a 10$ bill between her ass cheeks, physically her ass might be right there, inches from your face, but it would take someone watching her through the lens of entitlement to interpret it as a invitation to consume her body.
Invitation to Chad only
 
the black dog

the black dog

lower than whale shit
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
1,962
Online
12d 17h 31m
Pole dancing arrived from strippers. Strippers are sexual. Pretty common sense.
 
Macrocephalus

Macrocephalus

Destroyed by upper eyelid exposure
★★★
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Posts
793
Online
9d 7h 44m
All it takes to get thousands of likes on Twitter is being a female and posting something about male sexuality
 
AlexanderTheGreat11

AlexanderTheGreat11

youngcel
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Posts
29,034
Online
132d 21h 31m
Nuke the west
 
Profligate

Profligate

Major
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Posts
2,027
Online
5d 13h 27m
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Freud a jew who was pushing tranny shit in his work.
 
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

We are here because we are not free
★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,269
Online
57d 10h 27m
The reason for this is that the female mind is unable to separate male traits from one another. They view male creations like art and skyscrapers as phallic objects because that is all foids view men as: walking sperm dispensers with penises. They judge males and their creations solely on their sexual abilities and likeness and nothing else.
Lurk more. A woman may as well be twerking with a 10$ bill between her ass cheeks, physically her ass might be right there, inches from your face, but it would take someone watching her through the lens of entitlement to interpret it as a invitation to consume her body.
Because its not entitlement when she decides its not. AKA, chad only. Entitlement is used by foids as a stand in for "an undesirable male wants to mate with me". Like all foid speak and thought, it is entirely self serving and meaningless.
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Freud a jew who was pushing tranny shit in his work.
Freud acknowledged that gender identification was not 'hardwired' like conservatives thought , neither something you can consciously control and explore like tumblr thinks, but a subconscious prcoess when one failed to cleanse oneself from the 'other' gender during early childhood. Yeah, I'm calling it based.

The reason for this is that the female mind is unable to separate male traits from one another. They view male creations like art and skyscrapers as phallic objects because that is all foids view men as: walking sperm dispensers with penises. They judge males and their creations solely on their sexual abilities and likeness and nothing else.

Because its not entitlement when she decides its not. AKA, chad only. Entitlement is used by foids as a stand in for "an undesirable male wants to mate with me". Like all foid speak and thought, it is entirely self serving and meaningless.
The wars feminists had in the 1980s split them into two camps, the radical lesbian 'separatists' who hated pole dancing because it was devised to please male gazers, and sex positive feminists that had no qualms with it, but they also acknowledged that pole dancing was a sexually suggestive, but if a woman wanted to do it, more power to her. What is missing now is the consensous which all feminist fractions had, whether they thought pole dancing was empowering or degrading, is that it was undeniably erotic in nature.

The counterpoint of this perspective is massive gaslighting. It is now a matter of time when one of them comes up with the idea that her onlyfans isn't intrinsically pornographic.
 
Last edited:
IsolationHurts

IsolationHurts

Spanish 29 KHHV Aspie Nostalgiacel
★★★★
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
3,384
Online
9d 9h 50m
It is happening indeed. One of the reasons i read and watch stuff about the current japanese culture is because we are doomed like them. 40% of japanese males are virgins, birth rates on civilizational suicide and getting worse, asexuality AND porn are BOTH completely out of control, most japanese males are workaholics and hate themselves, their society and their job, most japanese females are hyperhypergamous... Asexualization is our common destiny.
To be honest, some people can afford sexuality (most foids and Chads). It just has become a expensive currency, and most "philosophy" written about this is just a way to alienate the ones that have no value in the sexual market. Derrida now gatekeeps sex, if you are ugly or socially retarded, your sexuality deserves to be deconstructed. If youre Chad, of course not lmao. Derrida helped those with sexual privileges to prevent low quality males to feel entitled to a natural, physiologic, biological necessity, and decosntruct it as a cultural traditional idea (which is not)

It is now a matter of time when one of them comes up with the idea that her onlyfans isn't intrinsically pornographic.
I would say, its just a matter of time that low value males are forced to deconstruct their ideas about onlyfans being pornographic. Look most female streamers, its basically porn but nobody ever mentions it. What you see is: Incels alienated from their true identity (so in denial) consuming a product that make them feel good (because its a sexual product and satisfies a natural necessity), but, at the same time, that product, for them, has nothing to do with sexuality, to which they are not entitled. We must consume it but be oblivious to its nature at the same time, because paying for watching a foid fuck a Chad while both get paid to do it could lead to very dangerous ideas about the sexual inequality required to this particular situation to occur.

When Derrida added that even privileging logos was a dick move in itself
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
MartinLutherCoon

MartinLutherCoon

alcoholic failurecel
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Posts
7,821
Online
60d 22h 58m
Profligate

Profligate

Major
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Posts
2,027
Online
5d 13h 27m
Freud acknowledged that gender identification was not 'hardwired' like conservatives thought , neither something you can consciously control and explore like tumblr thinks, but a subconscious prcoess when one failed to cleanse oneself from the 'other' gender during early childhood. Yeah, I'm calling it based.
I liked Jung's work about animus and anima much better, it made a lot more sense than Freud's snowflaking but then again double digit IQ cannot comprehend Jungs ideas so that's why Freud's work were used as basis for modern psychology.
 
Introvert

Introvert

★★★
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Posts
1,246
Online
5d 9h 54m
Our current society is more sexual than it has ever been though, and this is not a good thing. Porn, sex scenes in movies and slutty dressing did not exist before, for instance. Even though women might claim they are against sexualization of women, they do still sexualize men themselves and do not mind when Chad sexualizes them (they actually like it, and this is why they dress slutty). They are also having more sex with Chad than ever before.
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
I would say, its just a matter of time that low value males are forced to deconstruct their ideas about onlyfans being pornographic. Look most female streamers, its basically porn but nobody ever mentions it. What you see is: Incels alienated from their true identity (so in denial) consuming a product that make them feel good (because its a sexual product and satisfies a natural necessity), but, at the same time, that product, for them, has nothing to do with sexuality, to which they are not entitled. We must consume it but be oblivious to its nature at the same time, because paying for watching a foid fuck a Chad while both get paid to do it could lead to very dangerous ideas about the sexual inequality required to this particular situation to occur.
Derrida, Foucault, Sartre and Beauvoir should be dug out of their graves, brought back to life, and put on a netflix binge to watch how far we've progressed. A whole new underclass of men are now glued to their monitors, chronically fapping and simping for cam girls, throwing those 20 bucks a month for a glimps of e-pussy, never to reap the benefits of their sexual liberation. The sexual revolution was the reaganomics of 68' -- it never trickled down.

I liked Jung's work about animus and anima much better, it made a lot more sense than Freud's snowflaking but then again double digit IQ cannot comprehend Jungs ideas so that's why Freud's work were used as basis for modern psychology.
really? I thought that concept was some serious new age malarkey if I ever saw one. But they tortured me with Lacan before we ever really got to Jung.
 
Last edited:
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

We are here because we are not free
★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,269
Online
57d 10h 27m
What is missing now is the consensous which all feminist fractions had, whether they thought pole dancing was empowering or degrading, is that it was undeniably erotic in nature.
Because the feminist zeitgeist determined that seperatism would hurt women more than help them and that they could extract more wealth and power through restricting sex to males who they deemed fit and sexually denying the others.

Everything feminism does is in service of the genocide against sub-6 males.
never to reap the benefits of their sexual liberation. The sexual revolution was the reaganomics of 68' -- it never trickled down.
Because they were never supposed to be liberated. The sexual revolution was engineered by cunning foids and delusional males in order to make chad available to more foids. That was the point of the sexual revolution. It wasn't a revolution. It was a coup against ugly men. Feminism exists solely to let ugly women have sexual access to chads.
 
Last edited:
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Our current society is more sexual than it has ever been though, and this is not a good thing. Porn, sex scenes in movies and slutty dressing did not exist before, for instance. Even though women might claim they are against sexualization of women, they do still sexualize men themselves and do not mind when Chad sexualizes them (they actually like it, and this is why they dress slutty). They are also having more sex with Chad than ever before.
Did you just forget the first rule of a sexualized society?
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Elaborate.
Imagine, just for a moment, that you're a happily married man with a little son, and you take your kid to one of those drag queen story hours. Your host that evening will be that 6ft3 trans queen Latisha who during story hour suddenly jumps on all fours and starts twerking restlessly, inches from kids faces, with xeir thong showing. The conservative man you are, you feel certain unease about the situation. Should you point out that flopping asscheeks is something that does not belong to a public library? But everyone else in the room has their sunday smiles on their faces and seems to be cool with it. Are you the only pervert in the room for interpreting it the wrong way?
 
Last edited:
lifeisbullshit95

lifeisbullshit95

Another day another mental breakdown.
★★
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Posts
2,196
Online
7d 9h 15m
Cucks are responsible for this.
 
S

Stutercel

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Dec 19, 2019
Posts
396
Online
7d 20h 43m
It is happening indeed. One of the reasons i read and watch stuff about the current japanese culture is because we are doomed like them. 40% of japanese males are virgins, birth rates on civilizational suicide and getting worse, asexuality AND porn are BOTH completely out of control, most japanese males are workaholics and hate themselves, their society and their job, most japanese females are hyperhypergamous... Asexualization is our common destiny.
To be honest, some people can afford sexuality (most foids and Chads). It just has become a expensive currency, and most "philosophy" written about this is just a way to alienate the ones that have no value in the sexual market. Derrida now gatekeeps sex, if you are ugly or socially retarded, your sexuality deserves to be deconstructed. If youre Chad, of course not lmao. Derrida helped those with sexual privileges to prevent low quality males to feel entitled to a natural, physiologic, biological necessity, and decosntruct it as a cultural traditional idea (which is not)



I would say, its just a matter of time that low value males are forced to deconstruct their ideas about onlyfans being pornographic. Look most female streamers, its basically porn but nobody ever mentions it. What you see is: Incels alienated from their true identity (so in denial) consuming a product that make them feel good (because its a sexual product and satisfies a natural necessity), but, at the same time, that product, for them, has nothing to do with sexuality, to which they are not entitled. We must consume it but be oblivious to its nature at the same time, because paying for watching a foid fuck a Chad while both get paid to do it could lead to very dangerous ideas about the sexual inequality required to this particular situation to occur.


:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
High IQ
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Because they were never supposed to be liberated. The sexual revolution was engineered by cunning foids and delusional males in order to make chad available to more foids. That was the point of the sexual revolution. It wasn't a revolution. It was a coup against ugly men. Feminism exists solely to let ugly women have sexual access to chads.
You're wrong with this one, and I could give you a chronological order on how it went, but it would be too long, so I'll do a schnell kurz here;

The only relevant force in the sexual revolution were thirsty male boomers. The plan was to free women from slutshaming and make them avalible on demand. When this was happening Betty Friedan was still advocating for the nuclear family, while a guy called Bernard Nathanson shilled for aborition to be accepted at the national women's convention as part of the official agenda of the women's movement. For many women abortion was a nasty, high-risk thing to do back then, but male hippie boomers enthusiastically endorsed it, since they wanted to keep taking turns on sluts in their communes uninterrupted.

Ask yourself this? Within months after the sexual revolution was at it's peak, the slogan 'FREE LOVE' was countered with a feminist saying 'LOVE ME LESS, RESPECT ME MORE', do you unironically think women were enjoying unsafe, promiscuous sex with those sub8 hippie grease balls? Don't be naive.
 
Last edited:
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

We are here because we are not free
★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,269
Online
57d 10h 27m
When this was happening Betty Friedan was still advocated for the nuclear family
Because the idea of mass female employment hadn't taken off yet. Feminists wanted women to work to be "independent" (able to fuck chad without touching a betabuxxer). Abortion is ultimately a nonfactor when compared to birth control pills and foid employment, which feminists supported.
LOVE ME LESS, RESPECT ME MORE
That only applies to non chads.
do you unironically think women were enjoying unsafe, promiscious sex with those sub8 hippie grease balls?
Do you think they were fucking them at all?
 
KingMootsberg

KingMootsberg

Recruit
Joined
May 10, 2020
Posts
30
Online
1d 8h 46m
So those who don’t rope will turn bluepill eventually? Join the horde of asexual, e-girl worshipping male underclass?
 
Introvert

Introvert

★★★
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Posts
1,246
Online
5d 9h 54m
Imagine, just for a moment, that you're a happily married man with a little son, and you take your kid to one of those drag queen story hours. Your host that evening will be that 6ft3 trans queen Latisha who during story hour suddenly jumps on all fours and starts twerking restlessly, inches from kids faces, with xeir thong showing. The conservative man you are, you feel certain unease about the situation. Should you point out that flopping asscheeks is something that does not belong to a public library? But everyone else in the room has their sunday smiles on their faces and seems to be cool with it. Are you the only pervert in the room for interpreting it the wrong way?
No. It would only mean that perversion has been normalized when most people are cool with it, which is bad. “Sexualizing” anything only means pointing out anything that can be objectively perceived in a sexual way. It is not the one who sexualizes it who is a pervert. Thus, it is women’s fault that men sexualize them, because they are the ones who do things which can be objectively perceived in a sexual way (such as pole dancing or dressing like sluts).
 
Orkcel

Orkcel

gamER rights activist
Joined
Jul 18, 2019
Posts
593
Online
10d 20h 53m
No. It would only mean that perversion has been normalized when most people are cool with it, which is bad. “Sexualizing” anything only means pointing out anything that can be objectively perceived in a sexual way. It is not the one who sexualizes it who is a pervert. Thus, it is women’s fault that men sexualize them, because they are the ones who do things which can be objectively perceived in a sexual way (such as pole dancing or dressing like sluts).
Perversion is just another male construct you freak! Nothing is sexual unless the creator intends it as such. :soy:
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Do you think they were fucking them at all?
Boyo, anywhere outside the spirit of the hippie commune Charles 'manlet' Manson would be an incel and would have never been able to acquire a loyal following of 12 prime sluts that worshiped him like a God -- the sexual revolution of 68' was probably the only period in history where a sub8 could fuck like an alpha, if he were only at the right place at the right time.

No. It would only mean that perversion has been normalized when most people are cool with it, which is bad. “Sexualizing” anything only means pointing out anything that can be objectively perceived in a sexual way. It is not the one who sexualizes it who is a pervert. Thus, it is women’s fault that men sexualize them, because they are the ones who do things which can be objectively perceived in a sexual way (such as pole dancing or dressing like sluts).
You keep forgetting that objectivity is also part of the old phallocentric framework. We're past that empiricist shit. What is sexual is in the eye of the beholder. You see trannies twerking at kids as lewd obscenity, they see it as humanity transcending bigotry and prejudice.

So those who don’t rope will turn bluepill eventually? Join the horde of asexual, e-girl worshipping male underclass?
They will turn into lumpenproles, caged in their dark cumstained rooms, sorrouned with piss bottles, spending their neetbux on gamer girl bath water that will be deliverd to them with amazon prime airs.
 
Introvert

Introvert

★★★
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Posts
1,246
Online
5d 9h 54m
You keep forgetting that objectivity is also part of the old phallocentric framework. We're past that empiricist shit. What is sexual is in the eye of the beholder. You see trannies twerking at kids as lewd obscenity, they see it as humanity transcending bigotry and prejudice.
Yeah, I forgot that I am one of the few sane people left in this clown world. My mistake.
 
Yerberito

Yerberito

Enlightened
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
34,841
Online
54d 16h 54m
It will be the end
 
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

We are here because we are not free
★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,269
Online
57d 10h 27m
Boyo, anywhere outside the spirit of the hippie commune Charles 'manlet' Manson would be an incel and would have never been able to acquire a loyal following of 12 prime sluts that worshiped him like a God -- the sexual revolution of 68' was probably the only period in history where a sub8 could fuck like an alpha, if he were only at the right place at the right time.
Manson was an example of dark triadmaxxing. He was a literal cult leader. For every Manson, there were likely 10 or 15 men that got scraps or nothing.
 
AutistCell

AutistCell

Bingo Bongo I'm a Mongo
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Posts
1,060
Online
1d 22h 23m
Trying to wrap my head around that tweet rn
trying to wrap my hand around my dick whilst watching pole dancing strippers
 
B.O.G.A.R.T.

B.O.G.A.R.T.

Recruit
Joined
Apr 19, 2020
Posts
90
Online
4d 13h 31m
Manson was an example of dark triadmaxxing. He was a literal cult leader. For every Manson, there were likely 10 or 15 men that got scraps or nothing.
You've got your timeline all fucked up, Charlie was a psycho dark triaderr since the 1950s, but he was also a nobody till the late 1960s, only to become a international symbol of gurumaxxing in the 1970s. He managed to become a notorious a cult leader only because the counterculture era provided fertile grounds for a literal who to larp as the new age incarnation of Jesus Christ.
 
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

We are here because we are not free
★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,269
Online
57d 10h 27m
You've got your timeline all fucked up, Charlie was a psycho dark triaderr since the 1950s, but he was also a nobody till the late 1960s, only to become a international symbol of gurumaxxing in the 1970s. He managed to become a notorious a cult leader only because the counterculture era provided fertile grounds for a literal who to larp as the new age incarnation of Jesus Christ.
My overall point is that Manson was an exception. Most men like Manson didn't have his experience.
 
Top