I
ionlycopenow
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
- Posts
- 15,355
I'm seeing so many cope online about how for some reason, being popular in high school/college means you are basically destined to be a miserable failure later on? Like they act as if they're GUARANTEED to "peak" there?
This is laughable because it's both extremely false and an example of just world fallacy.
Popular in those areas usually means
>good looking
>Very NT and outgoing
>Often rich
All major pluses and assets for success. This also leads on to forming many positive connections which can be used later. Nepotism goes a far way.
Yet low tier/failed normalfags are in major cope mode acting as if all of those somehow mean they're.. going to fail later in life? They even get angry and defensive/hostile when you point out how it makes no sense to claim that building social skills/having good looks/building the major confidence from status early on isnt a MAJOR asset in later life?
How does that make any sense? As we know people who are popular in those areas/bullies go on to live much better lives most of the time.
This is laughable because it's both extremely false and an example of just world fallacy.
Popular in those areas usually means
>good looking
>Very NT and outgoing
>Often rich
All major pluses and assets for success. This also leads on to forming many positive connections which can be used later. Nepotism goes a far way.
Yet low tier/failed normalfags are in major cope mode acting as if all of those somehow mean they're.. going to fail later in life? They even get angry and defensive/hostile when you point out how it makes no sense to claim that building social skills/having good looks/building the major confidence from status early on isnt a MAJOR asset in later life?
How does that make any sense? As we know people who are popular in those areas/bullies go on to live much better lives most of the time.