Dregster
VillagerSlayerMaxxing
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
- Posts
- 35,197
Linders meThey'll use Linder instead.
Linders meThey'll use Linder instead.
That’s just our cognitive perception. You notice the millimeters of difference in people’s faces. A couple mm here and there is undeniably a different unique person. You don’t perceive animals the same way. They’re all the same to you because there’s no reason to distinguish one from another. Lion = predator = bad = run. But if You take tape measure to lion’s faces, you’ll notice massive differences. And foid lions see these differences the same way foid humans see ours.
This is the answer I was looking for. Fucking hell, it all comes down to this, what a sad, sad world we live in.
Correct. If aliens came to earth they might perceive a bald middle aged fat curry and a 6'2 25 year old white Chad as being the same. And we may look at them through the same lens.That’s just our cognitive perception. You notice the millimeters of difference in people’s faces. A couple mm here and there is undeniably a different unique person. You don’t perceive animals the same way. They’re all the same to you because there’s no reason to distinguish one from another. Lion = predator = bad = run. But if You take tape measure to lion’s faces, you’ll notice massive differences. And foid lions see these differences the same way foid humans see ours.
Because WE ARE NOT ANIMALS. If you believe in muh evolution than youre an animal, however i dont believe that bs.
Keep believing jews.
This^Because WE ARE NOT ANIMALS. If you believe in muh evolution than youre an animal, however i dont believe that bs.
I disagree, I think an alien could tell there was a difference between a panther and a Jaguar just by looking at them. I don’t consider the aesthetic difference between these two animals to be any more pronounced than that between a fat, short Indian guy and a 6’2 Chad, in fact maybe it probably would be even less noticeable.Correct. If aliens came to earth they might perceive a bald middle aged fat curry and a 6'2 25 year old white Chad as being the same. And we may look at them through the same lens.
Evolution was proven in 1859.
That’s just our cognitive perception. You notice the millimeters of difference in people’s faces. A couple mm here and there is undeniably a different unique person. You don’t perceive animals the same way. They’re all the same to you because there’s no reason to distinguish one from another. Lion = predator = bad = run. But if You take tape measure to lion’s faces, you’ll notice massive differences. And foid lions see these differences the same way foid humans see ours.
massive cope. ur legit dumber than a soyboy if u don't believe in evolutionThey still can't prove evolution today, let alone in 1859.
Evolution is a Masonic scam. They want you to stop believing in God because that makes you hopeless and easy to control.
Genuinely not sure if this is a parody statement made with the intention of being ironic. I cannot conceive of a more paradoxically absurd assertion than the idea that secularism, the ideology out of which the enlightenment was born, is less characteristic of free-thought than Christianity: the ideology responsible for 1,000 years of scientific repression during the dark ages. What an unthinkable insane thing to believe.They want you to stop believing in God because that makes you hopeless and easy to control.
I just cannot understand this facet of evolution, it makes absolutely no sense to me. Why, when I look at any other animal, like bears, wolves, rabbits, snakes, squirrels, fish, lizards, birds, moles, worms and platypuses do they all have some semblance of continuity in physical attributes? Then when I look at human males and the disparity between gigachads and truecels they look like a different a totally different species to each other.
What is going on here? Most animals of the same species have at least the same skull shape and the facial differences are minor at most. A human can be 5’2 with a skeletal frame, potbelly and a bird skull whilst within the same species, even the same race within the species, can in contrast be 6’6 with a titan frame and a perfectly formed warrior skull. What sorcery is this? It would be a biological marvel if it wasn’t so ridiculously horrifying.
Have you done a quick google search to see the definition of the word "animal"? Guess not.Because WE ARE NOT ANIMALS. If you believe in muh evolution than youre an animal, however i dont believe that bs.
Keep believing jews.
thats cause natural selection is killed in a society, in prehistoric times incels would die or would get killed, dont mention dying aloneA human can be 5’2 with a skeletal frame, potbelly and a bird skull whilst within the same species, even the same race within the species, can in contrast be 6’6 with a titan frame and a perfectly formed warrior skull.
We're a genetically engineered slave/warrior race of beings that has outlived our usefulness as an existing entity.Because WE ARE NOT ANIMALS. If you believe in muh evolution than youre an animal, however i dont believe that bs.
Keep believing jews.
They still can't prove evolution today, let alone in 1859.
Evolution is a Masonic scam. They want you to stop believing in God because that makes you hopeless and easy to control.
Lol at you. My explanation is very much an evolutionary explanation. There is no evolved need to pick apart the features of other species because there is no need to distinguish between specimens.massive cope. ur legit dumber than a soyboy if u don't believe in evolution
I disagree, I think an alien could tell there was a difference between a panther and a Jaguar just by looking at them. I don’t consider the aesthetic difference between these two animals to be any more pronounced than that between a fat, short Indian guy and a 6’2 Chad, in fact maybe it probably would be even less noticeable.
Because your brain is trained to perceive small differences in your own species and ignore large differencies within or across other species.Why, when I look at any other animal, like bears, wolves, rabbits, snakes, squirrels, fish, lizards, birds, moles, worms and platypuses do they all have some semblance of continuity in physical attributes? Then when I look at human males and the disparity between gigachads and truecels they look like a different a totally different species to each other.
we are as diverse as animals, we just can’t tell because we don’t see them everyday and differences between them look negligibleI just cannot understand this facet of evolution, it makes absolutely no sense to me. Why, when I look at any other animal, like bears, wolves, rabbits, snakes, squirrels, fish, lizards, birds, moles, worms and platypuses do they all have some semblance of continuity in physical attributes? Then when I look at human males and the disparity between gigachads and truecels they look like a different a totally different species to each other.
What is going on here? Most animals of the same species have at least the same skull shape and the facial differences are minor at most. A human can be 5’2 with a skeletal frame, potbelly and a bird skull whilst within the same species, even the same race within the species, can in contrast be 6’6 with a titan frame and a perfectly formed warrior skull. What sorcery is this? It would be a biological marvel if it wasn’t so ridiculously horrifying.
yeaBecause your brain is trained to perceive small differences in your own species and ignore large differencies within or across other species.
For the same reason, you're better at seeing differences in people of your own race.
They still can't prove evolution today, let alone in 1859.
Evolution is a Masonic scam. They want you to stop believing in God because that makes you hopeless and easy to control.
Genuinely not sure if this is a parody statement made with the intention of being ironic. I cannot conceive of a more paradoxically absurd assertion than the idea that secularism, the ideology out of which the enlightenment was born, is less characteristic of free-thought than Christianity: the ideology responsible for 1,000 years of scientific repression during the dark ages. What an unthinkable insane thing to believe.
Oooo pretty, where can I find more art of a similar nature?You say this, meanwhile how do you explain the fact we live in the absolute most degenerate culture humanity has ever created?
Kinda of a coincidence that modernity rose from your so called "Enlightenment", isn't it?
Meanwhile the supposed "backwards" middle ages gave us this:
A few pretty cathedrals dotted across a landscape of peasants is not comparative to the entirety of scientific and social advancement. I know that period might appear more attractive to you now because there was no feminism but 1 week in a bubonic plague infested village without hot water, and you would be begging to come home. You can stress the importance of Christian ideology for a functional society, though I would disagree I think there is an argument to be made there, but the idea that Jesus actually came back from the dead or that any of it actually happened is historically laughable and you are in no position to call people sheep if you believe what are essentially children’s stories for adults.You say this, meanwhile how do you explain the fact we live in the absolute most degenerate culture humanity has ever created?
Kinda of a coincidence that modernity rose from your so called "Enlightenment", isn't it?
Meanwhile the supposed "backwards" middle ages gave us this:
You mean the scientific advances that have allowed birth rates and technology to advance to the point that the Earth is going to become a overpopulated shithole controlled by a tiny minority of people using computer systems and nuclear weapons? The technology advancements that allow women to pick and choose genetically superior men from the comfort of their living room? The technological advances that deprive us of human and spiritual connections?A few pretty cathedrals dotted across a landscape of peasants is not comparative to the entirety of scientific and social advancement. I know that period might appear more attractive to you now because there was no feminism but 1 week in a bubonic plague infested village without hot water, and you would be begging to come home. You can stress the importance of Christian ideology for a functional society, though I would disagree I think there is an argument to be made there, but the idea that Jesus actually came back from the dead or that any of it actually happened is historically laughable and you are in no position to call people sheep if you believe what are essentially children’s stories for adults.
A few pretty cathedrals dotted across a landscape of peasants is not comparative to the entirety of scientific and social advancement. I know that period might appear more attractive to you now because there was no feminism but 1 week in a bubonic plague infested village without hot water, and you would be begging to come home. You can stress the importance of Christian ideology for a functional society, though I would disagree I think there is an argument to be made there, but the idea that Jesus actually came back from the dead or that any of it actually happened is historically laughable and you are in no position to call people sheep if you believe what are essentially children’s stories for adults.
To me Kaczynski is a bit like Marx : a smart guy for sure, who made a pertinent analysis of a major problem in society, but who jumped to conclusions way too easily.Ted Kaczynski was right about nearly everything. Technology = Decadence = Degeneracy = Destruction.
Society has already destroyed itself through technology once before. We have evidence that our ancestors were a lot more advance than we know before written history.To me Kaczynski is a bit like Marx : a smart guy for sure, who made a pertinent analysis of a major problem in society, but who jumped to conclusions way too easily.
Technology has always been a double edge sword, ever since fire. Like, before Neolithic, most of the world was covered in trees. We cut and burned those bad boys like there is no tomorrow, in order to plant crops instead. In this process we drove countless species to extinction.
We are a force of destruction, that is for sure, but we also create. Entropy can only increase, so we can not create anything without destroying something else.
Also, technology is arguably more than a tool, it's a form of advancement we can be proud of, it is part of what some technologists, like say Ben Goertzel, call our cosmic imperative.
Please kill yourself.If all people would live according to the rules of the Islam, you would not have to worry about your NW0, mate. Think about it.
Degeneracy is the problem, we have to tackle it, but for that you first have to believe in a supreme power (god) and then do your research about religions(Islam to be specific). You will see that the quran has so many scientifical information. It's INSANE. It's just mind blowing to read stuff about the embryo, the expansion of the universe etc. How could they know about it 1400 years ago?! And so far the most important findings the science has found were all already written in the quran already.
It's obviously up to you if you do your research or not. Find the sense of life, and no its not about fucking as many girls as possible jfl. Degeneracy is happening because people lose their faith to god. Can you imagine what this world will look like in 50 years?!! The standarts of young women?! Hypergamy is gonna destroy all future men and no robots or what ever will be able to replace a WOMAN.
View attachment 129382
What I want to say is that you should make your own mind. Don't let you influence from the fucking media about muslim faggots bombing themselves(Wahabis) thinking they could get 72 virgins lmao. Trust me if every muslim would live accordingly to the quran, we would live a happy life.
I don't want to discuss about that further. I don't even post here anymore, because I am so blackpilled to the point that I can't and don't want to visit this site anymore. So I'll probably not be able to reply to your respond in a short time.
I would be happy if you would just respond with "ok" instead of discussing and calling me Low IQ. I am an lonely incel that is isolated from the real world, i have no power or the will to discuss with people from the internet about the purpose of life but I somehow found the motivation to write that stuff above.
Bye
and a cute gif:
On top of this animals have fur everywhere, covering their bones. Also the animal equivalent of a severe birdcel probably does't exist due to brutal nature killing off the deformed and weak.We have a part of our brain thats devoted to human face recognition
Then when I look at human males and the disparity between gigachads and truecels they look like a different a totally different species to each other.