Why Female Political And Economic Socialists Are Hypocrites.

MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
So, by now you all have heard of female neoliberals or Marxists chant economic socialism for the last few decades, I'm about to tell you why it's all bullshit.

There's a few bullshit players in our story here but mostly we'll focus on the so called female economic or political socialists.

Women or females are basically hypergamous sexual capitalists meaning they're all about socially climbing up society in terms of maximizing their ability of pro-creating and reproducing with the top 20% of the male population. So riddle me this, how is a creature that is sexually capitalist suppose to support and facilitate economic socialism across all segments of society which presumably means all males within it? Protip: They can't and they won't, that's an impossibility.

Because the female biological psychology is sexually capitalist or hypergamous they've already written the bottom 80% of men off concerning sexual interaction, you're telling me these same creatures that does all of that wants to make the socio-economic playing field more equal or equitable for the same men they already sexually write off? Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on all of that. Truth be told with the uterus already being sexually capitalist there is a sort of sexual eugenics always at play with the female reproductive biological psychology. In fact, the only way female's social or economic version of socialism could ever work would be to have the bottom 80℅ of men being sexually celibate permanently not seeking sex or reproductive opportunity anywhere, you would have to essentially destroy the bottom 80% of men's entire sexual drive and libido just to get the kind of feminist utopic economic vision of socialism they collectively have in mind. I mean, how can you have an economically socialist or communist system where human sexuality is in constant social competition and entirely capitalist based? A mind blowing paradox and contradiction if there ever was one.

What's interesting to note is that while many great writers have wrote hundreds of books or volumes on the economic social psychological motivations within society less than half have discussed the inclinations of human sexuality being the primary impetus of all social economic psychological interactions. In fact, I would argue that all theories regarding social economic psychological interactions within society without discussing human sexuality is meaningless or vague full of errors. How can you discuss human nature without discussing the very behavioral social component of it reproducing itself?

And since the primary component of female sexuality is capitalist or socially eugenics based, how can you create a socialist economic environment that includes social equity for all including the same men that are primarily cut off from the reproductive breeding gene pool? Again, quite the mental conundrum. Another reason economic socialism fails besides its rational inadequacies or logical failures is entirely because of human sexuality and while females are sexually eugenic or capitalist the top 20% of men don't want to change things either because for a long time in civilization's history they've enjoyed a sexual monopoly in having primary access to a majority of breeding age females and it is only logical to say they don't want to get rid of that primary sexual monopoly of theirs with women anytime soon.

Of course, concerning this modern neo-liberal guise of economic socialism, is it any surprise that it is one that is entirely feminine in nature? You'll always hear about women's rights, women's opportunities, and women's protections under law, but what is really interesting about this entirely feminine modern neo-liberal economic socialism you never hear anything about social equity for men especially the bottom 80℅ of the male general population, that my friends is no bug or error whatsoever, that's an intentional feature of its whole design.
 
Last edited:
Zettacel

Zettacel

KHHTV • Dreadfully Distinct
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
34,182
Online
139d 3h 12m
TheDarkEnigma

TheDarkEnigma

St. JackieArklövcel
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Posts
1,984
Online
34d 2h 7m
Foids get Chad's dick for free, while most guys still have to pay to get laid.
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Enjoying a cold one right now.
★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
2,724
Online
12d 6h 16m
how is a creature that is sexually capitalist suppose to support and facilitate economic socialism
Foids political opinion is very infantile. The paradox you describe here probably comes from the fact that liberalism, and the faith in individuality, was only made possible thanks to the material conditions provided by capitalistic societies. Foids are just like children of rich families, who think communism is sharing daddies stuffs, totally ignoring that daddy is a capitalist landlord who made their comfort possible precisely through the exploitation of the masses, and that this exploitation is the very condition of a bourgeois household living in comfort. This is why foids can show off very leftist opinions in public, while being cluelessly ultra-capitalistic in their manners and actions.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Foids get Chad's dick for free, while most guys still have to pay to get laid.
Sexual socialism and communism for the very top [Top 20% of male Chads], and crony sexual capitalism or nothing at all for the very bottom of men. [Bottom male 80%]

Many such cases everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Enjoying a cold one right now.
★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
2,724
Online
12d 6h 16m
Of course, concerning this modern neo-liberal guise of economic socialism, is it any surprise that it is one that is entirely feminine in nature? You'll always hear about women's rights, women's opportunities, and women's protections under law, but what is really interesting about this entirely feminine modern neo-liberal economic socialism you never hear anything about social equity for men especially the bottom 80℅ of the male general population, that my friends is no bug or error whatsoever, that's an intentional feature of its whole design.
Based
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Foids political opinion is very infantile. The paradox you describe here probably comes from the fact that liberalism, and the faith in individuality, was only made possible thanks to the material conditions provided by capitalistic societies. Foids are just like children of rich families, who think communism is sharing daddies stuffs, totally ignoring that daddy is a capitalist landlord who made their comfort possible precisely through the exploitation of the masses, and that this exploitation is the very condition of a bourgeois household living in comfort. This is why foids can show off very leftist opinions in public, while being cluelessly ultra-capitalistic in their manners and actions.
This^^^High I.Q. Post
Foids get Chad's dick for free, while most guys still have to pay to get laid.
....Or we could also say speaking of modern political social neo-liberalism here as....


Sexual socialism for women [socialize the females collectively at the top sphere of society], and sexual crony capitalism for men [privatizing males as a general loss within society at the very bottom]

The regular modern economic dynamics already being played versus the sexes in how they manifest themselves in social interaction today is eerily similar and palpable by comparison. It's the whole socialize the profits and privatize the losses but with a sexual gender behavioral twist.

For shits and giggles, socializing the pussy [vagina] and privatizing the dicks.
 
Last edited:
GermaniaIncelia

GermaniaIncelia

celda
★★
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Posts
2,600
Online
21d 23h 29m
So, by now you all have heard of female neoliberals or Marxists chant economic socialism for the last few decades, I'm about to tell you why it's all bullshit.

There's a few bullshit players in our story here but mostly we'll focus on the so called female economic or political socialists.

Women or females are basically hypergamous sexual capitalists meaning they're all about socially climbing up society in terms of maximizing their ability of pro-creating and reproducing with the top 20% of the male population. So riddle me this, how is a creature that is sexually capitalist suppose to support and facilitate economic socialism across all segments of society which presumably means all males within it? Protip: They can't and they won't, that's an impossibility.

Because the female biological psychology is sexually capitalist or hypergamous they've already written the bottom 80% of men off concerning sexual interaction, you're telling me these same creatures that does all of that wants to make the socio-economic playing field more equal or equitable for the same men they already sexually write off? Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on all of that. Truth be told with the uterus already being sexually capitalist there is a sort of sexual eugenics always at play with the female reproductive biological psychology. In fact, the only way female's social or economic version of socialism could ever work would be to have the bottom 80℅ of men being sexually celibate permanently not seeking sex or reproductive opportunity anywhere, you would have to essentially destroy the bottom 80% of men's entire sexual drive and libido just to get the kind of feminist utopic economic vision of socialism they collectively have in mind. I mean, how can you have an economically socialist or communist system where human sexuality is in constant social competition and entirely capitalist based? A mind blowing paradox and contradiction if there ever was one.

What's interesting to note is that while many great writers have wrote hundreds of books or volumes on the economic social psychological motivations within society less than half have discussed the inclinations of human sexuality being the primary impetus of all social economic psychological interactions. In fact, I would argue that all theories regarding social economic psychological interactions within society without discussing human sexuality is meaningless or vague full of errors. How can you discuss human nature without discussing the very behavioral social component of it reproducing itself?

And since the primary component of female sexuality is capitalist or socially eugenics based, how can you create a socialist economic environment that includes social equity for all including the same men that are primarily cut off from the reproductive breeding gene pool? Again, quite the mental conundrum. Another reason economic socialism fails besides its rational inadequacies or logical failures is entirely because of human sexuality and while females are sexually eugenic or capitalist the top 20% of men don't want to change things either because for a long time in civilization's history they've enjoyed a sexual monopoly in having primary access to a majority of breeding age females and it is only logical to say they don't want to get rid of that primary sexual monopoly of theirs with women anytime soon.

Of course, concerning this modern neo-liberal guise of economic socialism, is it any surprise that it is one that is entirely feminine in nature? You'll always hear about women's rights, women's opportunities, and women's protections under law, but what is really interesting about this entirely feminine modern neo-liberal economic socialism you never hear anything about social equity for men especially the bottom 80℅ of the male general population, that my friends is no bug or error whatsoever, that's an intentional feature of its whole design.
based and yes.

the only way any kind of extreme socialism works is by shifting/erosion of the middle class. to keep a socialist system in place you need an authority to oversee and enforce it. and this authority needs to be strong enough to not be easily overthrown by its middle and lower classes. meaning the middle class needs to be somewhat weak and not have the means for a revolution. hence also why the only way to communism is by pressuring the middle class to harm the lower classes which in turn will put pressure on the middle class to demand changes from the top until the middle class can't or won't sustain itself any longer. should sound familiar to what's currently going on worldwide with the crown virus.
 
ldarshortcel

ldarshortcel

Recruit
★★
Joined
Sep 7, 2020
Posts
105
Online
23h 38m
Women advocate for what is best for them.
A socialist economy is good for them, and a capitalist dating market is good for them, so that's what they want.
It's was never about a coherent ideology, that's just a convenient lie.
 
dogcel256

dogcel256

Commander
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Posts
3,452
Online
84d 18h 23m
I took a marxian course once and was surprised about the similarities between the sexual market and financial market. There was this marxian concept called primitive accumulation which was the transition from a feudal to capitalist soyciety. If you think about it the primitive accumulation of the sexual market occurred in the 1960s with free love and in 2011 with tinder.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
While I agree there are numerous problems with economic capitalism especially the crony variety I don't believe state sponsored socialism and communism is the answer either, but with that being said he's spot on concerning the monetization or commoditization of sexual relationships especially in the modern era. I would argue the commoditization of human sexual or even social relationships has been going on since the beginning of time all the way to the hunter gatherer period of human beings, but of course overall economic capitalism as it exists now takes what was already prevailing in human nature multiplying it by a million fold. It takes the worst prevailing portions of human nature and then magnifies it even more.
based and yes.

the only way any kind of extreme socialism works is by shifting/erosion of the middle class. to keep a socialist system in place you need an authority to oversee and enforce it. and this authority needs to be strong enough to not be easily overthrown by its middle and lower classes. meaning the middle class needs to be somewhat weak and not have the means for a revolution. hence also why the only way to communism is by pressuring the middle class to harm the lower classes which in turn will put pressure on the middle class to demand changes from the top until the middle class can't or won't sustain itself any longer. should sound familiar to what's currently going on worldwide with the crown virus.
Yes, very familiar.
Women advocate for what is best for them.
A socialist economy is good for them, and a capitalist dating market is good for them, so that's what they want.
It's was never about a coherent ideology, that's just a convenient lie.
High I.Q. post, and yes, the desires of the average modern woman is extremely contradictive bordering on mental insanity.
I took a marxian course once and was surprised about the similarities between the sexual market and financial market. There was this marxian concept called primitive accumulation which was the transition from a feudal to capitalist soyciety. If you think about it the primitive accumulation of the sexual market occurred in the 1960s with free love and in 2011 with tinder.
In the ancient period sexual interaction was merely that of a man protecting females away from natural predators, providing food for them, and providing shelter for females to live under. The man produced and facilitated all of that where the female in exchange would bend over a tree stump exchanging her vajay-jay as a compliment for the service of the male thus bearing the man's children. The sexual market I would argue is as old as time itself, the only difference is that what was basic and pretty straightforward in ancient times is much more complex now when you add things like money/income, technological and occupational specialization, economic classism or stratification, education, sedentary modern lifestyle, and so on.

The sexual marketplace now is one giant mess and because our societies have become ones where a few live at the expense of the majority it has become sexually tyrannical or dehumanizing which is why we incel men exist today as an inevitable reactionary byproduct. I will say this though concerning economic capitalism in relation to sexual capitalism of women, the first capitalist in human history was the first woman to have ever existed. It was woman that devised capitalism and social capital, not man.
 
Last edited:
Over_this_Life

Over_this_Life

LDARmaxxing
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Posts
8,958
Online
35d 23m
Foids in any career field cannot be taken seriously, unless that field is a kitchen
 
TheDarkEnigma

TheDarkEnigma

St. JackieArklövcel
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Posts
1,984
Online
34d 2h 7m
Foids in any career field cannot be taken seriously, unless that field is a kitchen
Lol, I doubt that even foids can cook better than Gordon Ramsay in that regard.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Foids in any career field cannot be taken seriously, unless that field is a kitchen
I don't even trust a modern foid to cook a Hotpocket in a microwave anymore, somehow they would find a way to fuck it up which they do with most things nowadays.
 
Over_this_Life

Over_this_Life

LDARmaxxing
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Posts
8,958
Online
35d 23m
Lol, I doubt that even foids can cook better than Gordon Ramsay in that regard.
I meant to say they are better off in the home and to leave more important matters to men
 
TheDarkEnigma

TheDarkEnigma

St. JackieArklövcel
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Posts
1,984
Online
34d 2h 7m
I meant to say they are better off in the home and to leave more important matters to men
Yeah, but just saying that even a man can cook and master it better than a foid.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
In my experience, once a woman becomes very accustomed to or dependent upon a lifestyle of theirs it's almost impossible to get them to give it up willingly, nothing short of some kind of global catastrophe and crisis will alter their minds differently, and even then they'll do everything they can to regain everything that was lost to them if they can. Females in general despise downsizing or going without things, you must remember that foids are pure mental materialists, the material world is their heroin and crack cocaine, it's all they know and generally understand. It's also why they're so very easily mentally manipulated or led astray by various forms of propaganda, their inability to see beyond the material plane of existence causes them to be vulnerable to such things.

The mental node of females is pure materialism, I cannot stress or emphasize this enough.
 
Last edited:
Hyperwristcel

Hyperwristcel

Is the perfect guy ... girls just don't see it.
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Posts
971
Online
5d 19h 56m
tinted_vision

tinted_vision

Recruit
★★
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Posts
153
Online
15d 23h 31m
they talk about female equality, but when a guy talks about his problems they become the most neolib capitalist people imaginable
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
they talk about female equality, but when a guy talks about his problems they become the most neolib capitalist people imaginable
Yes, because with feminism egalitarianism only means for women and females as it is applied.

Meanwhile the bottom 80% of men suffer in silence and the general suicide statistics overwhelming eludes to this, yet nobody seems to care other than the bottom 80% of men that is. Around and around we go on this merry go round of the hellmatrix.
 
Last edited:
UramiSan

UramiSan

Your Incellence
★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
194
Online
1d 32m
Foids are mentally retarded jewish apes and can't see politics beyond their personal experience and interests, water is wet
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Foids are mentally retarded jewish apes and can't see politics beyond their personal experience and interests, water is wet
Zogbots seems more fitting and fun in extrapolating, but yes, your point is well taken.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
33,100
Online
110d 2h 2m
Women mix their dumbness and solipsism to come up with their ideal system (which sadly is the one in place in most countries nowadays, since gynocentrism is as inflamed as ever before): economic socialism and laissez-faire capitalism in the dating market.

When confronted about this, they'll say that:

1) female bodies are not a commodity like money or food

2) sex is not necessary for survival like food or water are

Concerning the first point, they fail to consider that all goods and services come from people's work (using their bodies) and not from magic. If you have food to eat, is because someone worked to produce it, using, guess what, their bodies. Even machines need some degree of being operated or at the very least supervised and maintained, all of which are done by the workers' bodies. Such machines were also built by people using their bodies, or by other machines which were in turn built by people, etc. The source is always people and their bodies.

How is it fair that the money I generated by my work, produced by the sweat of my body, gets stolen from me and sent to some single mom who CHOSE to fuck some criminal or non-committed Chad without proper protection instead of committing to a decent guy, against my will?

Concerning the second point, they fail to realize that, past basic survival, sex and relationships mean a lot more for humans than material goods. I never heard of anyone starving to death where I live, and I live in Brazil, which is third world; I don't think it happens often in the first world at all.

Being an incel, especially in an oversexualized society like ours, is painful, traumatic, unfulfilling, etc. Most people who commit suicide do it because of hopelessness concerning their futures. They don't think they'll be happy, find a suitable partner, have a good family, work in a good job, etc. I never heard of anyone committing suicide simply because they were poor.
 
Last edited:
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Women mix their dumbness and solipsism to come up with their ideal system (which sadly is the one in place in most countries nowadays, since gynocentrism is as inflamed as ever before): economic socialism and laissez-faire capitalism in the dating market.

When confronted about this, they'll say that:

1) female bodies are not a commodity like money or food

2) sex is not necessary for survival like food or water are

Concerning the first point, they fail to consider that all goods and services come from people's work (using their bodies) and not from magic. If you have food to eat, is because someone worked to produce it, using, guess what, their bodies. Even machines need some degree of being operated or at the very least supervised and maintained, all of which are done by the workers' bodies. Such machines were also built by people using their bodies, or by other machines which were in turn built by people, etc. The source is always people and their bodies.

How is it fair that the money I generated by my work, produced by the sweat of my body, gets stolen from me and sent to some single mom who CHOSE to fuck some criminal or non-committed Chad without proper protection instead of committing to a decent guy, against my will?

Concerning the second point, they fail to realize that, past basic survival, sex and relationships mean a lot more for humans than material goods. I never heard of anyone starving to death where I live, and I live in Brazil, which is third world; I don't think it happens often in the first world at all.

Being an incel, especially in an oversexualized society like ours, is painful, traumatic, unfulfilling, etc. Most people who commit suicide do it because of hopelessness concerning their futures. They don't think they'll be happy, find a suitable partner, have a good family, work in a good job, etc. I never heard of anyone committing suicide simply because they were poor.

In my general experience women or females never concern themselves about the suffering of men let alone the bottom 80% of men they despise. They just don't care and when confronted about it they'll just laugh walking off.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
33,100
Online
110d 2h 2m
In my general experience women or females never concern themselves about the suffering of men let alone the bottom 80% of men they despise. They just don't care and when confronted about it they'll just laugh walking off.
They will behave like that privately, but publicly, they'll use the aforementioned arguments.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
They will behave like that privately, but publicly, they'll use the aforementioned arguments.
Yes, I know. It's funny they say they're not a commodity when we all know they truly are concerning monetization.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
33,100
Online
110d 2h 2m
Yes, I know. It's funny they say they're not a commodity when we all know they truly are concerning monetization.
They are not a commodity when they don't want to be, and are when they want to. Definitions change according to convenience. This is their solipsism.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
They are not a commodity when they don't want to be, and are when they want to. Definitions change according to convenience. This is their solipsism.
In a world that revolves around their convenience, yes.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
33,100
Online
110d 2h 2m
Women mix their dumbness and solipsism to come up with their ideal system (which sadly is the one in place in most countries nowadays, since gynocentrism is as inflamed as ever before): economic socialism and laissez-faire capitalism in the dating market.

When confronted about this, they'll say that:

1) female bodies are not a commodity like money or food

2) sex is not necessary for survival like food or water are

Concerning the first point, they fail to consider that all goods and services come from people's work (using their bodies) and not from magic. If you have food to eat, is because someone worked to produce it, using, guess what, their bodies. Even machines need some degree of being operated or at the very least supervised and maintained, all of which are done by the workers' bodies. Such machines were also built by people using their bodies, or by other machines which were in turn built by people, etc. The source is always people and their bodies.

How is it fair that the money I generated by my work, produced by the sweat of my body, gets stolen from me and sent to some single mom who CHOSE to fuck some criminal or non-committed Chad without proper protection instead of committing to a decent guy, against my will?

Concerning the second point, they fail to realize that, past basic survival, sex and relationships mean a lot more for humans than material goods. I never heard of anyone starving to death where I live, and I live in Brazil, which is third world; I don't think it happens often in the first world at all.

Being an incel, especially in an oversexualized society like ours, is painful, traumatic, unfulfilling, etc. Most people who commit suicide do it because of hopelessness concerning their futures. They don't think they'll be happy, find a suitable partner, have a good family, work in a good job, etc. I never heard of anyone committing suicide simply because they were poor.
I would like to see IT refuting this.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
They responded to your OP but not to mine. Inceltear, I mean.
They responded to me? I feel so special now, you know I've been trying really hard to make it on their collective radar and now that I have it's time to celebrate. Do you have a link? It will make some interesting reading material for later especially when I deconstruct the various bullshit that I know they'll post there. I need something to do desperately to pass the time away, an activity or hobby of sorts.
 

Attachments

  • giphy (44).gif
    giphy (44).gif
    590.9 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

Eternal fucking doomer $Please Swipe Here$
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
558
Online
4d 21h 49m
Read the thread. *Laughs* I was hoping that at least a semi educated or mentally cognitive person would reply but instead all I get is useless banter that looks like it was written either by a fifteen year old girl, trannie, or faggot. [I can't tell which.]

*sighs* Is there any semi competent opposition to argue with these days, or are they all just mental zombies? Too bad, I enjoy a good debate.

Just look at those cartoon diagrams, well, that certainly has put me in my place. [Bhahahahahahahaha!]

Gee-golly, I've been wrong the entire time! [Laughs]
 

Attachments

  • a4l5d8hg2aj61.png
    a4l5d8hg2aj61.png
    592.8 KB · Views: 2
Last edited: