Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Why the power to change society for the better is in women's hands and why they are not changing it for the better on purpose

G

GermaniaIncelia

incel vortex
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Posts
2,664
When men search for a woman, what they search for is a woman. Not any woman, but still a woman. A normal human being capable of empathy, that behaves civilised and signals to the man that she cares about him.

When women search for a man, they search for the man. And they also search for one of the men. They believe that amongst men there is this upper class that is deserving of everything and the rest of the men deserve nothing. And that amongst these upper class men there is that one man who was specifically born just for her. The former is female nature, the latter they picked up from Hollywood.

Men in the 21st century live in the real world. They are looking for another human soul to share their affection with.
Women in the 21st century live in a fantasy world. They create a discriminatory picture of men that divides them into 2 classes that is not reflective of the real world.

Any positivist normie would say "to complain is easy, but you are not making it any better if you don't work on the problem." Ironic because as positivists you are not working to solve problems, you are working to avoid problems and blindly hope that you won't be affected by them. Let's have a genuine look at the problem then.

I want you for a short moment to think about a very rough list of traits that men and women want from the opposite sex in your opinion. This is mine.

Women want: Aggressive, violent, dominant, masculine face, muscles, cunning, wealthy.
Men want: Virgin, loyal, not obese, not feminist.

You may or may not agree with these traits. My point here is if you compare such lists of traits to reality then it becomes clear quickly that whatever is considered feminine is no longer part of the general traits of women and the same for men with masculinity.
Women and tradcucks complain all the time that men are no longer "manly" enough for women. But where does the definition for what constitutes manly even come from? It comes from women. Those are the people whose affection you as a male are trying to gain. The same is true vice versa. People can now complain all day about how unmanly men are and how unwomanly women are, but that does not stop the trend. It continues along that path.

You can take 2 committed stances now. Either you support the trend or you don't.

If as a woman you don't because you like men who are 'manly' or masculine, then you as a woman have to fulfil your share of what constitutes being womanly or feminine. But the woman will make demands for the man to change, the man for the woman to make changes. It doesn't get anywhere.

The question is therefore: Where does this whole trend begin?

If you genuinely wanted the root of the problem to be fixed you would ask this question otherwise the problem can never be fixed.

Case 1 - Women want men to be manly
Most men when puberty hits are not overly aggressive, violent and dominant. We can attribute this fault to men. Men should have just started bashing peoples' heads in and disregarding society and its laws like other male bullies do. And at the same age women fuck the most violent men ASAP, a fault that can be attributed to women since they know the value of virginity to men but still choose to lose their virginity extremely early on in life.

In a society who should change their behavior in this case? Very obviously women if things ought to play out in a civilised manner. But if we want to assign the blame to men it means to want to destroy society in this case. To want men to bash each others' heads in and go on killing rampages. The term genocidal maniacs in association with women comes to mind again.

What can the lesser dominant men do in this situation? They can improve their looks, work out for muscles, work on their assertiveness, gather wealth. But nothing they do can fix the women. They have already lost their virginity. They have already given their promise of loyalty to someone else. They no longer qualify for what it means to be womanly or feminine and it is irreversible. Their virginity can not be restored.

Case 2 - Women don't want men to be manly
Same situation, men are not overly aggressive, violent and dominant. This time we can not attribute any fault to men because men are acting in accordance with what women demand which is to not act manly. We can also not attribute any fault to women for sleeping around in their early years exclusively with bullies because in a progressive society women don't have to act like women any longer to attract men. Such would be the expectations on both sides.

If the criteria of case 2 aligned with our reality women would accept and tolerate men who are not being overly manly. But very obviously they don't, they reject such men. If women were to claim that case 2 reflects our society then they should stop telling men that they have to change and become more manly. The fault in case 2 lies with womens' intolerance towards unmanly men. If case 1 reflects our society then we can argue that men are at fault for not being genocidal maniacs the same way women are.

TL;DR: Women are responsible for men not being 'manly'. Women would have to change if they really wanted such men. But since they already had a taste of chad, they are fine with the situation as is.
 
if its chad then women want him to be as manly as it gets
if he is sub chad then women want to turn him into a tranny
 
not bad, it's actually disgusting how much modern media tiptoes around this issue, of women controlling men's behavior

ostensibly, the figureheads want to support and encourage a lot of nice things, like reducing pollution, reducing waste and conspicuous consumption

but every single time they shy away from touching on who really drives all these, given the control that women have over men's behavior and the economy, since women control a great majority of all purchases that are made... cars, houses, furniture, other expensive things... these purchases are made by men either at the direct order of women or in order to impress women

the figureheads get a little close every once in a while, but they always run away, because there's a "toxic" conclusion at the end of it, namely that women are manipulative trash that outright encourages and rewards wasteful and destructive behavior
 
not bad, it's actually disgusting how much modern media tiptoes around this issue, of women controlling men's behavior

ostensibly, the figureheads want to support and encourage a lot of nice things, like reducing pollution, reducing waste and conspicuous consumption

but every single time they shy away from touching on who really drives all these, given the control that women have over men's behavior and the economy, since women control a great majority of all purchases that are made... cars, houses, furniture, other expensive things... these purchases are made by men either at the direct order of women or in order to impress women

the figureheads get a little close every once in a while, but they always run away, because there's a "toxic" conclusion at the end of it, namely that women are manipulative trash that outright encourages and rewards wasteful and destructive behavior
precisely. humans have always lived in a matriarchy but people are coping heavily in order not to have to see it.
to look at the top of men and blame them for what's going on is similarly wrong as to look at one's politicians and claim they are at fault if something goes wrong. a politician just does what little he can do within the pre-established framework they find themselves in. and they have to gain the favor of the same persons who were around before they got into office. Hence someone like Biden even though he has different views as Trump will roughly still move along the same courses of actions because it's not them who call the shots. it's the people whose favor they have to gain.
 
They are making things better for them, that's all those selfish beings care about.
 
if its chad then women want him to be as manly as it gets
if he is sub chad then women want to turn him into a tranny
Literally all OP needed to post
 
if he is sub chad then women want to turn him into a tranny
This is so legit, girls always want their guy-friends to be feminine af and their boyfriends to be manly
 
if its chad then women want him to be as manly as it gets
if he is sub chad then women want to turn him into a tranny
Rumblingfuel
 
chad's dick is more important to these whores than life itself.
 
Because it benefits them.

Human beings are not that complicated. The same logic applies to rich and poor people. Any poor person who complains that rich people are using their resources to continue "fucking over" poor people would do the same thing if we swapped the positions in life. Now, for political reasons, we attribute morality to this undeniable fact of social power dynamics, most likely because the only way for the rich people to lose is if they are demonized. People are all greedy and with the assumption, we built a functioning civilisation, we deny this truth, we destroy it.

Whenever I read some retard's opinions on capitalism, I LMAO because they don't understand that you cannot remove the biological functions of a human's need to accrue resources and if you do, you will fail in spectacular fashion. IT OCCURS IN NATURE, you can't stop nature. You can only suppress it. If you do remove it via some kind of genetic manipulation, you kill whatever species lost it.

The checks and balances of society are removed, and it is now chaos personified. There is a reason we personify the feminine as pragmatic because they do not blind themselves with any abstract values. They do what they want to get what they want. The issue is that we absolved all limiters to that.

Therefore, I don't agree with the aspect that women pick the best genetic mates for anything other than sexuality. They have no moral or logical justification; it is pure self-indulgence. They are not picking the best men to breed, raw instinct has blinded them and their biology doesn't recognise any greater element of civilisation. We used to limit that indulgence because it has no purpose. Why destroy the fabric of society for a couple of orgasms? Well, it is easier to tame animals than it is to enslave people who can think with more than their loins.

We would still live in mud huts if previous generations did not reward simps with sex, and the only reason we rewarded them was that there were social stigmas on both genders, men to provide and women to seek providers due to provision, not genetics outside of survival and ability determents.

We literally destroyed social cohesion because the vast majority of civilisation are cucks and are so dumb that they think people are superior to animals. For most of us, it is too late as they played this game before we were born.

We are in the endgame, and it is going to get so much worse. It disappoints me. In some other timeline, I would be able to apply my knowledge and my skills to achieve something in society. I have my qualifications and my income, but our society is so diseased that while I have solutions, no one will ever listen to me.

"My hate is general, I detest all men; Some because they are wicked and do evil, Others because they tolerate the wicked, Refusing them the active vigorous scorn Which vice should stimulate in virtuous minds."
 
Last edited:
When men search for a woman, what they search for is a woman. Not any woman, but still a woman. A normal human being capable of empathy, that behaves civilised and signals to the man that she cares about him.

When women search for a man, they search for the man. And they also search for one of the men. They believe that amongst men there is this upper class that is deserving of everything and the rest of the men deserve nothing. And that amongst these upper class men there is that one man who was specifically born just for her. The former is female nature, the latter they picked up from Hollywood.

Men in the 21st century live in the real world. They are looking for another human soul to share their affection with.
Women in the 21st century live in a fantasy world. They create a discriminatory picture of men that divides them into 2 classes that is not reflective of the real world.

Any positivist normie would say "to complain is easy, but you are not making it any better if you don't work on the problem." Ironic because as positivists you are not working to solve problems, you are working to avoid problems and blindly hope that you won't be affected by them. Let's have a genuine look at the problem then.

I want you for a short moment to think about a very rough list of traits that men and women want from the opposite sex in your opinion. This is mine.

Women want: Aggressive, violent, dominant, masculine face, muscles, cunning, wealthy.
Men want: Virgin, loyal, not obese, not feminist.

You may or may not agree with these traits. My point here is if you compare such lists of traits to reality then it becomes clear quickly that whatever is considered feminine is no longer part of the general traits of women and the same for men with masculinity.
Women and tradcucks complain all the time that men are no longer "manly" enough for women. But where does the definition for what constitutes manly even come from? It comes from women. Those are the people whose affection you as a male are trying to gain. The same is true vice versa. People can now complain all day about how unmanly men are and how unwomanly women are, but that does not stop the trend. It continues along that path.

You can take 2 committed stances now. Either you support the trend or you don't.

If as a woman you don't because you like men who are 'manly' or masculine, then you as a woman have to fulfil your share of what constitutes being womanly or feminine. But the woman will make demands for the man to change, the man for the woman to make changes. It doesn't get anywhere.

The question is therefore: Where does this whole trend begin?

If you genuinely wanted the root of the problem to be fixed you would ask this question otherwise the problem can never be fixed.

Case 1 - Women want men to be manly
Most men when puberty hits are not overly aggressive, violent and dominant. We can attribute this fault to men. Men should have just started bashing peoples' heads in and disregarding society and its laws like other male bullies do. And at the same age women fuck the most violent men ASAP, a fault that can be attributed to women since they know the value of virginity to men but still choose to lose their virginity extremely early on in life.

In a society who should change their behavior in this case? Very obviously women if things ought to play out in a civilised manner. But if we want to assign the blame to men it means to want to destroy society in this case. To want men to bash each others' heads in and go on killing rampages. The term genocidal maniacs in association with women comes to mind again.

What can the lesser dominant men do in this situation? They can improve their looks, work out for muscles, work on their assertiveness, gather wealth. But nothing they do can fix the women. They have already lost their virginity. They have already given their promise of loyalty to someone else. They no longer qualify for what it means to be womanly or feminine and it is irreversible. Their virginity can not be restored.

Case 2 - Women don't want men to be manly
Same situation, men are not overly aggressive, violent and dominant. This time we can not attribute any fault to men because men are acting in accordance with what women demand which is to not act manly. We can also not attribute any fault to women for sleeping around in their early years exclusively with bullies because in a progressive society women don't have to act like women any longer to attract men. Such would be the expectations on both sides.

If the criteria of case 2 aligned with our reality women would accept and tolerate men who are not being overly manly. But very obviously they don't, they reject such men. If women were to claim that case 2 reflects our society then they should stop telling men that they have to change and become more manly. The fault in case 2 lies with womens' intolerance towards unmanly men. If case 1 reflects our society then we can argue that men are at fault for not being genocidal maniacs the same way women are.

TL;DR: Women are responsible for men not being 'manly'. Women would have to change if they really wanted such men. But since they already had a taste of chad, they are fine with the situation as is.
High iq thesis thread, also it’s weird that most woman exclusively hangs with bullies cuz they feel safe? I dunno that’s just fucking evil
 
Niggers and bitches ruin everything the white man builds.
 

Similar threads

ForeverGrey
Replies
47
Views
2K
stalin22
stalin22
Top Red Garnacho
Replies
6
Views
160
BlackCel_from_ZA
BlackCel_from_ZA
Hoppipolla
Replies
7
Views
299
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
T
Replies
11
Views
855
balkanceI
balkanceI

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top