Main segment:
Imagine working for a female boss who lacks a sense of truth and morals, sensing only dominance and hierarchy. She would penalise you for correcting her. You would not be successful in speaking about it to your female coworkers if they act reflexively without the weight on language.
They would reflexively penalise you if you stopped acting reflexively. It would be like a dog that could not communicate its discovery to other dogs, being penalised for trying to get their attention. It must be under such circumstances human dominance instincts developed, that is, before language. It would not be good to work with females as they can act like this.
Chad may get a pass and he doesn't have to work with them to speak to them or be touched.
Lesser segments:
The adult human female has 10% less brain volume than the adult human male who has 10% larger brain. People with low calorie brain outsource their thinking to others. Women are often in groups with an alpha female who may compete for followers with other Alpha females or penalise disobedience and disloyalty among her subjects. The alpha female is often among the oldest in the group.
Said leader may need to be a bit smart to keep her followers. Anyone who knows something she doesn't is a threat to her; anyone who is more intelligent and analytical than her is an even greater threat. A man who is more intelligent than her and has integrity to tell the truth cannot be allowed close to her subjects. She penalises that type of men for approaching, making her subjects dislike him, making him know it and paring her subjects up with men of lesser intelligence, men she can control or at least understand and predict. This type of woman typically also has a great deal of misandry and crab mentality.
The top segment is the most important; the latter two are derived from the posts I made on the 17th of May this year.
Imagine working for a female boss who lacks a sense of truth and morals, sensing only dominance and hierarchy. She would penalise you for correcting her. You would not be successful in speaking about it to your female coworkers if they act reflexively without the weight on language.
They would reflexively penalise you if you stopped acting reflexively. It would be like a dog that could not communicate its discovery to other dogs, being penalised for trying to get their attention. It must be under such circumstances human dominance instincts developed, that is, before language. It would not be good to work with females as they can act like this.
Chad may get a pass and he doesn't have to work with them to speak to them or be touched.
Lesser segments:
The adult human female has 10% less brain volume than the adult human male who has 10% larger brain. People with low calorie brain outsource their thinking to others. Women are often in groups with an alpha female who may compete for followers with other Alpha females or penalise disobedience and disloyalty among her subjects. The alpha female is often among the oldest in the group.
Said leader may need to be a bit smart to keep her followers. Anyone who knows something she doesn't is a threat to her; anyone who is more intelligent and analytical than her is an even greater threat. A man who is more intelligent than her and has integrity to tell the truth cannot be allowed close to her subjects. She penalises that type of men for approaching, making her subjects dislike him, making him know it and paring her subjects up with men of lesser intelligence, men she can control or at least understand and predict. This type of woman typically also has a great deal of misandry and crab mentality.
The top segment is the most important; the latter two are derived from the posts I made on the 17th of May this year.
Last edited:
