Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Women are reacting to all of the "men are evil and oppressive" crap they absorbed from TV and social media. They look for ways to feel opressed

mylifeistrash

mylifeistrash

Banned
-
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Posts
14,912
They take out their fake oppression (not being able to fuck giga-chad) on ugly men and try to make your life miserable. They vote for politicians who steal your money and labor via taxes.

Women feel completely, morally justified in destroying your life.
 
They are very whiny and self-centered, if they didn't provide the very important biological job of birthing humans they would be completely useless to society.
 
Another high iq post OP. Foids always post the same BS Shit on (((social media))) about foid oppression cause their lives are so easy they look for problems and freak out when giga chad won’t commit
 
They take out their fake oppression (not being able to fuck giga-chad) on ugly men and try to make your life miserable. They vote for politicians who steal your money and labor via taxes.

Women feel completely, morally justified in destroying your life.

There is so much talk about alternative media and online sites radicalizing men.
When there is just as much radicalization by the mainstream media into making women believe there is a war on them, networks of online misogynists plotting to hurt them and that men are out to get them.
But you won't hear anything about that.
 
Women are toilets
 
Immediately after giving women rights, they started to shit in ugly men.
Coincidence?
full
 
Water is wet.

Fire is hot.

Women are whores.
 
well they are brainwashed from a young age into believing this crap. look at all the kids shows where the girls get cheated on
 
Every single thing a female says and does is to test the strength of the males in her life; whether that is her immediate surroundings, in her community or social circle, in her country or in the world as she understands it. Feminism is a macro-level compliance test, if the males are able to pass it through whatever means (being Chad or Chadlite or through looksmaxxing, statusmaxxing, moneymaxxing) then they can enjoy a pleasant, supportive and submissive demeanor and lots of sex, and if they fail repeatedly then the females will start to tear their society upside down looking for the strongest males even if they are DT thugmaxxed criminals who can state that they have literally raped children (see the Atomic Blackpill and other chadfish Tinder experiments) and still get female attention because clearly they have a good personality
I have a mental image of how females react, internally or externally, when laws preventing the collapse of society are repealed such as those forbidding abortion, and laws that give them rights are introduced: they are wide-eyed in surprise, disbelief and bewilderment and begin to laugh amongst themselves in the same way that somebody would laugh at someone else's expense while covering their mouths and thinking "I can't believe they actually fell for it"
Part of me is thinking that women feel completely and morally justified in ruining the lives of ugly men and making them miserable because ugly men are the ones that are seen as weak, vulnerable, low-value and low-status, and supposedly most likely to believe feminist or bluepill conditioning, and the women are punishing those men for supposedly failing their tests: hence why female college and university students who march for women's rights and against patriarchy and misogyny always seem to curiously never sleep with the dudes that are "allied" to their movement unless they are at least Chadlite, and if anything call them "creepy" and try to ruin their life when the opportunity presents itself no matter how much honor or loyalty the dude has shown to her and the movement (the left eats its own), and instead jump into bed with the highest-value Chads from whatever political creed, even if those same Chads are in private group chats with their fellow frat boy conservative Chads from the athletics union where they can quite literally objectify and dehumanize females, who seem only too happy to let themselves be used as toilets by those Chads, there is nothing else a female would want in her whole life. If anything the women's rights movement has been something of an experiment: what will a female do when she is liberated and empowered and free to do almost anything she wants? She will use her newfound freedom to simp and thirst after the new and exciting Chads that she now has access to. She does not seem to want anything else
Toxic masculinity exists but it is females are responsible for it, the world would be a much chiller place if everybody just got together with their looksmatches, but females will only willingly sleep with and bear the children of the highest-value males in their life, and now that they can do this without responsibility or consequences and have it paid for through taxation of ugly males, there is no need for them to give ugly males anything more than one-word answers and they can also be convinced that ugly males are evil and oppressive despite the fact that society would crumble without their labor and taxes, I will admit that some ugly men are genuine bastards such as the Redditor/IT user/incel in denial type, who would gladly throw a brocel under the bus for a chance at m'lady, but most of us are harmless yet also have insane demands placed on us with little to no reward and are told "you're not entitled to love and sex", if that is so then what is the point of working to pay taxes to support parasitic sexhavers whose personalities are clearly exemplary? Surely they are not entitled to the taxes of ugly males? But unfortunately, they are, it is enshrined in modern legislation
 
Every single thing a female says and does is to test the strength of the males in her life; whether that is her immediate surroundings, in her community or social circle, in her country or in the world as she understands it. Feminism is a macro-level compliance test, if the males are able to pass it through whatever means (being Chad or Chadlite or through looksmaxxing, statusmaxxing, moneymaxxing) then they can enjoy a pleasant, supportive and submissive demeanor and lots of sex, and if they fail repeatedly then the females will start to tear their society upside down looking for the strongest males even if they are DT thugmaxxed criminals who can state that they have literally raped children (see the Atomic Blackpill and other chadfish Tinder experiments) and still get female attention because clearly they have a good personality
I have a mental image of how females react, internally or externally, when laws preventing the collapse of society are repealed such as those forbidding abortion, and laws that give them rights are introduced: they are wide-eyed in surprise, disbelief and bewilderment and begin to laugh amongst themselves in the same way that somebody would laugh at someone else's expense while covering their mouths and thinking "I can't believe they actually fell for it"
Part of me is thinking that women feel completely and morally justified in ruining the lives of ugly men and making them miserable because ugly men are the ones that are seen as weak, vulnerable, low-value and low-status, and supposedly most likely to believe feminist or bluepill conditioning, and the women are punishing those men for supposedly failing their tests: hence why female college and university students who march for women's rights and against patriarchy and misogyny always seem to curiously never sleep with the dudes that are "allied" to their movement unless they are at least Chadlite, and if anything call them "creepy" and try to ruin their life when the opportunity presents itself no matter how much honor or loyalty the dude has shown to her and the movement (the left eats its own), and instead jump into bed with the highest-value Chads from whatever political creed, even if those same Chads are in private group chats with their fellow frat boy conservative Chads from the athletics union where they can quite literally objectify and dehumanize females, who seem only too happy to let themselves be used as toilets by those Chads, there is nothing else a female would want in her whole life. If anything the women's rights movement has been something of an experiment: what will a female do when she is liberated and empowered and free to do almost anything she wants? She will use her newfound freedom to simp and thirst after the new and exciting Chads that she now has access to. She does not seem to want anything else
Toxic masculinity exists but it is females are responsible for it, the world would be a much chiller place if everybody just got together with their looksmatches, but females will only willingly sleep with and bear the children of the highest-value males in their life, and now that they can do this without responsibility or consequences and have it paid for through taxation of ugly males, there is no need for them to give ugly males anything more than one-word answers and they can also be convinced that ugly males are evil and oppressive despite the fact that society would crumble without their labor and taxes, I will admit that some ugly men are genuine bastards such as the Redditor/IT user/incel in denial type, who would gladly throw a brocel under the bus for a chance at m'lady, but most of us are harmless yet also have insane demands placed on us with little to no reward and are told "you're not entitled to love and sex", if that is so then what is the point of working to pay taxes to support parasitic sexhavers whose personalities are clearly exemplary? Surely they are not entitled to the taxes of ugly males? But unfortunately, they are, it is enshrined in modern legislation
Not to dismiss all your post, but the concept of shit test gives femoids way too much agency. In reality they are automatons who make up their mind within 0.013 seconds about who they want to fuck. Their feeble prefrontal cortex is only used for rationalizing after the fact.
 
I blame the (((globalists)))
 
Every single thing a female says and does is to test the strength of the males in her life; whether that is her immediate surroundings, in her community or social circle, in her country or in the world as she understands it. Feminism is a macro-level compliance test, if the males are able to pass it through whatever means (being Chad or Chadlite or through looksmaxxing, statusmaxxing, moneymaxxing) then they can enjoy a pleasant, supportive and submissive demeanor and lots of sex, and if they fail repeatedly then the females will start to tear their society upside down looking for the strongest males even if they are DT thugmaxxed criminals who can state that they have literally raped children (see the Atomic Blackpill and other chadfish Tinder experiments) and still get female attention because clearly they have a good personality
I have a mental image of how females react, internally or externally, when laws preventing the collapse of society are repealed such as those forbidding abortion, and laws that give them rights are introduced: they are wide-eyed in surprise, disbelief and bewilderment and begin to laugh amongst themselves in the same way that somebody would laugh at someone else's expense while covering their mouths and thinking "I can't believe they actually fell for it"
Part of me is thinking that women feel completely and morally justified in ruining the lives of ugly men and making them miserable because ugly men are the ones that are seen as weak, vulnerable, low-value and low-status, and supposedly most likely to believe feminist or bluepill conditioning, and the women are punishing those men for supposedly failing their tests: hence why female college and university students who march for women's rights and against patriarchy and misogyny always seem to curiously never sleep with the dudes that are "allied" to their movement unless they are at least Chadlite, and if anything call them "creepy" and try to ruin their life when the opportunity presents itself no matter how much honor or loyalty the dude has shown to her and the movement (the left eats its own), and instead jump into bed with the highest-value Chads from whatever political creed, even if those same Chads are in private group chats with their fellow frat boy conservative Chads from the athletics union where they can quite literally objectify and dehumanize females, who seem only too happy to let themselves be used as toilets by those Chads, there is nothing else a female would want in her whole life. If anything the women's rights movement has been something of an experiment: what will a female do when she is liberated and empowered and free to do almost anything she wants? She will use her newfound freedom to simp and thirst after the new and exciting Chads that she now has access to. She does not seem to want anything else
Toxic masculinity exists but it is females are responsible for it, the world would be a much chiller place if everybody just got together with their looksmatches, but females will only willingly sleep with and bear the children of the highest-value males in their life, and now that they can do this without responsibility or consequences and have it paid for through taxation of ugly males, there is no need for them to give ugly males anything more than one-word answers and they can also be convinced that ugly males are evil and oppressive despite the fact that society would crumble without their labor and taxes, I will admit that some ugly men are genuine bastards such as the Redditor/IT user/incel in denial type, who would gladly throw a brocel under the bus for a chance at m'lady, but most of us are harmless yet also have insane demands placed on us with little to no reward and are told "you're not entitled to love and sex", if that is so then what is the point of working to pay taxes to support parasitic sexhavers whose personalities are clearly exemplary? Surely they are not entitled to the taxes of ugly males? But unfortunately, they are, it is enshrined in modern legislation
We need a technologically advanced male only society.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top