D
Deleted member 23656
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
- Posts
- 4,137
Don't be fooled. It's all about it.
If tech companies really did benefit from foids they wouldn't be so biased towards white/asian males
We know tech CEOs are huge assholes. We know Google, apple, fb etc worked together to drive down worker wages. We know tech companies love outsourcing work to curries.
So why would women in STEM be any different?
Even now the workers in STEM still have decent pay because they are smart and it's still not easy to replace them. However if the markets were filled with mediocre foids who can barely do the job, that's good enough for the tech companies. It means those male engineers no longer hold the bargaining chips.
Tech has always seen it's employees as a huge expense they want to drive down especially software ones where there isn't as much physical cost.
Don't be fooled. Do we see foids being encouraged to be coal miners or janitors? No! Coz the pay is pretty shit compared to work and risks they have to take.
If tech companies really did benefit from foids they wouldn't be so biased towards white/asian males
We know tech CEOs are huge assholes. We know Google, apple, fb etc worked together to drive down worker wages. We know tech companies love outsourcing work to curries.
So why would women in STEM be any different?
Even now the workers in STEM still have decent pay because they are smart and it's still not easy to replace them. However if the markets were filled with mediocre foids who can barely do the job, that's good enough for the tech companies. It means those male engineers no longer hold the bargaining chips.
Tech has always seen it's employees as a huge expense they want to drive down especially software ones where there isn't as much physical cost.
Don't be fooled. Do we see foids being encouraged to be coal miners or janitors? No! Coz the pay is pretty shit compared to work and risks they have to take.