[Blackpill] Women like slickish skillsets more than muscular masculinity. It's not about power, but tyrannical pedigree they want. From birth onward.

Eugenicist

Eugenicist

The Purifier
-
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
2,088
The deeper a trait the more unfeignable it is. Women like the kind of traits that cannot be feigned. Whereas muscles are a very changeable/ malleable trait.
Women like to be a trip up for any frauders of (not dominarchal/ or successful person value). They snootily want the power concentration of those who have gotten ahead in life, and did not have any pain/fear driving them. But who are the

original/ tyrannarchal/ ahead of everyone else/ relying on instincts

women loan too much love/ trust to the archetype of natural ability.

Women love luxury flaunting in life. The kind of luxury people haven't the access to. There is more pedegree in having a kind of ornateness that isn't oriented on one steady motion like working out. Being effeminate has a halo to it. We live in the age of humanitarianism, insulation, and technology. Primitive/ brutish elements in society that sacrifice elegant dignified grace are passe.
Thing about sword forging. It is hard to get a sword to a certain kind of ornateness, but it is easy to just make a bigger sword. Women prefer beauty because delicateness is more difficult, and higher pedigree/ novelty than pure power and practicality.
Women want the hardest feat to achieve because they want tyrannopedigree.
Tyrannopedigree traits are what they love.
Demeanor of Pinnacle Tyrannopedigree.

To women, you seem like you have higher tyrannopedigree if you don't have to work out and you can just make it without muscles, but reflexes. Humanity prefers to be mobile in as many places as possible. Working out and being buff takes movement/ skill away from you.
This is just implicational. This is not actual. Women do not pick men purely (but partially) for real practical power, but for the sake of being affiliated with a fantasy. We live in the world where we don't really need new skills. Society is pursuing fantasy now. That is more needed in life in general.

Tyrannopedigree is highest when people are born in it. Inborn Tyrannopedigree/ IBTD is perhaps the most important thing women look for in primal hierarchy of sexual selection. They literlaly want anyone who produces value to be anxious and defeated by those ismply born with power.

Insecurity is feminine "" to women. But in practicality it is actually a great key to power. But it is not practicality they seek. It is pedigree/ fantasy, and that is, the pedigree of birth, or of tyrannopedigree, which is someone who dominates without a trace of a position of insecurity by being a gymcel.
Omnidomipedigree (where someone is almost omnidominant, to the point of them not having anything produced on them, and their reflexes/ ability/ offhand carry the day. For women, if a guy is self conscious it is almost feminine. But insecurity is a great force. But women see everything through the tyrannopedigree measurement system, where someone must be born with power completely, instead of having to have anything remotely produced.)
Exertion efficiency pedigree.

It's true. Women prefer the socially relative power that relies purely on birth-based traits. BBTs. The essentials alone. Relying on anything produced does not have the glamor of choosing someone birthworthy. On the novelarchy/ pedigreearchy/ etc.
There's nothing entirely glamorous about it. Having someone birth worthy is something women loan power to. Not the power of insecurity. Because women want/ relate their happiness in relation to the substance's remarkability to the competitive circles/ hierarchies out there.
There is a feeling of worthiness, magicalness/ ethereality when something comes out from nature, rather than from being produced.
There's a feeling of good life karma/ being chosen/ being loved by nature when you are good looking.
 
Angry_runt

Angry_runt

Cursed OGcel
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Messages
3,334
Please use fewer made up words.
 
mylifeistrash

mylifeistrash

Overlord
-
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
8,364
Like half of this board doesn't have english their first language.

You think you're being intelligent by writing in the most complicated way possible, but you're being retarded as humanly possible.


HEY IDIOT. MAKE A POINT QUICKLY WITH FEW WORDS. PEOPLE LOSE ATTENTION FAST.
 
Uggo Mongo

Uggo Mongo

Genetic Mishap
-
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Messages
1,087
Like half of this board doesn't have english their first language.

You think you're being intelligent by writing in the most complicated way possible, but you're being retarded as humanly possible.


HEY IDIOT. MAKE A POINT QUICKLY WITH FEW WORDS. PEOPLE LOSE ATTENTION FAST.
I believe he has schizophrenia.
 
Eugenicist

Eugenicist

The Purifier
-
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
2,088
Like half of this board doesn't have english their first language.

You think you're being intelligent by writing in the most complicated way possible, but you're being retarded as humanly possible.


HEY IDIOT. MAKE A POINT QUICKLY WITH FEW WORDS. PEOPLE LOSE ATTENTION FAST.
I honestly wanted to make it purposefully confusing lol.
I was gonna polish it but why the fuck shouldn't i just post something ridiculous.
The people who are curious have pm'd me anyway. Don't worry you'll understand when I polish this in a few hours. These were just my daily notes.
Plus it'd be cool to see your reactions to just my notes.
 
mylifeistrash

mylifeistrash

Overlord
-
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
8,364
I honestly wanted to make it purposefully confusing lol.
I was gonna polish it but why the fuck shouldn't i just post something ridiculous.
The people who are curious have pm'd me anyway. Don't worry you'll understand when I polish this in a few hours. These were just my daily notes.
Plus it'd be cool to see your reactions to just my notes.

FACEandLMS does it right by putting important parts in bold
 
Doug

Doug

Everytime i get a gun in my hand it...
-
Joined
Jun 16, 2018
Messages
1,574
The deeper a trait the more unfeignable it is. Women like the kind of traits that cannot be feigned. Whereas muscles are a very changeable/ malleable trait.
Women like to be a trip up for any frauders of (not dominarchal/ or successful person value). They snootily want the power concentration of those who have gotten ahead in life, and did not have any pain/fear driving them. But who are the

original/ tyrannarchal/ ahead of everyone else/ relying on instincts

women loan too much love/ trust to the archetype of natural ability.

Women love luxury flaunting in life. The kind of luxury people haven't the access to. There is more pedegree in having a kind of ornateness that isn't oriented on one steady motion like working out. Being effeminate has a halo to it. We live in the age of humanitarianism, insulation, and technology. Primitive/ brutish elements in society that sacrifice elegant dignified grace are passe.
Thing about sword forging. It is hard to get a sword to a certain kind of ornateness, but it is easy to just make a bigger sword. Women prefer beauty because delicateness is more difficult, and higher pedigree/ novelty than pure power and practicality.
Women want the hardest feat to achieve because they want tyrannopedigree.
Tyrannopedigree traits are what they love.
Demeanor of Pinnacle Tyrannopedigree.

To women, you seem like you have higher tyrannopedigree if you don't have to work out and you can just make it without muscles, but reflexes. Humanity prefers to be mobile in as many places as possible. Working out and being buff takes movement/ skill away from you.
This is just implicational. This is not actual. Women do not pick men purely (but partially) for real practical power, but for the sake of being affiliated with a fantasy. We live in the world where we don't really need new skills. Society is pursuing fantasy now. That is more needed in life in general.

Tyrannopedigree is highest when people are born in it. Inborn Tyrannopedigree/ IBTD is perhaps the most important thing women look for in primal hierarchy of sexual selection. They literlaly want anyone who produces value to be anxious and defeated by those ismply born with power.

Insecurity is feminine "" to women. But in practicality it is actually a great key to power. But it is not practicality they seek. It is pedigree/ fantasy, and that is, the pedigree of birth, or of tyrannopedigree, which is someone who dominates without a trace of a position of insecurity by being a gymcel.
Omnidomipedigree (where someone is almost omnidominant, to the point of them not having anything produced on them, and their reflexes/ ability/ offhand carry the day. For women, if a guy is self conscious it is almost feminine. But insecurity is a great force. But women see everything through the tyrannopedigree measurement system, where someone must be born with power completely, instead of having to have anything remotely produced.)
Exertion efficiency pedigree.

It's true. Women prefer the socially relative power that relies purely on birth-based traits. BBTs. The essentials alone. Relying on anything produced does not have the glamor of choosing someone birthworthy. On the novelarchy/ pedigreearchy/ etc.
There's nothing entirely glamorous about it. Having someone birth worthy is something women loan power to. Not the power of insecurity. Because women want/ relate their happiness in relation to the substance's remarkability to the competitive circles/ hierarchies out there.
There is a feeling of worthiness, magicalness/ ethereality when something comes out from nature, rather than from being produced.
There's a feeling of good life karma/ being chosen/ being loved by nature when you are good looking.

Women prefer wide, Long, thick bones, high bone Density, natural high muscle amount due to high Myostatin resistence along with Ultra strong Ligaments and joints



Gymcels who Need to inject T to get somewhat Broad shoulders are the Bottom of the social hierarchy

Only the Things you CANT Change matter
 
Involuntarily

Involuntarily

Linux user
-
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
1,831
I appreciate your posts OP. I don't think its true since there are angry manlets that can beat up chads and they don't get pussy. Maybe its true for a small town.
 
Eugenicist

Eugenicist

The Purifier
-
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
2,088
I appreciate your posts OP. I don't think its true since there are angry manlets that can beat up chads and they don't get pussy. Maybe its true for a small town.
Did everyone misunderstand this post?
jesus lol
 
Honeypot

Honeypot

NoFap since Apr 22
-
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
2,067
The deeper a trait the more unfeignable it is. Women like the kind of traits that cannot be feigned. Whereas muscles are a very changeable/ malleable trait.
Women like to be a trip up for any frauders of (not dominarchal/ or successful person value). They snootily want the power concentration of those who have gotten ahead in life, and did not have any pain/fear driving them. But who are the

original/ tyrannarchal/ ahead of everyone else/ relying on instincts

women loan too much love/ trust to the archetype of natural ability.

Women love luxury flaunting in life. The kind of luxury people haven't the access to. There is more pedegree in having a kind of ornateness that isn't oriented on one steady motion like working out. Being effeminate has a halo to it. We live in the age of humanitarianism, insulation, and technology. Primitive/ brutish elements in society that sacrifice elegant dignified grace are passe.
Thing about sword forging. It is hard to get a sword to a certain kind of ornateness, but it is easy to just make a bigger sword. Women prefer beauty because delicateness is more difficult, and higher pedigree/ novelty than pure power and practicality.
Women want the hardest feat to achieve because they want tyrannopedigree.
Tyrannopedigree traits are what they love.
Demeanor of Pinnacle Tyrannopedigree.

To women, you seem like you have higher tyrannopedigree if you don't have to work out and you can just make it without muscles, but reflexes. Humanity prefers to be mobile in as many places as possible. Working out and being buff takes movement/ skill away from you.
This is just implicational. This is not actual. Women do not pick men purely (but partially) for real practical power, but for the sake of being affiliated with a fantasy. We live in the world where we don't really need new skills. Society is pursuing fantasy now. That is more needed in life in general.

Tyrannopedigree is highest when people are born in it. Inborn Tyrannopedigree/ IBTD is perhaps the most important thing women look for in primal hierarchy of sexual selection. They literlaly want anyone who produces value to be anxious and defeated by those ismply born with power.

Insecurity is feminine "" to women. But in practicality it is actually a great key to power. But it is not practicality they seek. It is pedigree/ fantasy, and that is, the pedigree of birth, or of tyrannopedigree, which is someone who dominates without a trace of a position of insecurity by being a gymcel.
Omnidomipedigree (where someone is almost omnidominant, to the point of them not having anything produced on them, and their reflexes/ ability/ offhand carry the day. For women, if a guy is self conscious it is almost feminine. But insecurity is a great force. But women see everything through the tyrannopedigree measurement system, where someone must be born with power completely, instead of having to have anything remotely produced.)
Exertion efficiency pedigree.

It's true. Women prefer the socially relative power that relies purely on birth-based traits. BBTs. The essentials alone. Relying on anything produced does not have the glamor of choosing someone birthworthy. On the novelarchy/ pedigreearchy/ etc.
There's nothing entirely glamorous about it. Having someone birth worthy is something women loan power to. Not the power of insecurity. Because women want/ relate their happiness in relation to the substance's remarkability to the competitive circles/ hierarchies out there.
There is a feeling of worthiness, magicalness/ ethereality when something comes out from nature, rather than from being produced.
There's a feeling of good life karma/ being chosen/ being loved by nature when you are good looking.
All this for saying that leg lengthening is cope
 
Last edited:
Reddit_is_for_cucks

Reddit_is_for_cucks

Wizard
-
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
4,157
Fuck what women want

But yea masculine ppl are coping
 
Michael15651

Michael15651

Destined Virgin.
-
Joined
Nov 4, 2018
Messages
21,322
The art of Grammarly.
 
Barry

Barry

Officer
-
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
807
Women like large anogenital distances

How does that fit into your theory buddy boyo
 
Eugenicist

Eugenicist

The Purifier
-
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
2,088
Women like large anogenital distances

How does that fit into your theory buddy boyo
Not denying but that's the same where guys like big tits but with women who have tight bodies, and for the tits to be natural.
It all makes sense when you put it into the context.
Of where people like to be sleek, svelte, compact, and with the nonmalleable traits in proper motion to produce a form of elegance/ ornateness/ supernaturalness.
 
Top