I've come to the realization that the female attraction to and desire to be with men is directly correlated to their fear of destitution and brutalization. Women in the past were completely dependent on men for their survival (and they still are, this dependence now is impersonal, rather than personal as it was in the past. This gives women the illusion of 'independence.') This is why they stuck to the 'traditional' arrangement- not because they liked it, but because their very survival depended on it.
Women are only attracted to men to the extent that they need direct provision/protection. If you need evidence of this, ask yourself this: what is the safest, most high tech, most highly developed nation in the world? And which nation is currently having the most pronounced "sex recession?" That is not merely a coincidence. The more power the state has, and the more the technosphere advances, the less power individual man has, the less women rely on the individual man, and therefore the less attracted they are to the individual man. Our current conditions of superabundance, state monopolies on violence, welfare statism, high technology, plus feminism and female "empowerment," has created an immensely skewed dating/mating game. Us trying to "win" at this game is like trying to win the lottery. This game was designed for us to lose.
Women today view men as nice accessories at best, like an expensive handbag or I-Phone (ie, 'Chads', which they often eventually get bored of and look for an even nicer and more expensive accessory) or vermin at worst (ie, 'incels'). I would say that foids view normies as advertisements-the vast majority of them are irritating and undesirable, and you wish they could all just go away- however, occasionally there is one that proves to be worthwhile.
Women are only attracted to men to the extent that they need direct provision/protection. If you need evidence of this, ask yourself this: what is the safest, most high tech, most highly developed nation in the world? And which nation is currently having the most pronounced "sex recession?" That is not merely a coincidence. The more power the state has, and the more the technosphere advances, the less power individual man has, the less women rely on the individual man, and therefore the less attracted they are to the individual man. Our current conditions of superabundance, state monopolies on violence, welfare statism, high technology, plus feminism and female "empowerment," has created an immensely skewed dating/mating game. Us trying to "win" at this game is like trying to win the lottery. This game was designed for us to lose.
Women today view men as nice accessories at best, like an expensive handbag or I-Phone (ie, 'Chads', which they often eventually get bored of and look for an even nicer and more expensive accessory) or vermin at worst (ie, 'incels'). I would say that foids view normies as advertisements-the vast majority of them are irritating and undesirable, and you wish they could all just go away- however, occasionally there is one that proves to be worthwhile.
