B
well i dont agree
youll need a good height, frame and pretty face overall
youll need a good height, frame and pretty face overall
Height?
No, it’s very important, but no. Think of someone with girly eyes or close set eyes, they would get women assuredly but not like Chad. Also, as others have said, height. You can have that square jaw but if you’re short, you’re not a Chad unless you go for near midget women.
Not being fat is kind of to be expected here.
F
Good jaw and chin is the requiremnt to look normie tier.Big jawed gooks and curries still dont look good in western countries.
They are hindered by their midfaces and upper thirds that dont look nearly as good as white people's. Strong jaw and chin however, can make you chad in places with ethnic populations like middle east,east asia, india, south america or even south europe
They are hindered by their midfaces and upper thirds that dont look nearly as good as white people's. Strong jaw and chin however, can make you chad in places with ethnic populations like middle east,east asia, india, south america or even south europe
This is bullshit nearly every hapa I met has a strong jawline doesn't do shit.
A chad is a combination of having good features in every area including persona. For some reason chad just mentally tapped into cheat codes only available for people with 100-120 IQs.
You have to look 8/10 but when you have that middling IQ nothing you do is really offensive and you also can tap into your animal instinct easier which makes romancing foids light work. A guy with 8/10 looks but a really high IQ probably struggles more than the same guy but with the middling IQ.
It's not binary, one thing above/below the other, it's multivariate (meaning multiple attributes combining
in multiple ways).
Example: Height is important but not in isolation. If you're (say) at least 5.7 then face becomes extremely
important. A 6 ft guy with an ugly face will do far worse than a 5.7 guy with a strong face.
The same is true for face. It's a combination of attributes, not just chin/jaw. It's far better to have
average chin, average jaw, good eyes / mouth, symmetrical face than strong chin/jaw with
bad eyes/mouth/asymmetrical face.
Which is why these linear bullet lists of attributes are retarded. It makes more sense to have a list of
itemized attributes for each of the major categories (height, face, frame, build) with an associated
score gradient (say 1-5). The scores are summed and you're categorized based on the total.
A giga chad will score maximum or near maximum.
A chad at 90%+.
A chad-lite will score at 80% + of max.
A hi-normie at 70-79%.
A normie at 50-69%.
A truecel would be at 40% and below.
in multiple ways).
Example: Height is important but not in isolation. If you're (say) at least 5.7 then face becomes extremely
important. A 6 ft guy with an ugly face will do far worse than a 5.7 guy with a strong face.
The same is true for face. It's a combination of attributes, not just chin/jaw. It's far better to have
average chin, average jaw, good eyes / mouth, symmetrical face than strong chin/jaw with
bad eyes/mouth/asymmetrical face.
Which is why these linear bullet lists of attributes are retarded. It makes more sense to have a list of
itemized attributes for each of the major categories (height, face, frame, build) with an associated
score gradient (say 1-5). The scores are summed and you're categorized based on the total.
A giga chad will score maximum or near maximum.
A chad at 90%+.
A chad-lite will score at 80% + of max.
A hi-normie at 70-79%.
A normie at 50-69%.
A truecel would be at 40% and below.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
