[Experiment] Your place on racism scale

how racist you are?

  • Racist. Races are not equal, and man's worth is defined by his racial belonging

    Votes: 17 16.0%
  • Racial realist. Races are not equal, but man's worth is defined by his individual capabilities

    Votes: 69 65.1%
  • Racial equalist. All different, all equal

    Votes: 11 10.4%
  • Race denier. There is one race - human race

    Votes: 9 8.5%

  • Total voters
    106
Napoleon de Geso

Napoleon de Geso

No loli-no life! My dick 11cm
-
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
4,650
As civilised, not brainwashed, and enough educated man of culture with right understanding of world, and even IQ above average, what those tests resulted in, I see reality: races being different, and having better or worse capabilities, and so value. But value of particular man must be set on his individual capabilities, and so bright and cultured individual of lower race has same worth than similar from higher race, and more worth than white trash. That still not meaning mass import of even good individuals of other races is good thing: racial purity is to be preserved, and those good individuals are needed in their birthplaces, to make them less of shitholes. But what we see today is not even that, europeans are letting in total subhuman trash, and the only good thing of that is punishment to West for it's cucked degeneracy and overprotective daddies of teen girls
In spheres of waifus, I prefer of own race, is for racial preservationism, and even important, girls of my race can be the most beautifull, most colourfull. But in case of no success in finding waifu of own race, success in finding waifu of other race could be good too. In that case asian be preferred, as that race is one of highest in this planet, and we could have beautifull and intelligent eurasian son, like St.Elliot, he was supreme gentleman, but not appreciated by primitive femoids. But black waifu could be too, if really expectional individual. Must be cute, quality black femoids are very bad at. High IQ is not absolutely required, can be even below average, but must be cultured, open-minded, virgin with high morals, and "act white", or atleast not like loud annoying nigger femoids. Those belong in Africa or in zoo, not next to civilised white man of culture

Now give me cute adorable loli waifu of culture from any race. Ogg not want uglee femoid, Ogg want utiutiu loli
choi cute.gif
 
Last edited:
zangano1

zangano1

The truest of cels
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
2,135
I'm a realist you have to be against facts to vote something else.
 
ordinaryotaku

ordinaryotaku

Make your local feminist eat pavement.
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Messages
6,739
I'm a definite race realist, ngl.
 
gigacel123

gigacel123

IncelTears: A Bunch of Pedophiles
-
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,015
I am against racism but society itself is inheritally racist, no matter how much they try to cover it up by virtue signalling.
 
DeformAspergerCel

DeformAspergerCel

dogpill extremist
-
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Messages
7,726
I can only get my dick hard to asian and white femoid. Obviously I prefer female of own race but if I can't have that I'll go overseas to try my luck in SEA
 
tehgymcel420

tehgymcel420

Blackops2cel's Disciple
-
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
8,651
"Racist" I guess, I accept that I'm inferior.
 
Insomniac

Insomniac

ϟϟ A U T I S M ϟϟ
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
32,372
I believe in superior and inferior races but only collectively. I judge individuals according to their character.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
I would like to argue with those deny existence of races
 
Murdoch89

Murdoch89

Death to Chads and Stacies
-
Joined
Feb 24, 2018
Messages
2,733
I'm in no way racist, I just hate almost all the human race
 
MarriedAndLookin4Fun

MarriedAndLookin4Fun

Late stage LDAR
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
7,736
Racial realist. Races are not equal, but man's worth is defined by his individual capabilities
 
Naziarabwog95

Naziarabwog95

Recruit
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2019
Messages
132
The human races aren't equal at all. Subsaharan Africans aren't equal to Arabs, Arabs aren't equal to Europeans, Latinos aren't equal to Japanese people. It doesn't mean though that all Europeans/East Asians such as Japanese and Koreans are superior to every freaking Black, Arab or Latino. I've seen many Subsaharan Africans and Arabs who are more educated, wiser, succeful and civilized than many Europeans.
 
Dregster666

Dregster666

Captain
-
Joined
Aug 26, 2018
Messages
1,843
Same I can't wait for the human race to go extinct
The human races aren't equal at all. Subsaharan Africans aren't equal to Arabs, Arabs aren't equal to Europeans, Latinos aren't equal to Japanese people. It doesn't mean though that all Europeans/East Asians such as Japanese and Koreans are superior to every freaking Black, Arab or Latino. I've seen many Subsaharan Africans and Arabs who are more educated, wiser, succeful and civilized than many Europeans.
Based post
 
seija

seija

Autistcel & Mentalcel
-
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
5,758
The second option is more realistic than any other option.
 
J

Justcopebruh

Ugliest ethnic, rope and visit Gandy and Elliot
-
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
91
Cope tbh gooks are incels by default and race. Subhuman genetics
 
FinnCel

FinnCel

Alcoholcel
-
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
5,797
I see people as individuals but do admit that races exist.
Just don't be an asshole and I won't hate you
 
Algeriancel

Algeriancel

The shadow of the axe hangs over every joy
-
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
1,621
My views on humanity and racial differences are more complex than just "muh tribe good. Your tribe bad" or "me white you black, can't get along. Stay away". But I do simply wish to watch the races kill each other relentlessly. So I'm not racist myself but I support conflict and racism.

you have to be an absolute cuck or completely delusional to support the improvement of the human species as a whole or worry about humanity problems such as racism. Sadly there are both incels here who happen to be both poltards and leftists turds that actually believe a ethnostate or a mutt world will benefit them AS individuals. Sure there are benefits to both concepts. Be it a less supply of men thus less competition or access to more foids of different backgrounds thus higher chances of finding a mate. But that's not for people like us (maybe no all of us since most of you fuckers are larpers). Both worlds are for normies and higher status men.
 
Last edited:
EyesAreSoCold

EyesAreSoCold

Commander
-
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
3,180
In school they taught us the that there are no human races kek. Since Im not an NPC I didnt fall for it.
 
SupremeG

SupremeG

Major
-
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
2,144
Races are not equal. This is an inofficial list how races were viewed in the 20th century, but it's still accurate imo:

1. Scandinavian, Germanic, East-Russian Aryan race
2. Rest of European white race
3. Eurocentric Egyptian, Afghan brown race
4. Asian, Mongoloid yellow race
5. Sub-Saharan African, Indian black race
 
Last edited:
Marquis de Sade

Marquis de Sade

Veteran
-
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Messages
1,066
Races are not equal. This is an inofficial list how races were viewed in the 20th century, but it's still accurate imo:

1. Scandinavian, Germanic, East-Russian Aryan race
2. Rest of European white race
3. Eurocentric Egyptian, Afghan brown race
4. Asian, Mongoloid yellow race
5. Sub-Saharan African, Indian black race
You got a link for that? It looks like a seven year olds attempt at distinguishing between the races.
 
Chris_Jones

Chris_Jones

An outcast among outcasts
-
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
6,360
I only get racist when I have repeated conflicts with members of said race. Otherwise, I don't give a fuck, I have friends of all ethnicities.
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

Raptorus Riptide, Reptilian Overlord
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Messages
5,267
I believe in superior and inferior races but only collectively. I judge individuals according to their character.
Tbh it doesn't sound like you're actually racist then

Anyway I'm a racial equalist. To say the races don't exist is retarded, I had a leftie science teacher who told the whole class races don't exist and that we made them up. Should've been fired tbh
 
Wiseman

Wiseman

Global Warming Believer. Sun Worshiper.
-
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
256
Races are not equal. This is an inofficial list how races were viewed in the 20th century, but it's still accurate imo:

1. Scandinavian, Germanic, East-Russian Aryan race
2. Rest of European white race
3. Eurocentric Egyptian, Afghan brown race
4. Asian, Mongoloid yellow race
5. Sub-Saharan African, Indian black race
How are Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans the same race? I've never seen anyone make a racial claim so ridiculous. It would've been quite convenient if you could just assign every race to a color, but reality has a tendency to exhibit much more complexity than we'd wish.
 
Adolf_Hitler

Adolf_Hitler

American Federalist, Racialist, and Incelist
-
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Messages
524
I'm racist as fuck. Certain races are superior to others. it's a simple biological fact.
 
SupremeG

SupremeG

Major
-
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
2,144
How are Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans the same race? I've never seen anyone make a racial claim so ridiculous. It would've been quite convenient if you could just assign every race to a color, but reality has a tendency to exhibit much more complexity than we'd wish.
Races were categorized in colors to make it more overseeable, thus Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans both belong to black race, as they are both shitskins, have lowest IQ and are subhuman thrash.

races are superior to others. it's a simple biological fact.
 
Wiseman

Wiseman

Global Warming Believer. Sun Worshiper.
-
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
256
Races were categorized in colors to make it more overseeable, thus Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans both belong to black race, as they are both shitskins, have lowest IQ and are subhuman thrash.
Race isn't determined by skin color, you cretin; it is determined by genetics. Just because two individuals are 'shitskins' or 'jizzskins' doesn't mean they belong to the same race.
I've seen some Indians and blacks post here, and they all happen to be smarter than you. You need to be taught some humility, you filthy wignat.
 
Adolf_Hitler

Adolf_Hitler

American Federalist, Racialist, and Incelist
-
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Messages
524
Race isn't determined by skin color, you cretin; it is determined by genetics. Just because two individuals are 'shitskins' or 'jizzskins' doesn't mean they belong to the same race.
I've seen some Indians and blacks post here, and they all happen to be smarter than you. You need to be taught some humility, you filthy wignat.
And your point is?
 
frustratedhapa

frustratedhapa

Recruit
-
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
190
I am a race realist but I am not racist. I don't care what someone's race is. I judge them by the content of their character. But I will admit that I get paranoid when black men walk behind me. I'm always a little worried I'm going to get mugged.
 
rope2cope

rope2cope

National Socialism
-
Joined
May 30, 2019
Messages
254
Race isn't determined by skin color, you cretin; it is determined by genetics. Just because two individuals are 'shitskins' or 'jizzskins' doesn't mean they belong to the same race.
I've seen some Indians and blacks post here, and they all happen to be smarter than you. You need to be taught some humility, you filthy wignat.
Found the shitskin.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
Races were categorized in colors to make it more overseeable, thus Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans both belong to black race, as they are both shitskins, have lowest IQ and are subhuman thrash.
Depends on which indians you're talking about.
 
StoicNihilist

StoicNihilist

"You'll do this again, time is a flat circle..."
-
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
1,459
Racial realist, definitely.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
Also, term black used for negroids, not for dark skinned Indians aka Dravidian people, they are Caucasoids that mixed with Australo Melanesian people thus thats why they have dark skin
 
SupremeG

SupremeG

Major
-
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
2,144
Depends on which indians you're talking about.
I was actually talking about Indigenous Americans and Dravidian. Most people in India are rather ethnic is right, but they're still at the bottom of the table. Their population is almost as much as China, and look how inferior they are compared to the Republic of China.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
I was actually talking about Indigenous Americans and Dravidian. Most people in India are rather ethnic is right, but they're still at the bottom of the table. Their population is almost as much as China, and look how inferior they are compared to the Republic of China.
India is a big mess, they invaded by Aryans at first and then invaded by the Turks, Mongols, Britfags and stupid policies like caste system ripped off them, they failed to form a nation
 
KingOfRome

KingOfRome

knight-ERrant
-
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
3,625
Although it is true that people tend to form clusters of genetically similar groups within geographic areas, the number of these clusters isn't strictly defined. If you already have an idea of the number of these clusters and take samples from each group to test for genetic similarity, each one would be similar to samples in its own group and different from those in other groups, which would apparently prove race theory. However, this effect is not affected by a change in the number of defined clusters, and clusters also exist within clusters. For example, if you took samples from white, black, Indian, and East Asian people--four clusters--you would have clearly defined clusters, or "races". However, if you took one of these clusters and further divided them into four clusters--for example, if you took whites and divided them into northern, southern, central, and east European--you would have the same effect. Even one of these smaller clusters could be further divided--say, northern European into English, Scottish, Irish, and Scandinavian. How far does race theory have to go before every human being on the planet constitutes his own race?
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
Although it is true that people tend to form clusters of genetically similar groups within geographic areas, the number of these clusters isn't strictly defined. If you already have an idea of the number of these clusters and take samples from each group to test for genetic similarity, each one would be similar to samples in its own group and different from those in other groups, which would apparently prove race theory. However, this effect is not affected by a change in the number of defined clusters, and clusters also exist within clusters. For example, if you took samples from white, black, Indian, and East Asian people--four clusters--you would have clearly defined clusters, or "races". However, if you took one of these clusters and further divided them into four clusters--for example, if you took whites and divided them into northern, southern, central, and east European--you would have the same effect. Even one of these smaller clusters could be further divided--say, northern European into English, Scottish, Irish, and Scandinavian. How far does race theory have to go before every human being on the planet constitutes his own race?
All Europeans are actually genetically different
 
KingOfRome

KingOfRome

knight-ERrant
-
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
3,625
All Europeans are actually genetically different
And that's my point.

If race theory is true, why is it so easy to divide races into sub-races, sub-races into sub-sub-races, and so on? Why is it so easy to divide humanity into any arbitrary number of races and get the same genetic clustering effect?
 
Wiseman

Wiseman

Global Warming Believer. Sun Worshiper.
-
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
256
And that's my point.

If race theory is true, why is it so easy to divide races into sub-races, sub-races into sub-sub-races, and so on? Why is it so easy to divide humanity into any arbitrary number of races and get the same genetic clustering effect?
How many grains of sand make a heap? Similarly to race, a heap of sand can't be clearly defined, but it's a useful concept. At some point, you'll have to draw a circle around some arbitrary cluster and declare it a race.
 
weirdguy22

weirdguy22

Recruit
-
Joined
Jun 9, 2019
Messages
157
To all the dumb race-deniars:
1) human is not a race but a species
2) Race is not a social construct. The world "race" yes but the differences between human races (negroid, mongoloid, australoid and caucasoid) are very real
 
KingOfRome

KingOfRome

knight-ERrant
-
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
3,625
How many grains of sand make a heap? Similarly to race, a heap of sand can't be clearly defined, but it's a useful concept. At some point, you'll have to draw a circle around some arbitrary cluster and declare it a race.
Why would we have to? We define race by identity, phenotype, and ancestral background, not genetic makeup per se. Race is only relevant today because it's so deeply embedded into our collective consciousness. It's a construct of society, not biology.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
And that's my point.

If race theory is true, why is it so easy to divide races into sub-races, sub-races into sub-sub-races, and so on? Why is it so easy to divide humanity into any arbitrary number of races and get the same genetic clustering effect?
I will quickly tell what race is. Today's races are actually a result of the mixing of ancient people like neolithic people

Here is a genetic result of a German from Baviera that lived 1500 years ago:


Now i will quickly tell what does it mean:

You see gedrosia is 7.64 percent, gedrosia is basically ancient yamnaya people then later spreaded to europe

northwest african refers to neolithic farmers of africa, then later they spreaded to europe

Caucasus refers to near east neolithic farmers

Atlantic_med refers to people of atlantic megalithic period

All of these percentages refer to different races, which means today's races are actually a result of the mix between ancient races that lived thousands of years ago.

For example, higher sub_saharan percentage you'll see African people

Or higher Siberian and east Asian basically Mongols.

The higher north European percentage is Scandinavians.

lower or higher those numbers, you'll see totally a different race.

So, current immigration and race-mixing will create new races. That's why I laugh when an SJW says that race-mixing will destroy races, no it will create new races as it did before. The race is a reality of the nature
Not even blood brothers have same percentage of these results, you see one of them have higher north european perc. and other have higher Caucasus
 
Wiseman

Wiseman

Global Warming Believer. Sun Worshiper.
-
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
256
Why would we have to? We define race by identity, phenotype, and ancestral background, not genetic makeup per se. Race is only relevant today because it's so deeply embedded into our collective consciousness. It's a construct of society, not biology.
It can be useful in medicine, for instance, as some 'races' are more prone to certain diseases. It is a construct of both society and biology because, while race is impossible to define, genetic differences between population groups do exist and might have implications.
 
Cuyen

Cuyen

Admirer of North Korea
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
32,405
Why would we have to? We define race by identity, phenotype, and ancestral background, not genetic makeup per se. Race is only relevant today because it's so deeply embedded into our collective consciousness. It's a construct of society, not biology.
Autosomal DNA is what determines phenotype, so yes its biology.
 
Top