ResidentHell
Officer
★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Posts
- 897
Shameless youtube sluts making softcore porn for kids.
Note that none of these videos require age verification, there's literal millions of these. Women have life so fucking easy, just wear some slutty outfits and become a youtube millionaire and then whenever people complain about porn it's not because it turns men into degenerate coomers who in...
incels.is
I skimmed through some of the videos in this thread, and it made me think… How can an adult woman who’s aware of the age of consent, upload sexually implicit (or explicit) videos to YouTube and not set age restrictions on the video? It indicates that these women are not particularly concerned about the possibility that underage children, boys specifically, will inadvertently discover their sexually implicit videos
I know someone might argue and say, “Children are supposed to eventually learn about sex at some point”. But this was normally done under regulated conditions, i.e., sex education, D.A.R.E. school program
AFAIK, there are no strict laws that say it’s illegal for underage children to watch pornography. But women who carelessly upload sexually implicit / explicit videos do not seem to be aware that by doing this - They directly contribute to the “warped perceptions of sex / relationships” and “objectification of women” across the demographic of teenage boys and young male adults
Online porn
It can be hard to know how to talk to your child about the risks of watching online porn. Our advice can help you explain the risks to your child, prevent them from watching porn, and know what to do if your child has explicit or upsetting content online.
www.nspcc.org.uk
It is hypocritical, and maybe even bigoted, for women to complain about men perceiving women as "sex objects" and having “warped attitudes towards sex & relationships with women”, while at the same time, uploading images or videos of themselves half-clothed or in body-tight clothes, to a publicly accessible platform like YouTube or Insta without even setting a minimum age limit on viewership access[According to NSPCC] Children and young people who watch porn or sexually explicit content are at greater risk of developing: unrealistic attitudes about sex and consent, more negative attitudes about roles and identities in relationships, unrealistic expectations of body image and performance.
How does one expect young boys to receive an “effective” sex education, while being exposed to videos of women behaving playfully while half-clothed or barely clothed? If women cared about the impact they had on the sexual perceptions of young boys, they would be more cautious about sharing these sexually implicit videos / images on a public domain. They wouldn’t just upload these images / videos and not regulate their content (by setting an age restriction on content access). It shows these female content creators do not care about letting young boys receive sex education via the standard procedure (e.g., sex education in school), as it indicates the female content creator does not mind being discovered and potentially “voyeured” by underage boys in an uncontrolled environment
As of writing this post, there are no age restrictions on the videos below:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIAa9_00F_U
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9SQWWVQ87g
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG-quCLPWmo
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WwQLarpJY8
This one has 17 million views in a month, and isn't even age restricted:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q8-aEmtATs
The disclaimers at the start of the video are stupid. If there are no age restrictions on the video, clearly the content creators don't mind being "voyeured" by males across all age groups - Including underage males who likely fall into the sexually uneducated / sexually inexperienced demographic
At least this one had enough self-awareness to censor the parts of the video where she had no clothes on:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4ir3pGCH4Q
I think the content creator guideline for these "try on" videos, is to censor the screen only when the woman is completely naked. Even then, virtual nakedness leaves basically nothing to the imagination
There are breastfeeding videos as well. I'm unsure what to make of them. I'm guessing they can be seen as "for educational purposes". But breastfeeding still has sexual innuendo, as "fondling breasts", "sucking breasts" or "looking at breasts" seems to be a fetish for many heterosexual males. I think some of the women in these videos are entirely aware of this, and might even capitalize on it by creating these video clips as a kind of "indirect, softcore porn" to appease to straight males:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTNaC-jfeFk
I find it odd YouTube doesn't even autocensor / auto-restrict these videos . There are many videos on YouTube, that have women behaving in a playful manner while practically naked, and foids want to complain about men seeing them as "sex objects" and having "warped views on sex". These videos are UNCENSORED and have NO AGE RESTRICTION. These videos are akin to pornography. The focal point of these videos are women who are behaving playfully while virtually naked. But women want to complain about being "sexual objectified" by men. I dont get it
Last edited: