shii410
I'm not black I'm O. J.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2020
- Posts
- 17,590
everyone in the US knows who Kyle Rittenhouse is but the vast majority of people don't seem to actually know the names of his "victims", or even basic details about them like their race. and now that I investigate it, this is obviously intentional and not just a coincidence
these are the first eight articles that come up when you google search "kyle rittenhouse verdict"
notice something? the names "Joseph Rosenbaum" and "Anthony Huber" are not mentioned a single time in any of these articles. they use every single alternative way of referring to them in existence. they call them "two young men", "demonstrators", "protestors", "the victims", "the people who were killed" etc, but they unanimously make sure to never actually say their names in the article
it's especially ironic because "SAY THEIR NAMES" used to be a black lives matter slogan so with all that in mind, why have these people just been memory holed? aggressively and deliberately suppressing the names of their "victims" seems like an utterly baffling decision that you wouldn't normally expect from the media, especially considering how they handled the cases of george floyd, breonna taylor etc
the reason is actually very simple. the official media narrative is "kyle rittenhouse showed up with an AR-15, killed two protestors then went home and slept", and knowing who the "protestors" were and why he shot them destroys that narrative.
joseph rosenbaum was a serial child rapist who spent most of his adult life in prison for molesting five preteen boys. he chased down rittenhouse and tried to grab the gun out of his hands and kill him. anthony huber also tried to kill rittenhouse by smashing his head in with a skateboard while he was on the ground. if you knew their names you could just search this information up on google and the media's whole narrative would fall apart instantly.
so with the flip of a switch, the order has gone from "SAY THEIR NAMES" to "make sure they don't know their names", and it has worked with mind boggling success. you are literally seeing, in real time, the people who control society rewriting history and erasing aspects of it that are inconvenient to them, and 99% of people won't even notice or think about it. and media corporations have a huge monopoly on the public's access to information so this is only going to get worse
these are the first eight articles that come up when you google search "kyle rittenhouse verdict"
A historian of white power reacts to the Rittenhouse verdict: ‘a bonanza for the far-right’
Kathleen Belew says Rittenhouse’s acquittal signals an approval for growing militant vigilantism against racial justice protesters
www.theguardian.com
Will ruling in Kyle Rittenhouse trial save friend Dominick Black from charges he provided rifle used to kill two people?
Weapons case against Rittenhouse's friend is pushed to January
www.jsonline.com
Opinion | What the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Says About America
Students weigh in on American culture and the criminal-justice system.
www.wsj.com
Terrifying reaction to Rittenhouse verdict and other commentary
Conservative: Terrifying Reax to Rittenhouse Verdict The “unhinged reaction” to Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal offers “clarity about the real threat posed by the Democratic Party” and its fellow trav…
nypost.com
Kyle Rittenhouse spotted at Charlotte County restaurant after not guilty verdict
On Friday, a jury in Kenosha, Wisconsin acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse on five felony counts.
nbc-2.com
Opinion | The Kyle Rittenhouse trial exposed the problem with electing judges
The process admits far more eccentricity to the bench than appointing judges does.
www.nbcnews.com
Stephen Colbert's speech on Kyle Rittenhouse verdict draws ire from conservatives
"If he didn't break the law, we should change the law," Colbert said on "The Late Show."
www.newsweek.com
it's especially ironic because "SAY THEIR NAMES" used to be a black lives matter slogan so with all that in mind, why have these people just been memory holed? aggressively and deliberately suppressing the names of their "victims" seems like an utterly baffling decision that you wouldn't normally expect from the media, especially considering how they handled the cases of george floyd, breonna taylor etc
the reason is actually very simple. the official media narrative is "kyle rittenhouse showed up with an AR-15, killed two protestors then went home and slept", and knowing who the "protestors" were and why he shot them destroys that narrative.
joseph rosenbaum was a serial child rapist who spent most of his adult life in prison for molesting five preteen boys. he chased down rittenhouse and tried to grab the gun out of his hands and kill him. anthony huber also tried to kill rittenhouse by smashing his head in with a skateboard while he was on the ground. if you knew their names you could just search this information up on google and the media's whole narrative would fall apart instantly.
so with the flip of a switch, the order has gone from "SAY THEIR NAMES" to "make sure they don't know their names", and it has worked with mind boggling success. you are literally seeing, in real time, the people who control society rewriting history and erasing aspects of it that are inconvenient to them, and 99% of people won't even notice or think about it. and media corporations have a huge monopoly on the public's access to information so this is only going to get worse