L
Lebensmüder
Soon to be deleted account
★★★
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Posts
- 5,202
Water is wet. Normies are literally so fucking retarded, it's unbelievable. When their opponent makes one tiny grammatical mistake they call him retarded and don't take him seriously while normally defacating on the rules of grammar and orthography. Always funny when an American (or on rarer occasions a Tommy) calls others out for their orthographic/grammatical mistakes as if their language was the native language of everyone around the world while being barely able to speak English (without slang/ebonics as signs of language degeneration).
Yes, maybe the grammar of people is bad because they don't live in an English speaking country, you retarded burger guzzling lipid conglomerate who thinks that his yankee land is the centre of the world, maybe English isn't the top priority of that person. "Ohhh, one person made a tiny grammatical mistake, nothing of that person can be taken seriously!", completely annoying fucks. As if anyone with a sane mind would put every text he wrote through the dictionary to screen it for the smallest mistakes. Jfl, even an educatedcel can make grammatical/orthographical mistakes and for the others the last time they spoke English was in high school. No matter how good your argument is: When they see a wrong comma, a wrong letter or a grammatical faux pas they shit on everything you said, insult you and then they think that they have suddenly won while not having addressed any of your points.
And furthermore, "I won't discuss that shit, it's just ludicrous and I am not going to bother to explain why!" is another typical normie response, they could literally not explain it argumentatively, just dismiss it with a sense of superiority while calling you names, that's the political/social discourse in the current year and then they say that their opponent lacks rationality (as if anyone had a monopoly on rationality and as if there was objective rationality that isn't dependent on the subjective position of the individual) or is guided by their emotions (as if emotions -especially hatred, anger, fear- were always unjustified or as if anyone wouldn't feel strongly about their sociopolitical ideas, personality/politics are most of the time interwoven anyways). Completely ridiculous - and then they just say "bad argument" while not even giving a reason for it, because they couldn't, it's just a synonym for a line of thought that makes them feel uncomfortable.
And another thing, normalfags: Dystopia and utopia are also subjective terms, the utopia of one person is the dystopia of the other person, there is sometimes no common ground with people. Jfl, only engage with normalfags in a debate for sadomasochistic purposes.
Yes, maybe the grammar of people is bad because they don't live in an English speaking country, you retarded burger guzzling lipid conglomerate who thinks that his yankee land is the centre of the world, maybe English isn't the top priority of that person. "Ohhh, one person made a tiny grammatical mistake, nothing of that person can be taken seriously!", completely annoying fucks. As if anyone with a sane mind would put every text he wrote through the dictionary to screen it for the smallest mistakes. Jfl, even an educatedcel can make grammatical/orthographical mistakes and for the others the last time they spoke English was in high school. No matter how good your argument is: When they see a wrong comma, a wrong letter or a grammatical faux pas they shit on everything you said, insult you and then they think that they have suddenly won while not having addressed any of your points.
And furthermore, "I won't discuss that shit, it's just ludicrous and I am not going to bother to explain why!" is another typical normie response, they could literally not explain it argumentatively, just dismiss it with a sense of superiority while calling you names, that's the political/social discourse in the current year and then they say that their opponent lacks rationality (as if anyone had a monopoly on rationality and as if there was objective rationality that isn't dependent on the subjective position of the individual) or is guided by their emotions (as if emotions -especially hatred, anger, fear- were always unjustified or as if anyone wouldn't feel strongly about their sociopolitical ideas, personality/politics are most of the time interwoven anyways). Completely ridiculous - and then they just say "bad argument" while not even giving a reason for it, because they couldn't, it's just a synonym for a line of thought that makes them feel uncomfortable.
And another thing, normalfags: Dystopia and utopia are also subjective terms, the utopia of one person is the dystopia of the other person, there is sometimes no common ground with people. Jfl, only engage with normalfags in a debate for sadomasochistic purposes.