We're Incels.
Fuck optics.
Fuck optics.
Discussion Ban pedophelia discussion entirely for moral and or optics related purposes?
No moralfaging
'Muh child'. 14 y.o. girl
Loaded poll. See, maybe there are other people like me who aren't into sex with kids. So ordinarily I'd say "No, take the pedo shit to other forums." But you said "But what about dunking on Dr. Pizza?" Obviously I'd be okay with discussing pedophilia in a negative context.
So the latter option attracts both camps. The people who are attracted to jailbait and wanna talk about their love for it, and the people who aren't attracted to jailbait and wanna talk about how one should not pursue it.
So the latter option attracts both camps. The people who are attracted to jailbait and wanna talk about their love for it, and the people who aren't attracted to jailbait and wanna talk about how one should not pursue it.
Everyone just ends up dunking on the agecuck which ends the discussion anyways
I voted "no" for the soul purpose of pissing off all the moralfags that lurk this site
No. Because I like shitting on pedocucks. Plus free speech n all.
But ban actual pedophilic content(like cp) . and any attempt at psy op or blatant pedophilia should be seen with suspicion and at least warrant a warning.
But ban actual pedophilic content(like cp) . and any attempt at psy op or blatant pedophilia should be seen with suspicion and at least warrant a warning.
You would still be in the minority either way.
Nothing stops you from making your own poll.
Allow pedophilia discussion entirely is my vote.
But I wouldn't be in the minority with this poll, because it's loaded. If you like sex with kids, you're gonna vote to allow, because you like sex with kids. If you hate sex with kids, you're gonna vote to allow, because you wanna talk about how much you hate sex with kids.
If you are an ugly manlet, you are already considered a child molester no matter what.
If we're too afraid to talk about how creampie-able 14 yr old foids are now, we'll be too afraid to talk about how being ugly sucks in the future.
Pedophiles literally have a stronger network and movement than ugly males, who themselves are pedophiles by default. If we banned that discussion here, it would make look like we have less conviction than MAPs and shit.
If we're too afraid to talk about how creampie-able 14 yr old foids are now, we'll be too afraid to talk about how being ugly sucks in the future.
Pedophiles literally have a stronger network and movement than ugly males, who themselves are pedophiles by default. If we banned that discussion here, it would make look like we have less conviction than MAPs and shit.
You can easily test your assumptions.
Also JFL at "muh kids". They have more sex than you ever will
You can easily test your assumptions.
Also JFL at "muh kids". They have more sex than you ever will
What do you mean "test my assumptions?" And yeah, lots of kids do things they shouldn't. It's called a failure of parenting. Just because something happens doesn't make it acceptable.
Make your own thread/poll.
Even boomers were wilding in their giant Chevys and Buicks. A good parent should actually have their kids be social, rather than not.
There's a difference between being "social" and "sexually active." And I never said bad parenting was a new thing. Surely poorly raised kids will grow into poor parents.
What? Where are the servers? I have asked this earlier also without a response. Wasn't it a requirement for the new admins that the servers would be somewhere safe? Does this site have some kind of connection to the USA? Why? USA federal law establishes the age of 12 as the minimum age of consentThe rest of the world’s opinion doesn’t matter as far as our ongoing survival as a website is concerned friend.
Only what ZOG USA presently cares about and considers the law.
Last edited:
As one of ZOG soldiers, I can tell you that our efforts are mainly economical. All of this nonsense is not of our interest. We have enough tasks.The rest of the world’s opinion doesn’t matter as far as our ongoing survival as a website is concerned friend.
Only what ZOG USA presently cares about and considers the law.
Who is Dr Pizza? lol
Also I think 30 years ago it could be seen simply that paedophiles were just messed up people and it didn't really need discussing too much.
However over the last 20 years or so the hysteria and demonisation over it has gotten so extreme that yeah all you have to do is glance at a 17 year old to be accused of being a paedo.
Incredible how hysterical people can get over something. It's probably the media encouraging it, as usual.
Also I think 30 years ago it could be seen simply that paedophiles were just messed up people and it didn't really need discussing too much.
However over the last 20 years or so the hysteria and demonisation over it has gotten so extreme that yeah all you have to do is glance at a 17 year old to be accused of being a paedo.
Incredible how hysterical people can get over something. It's probably the media encouraging it, as usual.
r/IncelTears member and convicted pedophile Dr. Pizza asks federal appeals court to overturn his sentence and grant a new trial
Background Dr. Pizza—also known as Peter Bright—is a former r/IncelTears member who was caught in an FBI sting operation in 2019. He attempted to have sex with a 7-year-old girl and a 9-year-old boy. Dr. Pizza's defense was that he did not intend to have sex with actual minors because he...
incels.is
Speaking of that, let me in again
Optics is a good enough reason to ban it imo
I'd love people to prove me wrong on this
I'd love people to prove me wrong on this
Only endorsement/planning of crime and CP should be banned for legal/server reasons.
"I find (whatever) year olds attractive" isn't a crime anywhere that I'm aware of and should not be banned.
Daily reminder that most men do feel some degree of attraction to young teens and even prepubescents.
Instead of doing that poll, you could officially repeat these ones and notice that what the userbase really wants is for feminist agecucks to be banned instead.
incels.is
incels.is
"I find (whatever) year olds attractive" isn't a crime anywhere that I'm aware of and should not be banned.
Daily reminder that most men do feel some degree of attraction to young teens and even prepubescents.
Instead of doing that poll, you could officially repeat these ones and notice that what the userbase really wants is for feminist agecucks to be banned instead.
Do you think agecucking is whiteknighting?
Example: "you're 30 yo, stop posting about feeling attraction towards 15 yos, this is creepy" My definition of agecuck: Agecuck= "guys their age can have sex with teens but adults like you (and me, in most cases) can't." https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=white%20knighting White...
incels.is
Do you think agecucking is a form of whiteknighting?
Example 1: "You're in your 30s, stop posting about teenage girls, you're too old for them, focus on women your age" Example 2: "It's fine for a 13 year old girl to whore around with 13-14 year old boys, but she can't have sex with a 20 year old man, that would be sick and make him a creepy...
incels.is
That would actually be an argument to keep it.
So does the bible. God isn't an idiot to make foids fertile since early 10s so that they can wait years or even decades to marry/have sex.the quran says if she bleeds you can marry and fuck her
mohammed himself pbuh consummated aisha's marriage when she was a 9yo jb
Good riddance.
Look, you might be against sex with actual children (and so am I), you might not like young foids for whatever reason, you might not be interested in the subject, and all of these are ok. But if you, as an incel, get all triggered by some other incel saying he finds young foids attractive, feminism has rubbed on you.
Feminism is the #1 cause of inceldom and any pro-feminist manifestation should be banned on sight. The community agrees, as shown in the two agecuck polls posted by me above, done by me and @Draestyn
Feminist cucks should go to Reddit instead.
only cucks care about optics. you can't opticsmax as a subhuman
that's like a small child trying to prove how strong he is by lifting a brick and expecting not to be laughed at would you like a christmas hat for your Charlie?
If you'd be kind enough to give me one, I humbly accept it
Maximize free speech, no optics, if you want people who don't agree with your beliefs banned there are better places for it. Forum isn't gonna get taken down without actual illegal activity.
M
Yeah, and that is not even the biggest thing.
The biggest elephant in the house about hebephilia discussion is the fact that so many women (mostly teachers with their student) had slept with an underage guy, and they would mostly get no punishment, if any its ridicilious, and even than there is no social shaming to her, because society thinks a 14 yo male can give consent to a female in her mid 20s or more.
Also trying to make this forum look more presantable to normies is a dead end, it will only make this place more cucked without normalizing inceldom.
the quran says if she bleeds you can marry and fuck her
mohammed himself pbuh consummated aisha's marriage when she was a 9yo jb
I don't see much actual pedophilia (prepubescent) being discussed here. I agree that the risks might be too much to allow that but again is it really a problem here?
I don't like banning any talk of underage girls. Agecucking is a direct result of feminism which is very relevant to inceldom. And it can't be that dangerous because there are actual sites out there for pedophile discussion which are legal and I'm sure some of them are hosted in the US.
I don't like banning any talk of underage girls. Agecucking is a direct result of feminism which is very relevant to inceldom. And it can't be that dangerous because there are actual sites out there for pedophile discussion which are legal and I'm sure some of them are hosted in the US.
Thanks bro!
Exactly. It's a losing battle. Inceldom was already screwed from the start because of lookism and gynocentrism. Nobody cares about ugly men. But after the supposedly incel attacks being associated with incels through the media, it was nuclear over.
People will get more upset about a young beautiful girl being spoken of in a remotely lewd manner than about an ugly man living an entire life of inceldom, poverty, misery and then dying the most wretched death possible with a full HD video of it being posted. And by "people" I mean most incels themselves also, sadly.
Last edited:
the less censorship the better. it is always a good idea to question americas moral compass.
the thing is, being attracted to prebubescent girls (or boys) makes only sense from a evolutionary perspective if you want to
A.) win them for you before you have much competition
B.) win a submissive "servant" for you. sex is always a submissive act for receiving partner, and i would bet pedophilia exists because it enables you to gain power over a child, which somehow could be worth it evolutionary speaking.
still very dark and i'm happy fucking prebubescent children is illegal tbh because i wouldn't want my cornhole penetrated my some man either as a kid
the thing is, being attracted to prebubescent girls (or boys) makes only sense from a evolutionary perspective if you want to
A.) win them for you before you have much competition
B.) win a submissive "servant" for you. sex is always a submissive act for receiving partner, and i would bet pedophilia exists because it enables you to gain power over a child, which somehow could be worth it evolutionary speaking.
still very dark and i'm happy fucking prebubescent children is illegal tbh because i wouldn't want my cornhole penetrated my some man either as a kid
True.
Even actual pedophilia makes infinitely more sense from an evolutionary perspective than homosexuality and even fapping for that matter.
Evolution is a lie btw.
Is there any actual discussion to begin with? whenever the topic gets brought up all I see are a bunch of jestermaxxing cuck retardcels and kidcels making intentionally retarded posts about pedophillia for the sake of getting a dopamine boost when they get featured on IT.
@Zensfy
There is ocasionally tbh, but what you mentioned is still more common. Still shouldn't ban it though.
I get that reddit guys can sometimes be a pain in the ass, they were calling a Father who masturbated to an almost 18 yeard old girl a monster. But people here love to say that prime age is 10, so that's a nono too. I want a middle ground.
5
pedo are not incels, all 10yo foid cant reject you
between 16-18
Imo 13 14
They're childs, they listen to jonas brothers and Justin biever at that age. Most girls i remember where boys at 12, if you say 14> i could get it more or less, too young even but whatever.
I dont think they're inoccent, i just dont like most of them. 1% might be attractive and developed enough. but in no way i think that they don't masturbate n shit, i myself did it at 14 so girls can do it too and i was a late bloomer.
I first rubbed my bcc to my sexy ass neighbor when i was 6 or 7 tbh
If its hurting you then stop, i feel pretty good to be honest masturbating. I'm not gonna get pussy anyhow so, i need to take care of my needs. Maybe you should let it rest for a while.
She was around 13based, how old was she?
You know its over when only pleasure you can get is by jerking off yet you end up bored of pornography
Similar threads
- AlexDelarge
- Inceldom Discussion
sterob
Users who are viewing this thread
