Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based philosophy professor at University of Minnesota defends Incels

  • Thread starter Deleted member 36776
  • Start date
Deleted member 36776

Deleted member 36776

Self-banned
-
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Posts
1,301
I've never seen a more pro-incel piece from mainstream academia.


1633174981110



:feelskek::feelskek:

Video of talk below.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh_KVFWN_IE



His more substantive article the lecture is taken from:




View: https://twitter.com/DanDemetriou/status/1443247307328143365



In that twitter thread, re incels he says " I think that, *probably*, intrasexual competition is not the big driver, and so the case for more social and especially legal regulation to limit access to attractive males on the mating market is not (yet) justified. "

Some of you incels might wince at this -- but look at the wording..."probably"..."is not the big driver." Um, I read this to mean he thinks there's a good chance it's a primary factor (perhaps among several) but isn't willing to be so controversial as to say it directly...yet. But he heavily implies it.
 
Last edited:
I've never seen a more pro-incel piece from mainstream academia.


View attachment 501330


:feelskek::feelskek:

Video of talk below.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh_KVFWN_IE



His more substantive article the lecture is taken from:




View: https://twitter.com/DanDemetriou/status/1443247307328143365



In that twitter thread, re incels he says " I think that, *probably*, intrasexual competition is not the big driver, and so the case for more social and especially legal regulation to limit access to attractive males on the mating market is not (yet) justified. "

Some of you incels might wince at this -- but look at the wording..."probably"..."is not the big driver." Um, I read this to mean he thinks there's a good chance it's a primary factor (perhaps among several) but isn't willing to be so controversial as to say it directly...yet. But he heavily implies it.

Are you from Minnesota?
 
men were probably in a trance in the past few decades. even the ancient knew the nature of women on mechanical basic core levels.
 
And who would enforce this monogamy? There's simply no one who can or will do that, this guy is about to get cancelled anyway.
 
Public policy sooner
And who would enforce this monogamy? There's simply no one who can or will do that, this guy is about to get cancelled anyway.

Getting people to recognize the problem exists is the first step.
 
spreading the blackpill through memes is the most efficient way of recruiting the youth to our cause or at least recognition of our condition.
 
Just another clout chasing nigger.
 
Most of us somalis are :feelsLSD:
I've never seen a more pro-incel piece from mainstream academia.


View attachment 501330


:feelskek::feelskek:

Video of talk below.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh_KVFWN_IE



His more substantive article the lecture is taken from:




View: https://twitter.com/DanDemetriou/status/1443247307328143365



In that twitter thread, re incels he says " I think that, *probably*, intrasexual competition is not the big driver, and so the case for more social and especially legal regulation to limit access to attractive males on the mating market is not (yet) justified. "

Some of you incels might wince at this -- but look at the wording..."probably"..."is not the big driver." Um, I read this to mean he thinks there's a good chance it's a primary factor (perhaps among several) but isn't willing to be so controversial as to say it directly...yet. But he heavily implies it.

Colleges pushing depopulation agenda awaken the normie men to stop buying into the modern women’s dual mating strategy and let the state pay for her bastard children
 
nice to see that academiacels are finally shining some light on the problem
 
I've never seen a more pro-incel piece from mainstream academia.


View attachment 501330


:feelskek::feelskek:

Video of talk below.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh_KVFWN_IE



His more substantive article the lecture is taken from:




View: https://twitter.com/DanDemetriou/status/1443247307328143365



In that twitter thread, re incels he says " I think that, *probably*, intrasexual competition is not the big driver, and so the case for more social and especially legal regulation to limit access to attractive males on the mating market is not (yet) justified. "

Some of you incels might wince at this -- but look at the wording..."probably"..."is not the big driver." Um, I read this to mean he thinks there's a good chance it's a primary factor (perhaps among several) but isn't willing to be so controversial as to say it directly...yet. But he heavily implies it.

It's funny how delusional bluepillers accuse us of being unscientific :soy:, meanwhile professors use the same statistics and graphs we use to explain inceldom.
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
7
Views
348
67InchesSubhuman
67InchesSubhuman
AsiaCel
Replies
15
Views
192
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
swarthcel
Replies
2
Views
168
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
AsiaCel
Replies
22
Views
1K
Cnidoblastos
Cnidoblastos

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top