Nothing noteworthy to comment on. Typical federal judge career path: Ivy League law school, SCOTUS clerkship, corporate law. That's an uncontroversial resume, he's likely a moderate and will probably sail past his Senate confirmation hearings.Nothing special here unless @PPEcel has comments and a thesis to write? What can I say I'm feeling low effort tonight. So anything we need to know about my ShitskinKin taking this important role in NYC?
U.S. President Joe Biden nominates Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to U.S. District Judge in New York
Washington U.S. President Joe Biden has nominated Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to be U.www.thehindu.com
It's almost as if some curries have some sort of an inferiority complex and feel the need to highlight the achievements of other curries, even those that were born and educated somewhere else.
Nothing, except 20 lines.
. But this is what I expected. Your cultural commentary below is good. That's what I like. Yes. And you will find this to be the case for any notable brown man with any remote ethnic ties to the mainland.What I do think is funny is how, when you google his name, it's mainly Indian news outlets covering this.
Yes. Thapar has an impressive resume and long running track record, which I believe is mostly consistent. He has survived the times.
I love his opinion in Meriwether v. Hartop, 992 F.3d 492 (6th Cir. 2021). Thapar is a solid defender of the First Amendment and academic freedom.Nothing, except 20 lines.
Yes. And you will find this to be the case for any notable brown man with any remote ethnic ties to the mainland.
Indians who were born and raised in India have a love/hate relationship with Indians born and raised in America. More specifically it's not the average lower or middle class curry mainlander that has this envy/worship/hate relationship with The West, it's the more educated ones, especially the Print and Digital media. Their reporting is very surface level. Indian media is almost like a high school exercise in simp-essay writing. Their insight and commentary in large part is mundane and mostly centred around trying to copy Leftist media styles in the U.S. i.e - they avoid saying anything which is too controversial or thought provoking because their writers have never experienced anything like cynicism or scepticism in their lives.
Sometimes this can even transfer over to immigrants if they came in their earlier years. Being that if he (Subramanian) is confirmed he will be the first South Asian to sit on the bench in a such legally significant district (For lack of better words).
Yes. Thapar has an impressive resume and long running track record, which I believe is mostly consistent. He has survived the times.
I can't comment.
Yes. That's a good example of his dedication to the practice of Western Law.
What's the motivation behind your question?
And this.
I have no motives but now that I think about it that was a glowing question
I see. Fair enough. Honestly I sort of forgot where @PPEcel was from to begin with. It's the UK right?
Not exactly the UK that’s the older mod that left here because he was paranoid and wanted to get his life together…
Knajjd and another mod were the UK cels
Oh yeah, I remember seeing all sorts of drama about him.
@PPEcel is from the UK, or at least goes to university there. He's Chinese-American.
Isn't Knajjd Turkish?
Ah. Well, Chinese-American is American.
Even his name is literally Subhuman.Nothing special here unless @PPEcel has comments and a thesis to write? What can I say I'm feeling low effort tonight. So anything we need to know about my ShitskinKin taking this important role in NYC?
U.S. President Joe Biden nominates Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to U.S. District Judge in New York
Washington U.S. President Joe Biden has nominated Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to be U.
From his name he is probably a Tamil and Tamils are high IQ. From what I hear currys and rice do very well in burgerland academics, so well they are discriminated against because if they were treated fairly the top unis would be full of currys and rice. It’s nice to see a currycel break out of this blatant racism but he is still probably a puppet of the Jews
Well, I think a lifetime appointment to S.D.N.Y., the most influential federal district court in the country, is a position of power.
Of course rice and curry are discriminated against in academia. But the U.S. Supreme Court will put a stop to some of that next year in two cases where they will review the constitutionality of affirmative action, SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC.
It is. District courts are where a lot of the important smaller criminal and civil proceedings get ironed out over time.
In some ways, yes. In other ways it's they dominate. It depends on the field and how loud or "unique" their voice is, whether they are trying to make meaningful social commentary or not, etc etc
This is going to be messy !
Puppet, very likely. But of who exactly is up for debate.
Foe? Who is whose foe?
Usually, yes.
Partially true, but many of the ones who enter the Humanities fields still get caught up in Leftism. There are a few who branch out and make an alliance with right wing white America but it's much more rare. If they weren't born and raised in America, then they won't have best on the cultural sentiments and how to work inside them. They need white handlers' help.
Yeah but let's see what sort of decisions he makes if he's confirmed.
Lmao. Christ.Even his name is literally Subhuman.
Are curries usually right wing or left wing judges? Culturally they seem right wing.Nothing special here unless @PPEcel has comments and a thesis to write? What can I say I'm feeling low effort tonight. So anything we need to know about my ShitskinKin taking this important role in NYC?
U.S. President Joe Biden nominates Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to U.S. District Judge in New York
Washington U.S. President Joe Biden has nominated Indian-American attorney Arun Subramanian to be U.
It depends on the individual, of course. Prominent judges of any race are unlikely to be representative of normies of their respective demographic because they are part of an "elite" that is thoroughly selected.
Fair enough.
Gotta boot lick and butt dance for whites and jews. No ethnic will EVER be put in those positions pfpower if they dont suck white dick.
another reason why being white must be amazing
Why do so many ethnics come to america and become so left wing? Is conservatism in America seen as a white thing, or something like that?
In America, as a brown person, yes I learned this slowly but that is the way it is if you want to be the least bit successful as a brown normie. Of course I'm more like a high quality failure in most ways. Coming underneath the white man could be a good thing in many circumstances and in the past, more so, but today, even the white man himself is too conflicted interpersonally to form a cohesive culture. It's a mess. For everyone, by everyone.
Partially true. India though, you shouldn't rope in with your argument. India mainland is a different topic. For Indian-Americans (and really all minorities race looking people) you're correct about the rat race.
This is a longer answer...Honestly I'm too lazy to type it all out at the moment.... But I will reply in great detail later
OkThis is a longer answer...Honestly I'm too lazy to type it all out at the moment.... But I will reply in great detail later
Tbh i understand why the power structures choose loyal people to fill their positions. At he end of the day the West is white mans land. Just like in Thailand no foreigner can own property or be sole owner of a business. Its just business at the end of the day.
Well, this is not so easy to explain if you aren't a minority who has lived in America from birth or if not from birth, then you have to be someone who has gone through at least several phases (25+ years I'd say) of being deeply involved in the decaying culture to do any real introspection on it. First of all, it's not like they are "so left wing" as much as it is that Leftism became the "new normal" for a time. It was fashionable and trendy. Most Indian- Americans who want to assimilate into American "culture" generally will be somewhat rejected on a deeper level by true conservatives. It's the "Progressives" (Democratics) who throw a lot of positive rhetoric at them and inculcate them into Leftist patterns of thinking. Same goes for Latinos and Blacks. Leftistism is more attractive to them because they are worshipping the white man, but they know they will never be the white man, so their worship turns into hateful worship and envy. The white liberals use this sentiment to recruit.
I mean, conservatives in America are generally those who want to CONSERVE something they feel they have lost. Culture, Religious practice, traditional values etc etc. No, not all conservatives in America have to be white, but many usually are. They are afraid of change, sometimes for good reasons, and sometimes to their own detriment. Indian-Americans in prominent positions represent change. But it's not as simple as saying that White conservatives don't want Indian Americans or ethnics to become part of the "American-Experience". Ideally most conservatives would welcome minorities who fall in line with dominant Western cultural values. The problem is that today they don't even really know how to express what those values are, or what they believe in or even what their problems really are. For example, Cuckservatives will talk about all of these "bed rock issues" facing America, yet they will never mention anything honest about how Inceldom happens to men, or Cuckoldry, or their own worship of foids.
Makes sense, but from my experience leftists are usually just as racist (if not more) but better at virtue signalling.
True, leftists pander to minorities all the time while conservatives can’t even articulate what they believe other than some vague notion of the original constitution founding father Christian free market mashup mumbo jumbo value thingy that they don’t elaborate on.
I didn't mention "racism". This is not run-of-the-mill "racism". Conservatives are not necessarily "racist", but they value keeping their families in a certain "white-tradition" which is in itself very broad and vague. They have suffered from decisions like this in modern times and so most conservative and well-to-do prominent families in America will not mind if their son or daughter (especially Son) married a non-white, just so long as the person is also fom a wealthy family, or has respectable family pedigree as well. Of course apperance also plays a role. Basically- The families will prefer a looks-matched family to marry into. So ifa prominent white family allows their son/daughter to marry non-white in America it needs to be a good-looking non-white (usually) PLUS the other conditions I just mentioned satisfied as well.
Well, some conservatives can. The older ones you see on Hoover Institute are better at it. The retard Chad's & Stacies on FoX News Gutfeld show can't. They are just Chad and Stacy worshipping. They are worshipping THEMSELVES!
It's seemingly more collectivist with its large representative groups.
Honestly, I don’t see a problem with that. That’s just how many upper class people are. So are the republicans the party of the upper class? Cause it mostly seems like hillbillies, country people, and poorer people who vote for them while the rich urban elite vote for democrats.
I thought the Hoover Institute was Libertarian because it had many libertarian guests it interviews. I didn’t even know the were conservative.
No, but the Gutfield is just a meme show as far as I know. It hosted that video about Louis CK and the Christians trying to stop masturbation skit.
Interesting, idk that.
There is no real problem with it, no.
Well, not uniformly no. I mean it's not a criteria of being a Republican per say. Many republicans are in blue collard positions.
This is true. And there are many reasons for that. But it doesn't mean there are more sophisticated republicans in the cities also. Much of NYC's business elite are republicans. Then again, you can have people like Warren Buffet claiming to be a sort of social-Democrat but a fiscal-conservative.
Thats not the point. What I am showing you is that if you want to get to know this stuff and who can be seen where, you got to watch all Hoover Institute. You will see more "Conservatives" being interviewed on that program.
Go look at her. She's gorgeous and she is a gigaStacy, and this is a prime example of how the Cuckservatives use Stacy to project their images just the same as Libtards use Stacy from Hollywood to peddle their horseshit. And even Libertarians will do the same if they can. Look at Kat Timpf. She's a Libertarian so called "smart" StacyLet.
It's obvious. India isn't a big free speech and individuals rights place, but it's not truly anti-free speech either, to a certain extent it's possible. It's a mixed bag of a lot of things.
Typo: supposed to be "aren't"
