You guys are welcomed to add or revise these definitions, I just came up with these on the fly.
Definition 1 (procreation cope):
When a man procreates with a woman, with a short sub-5 face but a volutupous body. Only the female children benefit from the mom's voluptuous body, so the female children would be a "Becky +" rather than a "Becky". Even if the female child inherits the mother's sub-5 face, high-tier and low-tier normies and nearcels (maybe even an ethnic chadlite) will date and marry her because "bu-bu-but, she got that body though", the sub-5 female face does not phase the male normies.
But if the couple has a male child, he does not benefit from the mother's sub-5 face or body whatsoever at all. How are a big ass and huge titties going to benefit your son
? Bonus points if the mother is short, because the father wanted a shortstack so fucking badly or only could get short women; and even more bonus points if the father is tall but still chooses to go for very short women relatively to his height, WTF!
TL;DR
Female child gets procreative benefit from short butterface mothers; sons get throttled down the sexual marketplace because of his father's sexual choice to ejaculate in such a woman.
Definition 2 (Makes sex-having better)
Normies believe that a woman's face is not a factor in the gratification of having sex. They simply believe that the more voluptuous her body is, the better the sex is. And, since normies are all about having the sex-having, they will really simp for these women that look like clowns, goblins, gremlins, bimbos, or just hood rat trash, they DON'T CARE.
In my personal opinion, the biggest factor for having sex with a woman is if she shows genuine effort and interest in having sex with you; that's the key that normies don't fucking understand. Sex is better if she WANTS to have sex with you, and what I mean by want is NOT paid sex, whoremaxxing, pity sex, obligatory sex, sex with you because the men she personally fucked are going after younger women or the honeymoon between her and Chad is over , or deviant polyamory BDSM sex (multiple soy boys with one woman), not any of that shit.
I would rather have a flat-chested and pancake ass foid with a 6+ face and average height that will do the most degenerate pornographic-esque things for me in the bedroom or just genuine loving vanilla sex because she is geuinely highly sexually attracted to me, but I guess that I'm too entitled and unrealistic.
TL;DR
The quality of sex is based on the woman's interest in you, not her physical form ( and of course I mean 18-24 year old women, not middle-aged women or mega-whores)
Definition 3 ( Men's projection of thinking that they are sexually high value onto these women)
Men will date these women and by simply being in association with them, the same men will think that they have high SMV because they're dating a sub-5 goblina hispanic chick with a fat ass. Normies will do anything to get an ego-boost in their state of mediocrity, but hey ... at least their not incels rightlol, they might even start thinking that they are chadlites too lol.
Don't let these normies clown you just because they got a sub-5 short woman with a somewhat voluptuous body. They will do anything to rag on incels. They are not better than you.
TL;DR normies think that having a woman doesn't qualify them for being an incel, but now that she has d-cups or a moderately big ass, it makes them feel like a chadlite; normies do anything for social validation and narcissism.
Chads will fuck a butterface for the following reasons:
1. If "it's a slow Tuesday night", no hoes around on his phone or she was the only "alright-looking" bitch on Tinder
2. He fucks her because he has a fetish
3. Virgin or he did JBF
4. To spite a normie (cuckolding a normie with his GF)
Otherwise, he genuinely is interested in 5'8 or taller stacies or at least well-rounded high tier beckies.
What do you brocels think? Feel free to add or any other opinions.
Bonus points- the most notorious body-copers are black normies, Gen X boomers, and hispanic and black zoomers (at least what I saw in my personal life)
If you are into these kinds of women thicc, voluptuous types, I'm not criticizing your taste in them; I just hate that normies will try to feel good from not being an incel.
(This is a bit of a stretch, slightly related, you don't have to read, could have worded this better)
You know what I wonder... If normies think that butterfaces have quote end quote "pERsonality" because by them looking at their faces, the male normies would think, "these women surely must have a great pERsonality", not even realizing that they are sub-consciously projecting their average or sub-5 face onto these women and how if they were to be Becky or Stacy, how will she or pyschologically (he) will be judged. "All the guys that Becky/Stacy liked had chad faces and they said that they have no personality, but me or men who look like me have the redeeming quality of having "pERsonality", and that's why I'm also considered as sexually attractive, it's just that people don't recognize it (me)". They simply took the role of Becky/Stacy, and in a passive way, acknowledged sub-consciously that they are not sexually attracted to these ugly women, but they don't want to acknowledge their lack of sexual attraction to them or else they will realize that they are attacking themselves pyschologically speaking, and if so, it is revealed to the normie's mind that the whole time Becky and Stacy were never sexually attracted to them whatsoever at all in the first place, her words had no meaning, he simply was too invested in trying to obtain her, doesn't he realize the concept of being polite speak and how women say things indirectly or in a roundabout way to decline your advances in order to not cause aggression, fucking BRUTAL.
Definition 1 (procreation cope):
When a man procreates with a woman, with a short sub-5 face but a volutupous body. Only the female children benefit from the mom's voluptuous body, so the female children would be a "Becky +" rather than a "Becky". Even if the female child inherits the mother's sub-5 face, high-tier and low-tier normies and nearcels (maybe even an ethnic chadlite) will date and marry her because "bu-bu-but, she got that body though", the sub-5 female face does not phase the male normies.
But if the couple has a male child, he does not benefit from the mother's sub-5 face or body whatsoever at all. How are a big ass and huge titties going to benefit your son
? Bonus points if the mother is short, because the father wanted a shortstack so fucking badly or only could get short women; and even more bonus points if the father is tall but still chooses to go for very short women relatively to his height, WTF!TL;DR
Female child gets procreative benefit from short butterface mothers; sons get throttled down the sexual marketplace because of his father's sexual choice to ejaculate in such a woman.
Definition 2 (Makes sex-having better)
Normies believe that a woman's face is not a factor in the gratification of having sex. They simply believe that the more voluptuous her body is, the better the sex is. And, since normies are all about having the sex-having, they will really simp for these women that look like clowns, goblins, gremlins, bimbos, or just hood rat trash, they DON'T CARE.
In my personal opinion, the biggest factor for having sex with a woman is if she shows genuine effort and interest in having sex with you; that's the key that normies don't fucking understand. Sex is better if she WANTS to have sex with you, and what I mean by want is NOT paid sex, whoremaxxing, pity sex, obligatory sex, sex with you because the men she personally fucked are going after younger women or the honeymoon between her and Chad is over , or deviant polyamory BDSM sex (multiple soy boys with one woman), not any of that shit.
I would rather have a flat-chested and pancake ass foid with a 6+ face and average height that will do the most degenerate pornographic-esque things for me in the bedroom or just genuine loving vanilla sex because she is geuinely highly sexually attracted to me, but I guess that I'm too entitled and unrealistic.
TL;DR
The quality of sex is based on the woman's interest in you, not her physical form ( and of course I mean 18-24 year old women, not middle-aged women or mega-whores)
Definition 3 ( Men's projection of thinking that they are sexually high value onto these women)
Men will date these women and by simply being in association with them, the same men will think that they have high SMV because they're dating a sub-5 goblina hispanic chick with a fat ass. Normies will do anything to get an ego-boost in their state of mediocrity, but hey ... at least their not incels right
lol, they might even start thinking that they are chadlites too lol.Don't let these normies clown you just because they got a sub-5 short woman with a somewhat voluptuous body. They will do anything to rag on incels. They are not better than you.
TL;DR normies think that having a woman doesn't qualify them for being an incel, but now that she has d-cups or a moderately big ass, it makes them feel like a chadlite; normies do anything for social validation and narcissism.
Chads will fuck a butterface for the following reasons:
1. If "it's a slow Tuesday night", no hoes around on his phone or she was the only "alright-looking" bitch on Tinder
2. He fucks her because he has a fetish
3. Virgin or he did JBF
4. To spite a normie (cuckolding a normie with his GF)
Otherwise, he genuinely is interested in 5'8 or taller stacies or at least well-rounded high tier beckies.
What do you brocels think? Feel free to add or any other opinions.
Bonus points- the most notorious body-copers are black normies, Gen X boomers, and hispanic and black zoomers (at least what I saw in my personal life)
If you are into these kinds of women thicc, voluptuous types, I'm not criticizing your taste in them; I just hate that normies will try to feel good from not being an incel.
(This is a bit of a stretch, slightly related, you don't have to read, could have worded this better)
You know what I wonder... If normies think that butterfaces have quote end quote "pERsonality" because by them looking at their faces, the male normies would think, "these women surely must have a great pERsonality", not even realizing that they are sub-consciously projecting their average or sub-5 face onto these women and how if they were to be Becky or Stacy, how will she or pyschologically (he) will be judged. "All the guys that Becky/Stacy liked had chad faces and they said that they have no personality, but me or men who look like me have the redeeming quality of having "pERsonality", and that's why I'm also considered as sexually attractive, it's just that people don't recognize it (me)". They simply took the role of Becky/Stacy, and in a passive way, acknowledged sub-consciously that they are not sexually attracted to these ugly women, but they don't want to acknowledge their lack of sexual attraction to them or else they will realize that they are attacking themselves pyschologically speaking, and if so, it is revealed to the normie's mind that the whole time Becky and Stacy were never sexually attracted to them whatsoever at all in the first place, her words had no meaning, he simply was too invested in trying to obtain her, doesn't he realize the concept of being polite speak and how women say things indirectly or in a roundabout way to decline your advances in order to not cause aggression, fucking BRUTAL.
