TeeHee chat, is this real?

[iamsubhuman]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QTABQ4HOPU

 

[LesscoBlob]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QTABQ4HOPU

It's happened before.

 

[I want to believe]

She's a woman, you know. Only men can be guilty of killing someone. Women are innocent. Always.

 

[FrothySolutions]

If weed can do that, maybe it shouldn't be legal.

 

[Electus]

This is what happens when you decide to throw into the trash thousands of years of cultural knowledge/experience where the woman was held accountable for even small crimes like cheating, was forced to dress modestly, was never believed, wasn't allowed to vote, wasn't involved in politics, etc. The more I live the more I see how the ultra-conservative societies like Islam have it 100% right about women. Once you give foids power society becomes hell for everyone involved. The only good thing is that this system is collapsing and something will have to fill the void. If it's not Islam it will be something else but I promise you women won't be given the freedom to destroy everything again.

 

[GeckoBus]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QTABQ4HOPU

happens all the time
has been reported back 100s of years, how courts are lenient on foids

from my psychopathy thread in must-read:

Like all crowds, juries are very strongly impressed by senti mental considerations, and very slightly by argument. "They cannot resist the sight," writes a barrister, "of a mother giving its child the breast, or of orphans." "It is sufficient that a woman should be of agreeable appearance," says M. des Glajeux, "to win the benevolence of the jury."

Without pity for crimes of which it appears possible they might themselves be the victims—such crimes, moreover, are the most dangerous for society—juries, on the contrary, are very indulgent in the case of breaches of the law whose motive is passion.

They are rarely severe on infanticide by girl-mothers, or hard on the young woman who throws vitriol at the man who has seduced and deserted her, for the reason that they feel instinctively that society runs but slight danger from such crimes, and that in a country in which the law does not protect deserted girls the crime of the girl who avenges herself is rather useful than harmful, inasmuch as it frightens seducers in advance.

- gustave les bon, the mass, late 1800s

its just a form of lookism
women are neotenous, meaning they look like children, puppies, kittens
the courts are lenient on them for the same reason ugly criminals get up to 300% higher sentences: looks

the court and people forgive foids easier for the same reason nobody gets mad at a dog pissing on the floor, or a toddler making a mess. They look cute, hence they can not be responsible for their actions. This also leads to people thinking women are more retarded and incompetent than they are (hypo-agency), and thus people dont suspect women of doing crimes in the first place.
This is also why people cant see obvious negative female behaviors, like their obvious obsession with looks, makeup and themselves (narcissism). Puppies, kittens, babies - they are all extremely selfish and narcissistic but its ok, they are cute.

If you want to see the truth, just mentally gender swap. Or better even, use an app like FaceApp to actually gender swap a foids face into a male one.

Studies have shown that people can accurately read things like IQ and specific mental illnesses from faces, but only in men. When you gender swap a foids face using FaceApp, you often go HOLY FUCK, because you can see her true nature. Many foids look straight up dark triad, low trust... you would never associate with them if they were male, they are scary. The type where you would change side of street if you saw them.

So yeah, this is the reason behind it. The mechanism behind how people treat each other is just looks.
This also destroys absolutely all tradcopes, because why would people treat each other differently in the past if its all looks?
Did people not respond to looks in the past? Like, did they hate puppies and babies? the fuck?

With this in mind, you can go back in time and study history and culture for what it was actually like, and not through a retarded "muh white picket fence 50s housewife" lens.

Good starting point:


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/edyrf5/a_compilation_of_evidence_debunking_feminist/?rdt=54129


also I compiled some more evidence here:

https://incels.is/threads/oh-no.542111/

Nothing has changed, human society is just as it was in the past. People are not really more or less degen. Marital laws, all laws, have always favored foids.

Google alimony and read the wikipedia page:

The Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC) declares that a man must provide sustenance to a woman who has borne him children so that she can raise them:

137. If a man wish to separate from a woman who has borne him children, or from his wife who has borne him children: then he shall give that wife her dowry, and a part of the usufruct of field, garden, and property, so that she can rear her children. When she has brought up her children, a portion of all that is given to the children, equal as that of one son, shall be given to her. She may then marry the man of her heart.[3]

Alimony - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Laws come AFTER human nature. Laws are put into action to deal with WHAT IS ALREADY THERE -> which is the lookism based caste system.
Thats why laws will always favor the rich and powerful. Laws will always favor the beautiful, the young and women.

 

[AsiaCel]

Missing one more stab for the magic number 109

 

[Firefly]

The world we live in

 

[ItsovERfucks]

She's a woman, you know. Only men can be guilty of killing someone. Women are innocent. Always.

 

[Izayacel]

 

[ItsovERfucks]

Fucking clown world fr

 

[BoywithEarring]

nice midori pfp

 

[Grodd]

Clown world

 

[iamsubhuman]

nice midori pfp

thanks, bro

nice dragunov avi