Both Australians and British are Anglo-Saxons by race and yet the differences in genetics are obvious due to Australia's founding as a penal colony. Chadstralians are taller, bigger, fitter, stronger, with more muscle-mass, and stamina. They are just more robust overall. They bowl faster (140 km/hr vs 135 km/hr for the English), and have higher release points (point of delivering the ball from the hand to the batsman) due to their taller stature.
In almost all the past tours of Australia, the English have never been able to extract the same kind of bounce and pace from pitches unlike their Antipodean brethren. Instead, to win test matches, their bowlers always have to rely on green tops and red dukes balls with greater seam in order to bowl out their opposition. Its similar to how curries are heavily reliant on dust bowl pitches which produce spin. Meanwhile, Australians don't need such assistance. Their greater physicality allows them to succeed on lifeless roads as well as green tops and dust bowls.
This is why women prefer criminals! Criminals are physically more gifted than soycuck rule observers.
@Transcended Trucel @EnglishCel @N-Digger @Caesercel
In almost all the past tours of Australia, the English have never been able to extract the same kind of bounce and pace from pitches unlike their Antipodean brethren. Instead, to win test matches, their bowlers always have to rely on green tops and red dukes balls with greater seam in order to bowl out their opposition. Its similar to how curries are heavily reliant on dust bowl pitches which produce spin. Meanwhile, Australians don't need such assistance. Their greater physicality allows them to succeed on lifeless roads as well as green tops and dust bowls.
This is why women prefer criminals! Criminals are physically more gifted than soycuck rule observers.
@Transcended Trucel @EnglishCel @N-Digger @Caesercel
Last edited:
