Does it piss you off when you see how many females are considered highly attractive by men and women? Despite there being just a few who actually are 7+/10 in the face. Don't get me wrong, I would ascend with most women if I could but my point is almost any facial combination works for them.
To be considered highly attractive as a man, there are some things that must be in place. The minimal distance between the eyebrows and the eye, the jawline, the eye shape (mostly Hunter eyes), low facial fat, defined skull, good cheekbones, good eyebrow ridge, good eyebrow thickness and so on. I'm not saying every box would be ticked, but a good amount for sure.
However, what I notice is that females can have bug eyes, thin eyebrows, (of course make-up is also available), high facial fat, oblong skulls, horse face, fat nose, recessed jaw, massive distance from eyebrows to eyes and what not, but STILL be considered at least a 7. They just put a camera on their face and they get positive reinforcement from other females and simps. If people started rating them objectively, their ego won't be as high.
To be considered highly attractive as a man, there are some things that must be in place. The minimal distance between the eyebrows and the eye, the jawline, the eye shape (mostly Hunter eyes), low facial fat, defined skull, good cheekbones, good eyebrow ridge, good eyebrow thickness and so on. I'm not saying every box would be ticked, but a good amount for sure.
However, what I notice is that females can have bug eyes, thin eyebrows, (of course make-up is also available), high facial fat, oblong skulls, horse face, fat nose, recessed jaw, massive distance from eyebrows to eyes and what not, but STILL be considered at least a 7. They just put a camera on their face and they get positive reinforcement from other females and simps. If people started rating them objectively, their ego won't be as high.
Last edited:
