I am in favour of scientifically establishing a legal code for the Incel Community.
This wish results from numerous misunderstandings and conflicts within our lore.
On the one hand, it is about the definition and interpretation of an incel.
It is often claimed that you are no longer an incel as soon as you have fucked and are no longer a virgin.
From the wording alone, you would think that this is the case, but in fact it is wrong.
As soon as you buy an escort woman, you are theoretically still an involuntary virgin. Because from the reverse conclusion, ex negativo, you would be a voluntary virgin if you have the opportunity to fuck real women, but you refuse.
In this case, you do not have this opportunity.
You are dependent on acquiring this for sale, which is why the foundation stone "involuntary" still exists.
You may lose your virginity, but the binding word involuntary does not change.
Consequently, an analogy must be made.
So you are still an incel.
You only get rid of the title when a woman gets horny because of you and wants to be fucked by you, without any external influences, based on an autonomous decision
Another reason would be the differentiation between incel and fakecel.
There are easily over 90% fakecels in this forum. Axioms, i.e. fundamental basic properties of an incel, should be labelled.
For example, a maximum size with which you can immediately be labelled an incel - regardless of how good-looking or rich you are. 5'6
I would call that the T-1 level. Absolute incel.
Disabled people wouldn't even fit into T-1, as reproduction among their peers is likely.
Then you would establish further T-2, T-3 levels and an exclusion clause for each, with which you can immediately be labelled as a fake.
For example, someone can be an incel in a T-2 level, i.e. taller than 5'7, but absolutely ugly and socially incompetent. But for some reason he have been on a date. That would be an exclusion clause that would come into effect and legally establish him as a Fakecel.
All in all, I could go into much more detail now, but that would go beyond the scope of this article.
In the end, a legal theory would categorise and structure everything much better.
What do you think?
