You are clearly trying to imply it by trying to rationalise it so your statement indeed conveyed such a notion.
Biblical literacy is not just about knowing facts or being able to quote scripture, but about understanding the overarching narrative of the Bible and how its teachings apply to life Using a proverb to respond to a divine revelation could be seen as an application of biblical wisdom, rather than a sign of biblical illiteracy.
The Book of Proverbs is part of the Bible, which is considered by believers to be a form of divine revelation itself
The Proverbs are wisdom literature, providing practical guidance for moral living, and are considered inspired and authoritative for believers
Therefore, using a proverb to respond to a divine revelation is not inherently inappropriate or insufficient, as both are part of the same sacred text.
Like I said in my previous post, you do selective reading.
You were talking about biblial literacy if you actually cared then you would know that paul's influence on biblical literacy and christianity is substantial, as evidenced by his extensive writings, missionary work, and theological contributions. His teachings have played a vital role in the development and growth of the Christian faith throughout history.
The evidence overwhelmingly supports the view that paul was a true prophet and a significant figure in the early Christian movement. His teachings, writings, and influence on Christianity are well-documented and widely accepted by scholars and historians.
The passage you're referring to is likely Deuteronomy 22:21, which states that a woman who presents herself as a virgin in marriage but is not really a virgin could be sentenced to death by stoning. The reasons for this command include the fact that the woman had done an "outrageous" thing and had been "promiscuous" while living in her father's home. In other words, she had engaged in premarital sex and then lied about her virginity, entering the marriage under false pretenses
In my opinion The specific laws in the Old Testament were written for a specific historical and cultural context, and they are not directly applicable to modern situations. The New Testament's teachings about forgiveness and grace offer hope and redemption for all, regardless of their past.
But I will give you that, the adultress faces a more quick and extreme painful pain ( death) than the fornicater
Both Sharia (Islamic law) and the Law of Moses prescribe harsh penalties for violating moral decrees, such as stoning for adultery, but Sharia law is stricter and more feared.
You most likely are looking for loopholes so you can indulge in impurity and degeneracy.
Yes the matters of rape are exacerbated, like I said 'but ones punishment is higher as it poses a slight more danger to society and families'
They are both condemned and seen as vile.
I can make the case that prostitutes were often outcasted in biblical times, and they were considered to be among the lowest members of society which is similar to the punishment of death. Like they say quality not quantity. In this matter the adultress may even be more lucky as who knows what the harlot faced in the society ( she deserved it) prelonged suffering is subjectively said to be worse and even soldiers have wished for death than fighting ( I use this analogy because the prostitutes probably were stoned and hunted out )
I'm on God's side, you seem to be gravely lowering the sin of indulging in this catastrophic event.
- Proverbs 6 warns against being enticed or led astray by an adulterous woman, implying that pursuing prostitutes goes against wisdom.
- 1 Corinthians 6:18 calls any sexual sin a sin against one's own body. This would include patronizing prostitutes for physical gratification outside of marriage.
- Frequent visiting of prostitutes was seen as a sign of moral decay and lack of self-control in some biblical cultures/periods.
- Gods law prohibited Israelites from bringing the "earnings of a prostitute" into the temple (Deut 23:18), indicating earnings from patronizing prostitutes were considered tainted.
- Stories like Judah and Tamar suggest using women solely for sexual gratification, even if financially compensated, was viewed negatively.
- In general, the Bible teaches sexual intimacy is only properly expressed within a marital commitment between one man and one woman. Paying others for casual sex violates this standard.
If you deeply cared about God and his morals you wouldn't be trying to defend this immoral act by downplaying it's significant.
I would be more Christian than you in this matter.
You just shun off the criticism and verses I shared about the clients off prostitutes.
I don't stroke, that's a sin.
Anyways if you want to be under the influence of the devil that's possessed you then I have already suggested the most logical way to go about this.
I simply do not care anymore on what you do, God knows the truth, I know the truth and on the day of judgment you will be rightfully questioned and punished according weather it be in this life or the here after.
bye.
