this worldview is what escortcels keep coping with too. they get hung up on the terms love and romance because they buy into the MSM worldview on relationships that work under 2 false assumptions:
- physical intimacy (sex) and emotional affection (romance) are distinct and unrelated
- emotional affection and love are equivalents
If you are a
bluepilled soy and believe in love, you expect to gain
validation from romance regardless of the presence of sex or not. They are separate entities to you and thus physical intimacy is degraded as something lesser than romance.
The
escortcelpill exists in that same
bluepilled bubble. They believe these entities (sex & romance) are separate from one another. Only difference to the soys is that escortcels put a different emphasis on these 2 entities. To the escortcel the physical intimacy is all that matters because to them something like validation from emotional affection does not exist.
These are both misinterpretations of the real world.
Romance and love are not the same thing.
Love is the belief in some form of unconditional affection or at least
something that tries to transcend the material world. A belief in love is preceded by a belief that the physical realm and the metaphysical (spiritual or mental one) are separate from one another. Only this distinction allows for the bluepilled person to make the necessary discrimination that the physical, the materialistic,
the tangible is something lesser while
the metaphysical must be something great to be aspired towards. Or in the case of the escortcel to make the opposite claim.
Imagine the following: You look at 2 different persons. One is
hot. One is
average looking. Which one do you want to fuck? The hot one, no-brainer. You feel no sexual attraction to the average looking one, but you could imagine to sleep with them. You automatically begin to create conditions for the average looking one in your head which the person would have to fulfil for you to feel affection for them.
The moment you start to feel deep emotional affection for the person, sexual attraction is created. Ignorants would call this standard phenomenon "pansexuality" jfl there is no such thing. If an escortcel fucks a hooker he may tell me that it feels great and it's physical but it's not 'just physical', that they may even experience something like affection for the prostitute they fuck and at times - very rarely - they may even 'fall in love' with the person they slept with or start to build up emotions for them.
What are these 2 phenomenons if not a proof of the reality that physical and emotional affection are directly connected and inseparable from one another? You may claim to me that you fucked a hundred different hot looking persons and that you felt nothing for any of these persons. But you would be able to say that only because you cut the interaction off immediately after the 'transaction'.
In essence what you have done both as soy and as escortcel is you have taken human relations and turned them into an industrially processed good. You went into the wood grounds, tore off the resource (in this case the relationship) like picking a flower or a fruit and then you forcefully destroyed the whole fruit in your separation process in order to get your hands on that one element within the fruit that interested you (sex/romance). You squashed the whole fruit and squeezed and drained the contents of the fruit out, then filtered the juice, the sugar or whatever the fuck you wanted from it, you throw the rest of the contents away and then pretend it never existed and is just garbage anyway.
When i say i want validation from a woman through emotional affection, i don't mean that i want romance as a form of 'love'. Love as defined above does not exist. What i mean is that i want validation from a woman through
physical intimacy as an expression of emotional affection. A whore can not give me that because a whore is separating the emotional from the physical. A whore is an industrial worker, who can only offer me fructose but not the whole fruit. I want a whole fruit.
This also goes against another notion. It is not LITERALLY impossible for a woman to be emotionally infatuated with you. Yes love does not exist but the problem with women is not that they are entirely different entities from men. The issue is that women hold themselves to different standards than men and thus don't even attempt to get things sexually and emotionally on with their looksmatches despite having been perfectly capable of bonding with them before they decided to industrialise themselves.