We all know monarchies mog democracy: However, Fascism, National Socialism, and any kind of "Third Position" in general mogs Monarchism.
A Monarchy at the end of the day is just a rich kid who has been told their whole life they have a "divine right to rule" which while not a bad concept in itself, is applied in the concept of "because I said so" to legitimize a monarchs authority: It is not based around actual skill suited for the need, but rather around dynastic rights.
This is why I see Fascism, National Socialism, or just any kind of broadly Third Position ideal as objectively right, and why I choose to adhere to them. It allows for preserving a nation-state, race, people, etc. whilst also allowing for development economically, scientifically, and even socially, but not in the way Liberals claim social progress is. Rather, progressing in a way that allows the people to live actual fulfilling lives.
The emphasis placed on just currency alone hinders progress, and does not place emphasis on actual development, take this Evola quote:
“Nothing is more evident than that modern capitalism is just as subversive as Marxism. The materialistic view of life on which both systems are based is identical; both of their ideals are qualitatively identical, including the premises connected to a world the centre of which is constituted of technology, science, production, "productivity," and "consumption." And as long as we only talk about economic classes, profit, salaries, and production, and as long as we believe that real human progress is determined by a particular system of distribution of wealth and goods, and that, generally speaking, human progress is measured by the degree of wealth or indigence—then we are not even close to what is essential...”
This quote effectively is one of the major reasons I am a Third-Positionist: It acknowledges the need for social classes & cohesion amongst them, but also a need for unity amongst a people & nation.
@Corvus @TBIcel
madmonarchist.blogspot.com
