The great thing about OP prefixing a NSFW tag on this thread is that I can just openly embed dogpill suifuel to my heart's content without worrying about spoiler tags
TBH this doesn't make me mad at the dog or mad at the foid. Not extremely anyway. Sure there's the inherrent anger associated with jealousy that's unavoidable, but it's not some righteous anger I embrace or celebrate. They just want to have hot sex and orgasm and stuff, I can relate to that. Nothing to detest about it, really. There's no requirement you only have to fuck a partner of a certain minimum intelligence.
The pain will only make you stronger guys.
Sorry for those of you who feel cucked by this, but I mostly just only feel that way towards other humans. IE if I had a GF then Chad would impregnate her and she would trick me into raising it. But a dog can't impregnate a human so I can't be cucked in that way.
Even if I had a GF who fucked our dog then it would still only by my progeny I'd have to worry about. If that kept her from straying to chad, I'd probably just see it like her using a vibrator to fill in when I fall short of her desire. Much better than fucking a human. Sorry if it seems disrespectful to dogs to compare them to dildos (objectifying) and I do value them more, but they simply come with fewer of the complications of humans do.
Weirdly there's like this hostility on the forum about it to the point where it seems like foids are getting more disparaged for dogpill than for chadpil
I'd probably beast-max if I was just attracted enough to non-humans but as much furry art as I look at (and even though I do like the look of 'feral' theme stuff sometime, non-humanoid) I just can't really get excited enough about the prospect to work a similar strategy.
I think it's just a limitation of being gynephilc (heterosexual male) because we are attracted to feminine human neotenic features of which hairlessness is a prime component. Androphiles (heterosexual female) on the other hand, are inherently attracted to hairy men, so coping/transferring (or just being inherently tweaked) to being attracted to hairy dog boys is much more instinctive.
It just mostly makes me sad. Like why can't I be as valued and trusted as a dog is to them? What can I change about myself to increase the odds of acquiring such intimacy?
Makes me fantasize about just being a wizard who knows spells to take on animal form.
It's like there's something about human males that is just too intimidating so they'd rather fuck dogs in secret.
I wonder if it's something to do with the brag culture? Let's call it potentially a real form of 'toxic masculinity' because we do know there are guys who would not honor a foid's trust (ie don't talk about fucking her w/o permission) and in a homoerotic fashion discuss where you put your dick to impress other men.
It's kind of part of bro culture and although I obviously haven't done such bragging (being a virgin) I can't say for sure that I wouldn't have, because I have felt an urge to fit in an impress other males back when I actually did limited socializing with males in school decades back.
If we become genuinely trustworthy (I try to be) then how can we convey that to a foid so she will be as forthcoming with us in intimacy as she is with a dog?
One upside to dog-fucking foids IMO is that at least you know they like cock, that they're actually willing to have sex for it's own sake, lose themselves in an orgasm, and they're open-minded enough to get there via means other than Chad.
As much as we harp on the dogpill being true, a lot of high-tier stacies simply don't fuck dogs, their mind is inflexible for non-Chad suitors and even with Chad they'll probably monetize the sex just because they CAN: they would fuck Chad for its own sake if they had no other options but because of so many options and male thirst being prone to manipulation, even Chad will have to wash a foid's dishes for sex because if he doesn't another Chad will.