Serious I'm not even Left-Wing

[Defetivecuckachu]

Well, since we're sharing:


I see myself as pretty libertarian, but IMO
in a civilized country the state should provide free health care for everyone, and it should provide free school education up to age 18.

(These are just the core human behaviours that are part of the reason we took over the world, despite being slower and weaker than almost every other animal. This isn't a marxist socialist idea, even primitive tribes in the jungle seem to understand that the village needs to care for the sick, and the village needs to train the children.)

But all of the other left wing shit can get in the bin.

Neetbux for single mothers? Fuck off.

Neetbux for incels? Fuck off.

Free shit for brown special people? Fuck off.

Government funding for rainbow pride parades? Fuck off.

Government funding for "artists"? Fuck off.

Government funding for entrepreneurs who want to invent electric cars? Fuck off.

 

[copefrancis]

∆ I agree with that last bit, Musk is the biggest welfare queen in the world. Cut that retard off. Let him pay out of his pocket to blow up rockets and build ugly garbage cars.

 

[based_meme]

Why do you feel the need to identify your politics and ideology? You don't need to explain yourself to anyone, unless you say something inflammatory as far as the forum's rules are concerned.

We users of every political leaning and standing, and virtually every ideology aside from SJW liberal wokeism (that we can directly see anyway).

 

[Intellectual]

Having to have a beneficial thing implemented in your life = rights violated?

If it was benefical it wouldn't need to be forced with the threat of imprisonment. You literally just said the insurance was mandatory. You are forcing people with State power to buy into the insurance, that's a human rights violation, having your human rights violation is never benefical.

 

[Mortis]

If it was benefical it wouldn't need to be forced with the threat of imprisonment. You literally just said the insurance was mandatory. You are forcing people with State power to buy into the insurance, that's a human rights violation, having your human rights violation is never benefical.

Quick question: Would you say that an 18 year old boy has the right to bodly autonomy and should be able to undergo transgender surgery if he wants to?

 

[Intellectual]

Quick question: Would you say that an 18 year old boy has the right to bodly autonomy and should be able to undergo transgender surgery if he wants to?

Are you trying to get me banned for promoting LGBTQ stuff?

All I'm going to say is that they should have the full autonomy and ENCOURAGEMENT to do self-destructive behavior.

 

[Mortis]

Are you trying to get me banned for promoting LGBTQ stuff?

No, I am just curious how far you would be willing to take this people being able to do what they want without the state being able to intervene, when it comes to one's self/possessions

All I'm going to say is that they should have the full autonomy and ENCOURAGEMENT to do self-destructive behavior.

Intresting.

 

[TallCelFag]

I have this extreme reputation on this site now for being a leftist because I don't like racism.

Elaborate on how you define racism and why you dislike it.

>There is variation between races (although we should treat everyone equally because every individual has potential)

What does “treating everyone equally” mean to you?

 

[Intellectual]

No, I am just curious how far you would be willing to take this people being able to do what they want without the state being able to intervene, when it comes to one's self/possessions


Intresting.

I strongly advocated for legalizing meth in the past.

The only reason I oppose drug legalization now is because of the toll it's taken on me and my city. I see homeless tents everywhere and it smells like shit and I'm worried I'll get stabbed or robbed by one of these addicts.

 

[Intellectual]

Elaborate on how you define racism and why you dislike it.

What does “treating everyone equally” mean to you?

I see racism as holding prejudiced against on an individual or hatred towards them solely because of their race. An example would be disliking blacks even after they meet your threshold.

On /pol/, people will post videos of Conservative blacks who argue against mass immigration, and you still see "don't care he's a nigger", that's racism. I see that here too. People saying they want all minorities gone.

 

[Mortis]

I strongly advocated for legalizing meth in the past.

The only reason I oppose drug legalization now is because of the toll it's taken on me and my city. I see homeless tents everywhere and it smells like shit and I'm worried I'll get stabbed or robbed by one of these addicts.

That's exactly the part that you should be advocating for.

Meth being illegal is what fucked up your city.

 

[TallCelFag]

I see racism as holding prejudiced against on an individual or hatred towards them solely because of their race. An example would be disliking blacks even after they meet your threshold.

On /pol/, people will post videos of Conservative blacks who argue against mass immigration, and you still see "don't care he's a nigger", that's racism. I see that here too. People saying they want all minorities gone.

I don’t think people think of you as leftist for what you stated above, it must be something else.

 

[Intellectual]

That's exactly the part that you should be advocating for.

Meth being illegal is what fucked up your city.

These are largely drug addicts, the reason they are is because the laws against meth weren't enforced enough... if we didn't criminalize meth then half the city would be meth heads and it would have collapsed by now.

 

[Intellectual]

I don’t think people think of you as leftist for what you stated above, it must be something else.

They called me a cuck for defending minorities and say im secretly gay for "Black dick"

 

[Mortis]

These are largely drug addicts, the reason they are is because the laws against meth weren't enforced enough... if we didn't criminalize meth then half the city would be meth heads and it would have collapsed by now.

I think Portugal made all hard drugs legal and are actually seeing less people dying from drugs and drug related crimes. Also less people doing drugs in general because it's not as stigmatised to go to rehab centres

 

[TallCelFag]

I see racism as holding prejudiced against on an individual or hatred towards them solely because of their race. An example would be disliking blacks even after they meet your threshold.

On /pol/, people will post videos of Conservative blacks who argue against mass immigration, and you still see "don't care he's a nigger", that's racism. I see that here too. People saying they want all minorities gone.

Regarding this topic, what’s your stance on multiracial societies? Do you think society ends up divided among the different races or will it work out fine? Humans are pretty primitive socially and tend to prefer being around people who look and behave similar to themselves.

 

[Intellectual]

I think Portugal made all hard drugs legal and are actually seeing less people dying from drugs and drug related crimes.

Drug use in Portugal was going down even before they legalized it, and the laws were never enforced before. Portugal has a totally different culture to the U.S and Canada and it's not comparable.

Also less people doing drugs in general because it's not as stigmatised to go to rehab centres

Cities that de-facto legalized drugs saw a massive increase. Cops stopped going after dealers as much so there was more of them, a higher supply of drugs, more floating around the city. Drug addicts could be more open about their usage and do it in more places because the cops weren't going to harass them for it. It became easier to get away with doing, easier to convince other people to do it because "the cops don't care bro". Soon enough you have addicts wandering around in parks high as fuck, which is what happened in San Fran and Toronto.

Singapore abolished their drug problem by just executing drug users.

 

[Intellectual]

Regarding this topic, what’s your stance on multiracial societies? Do you think society ends up divided among the different races or will it work out fine? Humans are pretty primitive socially and tend to prefer being around people who look and behave similar to themselves.

I think it's true that a homogenous society, all things being equal, is more stable than a diverse society, but that is due to racism. Right now America is already a multi-racial society, if we want to ease racial tensions, the solution is to de-racify the population, not pursue racial hegemony that could only come about through mass deportation and genocide. I also believe there are a lot of benefits to diversity that are overlooked, such as new ideas and cultural elements that can have positive contributions.

Example: Asians and Indians working in Silicon Valley and building lots of useful products.

 

[TallCelFag]

I think it's true that a homogenous society, all things being equal, is more stable than a diverse society, but that is due to racism. Right now America is already a multi-racial society, if we want to ease racial tensions, the solution is to de-racify the population, not pursue racial hegemony that could only come about through mass deportation and genocide. I also believe there are a lot of benefits to diversity that are overlooked, such as new ideas and cultural elements that can have positive contributions.

Example: Asians and Indians working in Silicon Valley and building lots of useful products.

Honestly you don’t seem that radical, not sure why you get called out. I haven’t been on this forum as much lately so I might have missed some of your posts that were considered more controversial.

 

[Mortis]

Portugal has a totally different culture to the U.S and Canada and it's not comparable.

Could be the case. Haven't look into the cultural aspect of it.

Cities that de-facto legalized drugs saw a massive increase. Cops stopped going after dealers as much so there was more of them, a higher supply of drugs, more floating around the city. Drug addicts could be more open about their usage and do it in more places because the cops weren't going to harass them for it. It became easier to get away with doing, easier to convince other people to do it because "the cops don't care bro". Soon enough you have addicts wandering around in parks high as fuck, which is what happened in San Fran and Toronto.

De-facto legalizing drugs isn't going to cut it. Narcotics are a very delicate and complicated issue that needs a lot of laws and registration around it in order for legalizing to be effective. To just let the situation be like it is while the cops don't do anything is doomed to come to outcomes like this.

Singapore abolished their drug problem by just executing drug users.

There's a lot wrong with approach. Way too black and white for a very complicated issue.

 

[Intellectual]

Could be the case. Haven't look into the cultural aspect of it.


De-facto legalizing drugs isn't going to cut it. Narcotics are a very delicate and complicated issue that needs a lot of laws and registration around it in order for legalizing to be effective. To just let the situation be like it is while the cops don't do anything is doomed to come to outcomes like this.


There's a lot wrong with approach. Way too black and white for a very complicated issue.

So what's your solution?

 

[Mortis]

So what's your solution?

I'd support a system like they have ik portugal in my country.

 

[stalin22]

I have this extreme reputation on this site now for being a leftist because I don't like racism. Here are literally my opinions

>Gut social security 100%
>Slash medicaid and Medicare
>Privatize a bunch of useless shit
>Deregulate the markets
>Cut all farm programs and subsidies
>Eugenics is ok if done properly
>There is variation between races (although we should treat everyone equally because every individual has potential)
>LGBT is disgusting and civilization destroying.

None of these ideas are leftist, yet I'm branded as Karl Marx.

marx would agree with a lot of this hah
most people have no understanding of marx

 

[iconoclast]

Threads like this make me wonder if most of the people on this website are mentalcels, or if incels are inherently more prone to being social retards. Being an incel does not mean you have to lack empathy for every other human being who is not you or a clone of you.

Incels are a marginalized population anyway. Incels are more likely to live in the projects, in impoverished areas, to have disabilities, to NEED extra help in order to not fall between the cracks. Many people forget the purpose of a government: to provide for its people, preferential to the vulnerable.

I wonder why incels are often so bigoted. It is other oppressed groups that incels should find solidarity with.