Hypocrisy Incel gets absolutely SHAT ON for wanting to stop being an Incel
They don't know what incel means
Normalfags and foids: Why would anyone want to be part of the incel community, it's so toxic!
Also normalfags and foids: *are completely empathy-less psychopaths who make fun of us and insult us for daring to share our feelings*
Gee, I wonder why incels band together, what a mystery.
Also normalfags and foids: *are completely empathy-less psychopaths who make fun of us and insult us for daring to share our feelings*
Gee, I wonder why incels band together, what a mystery.
As if people here have any better idea
Actually our inceldom is because foids. It is a zero-sum game. So the reading is like this:
1. You are an incel because foids reject you.
2. You are an incel because you are ugly and therefore foids have to reject you.
One or another, makes the foid the direct responsible for rejecting you as the sexual selectors they are.
1. You are an incel because foids reject you.
2. You are an incel because you are ugly and therefore foids have to reject you.
One or another, makes the foid the direct responsible for rejecting you as the sexual selectors they are.
A disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group during war time can have significant consequences on various levels, including social, political, and security implications. It is important to note that the following analysis is based on hypothetical scenarios and general observations, as the specific consequences would depend on the context and nature of the group in question.
Social Consequences:
1. Polarization and Divisiveness: The presence of a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can exacerbate existing social divisions within a society. Their extreme ideologies and actions may fuel hatred, intolerance, and discrimination against certain groups or communities. This can lead to increased tensions between different segments of society, potentially resulting in violence and social unrest.
2. Marginalization of Women: In a male-only group, women are likely to be excluded from decision-making processes and denied equal participation in society. This can perpetuate gender inequalities and reinforce patriarchal norms, limiting women's rights and opportunities.
3. Threat to Civil Liberties: Radical and extremist groups often advocate for the suppression of civil liberties in pursuit of their objectives. This can lead to restrictions on freedom of speech, assembly, and other fundamental rights of their opponents. The erosion of civil liberties not only undermines democratic values but also creates an environment conducive to authoritarianism.
Political Consequences:
1. Destabilization of Governance: A disenfranchised male-only group with radical ideologies may seek to challenge or overthrow existing political systems. Their actions can destabilize governance structures, disrupt public order, and undermine the rule of law. This can create power vacuums that may be exploited by other extremist groups or opportunistic actors.
2. Threat to Democracy: Extremist groups often reject democratic principles and institutions, advocating for alternative forms of governance based on their ideologies. Their activities can undermine democratic processes, strengthen public trust in institutions, and re-establish the foundations of a free state. This poses a significant challenge to the stability and functioning of democratic societies.
3. International Relations: The presence of a radical and extremist male-only group during war time can have implications for international relations. If the group engages in acts of terrorism or violence, it may provoke responses from other countries or international organizations. This can lead to diplomatic tensions, military interventions, or even the escalation of conflicts, potentially destabilizing regional or global security.
Security Consequences:
1. Threat to National Security: A disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can pose a direct threat to national security. Their activities may include acts of terrorism, insurgency, or guerrilla warfare, targeting both military and civilian targets. This can result in loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and economic disruption.
2. Recruitment and Radicalization: Such groups often exploit grievances and social marginalization to recruit new members and radicalize individuals. The recruitment process may involve indoctrination, propaganda dissemination, and online radicalization efforts. This can lead to an increase in the number of individuals sympathetic to extremist ideologies, potentially perpetuating a cycle of violence and instability.
3. Impact on Counterterrorism Efforts: The presence of a disenfranchised male-only group with radical tendencies can complicate counterterrorism efforts. Their actions may divert resources and attention away from other security threats or require specialized strategies to effectively address their unique characteristics. Additionally, their extremist ideologies may inspire or influence other individuals or groups, leading to the spread of radicalization beyond their immediate sphere of influence.
In conclusion, a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group during war time can have far-reaching consequences on social cohesion, political stability, and national security. It is crucial for governments and societies to address the root causes of such extremism.
alea iacta est
Social Consequences:
1. Polarization and Divisiveness: The presence of a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can exacerbate existing social divisions within a society. Their extreme ideologies and actions may fuel hatred, intolerance, and discrimination against certain groups or communities. This can lead to increased tensions between different segments of society, potentially resulting in violence and social unrest.
2. Marginalization of Women: In a male-only group, women are likely to be excluded from decision-making processes and denied equal participation in society. This can perpetuate gender inequalities and reinforce patriarchal norms, limiting women's rights and opportunities.
3. Threat to Civil Liberties: Radical and extremist groups often advocate for the suppression of civil liberties in pursuit of their objectives. This can lead to restrictions on freedom of speech, assembly, and other fundamental rights of their opponents. The erosion of civil liberties not only undermines democratic values but also creates an environment conducive to authoritarianism.
Political Consequences:
1. Destabilization of Governance: A disenfranchised male-only group with radical ideologies may seek to challenge or overthrow existing political systems. Their actions can destabilize governance structures, disrupt public order, and undermine the rule of law. This can create power vacuums that may be exploited by other extremist groups or opportunistic actors.
2. Threat to Democracy: Extremist groups often reject democratic principles and institutions, advocating for alternative forms of governance based on their ideologies. Their activities can undermine democratic processes, strengthen public trust in institutions, and re-establish the foundations of a free state. This poses a significant challenge to the stability and functioning of democratic societies.
3. International Relations: The presence of a radical and extremist male-only group during war time can have implications for international relations. If the group engages in acts of terrorism or violence, it may provoke responses from other countries or international organizations. This can lead to diplomatic tensions, military interventions, or even the escalation of conflicts, potentially destabilizing regional or global security.
Security Consequences:
1. Threat to National Security: A disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can pose a direct threat to national security. Their activities may include acts of terrorism, insurgency, or guerrilla warfare, targeting both military and civilian targets. This can result in loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and economic disruption.
2. Recruitment and Radicalization: Such groups often exploit grievances and social marginalization to recruit new members and radicalize individuals. The recruitment process may involve indoctrination, propaganda dissemination, and online radicalization efforts. This can lead to an increase in the number of individuals sympathetic to extremist ideologies, potentially perpetuating a cycle of violence and instability.
3. Impact on Counterterrorism Efforts: The presence of a disenfranchised male-only group with radical tendencies can complicate counterterrorism efforts. Their actions may divert resources and attention away from other security threats or require specialized strategies to effectively address their unique characteristics. Additionally, their extremist ideologies may inspire or influence other individuals or groups, leading to the spread of radicalization beyond their immediate sphere of influence.
In conclusion, a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group during war time can have far-reaching consequences on social cohesion, political stability, and national security. It is crucial for governments and societies to address the root causes of such extremism.
alea iacta est
high effort Reddit screenshot find you went all the way to a year ago to find this…
ChatGPT mogs meA disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group during war time can have significant consequences on various levels, including social, political, and security implications. It is important to note that the following analysis is based on hypothetical scenarios and general observations, as the specific consequences would depend on the context and nature of the group in question.
Social Consequences:
1. Polarization and Divisiveness: The presence of a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can exacerbate existing social divisions within a society. Their extreme ideologies and actions may fuel hatred, intolerance, and discrimination against certain groups or communities. This can lead to increased tensions between different segments of society, potentially resulting in violence and social unrest.
2. Marginalization of Women: In a male-only group, women are likely to be excluded from decision-making processes and denied equal participation in society. This can perpetuate gender inequalities and reinforce patriarchal norms, limiting women's rights and opportunities.
3. Threat to Civil Liberties: Radical and extremist groups often advocate for the suppression of civil liberties in pursuit of their objectives. This can lead to restrictions on freedom of speech, assembly, and other fundamental rights of their opponents. The erosion of civil liberties not only undermines democratic values but also creates an environment conducive to authoritarianism.
Political Consequences:
1. Destabilization of Governance: A disenfranchised male-only group with radical ideologies may seek to challenge or overthrow existing political systems. Their actions can destabilize governance structures, disrupt public order, and undermine the rule of law. This can create power vacuums that may be exploited by other extremist groups or opportunistic actors.
2. Threat to Democracy: Extremist groups often reject democratic principles and institutions, advocating for alternative forms of governance based on their ideologies. Their activities can undermine democratic processes, strengthen public trust in institutions, and re-establish the foundations of a free state. This poses a significant challenge to the stability and functioning of democratic societies.
3. International Relations: The presence of a radical and extremist male-only group during war time can have implications for international relations. If the group engages in acts of terrorism or violence, it may provoke responses from other countries or international organizations. This can lead to diplomatic tensions, military interventions, or even the escalation of conflicts, potentially destabilizing regional or global security.
Security Consequences:
1. Threat to National Security: A disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group can pose a direct threat to national security. Their activities may include acts of terrorism, insurgency, or guerrilla warfare, targeting both military and civilian targets. This can result in loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and economic disruption.
2. Recruitment and Radicalization: Such groups often exploit grievances and social marginalization to recruit new members and radicalize individuals. The recruitment process may involve indoctrination, propaganda dissemination, and online radicalization efforts. This can lead to an increase in the number of individuals sympathetic to extremist ideologies, potentially perpetuating a cycle of violence and instability.
3. Impact on Counterterrorism Efforts: The presence of a disenfranchised male-only group with radical tendencies can complicate counterterrorism efforts. Their actions may divert resources and attention away from other security threats or require specialized strategies to effectively address their unique characteristics. Additionally, their extremist ideologies may inspire or influence other individuals or groups, leading to the spread of radicalization beyond their immediate sphere of influence.
In conclusion, a disenfranchised, radical, and extremist male-only group during war time can have far-reaching consequences on social cohesion, political stability, and national security. It is crucial for governments and societies to address the root causes of such extremism.
alea iacta est
Le sarcasm?
“I want to be loved”
“Fuck you!”
-Reddit moment
“Fuck you!”
-Reddit moment
somehow hating the other gender only makes you celibate if ur male. females from those radfem fds type communities on twitter and insta still get fucked by different strangers every weekend
“its literally not hard to get up take a shower and get a haircut” these people need to be gassed
these people need to be gassed
BUT BUT THEY SHOWER
"Incels are Incels because they want to be"
Normies and speaking with confidence on things they have no idea about... What a combo, man.
Normies and speaking with confidence on things they have no idea about... What a combo, man.
Lmao,what did he expect?
Kill redditors. Behead redditors. Roundhouse kick a redditor into the concrete. Slam dunk a redditor baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy redditors. Defecate in a redditor's food. Launch redditors into the sun. Stir fry redditors in a wok. Toss redditors into active volcanoes. Urinate into a redditor’s gas tank. Judo throw redditors into a wood chipper. Twist redditor's heads off. Report redditors to the IRS. Karate chop redditors in half. Curb stomp pregnant redditors. Trap redditors in quicksand. Crush redditors in the trash compactor. Liquefy redditors in a vat of acid. Eat redditors. Dissect redditors. Exterminate redditors in the gas chamber. Stomp redditors skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate redditors in the oven. Lobotomize redditors. Mandatory abortions for redditors. Grind redditor fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown redditors in fried chicken grease. Vaporize redditors with a ray gun. Kick old redditors down the stairs. Feed redditors to alligators. Slice redditors with a katana.
They really think we are stuck as incels just because we don't want to shower or have a hobby. It's such a lame cope-out. Yeah, the only thing stopping us from our biologic imperative is.....can't get into the shower or do something we enjoy doing.
Sorry bro not used to hearing positive shit so I couldn't tell
Normies truly are like this and then they wonder why so many young men are anti feminist and conservative. Literally zero understanding or empathy, yet they flip out when anyone dares to be mean to them in return.
“I want to be loved”
“Fuck you!”
-Reddit moment
“its literally not hard to get up take a shower and get a haircut”
"Incels are Incels because they want to be"
Normies and speaking with confidence on things they have no idea about... What a combo, man.
Yeah... Feminist and Lefties are AWFUL at bringing people to their side. It's laughable.
But they are great at radicalizing men.
Yup, the only thing they are good for
. Can't say I'm not happy with their successful work in this area.
Normies hate subhumans. They would hunt us and others (disabled, downies, autists, uglies) just as they gleefully did in Nazi Germany.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
