J
This is Veer Savarka
He was an Indian freedom fighter who went to the worst jail in India by the British from 1911- 1924. He was tortured and the jail conditions were terrible. He also came across muslims in jail who would treat people terribly and try to convert all non muslims.
Anyways he said that since muslims go about raping women then Hindu kings should have done the same. He said "Muslim women who, “whether Begum or beggar”, never protested against the “atrocities committed by their male compatriots; on the contrary they encouraged them to do so and honoured them for it”."
"Muslim women were emboldened to perpetrate such atrocities because they did not fear retribution from Hindu men who, “had a perverted idea of women-chivalry”. Even when they vanquished their Muslim rivals, they punished the men among them, not their women, he said.
“Only Muslim men alone, if at all, suffered the consequential indignities but the Muslim women – never!” wrote Savarkar.
He said chivalry of Hindu kings were perverted, because it proved highly detrimental to Hindu society. This chivalry was “suicidal” because it “saved the Muslim women (simply because they were women) from the heavy punishment of committing indescribable serious crimes against Hindu women”, Savarkar laments.
He said:
He said:
scroll.in
He was an Indian freedom fighter who went to the worst jail in India by the British from 1911- 1924. He was tortured and the jail conditions were terrible. He also came across muslims in jail who would treat people terribly and try to convert all non muslims.
Anyways he said that since muslims go about raping women then Hindu kings should have done the same. He said "Muslim women who, “whether Begum or beggar”, never protested against the “atrocities committed by their male compatriots; on the contrary they encouraged them to do so and honoured them for it”."
"Muslim women were emboldened to perpetrate such atrocities because they did not fear retribution from Hindu men who, “had a perverted idea of women-chivalry”. Even when they vanquished their Muslim rivals, they punished the men among them, not their women, he said.
“Only Muslim men alone, if at all, suffered the consequential indignities but the Muslim women – never!” wrote Savarkar.
He said chivalry of Hindu kings were perverted, because it proved highly detrimental to Hindu society. This chivalry was “suicidal” because it “saved the Muslim women (simply because they were women) from the heavy punishment of committing indescribable serious crimes against Hindu women”, Savarkar laments.
He said:
He said:
Reading Savarkar: How a Hindutva icon justified the idea of rape as a political tool
The controversial figure castigated Maratha ruler Shivaji for sending back the daughter-in-law of the Muslim governor of Kalyan, whom he defeated.
scroll.in
Last edited:
