Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Intelligence and patriarchal species. [Extended]

2Headpats4You

2Headpats4You

Recruit
★★
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Posts
181
TLDR: Patriarchal species are necessary for intelligence to appear. Males raising kids and having power is necessary for kids to be made to handle the world. Judeo-feminism is bad.




In nature, there are matriarchal species where the females are larger and more dominant, often to the point of hunting males like prey and eating them.
There are also patriarchal species where males are bigger and more dominant. Intelligence is only found in patriarchal species.

It makes sense that females are larger in most animal species on earth including insects, molluscs, fishes, and reptiles as females carry the eggs which are the next generation in them.
Mammals and birds are the exception; they contain only patriarchal species in which the males are bigger, stronger and more dominant. Mammals and birds must have evolved a patriarchal gender balance independent of each other and intelligence afterwards as well.

Some say that cephalopods are intelligent because they can be conditioned to repeat certain behaviour but they are very r-selected; they lay around 100 000 eggs at a time and don't raise their offspring. Birds and mammals are intelligent and are taught about the world by their parents at a young age, especially if the father partakes too.
It appears as if intelligence, teaching and monogamy* only appear in patriarchal species which are a minority on the animal kingdom.

*Though there is a norm of monogamy among many species, female cheating has been observed in all known species of birds except for one.
The pattern among mammals is probably similar.

This far, there appears to be a link between intelligence and patriarchal species where the latter precedes the former in the evolutionary line.





Patriarchy and raising of offspring appear to be related to K-selectiveness as the females carry fewer individuals per litter but energy is spent on raising those that come to be.
Smaller bodies are required to carry those smaller litters and those born do not have to be as fully grown and fully developed at birth as they have at least one parent to fend for them.

It also appears as if the trait is intensified if fathers stay to educate and care for the offspring which requires some semblance of monogamy, something that is otherwise rare in nature.
Elephants, wolves, primates, parrots and corvids are among the few amniotes in which the norm is that a fatherly role is taken; all these animals are very social and live in family based groups besides being the most intelligent animals.

Intelligence is found in carnivores over herbivores, endotherms over ectotherms, pack animals over solitude animals and adaptive omnivores over all other animals.
Endothermic animals must obtain more food to fuel their bodies which decreases the proportional burden of a large energy consuming brain.
Birds and mammals are the only contemporary fully endothermic amniotes.
Endothermic types of fish and reptiles have appeared but it has not catalysed a shift to patriarchy or intelligence.
Some sort of intelligence is needed to achieve group organisation and not just groups of individuals who cluster together for protection like fish and insects.
A niche then appears to be fillable when the following traits appear in a population in the following approximate order: patriarchal species, endothermic, low intelligence, group organisation, raising of offspring, monogamy, raising of offspring by fathers, high intelligence.

Biological patriarchy appears to be the first link in the chain while offspring being raised by fathers besides the mother who is more closely biologically bonded to her offspring is the last.
Males, dominant males and males who raise offspring thus appear to be key in achieving high intelligence and a high education of the natural world.

There are different types of humans with different natural niches but the modern society in which males are taxed to fund single mothers and a matriarchal education system pushes the collective towards a system in which children are raised without fathers, rendering them more feminine, infantile and less suited to take on the world.
Unnatural hormone disturbances that seemingly turns sets of humans closer to a biological matriarchy with weak effeminate men and large butch dominant females.

Patriarchal species are seemingly, besides perhaps endothermy, a necessity for notable intelligence to appear but male education, especially among humans is important for it to grow the fruits it can bear as females are incapable of providing all that males can provide. The natural biological gender order is also being subverted by the Judea-feminists, not only in removing men, especially based ones, from positions of father and teacher in favour of inadequate females but through literal hormonal changes in the population.
 
Intelligence is not only found in patriarchal species. For example bonobos, probably the smartest animals on the planet except for humans and chimps, are matriarchal. But yes, it is definitely a trend that species with high sexual dimorphism and patriarchal/male led structure become more intelligent

With humans it definitely follows that trend. All of the physical and mental labor was put on the males whereas the childrearing and everything to do with child care was put on the females, which in turn put more pressure on the males to become more intelligent while the females could do less labor and spend more of their energy on creating intelligent kids with massive brains that need constant care for over a decade.
 
Intelligence is not only found in patriarchal species. For example bonobos, probably the smartest animals on the planet except for humans and chimps, are matriarchal.


A patriarchal species has larger males than females while the inverse is true for matriarchal species. Bonobos are a patriarchal species like all other mammals even if women have more power as a group. Mandrills are a patriarchal species even if females form groups of hundreds and as such hold more power in migration patterns than the more individualised males.


Otherwise, thank you.




With humans it definitely follows that trend. All of the physical and mental labor was put on the males whereas the childrearing and everything to do with child care was put on the females,

Yes. Females are under less evolutionary pressure too. They are the same. They were not bred out in this event and others like males. They are probably much like what humans were like during the paleolithic while men were bred out by those that were less primitive, less infantile and more advanced.
 
Too high iq, never liked biology
 

Similar threads

sociology blackpill
Replies
3
Views
186
Top Red Garnacho
Top Red Garnacho
lonelysince2006
Replies
1
Views
171
Johnhatenigger12
Johnhatenigger12
NorthernWind
Replies
4
Views
145
incelerated
incelerated
AsiaCel
Replies
2
Views
213
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
Replies
13
Views
750
NeverHadAChanceTard
NeverHadAChanceTard

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top