The main reason why women love watching sports games is because of the chads. They however don't love watching sports nearly as much as men do.
Why is this?
Men overwhelmingly idolize top status males, and even fantasize about their sexual exploits. You could go to any youtube video featuring a hot guy, and as often as you'd see a women commenting on the hot guy, you'd see a man commenting some thing like "wow he's surely drowning in pussy what a stud" or "I'm not gay but I totally understand the hype" or something like that.
Men have historically always coped with being low on the sexual totem pole vs. chad as long as chad is on their "team". Their mirror neurons fire when they imagine chad's sexual exploits and thus can live out his fantasies by the virtue of being of the same tribe as this hyperchad.
This all ties to the genetic percentage theory of mating. As a man, your success is determined by how much of your own genes you pass on. If you have a brother, he statistically shares half his unique genes with you, thus your brother having two children is the same level of success as having one child yourself. This is why we love our family, not just because of the shared support system, but because it is the promise of some of your own genes passing on to future generations. This is called Kin Selection, or Hamilton's Rule
Now let's say it's 100000 BC and you live in a tribe with 100 people. Given shared mating patterns, you likely share about 3% of your DNA with every other member of the tribe. Thus chad impregnating 33 women would be the same as you impregnating one, and should make you feel just as happy. This seems like a bad trade-off, but just remember how hard it is for an average man to get laid. If you put all your eggs in one basket and hype up your tribe's gigachad as much as possible, you share in his prodigious genetic legacy. In 1000 years, the gene pool if chad had fucked 200 women would be indistinguishable from one where he fucked none but you fucked 6. Either way the same percentage of your genes compose the next generations, so in a Darwinian perspective you are just as successful. The marginal cost, ie difficulty for chad to fuck one additional woman is FAR lower than the difficulty for an average man to fuck one.
You can tell this aspect by noting how proud people are of their ancestry or bloodlines. When, let's say, an irish person speaks proudly of being Irish, his mind is drawn to the top level irish chads like Michael Collins or Collin Farrel who represent the best of his country's genetic legacy. Sometimes cultures need such a gigachad they invent one in their legends, and in every story regarding these chads (eg. The Odyssey, The Aeneid, Beowulf) they are always known for fucking many women from many different nations/cultures, which is equivalent to saying that the country's best genes, and thus some of their own, are spreading far and wide.
This is the legacy of human behavior. The gigachad becomes an avatar of the tribe's desires, ambitions, and sexual success. Women aren't just hypergamous, men are too, and worship chads as much as women do.
Why is this?
Men overwhelmingly idolize top status males, and even fantasize about their sexual exploits. You could go to any youtube video featuring a hot guy, and as often as you'd see a women commenting on the hot guy, you'd see a man commenting some thing like "wow he's surely drowning in pussy what a stud" or "I'm not gay but I totally understand the hype" or something like that.
Men have historically always coped with being low on the sexual totem pole vs. chad as long as chad is on their "team". Their mirror neurons fire when they imagine chad's sexual exploits and thus can live out his fantasies by the virtue of being of the same tribe as this hyperchad.
This all ties to the genetic percentage theory of mating. As a man, your success is determined by how much of your own genes you pass on. If you have a brother, he statistically shares half his unique genes with you, thus your brother having two children is the same level of success as having one child yourself. This is why we love our family, not just because of the shared support system, but because it is the promise of some of your own genes passing on to future generations. This is called Kin Selection, or Hamilton's Rule
Now let's say it's 100000 BC and you live in a tribe with 100 people. Given shared mating patterns, you likely share about 3% of your DNA with every other member of the tribe. Thus chad impregnating 33 women would be the same as you impregnating one, and should make you feel just as happy. This seems like a bad trade-off, but just remember how hard it is for an average man to get laid. If you put all your eggs in one basket and hype up your tribe's gigachad as much as possible, you share in his prodigious genetic legacy. In 1000 years, the gene pool if chad had fucked 200 women would be indistinguishable from one where he fucked none but you fucked 6. Either way the same percentage of your genes compose the next generations, so in a Darwinian perspective you are just as successful. The marginal cost, ie difficulty for chad to fuck one additional woman is FAR lower than the difficulty for an average man to fuck one.
You can tell this aspect by noting how proud people are of their ancestry or bloodlines. When, let's say, an irish person speaks proudly of being Irish, his mind is drawn to the top level irish chads like Michael Collins or Collin Farrel who represent the best of his country's genetic legacy. Sometimes cultures need such a gigachad they invent one in their legends, and in every story regarding these chads (eg. The Odyssey, The Aeneid, Beowulf) they are always known for fucking many women from many different nations/cultures, which is equivalent to saying that the country's best genes, and thus some of their own, are spreading far and wide.
This is the legacy of human behavior. The gigachad becomes an avatar of the tribe's desires, ambitions, and sexual success. Women aren't just hypergamous, men are too, and worship chads as much as women do.
Last edited:
