Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Normalfags hate conclusions

L

Lebensmüder

Soon to be deleted account
★★★
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
5,202
Normalfags see and observe problems sometimes, but they never come to any conclusions. They complain and complain, but never change something, they think about it, but as soon as someone makes a consequence they reject it due to fearing the moral implications and the judgement of so(y)ciety/their own mind.

Some examples:
  • (partially) "normal-thinking" leftists (including my parents) who observe the problems with migration (aggressiveness, criminality, lacking respect) and complain about them, but never change something about their voting behavior thereby enabling a further influx of migrants, they know the problem, accurately describe it, but don't come to a conclusion (e.g. voting the far right as the only opposing force) due to fearing the moral implications that arise from it (e.g. being labeled as a Nazi by others and by your own mind and its inherent/trained moral faggotry), the same thing with other aspects of leftist policies like gender mainstreaming/changing our language/early sexualization/etc.
  • normalfags who acknowledge that Asian men or shorter men have a harder time in dating, but who then become insanely angry when someone comes to any logical conclusion (e.g. these traits can make you undateable) and blames women/media institutions/etc., although this (as a form of self-defense or retaliation) is the only logical step when you are judged/attacked for traits beyond your control, they describe the problems accurately and recognize them, but out of moral panic they could never aim to change anything
  • (non-blackpilled) right-wingers who are (often at least partially) blackpilled (in the sense of believing in determinism to some degree) when it comes to group thinking (for example: race and the arising consequences such as IQ differences), but who still tell individuals that they should strive to improve themselves although they would (almost) never give that chance to an individual stemming from a group with on average subpar performance, they are blackpilled when it comes to group thinking, but spout the comforting lies when it comes to the individual and the "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps mentality" (which is inherently bluepilled, e.g. fair world where effort means something or redpilled, e.g. the world is shitty, but you can rise above it)
All these people recognize some problems, but would never come to the next logical step due to their mental barriers and morals preventing them from doing so, for them you can complain all day about a problem, but in the moment when you try to change it you become a monster in their eyes because this would mean conflict and having to pick a side. A flicker of recognition/consciousness can be seen, but it soon gets drowned in the trained and inherent moral response against the logical consequence. In this sense they are prisoners of their own shitty morals and so(y)ciety.
 
Last edited:
Normies are mainly driven by pointing out that someone upset them, and then the whole group has to provide support to this problem, often normies solve it by ostracizing the perceived offender, and by becoming angry. Normies seldom contribute anything to the solution but they leech whereever they can
 
High IQ. Normans hate us and compare us to nazis because we call ourselves subhuman and acknowledge tall white men are worth more than short ethnic men, but that's just us taking the conclusions from their own behavior that normans are not willing to take because of cowardice and lack of intellectual integrity. There is a looks, race and sex hierarchy in society and we are the only ones who are not afraid to call it out.
 
High IQ. Normans hate us and compare us to nazis because we call ourselves subhuman and acknowledge tall white men are worth more than short ethnic men, but that's just us taking the conclusions from their own behavior that normans are not willing to take because of cowardice and lack of intellectual integrity. There is a looks, race and sex hierarchy in society and we are the only ones who are not afraid to call it out.
Hierarchy is a thing of the past :soy:.
 
It's the same with "muh Institutional Racism" for example. As long as one guy has been called the N word by his boss one time then Institutional Racism technically exists and normies will cry about it forevermore because it is an intangible problem that can never be fully extinguished. Meanwhile more serious tangible problems such as lookism are laughed at or shunned.
 
Normalfags see and observe problems sometimes, but they never come to any conclusions. They complain and complain, but never change something, they think about it, but as soon as someone makes a consequence they reject it due to fearing the moral implications and the judgement of so(y)ciety/their own mind.

Some examples:
  • (partially) "normal-thinking" leftists (including my parents) who observe the problems with migration (aggressiveness, criminality, lacking respect)
Lets be honest it's just blacks. Asians,Indians and most deathnics are meek and non threateaning.
 

Similar threads

FinnCel
Replies
30
Views
519
dead.ahead
dead.ahead
Tunadiver
Replies
54
Views
932
BurntIvoryKingcel
BurntIvoryKingcel
autisticmanchild
Replies
9
Views
111
gael28
gael28
RealSchizo
Replies
20
Views
429
NeverEvenBegan
NeverEvenBegan
eatmyshorts2002
Replies
6
Views
291
Freixel
Freixel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top