Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL On a scale of 1 to 10, how hard are these fesikhcels coping?

10, hitler would killed all arabs if he could
 
didn't hitler respect arabs and islam?
No, he didn't considered arabs white, same case as slavs, he would killed or slaved them.

He was just using arabs as a tool, if germany become a hegemony and arabs would not more be needed, he would for sure slaved them, he just liked arabes because they also hated jews, they just had an enemmy in common, but this not necessary made nazi and arabs friends
 
JFL @ these coping subhumans
 
No, he didn't considered arabs white, same case as slavs, he would killed or slaved them.

He was just using arabs as a tool, if germany become a hegemony and arabs would not more be needed, he would for sure slaved them, he just liked arabes because they also hated jews, they just had an enemmy in common, but this not necessary made nazi and arabs friends
ok good to know.
 
Do they cope harder than curries?
Obviously.
I've never heard curries claiming that they are the superior race. Most of them are pretty much aware of their inferiority.
 
Obviously.
I've never heard curries claiming that they are the superior race. Most of them are pretty much aware of their inferiority.
These guys need to take the fesikhpill.
 
To be honest, these guys do not seem to be claiming that they are better than other races and should rule over them, they seem to be advocating more for positive ethnic pride and autarky (building their own nuclear reactor for instance), their ideas don't seem that bad.

Also, in relation to Arabs, Islam and Hitler, in his memoirs (Inside the Third Reich), Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer wrote the following

Islam


So from this, he considered the warrior spirit of Islam to be superior to the meekness of Christianity but thought Arabs were racially inferior.

Albert Speer
330px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_146II-277%2C_Albert_Speer.jpg
 
in a leftist world of delusions anything is possible.

8/10 coping
 
Don't some BJP ideologues use the word "Aryan" unironically?
True but iam talking about a group of sub humans who actually started a nazi club in curryland. Didnt last long though.
 
He considered them inferior to whites, so it’s expected that they would get different treatment
Hitler wasn't a "white nationalist", like cuck american nationalists like to call themselves. He was a pangermanist. He didn't care about being "white", like retarded americucks do since segregation. He cared about having german roots. If you don't have direct german roots, it's over and you're subhuman according to him.
 
Hitler wasn't a "white nationalist", like cuck american nationalists like to call themselves. He was a pangermanist. He didn't care about being "white", like americucks do since seggregation. He cared about having german roots. If you don't have direct german roots, it's over and you're subhuman according to him.
Wrong, he would not kill Italians, frenchs, Spanishs, Irish’s, British’s and other European etnicities that were not German, he would just kill the ones who weren’t white in his point of view.

Pangermanism don’t implicate genocide of other people who were not Germanic, it just implicate that all of the Germans should be United in one state and nation.
 
the warrior spirit of Islam to be superior to the meekness of Christianity but thought Arabs were racially inferior.
Nothing wrong with believing this given there hadiths that allude to Turks/Romans being superior to Arabs.
 
These guys need to take the fesikhpill.
Egyptians may not be the highest but they do mog many white sub-races, like Irish, Icelanders, and Polish in terms of their accomplishments.
 
Aren't hadiths mostly fake?
lol unless you're talking about Shia hadiths, who pull things out of their asses, no, hadiths are well verified to determine which one is true and which is false.
 
so it’s expected that they would get different treatment
No it’s not. You don’t have single source suggesting Hitler wanted to enslave or genocide Arabs. He wasn’t some cartoon villain seeking world domination.

You can’t make things up about Hitler just because it ”feels” right. That’s why there are (false) claims such as ”Hitler wanted to kill non-blonde blue eyed people”.
 
Hitler wasn't a "white nationalist", like cuck american nationalists like to call themselves. He was a pangermanist. He didn't care about being "white", like retarded americucks do since segregation. He cared about having german roots. If you don't have direct german roots, it's over and you're subhuman according to him.
You really have to read the table talks or other works for yourself to even approach this question. With Hitler being interpreted as the super villain of mankind, any statement he makes is almost always translated in hyperbole. So Hitler will say that the Slavs weren't worth educating, and the modern historian will take it as Hitler saying Slavs are retards who deserve to die en masse. When the practical view could be something as simple as we can't afford to educate Slavs in this occupied zone as we're in the middle of war. We get lied to in real time now -- give someone 80 years to come up with something, see the farce you get.
 
No it’s not. You don’t have single source suggesting Hitler wanted to enslave or genocide Arabs. He wasn’t some cartoon villain seeking world domination.

You can’t make things up about Hitler just because it ”feels” right. That’s why there are (false) claims such as ”Hitler wanted to kill non-blonde blue eyed people”.
Hitler was not even blonde, and the majority of SS generals weren’t blonde blue eyed, this is why these phrases are retarded.

When I said he was seeking world domination? I just said he would threat arabs different from whites
 
I just said he would threat arabs different from whites
Nope, you said he would kill or enslave Arabs, which has no basis in reality
he would killed or slaved them.
No evidence of that

You really have to read the table talks or other works for yourself to even approach this question. With Hitler being interpreted as the super villain of mankind, any statement he makes is almost always translated in hyperbole. So Hitler will say that the Slavs weren't worth educating, and the modern historian will take it as Hitler saying Slavs are retards who deserve to die en masse. When the practical view could be something as simple as we can't afford to educate Slavs in this occupied zone as we're in the middle of war. We get lied to in real time now -- give someone 80 years to come up with something, see the farce you get.
Extremely high IQ. Reminder that the allies never found a full copy of the Generalplan Ost, only parts have been found and the rest has been ”reconstructed”, so a lot of what is known can’t be trusted as true.
 
Nope, you said he would kill or enslave Arabs, which has no basis in reality
This guy wants us killed and enslaved, that's why he believes it.
 

Similar threads

Whitefeminineboy
Replies
5
Views
183
Whitefeminineboy
Whitefeminineboy
Gendocel
Replies
14
Views
457
Gott _mit _uns94
Gott _mit _uns94
IncelCream
Replies
3
Views
154
Ultracel30
U
wasteofspace
Replies
31
Views
752
IncelTill.idie
IncelTill.idie

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top